Changes in corticomotor representations induced by prolonged peripheral nerve stimulation in humans
Introduction
The organization of the sensorimotor cortex is not fixed and many external manipulations can produce organizational changes within these regions. Stereotyped afferent inputs appear to be a key factor in producing these organizational changes. There are many examples of altered patterns of afferent input inducing organizational cortical change. Zarzecki et al. (1993) demonstrated that when digit 4 was removed or joined with digit 3, the incidence of excitatory post-synaptic potentials increased dramatically in digit 4's sensory cortical representational zone with stimulation of adjacent digits. Electrical stimulation of peripheral nerves also increases the receptive field size of cells in the sensory cortex. In cats, Recanzone et al. (1990) demonstrated that within 1–2 h of electrical stimulation of a cutaneous nerve, the sensory cortical representation of the territory innervated by that nerve increased at least in the short term. Comparable findings have been reported in the motor cortex. Amputation of the forelimb in rats results in marked reorganization within the motor cortex with the adjacent vibrissae and shoulder representations expanding into the former forelimb territory (Donoghue and Sanes, 1988).
Until recently, it was possible to obtain a map of the motor cortex only during neurosurgical procedures. However, it is now possible to obtain a functional representation of the corticospinal projection to a variety of muscles by using transcranial magnetic stimulation (TCMS) to activate the motor cortex at a number of scalp sites. These maps represent activation of the primary motor cortex (Wassermann et al., 1996) and it is possible to obtain useful somatotopic information using this technique (Wassermann et al., 1992, Wilson et al., 1993). TCMS studies have demonstrated that manoeuvres which inter alia alter sensory input can induce organizational change within the motor cortex. For example, following amputation (Cohen et al., 1991, Ridding and Rothwell, 1995) and ischaemic nerve block (Brasil-Neto et al., 1992), motor evoked potentials (MEPs) in muscles proximal to the amputation or block are larger, and can be evoked from a greater number of scalp sites than responses in homologous muscles in the intact limb. Repetitive movements also lead to an increase in MEP amplitude in muscles involved in the task (Pascual-Leone et al., 1995). It has been recently reported that a period of repetitive electrical stimulation of peripheral nerves can induce an increase in the amplitude of MEPs evoked by TCMS in muscles innervated by the stimulated nerve (Ridding et al., 2000). This study also suggested that following peripheral stimulation there might also have been a shift in the cortical representational zones of the target muscle.Here we investigate whether changes in cortical excitability following a period of peripheral nerve stimulation are accompanied by expansion or reorganization of the motor map. Our findings confirm that a period of prolonged peripheral stimulation induces excitability changes in the corticospinal projection to hand muscles, and that these changes are accompanied by significant reorganization with enlargement of the scalp evoked motor maps.
Section snippets
Subjects
A total of 14 right-handed subjects volunteered for the study. Eight normal right-handed adults (5 female, 3 male; age range 21–42 years) participated in the intervention experiments, and 6 further subjects (4 female, 2 male; age range 22–37 years) participated in a set of control mapping experiments. The protocols were approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee of Adelaide University and all subjects gave written informed consent.
Surface electromyography
Surface electromyograms (EMG) were recorded from the first
MEP amplitudes at optimal site
The results of these experiments are summarized in Table 1. The average amplitude of the MEPs evoked in FDI from the optimal scalp site was in the baseline condition (Time 1) and following the 2 h ‘non-stimulation’ period (Time 2). When the stimulus intensity was increased in order to evoke higher-amplitude MEPs (Time 3), the mean amplitude was . Across all mapping occasions (intervention and control experiments) there was a significant difference in MEP
Discussion
The present study confirms earlier observations that repetitive peripheral nerve stimulation can induce an increase in the amplitude of MEPs evoked in hand muscles (Ridding et al., 2000). The novel findings reported in the present study are, firstly, that following a period of peripheral nerve stimulation, MEPs can be evoked in a target muscle from a larger scalp area and, secondly, that the magnitude of the vector shift in CoG following a period of peripheral stimulation is significantly
Acknowledgements
M.C.R. was supported by a Royal Adelaide Post-Doctoral Florey Fellowship. This work was supported by the Australian Research Council.
References (35)
- et al.
Physiological studies of the corticomotor projection to the hand after subcortical stroke
Clin Neurophysiol
(1999) - et al.
Neurophysiological evaluation of the central nervous impulse propagation in patients with sensorimotor disturbances
Electroenceph clin Neurophysiol
(1988) - et al.
A new method for reproducable coil positioning in transcranial magnetic stimulation mapping
Electroenceph clin Neurophysiol
(1997) - et al.
Reliability of transcranial magnetic stimulation for mapping the human motor cortex
Electroenceph clin Neurophysiol
(1994) - et al.
Stimulus/response curves as a method of measuring motor cortical excitability in man
Electroenceph clin Neurophysiol
(1997) - et al.
Central motor tract propagation in men: studies with non-invasive, unifocal scalp stimulation
Brain Res
(1987) - et al.
Magnetic stimulation mapping of motor cortex: factors contributing to map area
Electroenceph clin Neurophysiol
(1998) - et al.
A model of the effect of MEP amplitude variation on the accuracy of TMS mapping
Clin Neurophysiol
(1999) - et al.
Clinical utility of magnetic corticospinal tract stimulation at the foramen magnum level
Electroenceph clin Neurophysiol
(1996) - et al.
Noninvasive mapping of muscle representations in human motor cortex
Electroenceph clin Neurophysiol
(1992)
Locating the motor cortex on the MRI with transcranial magnetic stimulation and PET
NeuroImage
Transcranial magnetic stimulation mapping of the motor cortex in normal subjects: the representation of two intrinsic hand muscles
J Neurol Sci
Stimulation of motor tracts in motor neuron disease
J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry
Rapid reversible modulation of human motor outputs after transient deafferentation of the forearm: a study with transcranial magnetic stimulation
Neurology
The corticomotor representation of upper limb muscles in writer's cramp and changes following botulinum toxin injection
Brain
Cerebral plasticity after stroke as revealed by ipsilateral responses to magnetic stimulation
NeuroReport
Functional classes of primate corticomotoneuronal cells and their relation to active force
J Neurophysiol
Cited by (189)
Association of short- and long-latency afferent inhibition with human behavior
2021, Clinical NeurophysiologyCitation Excerpt :Evidence in the literature suggests that the somatosensory system plays an important role in modulating motor output. For example, prolonged electrical peripheral nerve stimulation increases corticospinal excitability (Kaelin-Lang et al. 2002; Andrews et al. 2013) and enlarges muscle representations within M1 (Hamdy et al. 1998; Ridding et al. 2000, 2001). Neuromuscular electrical stimulation (NMES) of the ulnar nerve at the wrist abolished SAI (Mang et al. 2012).
Effects of prolonged vibration to the flexor carpi radialis muscle on intracortical excitability
2024, Scientific ReportsChallenges of neural interfaces for stroke motor rehabilitation
2023, Frontiers in Human Neuroscience