Short CommunicationProduction of biofuels, limonene and pectin from citrus wastes
Introduction
World production of citrus fruits is over 88 million tons per year (Marin et al., 2007). Almost half of these fruits is squeezed to juice, and the remainder including peel, segment membranes and other by-products is considered as citrus wastes (CWs) (Wilkins et al., 2007a). These CWs can be dried and used as raw material for pectin extraction or pelletized for animal feed (Mamma et al., 2008). However, a large fraction of CWs is still deposited every year. This deposition is not favored due to both economic and environmental arguments such as high transportation costs, lack of disposal sites, and the land-filling material having high organic content (Tripodo et al., 2004).
CWs contain different carbohydrate polymers, which makes them interesting sources for production of biogas and ethanol (Gunaseelan, 2004, Mizuki et al., 1990, Pourbafrani et al., 2007, Wilkins et al., 2007b). The main obstacle to using CWs as a substrate for biogas production is the presence of limonene in CWs. This component is very toxic for digesting microorganisms and decreases the biogas yield (Mizuki et al., 1990). Limonene is also a strong inhibitor for microorganisms in ethanol production (Pourbafrani et al., 2007, Wilkins et al., 2007b). Therefore, this component should be separated from the CWs prior to digestion or fermentation steps. It should also be noticed that digesting bacteria can hydrolyze the carbohydrate polymers in CWs and convert them finally to biogas, while hydrolysis by enzymes or chemicals is necessary to convert these polymers to sugars and then ferment the sugars by e.g. baker’s yeast to ethanol.
Two alternative processes for production of ethanol from CWs based on enzymatic hydrolysis have been previously introduced (Stewart et al., 2005, Wilkins et al., 2007b). In the first alternative (Stewart et al., 2005), CWs were hydrolyzed using a mixture of enzymes (cellulose, pectinase and β-glucosidase). Then, limonene was removed from hydrolyzate by filtration and ethanol was produced from fermentable sugars. In the second alternative (Wilkins et al., 2007b), limonene was partly released using steam stripping. Then, carbohydrate polymers were hydrolyzed and fermented to ethanol through a simultaneous saccharification and fermentation (SSF) process. In both alternatives, non-fermentable sugars and the residue of solid polymers were dried to be used as cattle feed (Stewart et al., 2005). Application of these alternatives is hampered by the high cost of enzyme and the slow rate of hydrolysis reactions (Grohmann et al., 1995). In addition, mechanical pretreatment of biomass, and high demand for energy in distillation and drying processes, might considerably increase the cost of the process.
A process based on dilute-acid hydrolysis of CWs can be considered as another alternative (Grohmann et al., 1995, Talebnia et al., 2008). However, the data are limited to the lab-scale experiments and it is difficult to scale up the process to industrial scale. In both studies (Grohmann et al., 1995, Talebnia et al., 2008), mechanical pretreatment was used before hydrolysis and the experiments were carried out in low solid/liquid ratio (Grohmann et al., 1995). Furthermore, dilute-acid hydrolysis showed low yields of sugars from the carbohydrate polymers.
The aim of the current work was to introduce a new process for production of ethanol and biogas from CWs. The CW was pretreated with dilute-acid explosion process to hydrolyze the CWs and also to get rid of limonene. The resultant slurry was then centrifuged, and the liquid part was fermented to ethanol and distilled. The stillage from the distillation column and the remained solids were mixed and digested to biogas. An industrial configuration was suggested for this process.
Section snippets
Citrus wastes composition
The CWs used in this work was the residue of orange obtained from Brämhults juice factory (Borås, Sweden) and stored frozen at −20 °C until use. Total dry content of CW was determined by drying at 110 °C for 48 h and it was 20.00 ± 0.80% w/w. The composition of the CWs used in this work as percentage of dry matter was: glucose 8.10 ± 0.46; fructose 12.00 ± 0.21; sucrose 2.80 ± 0.15; pectin 25.00 ± 1.20; protein 6.07 ± 0.10; cellulose 22.00 ± 1.95; hemicellulose 11.09 ± 0.21; ash 3.73 ± 0.20; lignin 2.19 ± 0.04 and
Dilute-acid hydrolysis
The citrus wastes from orange juice production were hydrolyzed with 0.5% v/v sulfuric acid at 130–170 °C for 3–9 min, and the results are summarized in Table 1. The maximum sugar yield, 42.05%, was achieved at 150 °C and 6 min. However, the more realistic value is the average of results of the 9th to 13th experiments (Table 1), with a sugar yield value of 41.33 ± 0.56%. Increasing the temperature and time to more than their optimal values results in a decrease of the total liberated sugars (Table. 1
Conclusion
In this work, a new process is presented to produce ethanol, biogas and limonene from CWs. Depending on the market and profitability of the process, pectin can be recovered as a by-product from the process. Simplicity of the process and low price of biomass compared to other ethanol processes from lignocelluloses make this process unique and favorable. However, further economic optimizations are required to investigate the profitability of the process.
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful to the Foundation of Swedbank in Sjuhärad, Brämhults Juice AB and Sjuhärad Association of Local Authorities (Sweden) for financial support of this work.
References (18)
- et al.
Fractionation and pretreatment of orange peel by dilute acid hydrolysis
Bioresour. Technol.
(1995) Biochemical methane potential of fruits and vegetable solid waste feedstocks
Biomass Bioenergy
(2004)- et al.
Method for determination of methane potentials of solid organic waste
Waste Manage.
(2004) - et al.
Fungal multienzyme production on industrial by-products of the citrus-processing industry
Bioresour. Technol.
(2008) - et al.
By-products from different citrus processes as a source of customized functional fibres
Food Chem.
(2007) - et al.
Inhibitory effect of citrus unshu peel on anaerobic-digestion
Biol. Wastes
(1990) - et al.
Citrus waste recovery: a new environmentally friendly procedure to obtain animal feed
Bioresour. Technol.
(2004) - et al.
Cellulose, hemicelluloses, lignin and ash content of some organic materials and their suitability for use as paper pulp supplements
Bioresour. Technol.
(2007) - et al.
Hydrolysis of grapefruit peel waste with cellulase and pectinase enzymes
Bioresour. Technol.
(2007)
Cited by (244)
Pre-feasibility assessment to obtain an extract rich in hesperidin from orange peel: A comparison of extraction technologies conventional and non-conventional
2024, Sustainable Chemistry and PharmacyBioconversion of citrus waste into mucic acid by xylose-fermenting Saccharomyces cerevisiae
2024, Bioresource TechnologyRecovery of resources and circular economy from biomass-derived waste through aerobic and anaerobic digestion-based technique
2024, Nanomaterials in Biomass Conversion: Advances and Applications for Bioenergy, Biofuels, and Bio-based ProductsProcess development and techno-economic analysis of co-production of colorants and enzymes valuing agro-industrial citrus waste
2023, Sustainable Chemistry and Pharmacy