Establishing compatibility between plants and obligate biotrophic pathogens

https://doi.org/10.1016/S1369-5266(03)00043-8Get rights and content

Abstract

The apparent under-representation of the term ‘plant disease susceptibility’ as opposed to ‘plant disease resistance’ in the current scientific literature might indicate that ‘compatibility’ has not gained the same appreciation as ‘resistance’ in the past. However, these seemingly contrary phenomena are intimately linked, and progress in understanding one process inherently contributes to our comprehension of the other. Recent progress in analyzing plant–biotroph compatibility includes the molecular isolation and functional characterization of haustorium-specific cDNAs that encode presumptive hexose- and amino-acid-transporter proteins for proton-driven nutrient uptake. Accumulating evidence from cytological, pharmacological, phytopathological and molecular studies indicates that pathogens mediate the suppression of host defenses in a range of plant–biotroph interactions. Arabidopsis thaliana mutants that are resistant to powdery or downy mildew but that do not exhibit constitutively activated defense could be affected in host-compatibility factors.

Introduction

Obligate biotrophs, such as powdery mildews, downy mildews and rust fungi, constitute a phylogenetically unrelated group of phytopathogens that cannot be extensively cultured in vitro and that form specialized infection structures, haustoria, within infected host cells [1]. Convergent evolution of haustoria has apparently occurred in oomycetes (e.g. Peronospora parasitica), ascomycetes (e.g. powdery mildews, such as Blumeria and Erysiphe ssp.), and basidiomycetes (e.g. rusts, such as Puccinia ssp.). This suggests that the ability to form haustoria is either indispensable for obligate biotrophs or creates a selective advantage to these pathogens (e.g. facilitating access to intracellular pools of solutes that are not available in the apoplast [1]). In contrast to necrotrophic and hemibiotrophic fungal and oomycete pathogens, which have no or only a limited biotrophic phase, obligate biotrophs are entirely dependent on living plant tissue for their growth and propagation. The initial phases of pathogenesis do not differ fundamentally among obligate biotrophs, hemibiotrophs and necrotrophs, and commonly include spore adhesion, appressorium formation and penetration [2]. At later stages, differences become evident as biotrophs establish haustoria within living plant cells and redirect the host’s metabolism to meet their own needs without causing the death of host cells. By contrast, necrotrophic and hemibiotrophic fungi trigger host cell death either immediately (e.g. by secretion of toxins) or during the course of infection. Lack of host cell death in plant–biotroph interactions might be accomplished by the pathogen’s ability to avoid or durably suppress pre-formed and induced host defenses [2]. It is plausible that specific host genes and/or proteins are targeted by biotrophs to achieve these goals, and as such may be considered to be compatibility factors that are essential for successful pathogenesis.

In this review, I summarize recent findings on the potential role of haustoria in the biotrophic lifestyle, on defense suppression in various plant–biotroph interactions, and on host mutants in which potential compatibility factors are affected.

Section snippets

Haustoria: efficient nutrient robbers and productive metabolite factories

Haustoria can be envisaged as determinate branches of intracellular, intercellular, or epicuticular hyphae that are formed upon host-cell penetration and terminate within the penetrated cell [1]. However, haustoria are not truly intracellular: they are separated from the host cytoplasm by a specific derivative of the host plasma membrane (PM), the extrahaustorial membrane (EHM), which is formed upon haustorium formation and tightly surrounds this fungal organ (1., 3., 4.; Figure 1). The

Switching off the alarm bells: defense suppression for compatibility

It has long been reasoned that pathogens, particularly those that form long-term biotrophic relationships with their hosts, may suppress host defense reactions [17]. However, experimental substantiation of this assumption has been scarce. Recent studies provide accumulating cytological, pharmacological, phytopathological, and molecular evidence that obligate biotrophs indeed have the capacity to disable host defense. Alternatively, it is conceivable that the apparent defense suppression is an

Keeping the host alive: suppression of cell death for compatibility

A localized programmed cell death at infection sites (frequently termed the ‘hypersensitive reaction’) is a common host response to pathogen attack that generally coincides with cessation of the attempted colonization. As host cell death is evidently detrimental to the success of the infection, biotrophs must avoid the triggering of this process by, for example, elicitors released during cell-wall penetration. Evidence that host cell death is indeed suppressed during compatible biotrophic

‘Susceptibility genes’: host genes required for compatibility

Loss of function of host genes that are required for a compatible plant–pathogen interaction is generally predicted to result in incompatibility. Thus, recessively inherited resistance to single or closely related pathogen species without constitutive activation of defense responses indicate the lack of a pathogen-specific host compatibility factor. Genetic analysis of resistant lines in natural plant populations and of induced mutations have revealed single recessive resistance loci that

Conclusions

Despite considerable recent progress, our understanding of many aspects of plant–biotroph compatibility is still in its infancy. An exponentially increasing number of pathogenicity genes have been isolated from phytopathogenic hemibiotrophic and necrotrophic fungi in recent years (reviewed in 48., 49.). Nevertheless, the lack of suitable methods for the molecular analysis of obligate biotrophic pathogens (e.g. in vitro cultivation, transformation and gene disruption) has so far hindered the

References and recommended reading

Papers of particular interest, published within the annual period of review, have been highlighted as:

  • of special interest

  • ••

    of outstanding interest

Acknowledgements

I am grateful for helpful suggestions on the manuscript proposed by Volker Lipka and Paul Schulze-Lefert.

References (56)

  • S.E Perfect et al.

    Infection structures of biotrophic and hemibiotrophic fungal plant pathogens

    Mol Plant Pathol

    (2001)
  • K Mendgen et al.

    Plant infection and the establishment of fungal biotrophy

    Trends Plant Sci

    (2002)
  • Heath MC, Skalamera D: Cellular interactions between plants and biotrophic fungal parasites. In Advances in Botanical...
  • L.J Szabo et al.

    Hidden robbers: the role of fungal haustoria in parasitism of plants

    Proc Natl Acad Sci USA

    (2001)
  • S.R Cutler et al.

    Random GFP: cDNA fusions enable visualization of subcellular structures in cells of Arabidopsis at a high frequency

    Proc Natl Acad Sci USA

    (2000)
  • Koh S, Ehrhardt D, André A, Somerville S: Subcellular dynamics in the early stages of the compatible interaction...
  • Spencer-Phillips PTN: Function of fungal haustoria in epiphytic and endophytic infections. In Advances in Botanical...
  • K Mendgen et al.

    Biotrophy and rust haustoria

    Physiol Mol Plant Pathol

    (2000)
  • M Hahn et al.

    Characterization of in planta induced rust genes isolated from a haustorium-specific cDNA library

    Mol Plant Microbe Interact

    (1997)
  • M Hahn et al.

    A putative amino acid transporter is specifically expressed in haustoria of the rust fungus Uromyces fabae

    Mol Plant Microbe Interact

    (1997)
  • R.T Voegele et al.

    The role of haustoria in sugar supply during infection of broad bean by the rust fungus Uromyces fabae

    Proc Natl Acad Sci USA

    (2001)
  • C Struck et al.

    Characterization of a developmentally regulated amino acid transporter (AAT1p) of the rust fungus Uromyces fabae

    Mol Plant Pathol

    (2002)
  • C Struck et al.

    The plasma membrane H+-ATPase from the biotrophic rust fungus Uromyces fabae: molecular characterization of the gene (PMA1) and functional expression of the enzyme in yeast

    Mol Plant Microbe Interact

    (1998)
  • K Shirasu et al.

    Cell-autonomous complementation of mlo resistance using a biolistic transient expression system

    Plant J

    (1999)
  • J Sohn et al.

    High level activation of vitamin B1 biosynthesis genes in haustoria of the rust fungus Uromyces fabae

    Mol Plant Microbe Interact

    (2000)
  • V.K Thara et al.

    In planta induced genes of Puccinia triticina

    Mol Plant Pathol

    (2003)
  • W.R Bushnell et al.

    Suppressors of defense reactions: a model for roles in specificity

    Phytopathology

    (1981)
  • M.C Heath

    Cellular interactions between biotrophic fungal pathogens and host or nonhost plants

    Can J Plant Pathol

    (2002)
  • D.G Mellersh et al.

    Plasma membrane–cell wall adhesion is required for expression of plant defense responses during fungal penetration

    Plant Cell

    (2001)
  • U Wäspi et al.

    Syringolin reprograms wheat to undergo hypersensitive cell death in a compatible interaction with powdery mildew

    Plant Cell

    (2001)
  • M.F Lyngkjaer et al.

    Induced accessibility and inaccessibility to Blumeria graminis f. sp. hordei in barley epidermal cells attacked by a compatible isolate

    Physiol Mol Plant Pathol

    (1999)
  • H.F Lyngkjaer et al.

    Modification of mlo5 resistance to Blumeria graminis attack in barley as a consequence of induced accessibility and inaccessibility

    Physiol Mol Plant Pathol

    (1999)
  • M.F Lyngkjaer et al.

    Virulent Blumeria graminis infection induces penetration susceptibility and suppresses race-specific hypersensitive resistance against avirulent attack in Mla1-barley

    Physiol Mol Plant Pathol

    (2001)
  • H Kunoh et al.

    Induced susceptibility and enhanced inaccessibility at the cellular level in barley coleoptiles. I. The significance of timing fungal invasion

    Physiol Plant Pathol

    (1985)
  • P.L Gregersen et al.

    Differential gene transcript accumulation in barley leaf epidermis and mesophyll in response to attack by Blumeria graminis f. sp. hordei (syn. Erysiphe graminis f. sp. hordei)

    Physiol Mol Plant Pathol

    (1997)
  • M.A Ayliffe et al.

    A plant gene up-regulated at rust infection sites

    Plant Physiol

    (2002)
  • V.K Rai

    Role of amino acids in plant responses to stresses

    Biol Plant

    (2002)
  • J.D Scholes et al.

    Photosynthesis in localized regions of oat leaves infected with crown rust (Puccinia coronata): quantitative imaging of chlorophyll fluorescence

    Planta

    (1996)
  • Cited by (156)

    • Application of molecular biotechnology to manage biotic stress affecting crop enhancement and sustainable agriculture

      2021, Advances in Agronomy
      Citation Excerpt :

      This serves as an interface for exchange of nutrients and signals. Interactions at the interface sites may lead to the transfer of dsRNA or siRNA from the host plant cells into the pathogenic fungus to generate RNA silencing-mediated resistance (Panstruga, 2003). Nowara et al. (2010) demonstrated that host-induced gene silencing of fungal genes occurred from Blumeria graminis, a biotrophic fungal pathogen responsible for barley powdery mildew.

    • dsRNA: The next-generation foliar fungicide

      2020, New and Future Developments in Microbial Biotechnology and Bioengineering: Recent Advances in Application of Fungi and Fungal Metabolites: Biotechnological Interventions and Futuristic Approaches
    • Role of small RNA in regulating plant viral pathogenesis

      2020, Plant Small RNA: Biogenesis, Regulation and Application
    • Genomics of Crucifer’s Host-Pathosystem

      2023, Genomics of Crucifer’s Host-Pathosystem
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text