Elsevier

Applied Catalysis A: General

Volume 608, 25 November 2020, 117872
Applied Catalysis A: General

Carbon deposition–resistant Ni3Sn nanoparticles with highly stable catalytic activity for methanol decomposition

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2020.117872Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Ni3Sn is more stable and exhibits higher selectivity to H2 and CO than Ni in methanol decomposition.

  • Methanol decomposition on Ni3Sn surface preferentially proceeds through the cleavage of Osingle bondH bond followed by Csingle bondH bond cleavage.

  • The activation energies of elementary reaction steps are higher on Ni3Sn than that on Ni.

Abstract

Ni3Sn intermetallic compound has the potential to serve as a catalyst for methanol decomposition. However, the catalytic stability of Ni3Sn and the resulting mechanism that governs methanol decomposition has not been elucidated thoroughly. Herein, isothermal tests were conducted to probe the methanol decomposition on unsupported Ni3Sn and Ni nanoparticles synthesized by a thermal plasma process. Ni3Sn exhibited higher selectivities for H2 and CO, more stable catalytic activity, and a higher resistance to carbon deposition than Ni. Synchrotron radiation X-ray diffraction and surface analyses revealed the high phase stability of Ni3Sn during methanol decomposition. Density functional theory calculations indicated that methanol decomposition on Ni3Sn surface preferentially proceeded through Osingle bondH bond cleavage, followed by Csingle bondH bond cleavage in the produced intermediates. The activation energies of CH3O and CO dissociation were higher on Ni3Sn than that on Ni surface, which was believed to account for the higher selectivity of Ni3Sn toward methanol decomposition.

Introduction

The high hydrogen to carbon ratio and the ease of transport/storage make methanol, which is liquid at room temperature, a promising hydrogen carrier and a useful raw material for the synthesis of hydrocarbons and their derivatives [[1], [2], [3], [4]]. Methanol decomposition, which affords H2 and CO, is one of the most important reactions for methanol utilization and is catalyzed by transition metals such as Ni, Cu, Pt, Pd, and Ru [[4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9]]. Among them, the relatively cheap and highly active Ni is viewed as a promising methanol decomposition catalyst [[10], [11], [12]]. Ni nanoparticles (NPs) are usually dispersed on large-surface-area oxide supports to obtain good catalytic performance but suffer from low selectivity for H2 and CO as well as low resistance to carbon deposition at high temperatures [10,12]. Therefore, new catalysts with high activity and selectivity for methanol decomposition in a wide temperature range are needed for decentralized H2 and/or synthesis gas production.

Intermetallic compounds (IMCs) have the potential to exhibit better catalytic performance than disordered alloy and monometallic catalysts due to their ordered crystal structure and strong chemical bonding that differs from that of their constituents. Many investigations on the use of IMCs in heterogeneous catalysis have been performed, and they were well summarized recently [[13], [14], [15], [16], [17]]. Some of IMCs were reported to exhibit excellent catalytic properties for a variety of reactions. For example, Pt3Ge shows high selectivity for butenes in the hydrogenation of 1,3-butadience, which is attributed to electron transfer from Ge to Pt and the geometrical environment change of Pt active sites [18,19]. Moreover, the selectivity of PdZn for methanol steam reforming is on par with that of Cu, possibly because of the similar valence electron density of states of these two catalysts, as revealed by energy band calculations and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) [20]. Co3Ta shows higher specific activity for hydrazine oxidation reaction than conventional Pt/C electrocatalysts [21]. Ni3Sn shows high selectivity for partial hydrogenation of acetylene and for dehydrogenation of cyclohexane [[22], [23], [24]]. It has also been reported that the formation of Ni3Sn phase in bimetallic Ni-Sn catalysts might enhance the selectivity for H2 during the reformation of aqueous hydrocarbon [25,26]. Our recent work on the catalytic performance of crushed single-phase Ni3Sn ingots for methanol decomposition revealed that these samples showed high selectivities for H2 and CO over a wide temperature range [27,28]. To realize an even higher catalytic activity, we synthesized Ni3Sn NPs through a thermal plasma process and examined their initial catalytic performance for methanol decomposition at 513–793 K [29], revealing that in the initial stage of the reaction, these NPs exhibited higher selectivity for methanol decomposition than Ni NPs over a wide temperature range. The above results suggest that Ni3Sn NPs are a promising catalyst for methanol decomposition. However, the catalytic performance stability of Ni3Sn NPs has not been investigated, and the mechanism of methanol decomposition over Ni3Sn remains poorly understood.

Herein, we report the catalytic performance stability and selectivity of Ni3Sn NPs for methanol decomposition at high reaction temperatures (673 and 793 K) required for decentralized H2 and/or synthesis gas production and compare the results with those obtained for monometallic Ni NPs synthesized by the same thermal plasma process. Samples before and after methanol decomposition are characterized by synchrotron radiation X-ray diffraction (SR-XRD), transmission electron microscopy (TEM), energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS), XPS, and Brunauer–Emmett–Teller (BET) surface area measurements. Moreover, density functional theory (DFT) calculations are performed to determine the adsorption energies of methanol and possible intermediates, and the activation energies of the possible elementary steps of methanol decomposition over Ni3Sn (0001) and Ni (111) surfaces are determined to provide molecular insights into the mechanism of methanol decomposition over Ni3Sn.

Section snippets

Catalyst preparation

Ni3Sn and Ni NPs were synthesized using a radiofrequency induction thermal plasma method (Nisshin Engineering Inc., Japan) from pure Ni and Sn fine powders (Kojundo Chem. Lab. Co., Ltd., Japan; Ni: 99.9 %, 2–3 μm in diameter; Sn: 99.9 %, <38 μm in diameter) as raw materials. The composition of as-synthesized Ni3Sn NPs was determined as Ni-21.3 at% Sn by fluorescence X-ray spectroscopy.

Catalyst characterization

The BET specific surface areas of NPs before and after the catalytic reaction were measured by N2 adsorption

Catalytic performance

The Ni3Sn NP catalyst was much more stable than Ni NP catalyst under the reaction conditions. Fig. 3 shows methanol conversion over Ni3Sn and Ni NPs at 673 and 793 K as a function of time on stream, revealing that at 673 K, conversion over Ni3Sn was stable at ∼35 % without any obvious decrease even after 70 h. In contrast, Ni showed an initially higher conversion of 53 %, which, however, decreased with time on stream to a value (37 %) close to that of Ni3Sn. At 793 K, conversion over Ni3Sn

Conclusions

The catalytic properties of Ni3Sn NPs for methanol decomposition were examined by performing isothermal tests at an LHSV of 30 h−1 and a temperature of 673 or 793 K. The above NPs exhibited high selectivities for H2 and CO and featured a carbon deposition resistance significantly exceeding that of monometallic Ni NPs. The activity of Ni3Sn NPs was slightly lower but much more stable than that of monometallic Ni NPs. The Ni3Sn phase of Ni3Sn NPs was stable during methanol decomposition at

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Ya Xu: Conceptualization, Methodology, Investigation, Writing - original draft. Huixin Jin: Software, Formal analysis. Jianxin Zhang: Validation. Yoshitaka Matsushita: Investigation.

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors report no declarations of interest.

Acknowledgements

This work was partly supported by the Japan Society for Promotion of Science (JSPS; KAKEHI Grant No. 15K06572). Synchrotron XRD experiments were performed at the SPring-8 facility on the approval of the NIMS Synchrotron X-ray Station (Proposal Nos. 2015B4901 and 2018A4907). The authors are grateful to Dr. M. Tanaka and Dr. Y. Katsuya at NIMS for their help with XRD experiments, Dr. H. Ohata at NIMS for help with XPS experiments, and Dr. J. Nara at NIMS for help with the PHASE0 software package

References (58)

  • M.A. Pena et al.

    Appl Catal a-Gen

    (1996)
  • J.R. Croy et al.

    Appl Catal a-Gen

    (2008)
  • Y. Matsumura et al.

    J Mol Catal a-Chem

    (2000)
  • B.A. Sexton

    Surf. Sci.

    (1981)
  • V.S. Marakatti et al.

    Prog. Solid State Chem.

    (2018)
  • T. Komatsu et al.

    Appl Catal a-Gen

    (2000)
  • A. Onda et al.

    J. Catal.

    (2001)
  • J.W. Shabaker et al.

    J. Catal.

    (2004)
  • M.Q. Fan et al.

    Int. J. Hydrogen Energy

    (2015)
  • D.H. Chun et al.

    J. Catal.

    (2006)
  • T. Yamasaki et al.

    Comput. Phys. Commun.

    (2019)
  • Y. Xu et al.

    Appl. Surf. Sci.

    (2008)
  • S. Saadi et al.

    Surf. Sci.

    (2009)
  • J.E. Demuth et al.

    Chem. Phys. Lett.

    (1979)
  • S.R. Bare et al.

    Surf. Sci.

    (1985)
  • S.M. Gates et al.

    Surf. Sci.

    (1984)
  • Y. Usami et al.

    Appl Catal a-Gen

    (1998)
  • P. Mizsey et al.

    Appl Catal a-Gen

    (2001)
  • E. Nikolla et al.

    J. Catal.

    (2007)
  • E. Nikolla et al.

    J. Catal.

    (2009)
  • E. Nikolla et al.

    Catal. Today

    (2008)
  • G.A. Olah

    Angew. Chem. Int. Edit.

    (2005)
  • M. Nielsen et al.

    Nature

    (2013)
  • G.A. Olah et al.

    J. Am. Chem. Soc.

    (2011)
  • W.H. Cheng

    Accounts Chem Res

    (1999)
  • Y.H. Wei et al.

    Catal. Letters

    (2019)
  • M. Morita et al.

    Nippon Kagaku Kaishi

    (1991)
  • K. Nakagawa et al.

    Catal Lett

    (2002)
  • M. Suehiro et al.

    J. Japan Petrol. Inst.

    (1983)
  • Cited by (4)

    • Potential of applying the thermochemical recuperation in combined cooling, heating and power generation: Route of enhancing the operation flexibility

      2021, Applied Energy
      Citation Excerpt :

      As for the methanol decomposition, its conversion ratio is strongly dependent on the temperature and pressure, varying the pressure in the range of 0.1–4 MPa and temperature of 293–673 K [42], the conversion ratio is analyzed based on the equilibrium reaction as shown in Fig. 3. Under the ambient pressure, the decomposition will be occurred even at about 423 K, and the conversion ratio is increased when further improving the reaction temperature, the complete conversion will be nearly achieved at the equilibrium temperature of 473 K. While, the increased pressure weakens the decomposition, and the equilibrium complete conversion temperature will be up to above 573 K with an improved pressure of 1.0 MPa [43]. Typically, the temperature of the exhaust gas from gas turbine and internal combustion engine usually higher than 623 K, the adopted reaction of methanol decomposition readily satisfies the temperature requirement and the convenient fuel utilization.

    View full text