The effect of age and gender on outcome after treatment for colon carcinoma: A population-based study in the Uppsala and Stockholm region

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.critrevonc.2008.03.005Get rights and content

Abstract

Rationale

The aim of this study was to assess whether there are differences in treatment strategy and outcome between different age cohorts among men and women with colon cancer.

Methods

All patients with colon cancer included in the regional quality registry in Uppsala/Örebro and Stockholm between 1996 and December 2004 were analysed (n = 11 002). Patients were divided into three age categories: ≤65 years, 66–80 years and >80 years.

Results

Overall and cancer-specific survival decreased with increasing age for stages II and III colon cancer but was not influenced by gender. Older patients with stage III tumours were less likely to be referred for chemotherapeutic treatment and there was a decrease in cancer-specific survival with increasing age, from 63.7% to 51.0% to 38.4% in the three age groups. Postoperative morbidity and the number of reoperations was significantly higher in men than in women.

Conclusion

The present study shows lower cancer-specific survival among older patients than among younger patients. Gender was not a prognostic factor in cancer-specific survival.

Introduction

Colorectal cancer is a disease of the elderly. As life expectancy increases [1], so does the number of cancer patients at an older age that require treatment. Over the past 10 years there has been a steady increase in the incidence of colon cancer [2]. It is the second most common type of cancer in both men and women in Sweden, with a median age at diagnosis of 73 years in men and 76 years in women [3]. Of the 3621 new patients diagnosed with colon cancer in 2004 in Sweden, 77% were older than 65 years and 12% were over the age of 85 [4]. In everyday clinical practice there is an ongoing debate concerning what constitutes the best for patients over the age of 75–80 years. Optimal therapy is often withheld, perhaps based on assumptions and emotions of the treating physician. Elderly patients do not seem to benefit as much from improvements in therapeutic regimens as younger patients do, especially concerning tumours that require chemotherapeutic adjuvant treatment [5]. Recently Eaker et al. investigated the treatment of women of all ages with breast cancer in the Uppsala/Örebro region and reported some disturbing findings [6]. There was a definite age bias in the management of older women, with those over 70 years of age receiving less comprehensive diagnostic testing, less aggressive treatment and a later diagnosis. This resulted in a reduction of 5-year relative survival of 13% in the older age group. A recent publication by Gondos et al. [5] showed that significant increases in 5-year relative survival for the most common tumour types are more often seen among patients younger than 75 years of age than among the older patients. Elderly patients have also been shown to have inferior outcome after treatment for colorectal cancer [7], [8]. Several factors may be responsible for these differences. Patients over 75 years of age suffer more postoperative morbidity and a higher incidence of postoperative deaths [7]. This would have an impact on overall survival. It is more worrying that cancer-specific survival is lower in old patients than in younger patients with the same diagnosis [8].

In 2005 life expectancy in Sweden was 82.8 years for a woman and 78.4 years for a man [1]. Roughly 20% of the population is aged over 65 years. It is important to keep in mind that as age increases after a certain number of years, so does the relative life expectancy. Life expectancy for a 65-year-old woman is not 17.8 but 20.6 years and for a man of the same age it is 17.4 and not 13.4 years. It is thus wrong to assume that the life expectancy of an 82-year-old woman is less than 1 year; it is in fact 5 years [1]. This is often overlooked in clinical practice and an important factor to keep in mind when discussing possible benefits of different treatment modalities for the elderly.

A factor closely intertwined with increasing age is the difference in treatment outcome between men and women. In recent years, studies comparing the outcome for the two sexes have reported improved survival of women with colorectal cancer [9], [10], [11]. The present study, based on 11 002 Swedish patients with colon cancer, aimed to assess whether men and women in different age cohorts receive equal treatment and whether any potential dissimilarity has measurable consequences in outcome, regarding postoperative morbidity and mortality, cancer-specific and overall survival.

Section snippets

Materials and methods

All patients with a verified adenocarcinoma of the colon, prospectively reported and registered either in the Regional Quality Registry in the Uppsala/Örebro region or the Stockholm/Gotland region between 1996 and 2004 were included (n = 11 002 patients). Colon cancer is defined as a malignant tumour of the colon located at least 15 cm from the anal verge. These two regions cover a total of 3.8 million inhabitants, thus constituting 43% of the entire Swedish population. At the beginning of the

Results

A total of 11 002 patients with newly diagnosed colon cancer were registered between 1996 and 2004 (Table 1).

The number of patients that did not undergo a resection or were operated on in an emergency setting increased significantly with age. There was no difference between age groups concerning how radical a resection was performed. A resection was defined as radical when deemed as R0 by the surgeon and pathologist. In all age groups and both gender categories the resection was deemed radical

Discussion

This study showed age and gender differences in outcome after surgery for colon cancer and that they led to a reduction in cancer-specific survival for stages II and III colon cancer among patients over 65 when compared to younger patients. This is in contrast to findings by the Eurocare-3 working group who reported that although early postoperative death was increased for patients over the age of 65 with colon cancer, the probability for the elderly of surviving was the same as for younger

Conclusion

Cancer-specific survival is decreased in patients over 80 years of age. In addition stage-specific cancer-specific survival in stages II and III colon cancer is decreased among patients over 65 years of age. Several factors might be responsible for this: elderly patients are more often given emergency surgery or no surgery at all, they may have less pronounced anti-tumour immune response and they are less often referred for adjuvant treatment.

More aggressive preoperative diagnostics and

Conflict of interest

None.

Reviewers

Levi, Fabio, Professor, IUMSP, CHUV, Cancer Epidemiology Unit, Rue du Bugnon 17, CH-1005 Lausanne, Switzerland.

Zbar, Andrew P., Professor, The University of the West Indies, Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Martindales Road, St. Michael, Barbados.

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the Swedish Cancer Society, project number 1921-B03-21XCC and the Dutch Cancer Foundation.

Anna Martling, M.D.; Ph.D. is a consultant surgeon and chairman of the Department of Surgery at the Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden. In 2003 she was awarded the Karolinska Institute grant for young and promising researchers. Her research subjects are colorectal cancer and gender differences in treatment outcome in colorectal cancer. She has published several papers on these subjects and has participated in several expert panels during international conferences.

References (27)

  • T. Latkauskas et al.

    The impact of age on post-operative outcomes of colorectal cancer patients undergoing surgical treatment

    BMC Cancer

    (2005)
  • C. Ratto et al.

    Prognostic factors in colorectal cancer, Literature review for clinical application

    Dis Colon Rectum

    (1998)
  • L.H. Iversen et al.

    Trends in colorectal cancer survival in northern Denmark: 1985–2004

    Colorectal Dis

    (2007)
  • Cited by (53)

    • Pharmacogenomics in gastroenterology

      2023, Pharmacogenomics: from Discovery to Clinical Implementation
    • YYFZBJS inhibits colorectal tumorigenesis by enhancing Tregs-induced immunosuppression through HIF-1α mediated hypoxia in vivo and in vitro

      2022, Phytomedicine
      Citation Excerpt :

      Thus, elucidation of the underlying mechanisms of Treg enrichment in CRC will be of value for developing therapeutic targets against Tregs to improve clinical outcome. The few chemotherapeutic drugs available are associated with significant toxic side effects that can severely impair the immune system and hematopoietic system (Missiaglia et al., 2014; van Leeuwen et al., 2018; Zheng et al., 2012). Therefore, there is need to develop novel therapeutic agents with minimal side effects.

    • Better preoperative physical performance reduces the odds of complication severity and discharge to care facility after abdominal cancer resection in people over the age of 70 – A prospective cohort study

      2018, European Journal of Surgical Oncology
      Citation Excerpt :

      This might lead to an underestimation of the outcomes. Nevertheless, it has been suggested that complication rates are higher in men than in women, which might be explained by a longer duration of surgery due to anatomical differences [54]. In addition, the multivariable analyses were adjusted by sex.

    • Value of geriatric screening and assessment in predicting postoperative complications in patients older than 70 years undergoing surgery for colorectal cancer

      2017, Journal of Geriatric Oncology
      Citation Excerpt :

      Almost 60% of new cases occur in people aged 65 or older [4]. In older patients, elective colorectal surgery is generally safe; however, postoperative morbidity and mortality are higher in the older compared to the younger age groups [5–10]. Traditional preoperative risk stratification (e.g. American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, Lee score) focuses on general health status or on organ specific compromise, whereas older patients may have problems and risk factors not captured by these risk scores.

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Anna Martling, M.D.; Ph.D. is a consultant surgeon and chairman of the Department of Surgery at the Karolinska University Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden. In 2003 she was awarded the Karolinska Institute grant for young and promising researchers. Her research subjects are colorectal cancer and gender differences in treatment outcome in colorectal cancer. She has published several papers on these subjects and has participated in several expert panels during international conferences.

    1

    In collaboration with the Regionalt Onkologiskt Centrum Uppsala and Onkologiskt Centrum Stockholm.

    View full text