Revisiting the reactions of superoxide with glutathione and other thiols
Introduction
I first met Helmut Sies at a 1983 EMBO workshop on Oxidative Damage and Related Enzymes, held in Frascati, just outside Rome. I have fond memories of this meeting, partly for the excellent food and ambience of the surrounding countryside, but more particularly as my first introduction to people like Helmut who were pioneering the free radical field. As illustrated in this special issue of ABB, Helmut Sies has made an enormous contribution to redox biology, in fields as diverse as the biological chemistry of carotenoids, glutathione and singlet oxygen, to formulating concepts of oxidative stress and defining what we mean by antioxidant. This article is based on one aspect of Helmut's work that had particular impact on my research, namely the reaction of superoxide with glutathione. But I would first like to mention some of his earliest work, carried out with Britton Chance and Nozomu Oshino in the early 1970s [1], [2], [3], in which they used the spectral characteristics of the redox states of catalase to show that hydrogen peroxide is produced during normal metabolism. Using this technology, they were able to estimate H2O2 production rates in liver tissue, and steady state concentrations in the nanomolar range. These data remain some of the best quantitative information available and are still widely quoted. However, I believe that the methodology used by Sies and colleagues has been underutilized and may have a place in today's efforts to clarify cellular functions of H2O2. The development of fluorescent probes and their use in live cell imaging has led to considerable advances in our understanding of redox metabolism. But powerful as these techniques are, quantification remains challenging. Measuring the redox state of catalase in cells or tissues may well provide complementary information.
The focus of this article relates to a 1983 paper by Sies and Heribert Wefers on the reaction of superoxide with GSH in which they showed that one of the products is singlet oxygen [4]. At that time there was considerable interest in identifying the biological molecules that react with superoxide radicals and establishing which of these reactions contribute to or protect against superoxide toxicity. We were interested in GSH as a free radical scavenger, and the fate of the glutathionyl radicals (GS) that are produced in the scavenging reaction. As discussed below, these go on to generate superoxide, so it was important to understand the fate of superoxide in such systems. This article describes what we now know about superoxide thiol interactions and how this relates to Sies's earlier findings.
Section snippets
GSH oxidation by superoxide
When we started our investigation [5], several investigators including Wefers and Sies had already shown that superoxide reacts with GSH. However, there was considerable disagreement about whether the reaction was fast enough for GSH to be a major physiological target or was much slower and would therefore be insignificant in cells containing superoxide dismutase (SOD). Reported rate constants ranged from >105 M−1s−1 (which supported the former conclusion) to 15 M−1s−1 (which supported the
Mechanistic considerations
Although the main reactions involved in thiol oxidation by superoxide are shown in Scheme 1, there have been no detailed mechanistic studies on how the contributions of the different pathways vary under different conditions. There is some uncertainty about the origin of the thiyl radical. The most obvious mechanism is via direct electron (or hydrogen) transfer from GSH to superoxide (reaction 4). However, this reaction produces H2O2 and experimental studies with GSH, dithiothreitol and
Superoxide production during radical scavenging by GSH
Superoxide is also an important participant in GSH biochemistry when GSH functions as a free radical scavenger. GSH scavenges a wide range of biologically relevant radicals. GS is produced (reaction 5) and this is followed by the reactions described above that result in superoxide production. There numerous reported studies showing that radical scavenging by GSH produces superoxide and (via dismutation) hydrogen peroxide (for example [22], [23], [24], [25], [26]). Furthermore, when the initial
Conclusions
The reaction of superoxide with thiols has been investigated in a number of laboratories, including Helmut Sies's study on product characterization. We now know that GSH and other thiols are oxidized by superoxide, but the reaction is relatively slow and may be significant physiologically only where little SOD is present. Therefore, it may be less relevant intracellularly than in compartments such as phagosomes or endosomes (redoxosomes) [28], [29] where NADPH oxidase activity generates large
References (29)
- et al.
The steady state level of catalase compound I in isolated hemoglobin-free perfused rat liver
FEBS Lett.
(1970) - et al.
The role of H 2 O 2 generation in perfused rat liver and the reaction of catalase compound I and hydrogen donors
Arch. Biochem. Biophys.
(1973) - et al.
The reaction of superoxide with reduced glutathione
Arch. Biochem. Biophys.
(1994) - et al.
Electron paramagnetic resonance spin trapping investigation into the kinetics of glutathione oxidation by the superoxide radical: re-evaluation of the rate constant
Free Radic. Biol. Med.
(2002) - et al.
The reaction of superoxide radical with N-acetylcysteine
Free Radic. Biol. Med.
(2000) - et al.
Roles of superoxide radical anion in signal transduction mediated by reversible regulation of protein-tyrosine phosphatase 1B
J. Biol. Chem.
(1999) Are free radicals involved in thiol-based redox signaling?
Free Radic. Biol. Med.
(2015)- et al.
Kinetic factors that control the fate of thiyl radicals in cells
Methods Enzymol.
(1995) Superoxide as an intracellular radical sink
Free Radic. Biol. Med.
(1993)The pecking order of free radicals and antioxidants: lipid peroxidation, α-tocopherol, and ascorbate
Arch. Biochem. Biophys.
(1993)