Elsevier

Bioresource Technology

Volume 123, November 2012, Pages 713-716
Bioresource Technology

Short Communication
Reduction of Cr(VI) by Escherichia coli BL21 in the presence of redox mediators

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2012.07.090Get rights and content

Abstract

Anthraquinone-2,7-disulfonate (2,7-AQDS), anthraquinone-1-sulfonate (α-AQS), anthraquinone-2-sulfonate (AQS), anthraquinone-2,6-disulfonate (AQDS) and anthraquinone-1,5-disulfonate (1,5-AQDS) were selected as redox mediators for Cr(VI) reduction by Escherichia coli BL21. In the presence of 0.8 mmol l−1 AQS, the Cr(VI) reduction efficiency was 98.5% in 7.5 h, whereas it was only 21–34% in the absence of a mediator or in the presence of α-AQS, 1,5-AQDS, AQDS, 2,7-AQDS. A linear correlation, k = 0.768CAQS + 1.5531 (R2 = 0.9935), was found for the reaction constant, k (mg Cr(VI) g−1 dry cell weight h−1) and the AQS concentration (CAQS). The Arrhenius equation described the Cr(VI) reduction in the tested temperature range, and the pre-exponential factor A was 13.249 mg Cr(VI) g−1 dry cell weight h−1,and the activation energy Ea was 28.01 kJ mol−1. Glucose was the best carbon sources, and the optimum pH was 6.0. The Cr(VI) reduction rate obtained with AQS is a significant improvement over low conventional anaerobic reduction rates.

Highlights

► The relationship of reaction constant (k) and AQS concentration (CAQS) was k = 0.768CAQS + 1.553. ► The Arrhenius equation was used to describe the Cr(VI) reduction in the tested temperature range. ► The optimal carbon source and pH was glucose and pH 6.0, respectively.

Introduction

Chromium (Cr), commonly found as Cr(VI) and Cr(III), is one of the priority pollutants in surface water and ground water. Cr(VI) is approximately 100× more toxic and 1000× more mutagenic than Cr(III) because of its solubility across nearly the entire pH range and its greater mobility (Song et al., 2009). The US EPA requires Cr(VI) in drinking water and inland surface water to be at or below 0.05 and 0.1 mg l−1, respectively (Kobya, 2004). Therefore, the reduction of Cr(VI)–Cr(III) is an attractive and useful process for remediation of Cr(VI) pollution.

Conventional treatment methods for Cr(VI) removal involve the reduction of Cr(VI)–Cr(III) using a strong reducing agent and precipitation of Cr(III). This process generates large quantities of hazardous sludge and may consume costly chemicals. An alternative treatment could be biotransformation of Cr(VI)–Cr(III) by various bacteria under both aerobic and anaerobic conditions (Liu et al., 2006, Liu et al., 2010), but this process can require several days or even weeks (Fredrickson et al., 2000, Lowe et al., 2003, Song et al., 2009). AQDS, AQS, lawsone and menadione have been shown to improve bacterial reduction of Cr(VI) (Fredrickson et al., 2000, Lowe et al., 2003, Liu et al., 2010). The biological Cr(VI) reduction with redox mediators is affected by temperature, pH and carbon source(Liu et al., 2006), and different redox mediators exhibited different accelerating effects(Liu et al., 2010).

Therefore, the present study investigated Cr(VI) reduction by E. coli BL21 in the presence of redox mediators at different temperatures and pHs as well as in the presence of various carbon sources. The relationship between the accelerating effects of redox mediators and their electrochemical characteristic (Ea values) of cyclic voltammetric analysis was also explored.

Section snippets

Chemicals, bacterial strains and culture conditions

Anthraquinone-2,7-disulfonate (2,7-AQDS), anthraquinone-1-sulfonate (α-AQS), anthraquinone-2-sulfonate (AQS), anthraquinone-2,6-disulfonate (AQDS) and anthraquinone-1,5-disulfonate (1,5-AQDS) were analytical grade and supplied by Sigma–Aldrich. The chemical structures of these redox mediators are shown in Supporting Information (SI) Fig. S1. Other chemical reagents were of analytical grade and purchased from Xiandai Ltd. (Shijiazhuang, China).

E. coli BL21 was cultured in Luria–Bertani (LB)

Effect of redox mediators on Cr(VI) reduction

In sterile controls, only a 0.2% change in the Cr(VI) over 48 h was observed (data not shown). The reduction of Cr(VI) by E. coli BL21 in the absence and presence of redox mediators are shown in Fig. 1. At 0.8 mmol l−1, AQS provided for the highest Cr(VI) reduction. The Cr(VI) reduction efficiency with AQS reached 98.5% after 7.5 h, whereas α-AQS, 1,5-AQDS, AQDS and 2,7-AQDS only allowed for reduction efficiencies of about 21–34%. The difference observed between AQS and AQDS is in agreement with

Conclusion

The biological Cr(VI) reduction efficiency was enhanced by different redox mediators, and the reaction constant k and the CAQS was correlated by k = 0.768CAQS + 1.5531 (R2 = 0.9935). The biological Cr(VI) reduction with AQS was affected by different carbon source, pH and temperature. The study explored a great improvement of the redox mediator application for the Cr(VI) bioremediation, but this technology and mechanism needs to be studied in details.

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 50978082), the Hebei Natural Science Foundation for Distinguished Young Scholars (Grant No. E2012208012), the Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University (Grant No. NCET-10-0127), China Postdoctoral Science Fund Special Grant (Grant No. 201104152) and China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (Grant No. 20100480485).

Cited by (33)

  • Application of different redox mediators induced bio-promoters to accelerate the recovery of denitrification and denitrifying functional microorganisms inhibited by transient Cr(VI) shock

    2021, Journal of Hazardous Materials
    Citation Excerpt :

    Furthermore, the redox mediators were added into R-R2 to R-R5 biofilm reactor, which could transfer electrons through continuous oxidation and reduction. Redox mediators were proved to increase the transfer rate of electrons (Li et al., 2013), thereby weaken the chromium toxicity by promoting the Cr(VI) reduction process (Guo et al., 2012). At the end of Phase III, the concentration of adsorbed Cr(VI) and intercellular Cr(VI) in R-R5 decreased by 28.13 mg/L, while the concentration of Cr(III) increased by 30.23 mg/L (Fig. 4c and d).

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text