ReviewScreening for the potential of a drug candidate to cause idiosyncratic drug reactions
Section snippets
The problem of IDRs
Some of the adverse reactions responsible for withdrawals are a result of drug interactions or known pharmacological properties, such as prolongation of the cardiac QT interval; such adverse reactions are more easily predicted today than in the past [2]. More problematic are the truly idiosyncratic reactions that do not involve the known pharmacological properties of the drug. Such reactions have characteristics suggesting that they are immune-mediated: there is a delay of a week or more before
Hapten hypothesis
The general characteristics of most IDRs suggest that they are mediated by the immune system. If this is the case, the idiosyncratic nature of these reactions is easier to rationalize because some people are allergic to particular compounds, whereas others are not. There are some examples, such as allergic reactions to penicillin and halothane hepatitis, in which clear involvement of the immune system has been demonstrated; however, in most cases, involvement of the immune system is only
Quinones and related structures
There are many different types of reactive metabolites that can be formed by drugs, a detailed description of which can be found elsewhere [19]. In general, reactive metabolites are either electrophiles (i.e. electron deficient) or free radicals. Electrophiles usually react with biological nucleophiles, such as glutathione or nucleophilic groups on proteins, such as sulfhydryl or amino groups. A common type of reactive metabolite are quinine compounds and related quinone imines and quinone
Avoiding suspect functional groups
The first step in avoiding reactive metabolites is to avoid, whenever possible, functional groups, such as aryl amines, that are known to readily form reactive metabolites [21]. In addition, metabolic pathways of the drug that would be expected to form reactive metabolites can often be anticipated. Early metabolic screens might produce metabolites that point to the formation of reactive intermediates. An obvious example of this is the finding of a glutathione conjugate, which is usually formed
Future directions
The development of better screening tests to predict IDR potential would clearly have a major impact on drug development (potential screening methods are listed in Box 1). However, a fundamental question remains: what is the role of reactive metabolites? Various other screens have been proposed to answer this question and are currently being used although they lack validation – many involve simple in vitro cytotoxicity assays – but results thus far are not encouraging. High concentrations are
References (31)
Mechanisms of idiosyncratic drug reactions: the case of felbamate
Chem. Biol. Interact.
(2002)Drug metabolites in safety testing
Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol.
(2002)Allergic and autoimmune reactions to xenobiotics: how do they arise?
Immunol. Today
(1998)- et al.
Innate immune recognition and control of adaptive immune responses
Semin. Immunol.
(1998) An innate sense of danger
Semin. Immunol.
(1998)The danger hypothesis–potential role in idiosyncratic drug reactions
Toxicology
(2002)A role for bioactivation and covalent binding within epidermal keratinocytes in sulfonamide-induced cutaneous drug reactions
J. Invest. Dermatol.
(2000)Association between presence of HLA-B*5701, HLA-DR7, and HLA-DQ3 and hypersensitivity to HIV-1 reverse-transcriptase inhibitor abacavir
Lancet
(2002)Timing of new Black Box Warnings and withdrawals for prescription medications
J. Am. Med. Assoc.
(2002)Drugs that prolong QT interval as an unwanted effect: assessing their likelihood of inducing hazardous cardiac dysrhythmias
Expert Opin. Pharmacother.
(2000)
Immunological principles of adverse drug reactions: the initiation and propagation of immune responses elicited by drug treatment
Drug Saf.
Hepatotoxicity with thiazolidinediones: is it a class effect?
Drug Saf.
Safety review of adult clinical trial experience with lamotrigine
Drug Saf.
The immunologic and metabolic basis of drug hypersensitivities
Annu. Rev. Pharmacol.
Role of drug disposition in drug hypersensitivity: a chemical, molecular, and clinical perspective
Chem. Res. Toxicol.
Cited by (122)
The use of structural alerts to avoid the toxicity of pharmaceuticals
2018, Toxicology ReportsChlorpromazine-induced hepatotoxicity during inflammation is mediated by TIRAP-dependent signaling pathway in mice
2013, Toxicology and Applied PharmacologyCitation Excerpt :The underlying mechanisms involved in idiosyncratic DILI in humans are widely debated. Immune-mediated hypersensitivity reactions (Uetrecht, 2003), role of the hemostatic system (Shaw et al., 2009a), accumulation of polymorphonuclear neutrophils (Zou et al., 2011), genetic polymorphisms in drug metabolizing enzymes (Poolsup et al., 2000) are some of the contributing factors to idiosyncratic DILI. Inflammation is considered to be an underlying factor determining the susceptibility for the toxic effects of xenobiotic agents including CPZ (Buchweitz et al., 2002; Roth et al., 1997).
Role of Structural Modifications of Drug Candidates to Enhance Metabolic Stability
2022, DRUG METABOLISM HANDBOOK: CONCEPTS AND APPLICATIONS IN CANCER RESEARCHChemical Structural Alert and Reactive Metabolite Concept as Applied in Medicinal Chemistry to Minimize the Toxicity of Drug Candidates
2022, DRUG METABOLISM HANDBOOK: CONCEPTS AND APPLICATIONS IN CANCER RESEARCH