Elsevier

Drug Discovery Today

Volume 8, Issue 18, 15 September 2003, Pages 832-837
Drug Discovery Today

Review
Screening for the potential of a drug candidate to cause idiosyncratic drug reactions

https://doi.org/10.1016/S1359-6446(03)02816-2Get rights and content

Abstract

Toxicity testing has been ineffective in the prediction of drug candidates that will be associated with a relatively high incidence of idiosyncratic drug reactions (IDRs). Circumstantial evidence suggests the involvement of reactive metabolites in the aetiology of these reactions and this has prompted several companies to screen drug candidates for the formation of such compounds. Most drugs form at least one reactive metabolite. To develop efficient prediction methods, a better understanding of the basic mechanisms involved is essential. This review highlights the current mechanistic hypotheses of IDRs and discusses future directions in the development of better predictive tests.

Section snippets

The problem of IDRs

Some of the adverse reactions responsible for withdrawals are a result of drug interactions or known pharmacological properties, such as prolongation of the cardiac QT interval; such adverse reactions are more easily predicted today than in the past [2]. More problematic are the truly idiosyncratic reactions that do not involve the known pharmacological properties of the drug. Such reactions have characteristics suggesting that they are immune-mediated: there is a delay of a week or more before

Hapten hypothesis

The general characteristics of most IDRs suggest that they are mediated by the immune system. If this is the case, the idiosyncratic nature of these reactions is easier to rationalize because some people are allergic to particular compounds, whereas others are not. There are some examples, such as allergic reactions to penicillin and halothane hepatitis, in which clear involvement of the immune system has been demonstrated; however, in most cases, involvement of the immune system is only

Quinones and related structures

There are many different types of reactive metabolites that can be formed by drugs, a detailed description of which can be found elsewhere [19]. In general, reactive metabolites are either electrophiles (i.e. electron deficient) or free radicals. Electrophiles usually react with biological nucleophiles, such as glutathione or nucleophilic groups on proteins, such as sulfhydryl or amino groups. A common type of reactive metabolite are quinine compounds and related quinone imines and quinone

Avoiding suspect functional groups

The first step in avoiding reactive metabolites is to avoid, whenever possible, functional groups, such as aryl amines, that are known to readily form reactive metabolites [21]. In addition, metabolic pathways of the drug that would be expected to form reactive metabolites can often be anticipated. Early metabolic screens might produce metabolites that point to the formation of reactive intermediates. An obvious example of this is the finding of a glutathione conjugate, which is usually formed

Future directions

The development of better screening tests to predict IDR potential would clearly have a major impact on drug development (potential screening methods are listed in Box 1). However, a fundamental question remains: what is the role of reactive metabolites? Various other screens have been proposed to answer this question and are currently being used although they lack validation – many involve simple in vitro cytotoxicity assays – but results thus far are not encouraging. High concentrations are

References (31)

  • D.J. Naisbitt

    Immunological principles of adverse drug reactions: the initiation and propagation of immune responses elicited by drug treatment

    Drug Saf.

    (2000)
  • A.J. Scheen

    Hepatotoxicity with thiazolidinediones: is it a class effect?

    Drug Saf.

    (2001)
  • J. Messenheimer

    Safety review of adult clinical trial experience with lamotrigine

    Drug Saf.

    (1998)
  • L.R. Pohl

    The immunologic and metabolic basis of drug hypersensitivities

    Annu. Rev. Pharmacol.

    (1988)
  • B.K. Park

    Role of drug disposition in drug hypersensitivity: a chemical, molecular, and clinical perspective

    Chem. Res. Toxicol.

    (1998)
  • Cited by (122)

    • Chlorpromazine-induced hepatotoxicity during inflammation is mediated by TIRAP-dependent signaling pathway in mice

      2013, Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology
      Citation Excerpt :

      The underlying mechanisms involved in idiosyncratic DILI in humans are widely debated. Immune-mediated hypersensitivity reactions (Uetrecht, 2003), role of the hemostatic system (Shaw et al., 2009a), accumulation of polymorphonuclear neutrophils (Zou et al., 2011), genetic polymorphisms in drug metabolizing enzymes (Poolsup et al., 2000) are some of the contributing factors to idiosyncratic DILI. Inflammation is considered to be an underlying factor determining the susceptibility for the toxic effects of xenobiotic agents including CPZ (Buchweitz et al., 2002; Roth et al., 1997).

    • Role of Structural Modifications of Drug Candidates to Enhance Metabolic Stability

      2022, DRUG METABOLISM HANDBOOK: CONCEPTS AND APPLICATIONS IN CANCER RESEARCH
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text