The effect of strategic alignment on the use of IS-based resources for competitive advantage

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0963-8687(00)00049-4Get rights and content

Abstract

Persuasive evidence has described the strategic use of information resources in organizations. As a result, IS researchers have sought empirically to link that use to improved organizational performance. However, this alignment-performance relationship has been difficult to confirm.

The current study contributes by distinguishing the alignment of the information systems plan with the business plan (ISP–BP) and the reciprocal alignment (BP–ISP). The study used 107 matched pairs of IS executives and other senior executives. Analysis showed that for IS executives both ISP–BP and BP–ISP alignment predicted the use of IS-based resources for competitive advantage. However, for other senior executives, only ISP–BP alignment predicted it. Study results suggest both groups of subjects share an understanding of the role of ISP–BP in creating competitive advantage from their information systems investments. However, the lack of a shared understanding of BP–ISP alignment may prevent organizations from achieving that advantage.

Introduction

Contemporary organizations are aligning IS and business strategies to improve organizational performance. Charles Schwab and Amazon.com have leveraged existing processes with online access and employed a first-mover strategy to realize record online revenues (Stewart, 1999). Dell Computer, in a first-mover strategy, has achieved success by aligning its core competency in supply-chain expertise with Internet technology. Chemical companies have successfully aligned information technology strategy and a business strategy of customer relationship management by creating virtual storefronts from which customers can access databases and complete transactions unassisted. Fingerhut has leveraged its transaction history of 75 million customers with data warehousing technology to identify customers with the highest potential for targeted marketing campaigns. Banks are mining data warehouses of customer information to profile profitable customers and target them with specialized services to retain their best and most profitable ones (Whiting and Sweat, 1999). Newcomer National Airlines is overcoming market entry barriers using an IS infrastructure that includes Internet and intranet sites, a data warehouse, and airplane maintenance system (Hibbard and Engler, 1999). All of these examples represent IS-based applications that are aligned with business plans and positively affect organizational performance.

IS-based applications can create competitive advantage based on the generic strategies of cost leadership, product differentiation, and market focus (Porter, 1980, McFarlan, 1984, Bakos and Treacy, 1986, Sethi and King, 1994). Strategic partnering, electronic data interchange, the introduction of switching costs via electronic alliances, distributed databases, geographical information systems, data warehouses, object-oriented development, and enterprise resource planning are all examples of IT investments for attaining competitive advantage (Eardley and Lewis, 1996, Gatignon and Xuereb, 1997).

Increased attention has been given to the alignment of IS and business strategies to create that advantage. In fact, the lack of such alignment has been argued to be the reason many businesses fail to realize value from investments in IT (Henderson and Venkatraman, 1993).

Investments in IT are often decided on the basis of the information systems plan and should be governed by the objectives of the firm as expressed in the business plan (Saunders and Jones, 1992). Thus, this alignment of the information systems plan and business plan is of utmost importance and leads to IS effectiveness (Chan and Huff, 1993). Firms are apt to view such IS-aligned investments as being strategically important and believe that they can enable IS resources to be used to produce competitive advantage (Kettinger et al., 1994).

The objectives of the study described herein were to: (1) provide a model of the relationship of strategic alignment and the use of IS-based resources to produce a competitive advantage; (2) develop measures for constructs of the model; (3) perform psychometric tests of those constructs; and (4) test the dependent variable from two perspectives — that of IS executives and that of other senior executives. This study would thus contribute to existing research through the parsimonious examination of the impact of alignment on the competitive advantage construct.

Section snippets

Model of strategic IS alignment

The research model envisages two types of strategic alignment that will be positively associated with the use of IS for competitive advantage. The first is the alignment of the IS plan with the business plan (ISP–BP). The second is the alignment of the business plan with the IS plan (BP–ISP). The following survey of literature elucidates the research model by summarizing the theory supporting each construct and its related measure.

Hypotheses

Fig. 1 depicts the four hypotheses in this research.

Survey instrument and construct measures

The model was investigated using a multi-informant field survey consisting of two instruments. Both instruments contained single sentence questions to be answered on a seven-point Likert-type scale. The evaluative dimensions for the scales were Strongly Disagree, Disagree, Mildly Disagree, Neutral, Mildly Agree, Agree, and Strongly Agree. Both instruments also contained general demographic questions.

Both instruments were sent to the senior IS executive who was asked to complete the primary

Analysis of data

Research data was analyzed using structural equation modeling. A discussion of this method and the confirmatory approach appears in Appendix B. Results of the confirmatory factor analysis are presented in Table 6 which includes standardized loadings for each of the study variables and measures of reliability and validity. Variable loadings were generally very high and significant (p<0.001). Convergent validity was supported by four tests and study variables were internally consistent. Measures

Support of hypotheses

Study results support three of the four hypotheses. Alignment of the IS plan with the business plan was associated with the use of IS for competitive advantage by both IS executives and other senior executives (Hypothesis 1, Hypothesis 2). Alignment of the business plan with the IS plan was associated with the use of IS for competitive advantage by the senior IS executives (Hypothesis 3), but not by other senior executives (Hypothesis 4).

Importance of aligning the IS plan with the business plan

Findings from this study strongly support the expectation

Contributions to theory and research

This study makes several useful contributions to theory and research. First, it tests existing theory about the impact of strategic alignment on the use of IS-based resources for competitive advantage. In doing so, it provides strong support for the impact of the alignment of the IS plan with the business plan. However, it provides only partial support for the impact of the alignment of the business plan with the IS plan. Moreover, it provides just conjecture as to why only partial support was

Conclusions

This study strongly supports the commonly held view that effective ISP–BP alignment presages the use of IS-based resources for competitive advantage. However, it does not so strongly support the analogous association of BP–ISP alignment with such advantage. A deeper understanding of these findings might reveal how organizations can apply strategic alignment to IS-based resources in order to gain competitive advantage and improve organizational performance.

References (82)

  • B.H Boar

    Practical Steps for Aligning Information Technology with Business Strategies: How to Achieve a Competitive Advantage

    (1994)
  • K.A Bollen

    Structural Equations with Latent Variables

    (1989)
  • K.A Bollen et al.

    Testing Structural Equation Models

    (1993)
  • A.C Boynton et al.

    The influence of IT management practice on IT use in large organizations

    MIS Quarterly

    (1994)
  • K Bruce

    Can you align IT with business strategy?

    Strategy & Leadership

    (1998)
  • B.M Byrne

    Structural Equation Modeling with EQS and EQS/Windows: Basic Concepts, Applications, and Programming

    (1994)
  • K.J Calhoun et al.

    From strategic business planning to strategic information systems planning: the missing link

    Journal of Information Technology Management

    (1990)
  • D.T Campbell et al.

    Convergent and discriminant validation by the multitrait-multimethod matrix

    Psychological Bulletin

    (1959)
  • J.I Cash et al.

    Corporate Information Systems Management: The Issues Facing Senior Executives

    (1988)
  • R.G Chapman

    Assessing nonresponse bias the right way: a customer satisfaction case study

    American Marketing Association Summer Educators Proceedings

    (1992)
  • Y.E Chan et al.

    Strategic information systems alignment

    Business Quarterly

    (1993)
  • P.Y.K Chau

    Reexamining a model for evaluating information center success using a structural equation modeling approach

    Decision Sciences

    (1997)
  • E.K Clemons

    Evaluation of strategic investments in information technology

    Communications of the ACM

    (1991)
  • E.K Clemons et al.

    Sustaining IT advantage: the role of structural differences

    MIS Quarterly

    (1991)
  • Coakley, J.R., Fiegner, M.K., Leader, B.A., White, D.M., 1995. An approach to assess the degree of integration between...
  • Cresap et al.

    Information Systems Planning to Support Business Objectives: A Survey of Practices

    (1983)
  • A Eardley et al.

    The linkage between IT and business strategy in competitive systems: a reappraisal of some ‘Classic’ cases using a competition analysis framework

    International Journal of Technology Management

    (1996)
  • M.J Earl

    Information systems strategy formulation

  • M.J Earl

    Experiences in strategic information systems planning

    MIS Quarterly

    (1993)
  • C Fornell et al.

    Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error

    Journal of Marketing Research

    (1981)
  • H Gatignon et al.

    Strategic orientation of the firm and new product performance

    Journal of Marketing Research

    (1997)
  • R.D Galliers
  • Y.P Gupta et al.

    Impact of information systems steering committees on IS planning

    Decision Sciences

    (1989)
  • J.F Hair et al.

    Multivariate Data Analysis with Readings

    (1995)
  • C Hartog et al.

    Opinion survey of MIS managers: key issues

    MIS Quarterly

    (1986)
  • J Hartwick et al.

    Explaining the role of user participation in information system use

    Management Science

    (1994)
  • Hatcher, L., 1994. A Step-by-Step Approach to Using the SAS System for Factor Analysis and Structural Equation...
  • J.C Henderson et al.

    The value of strategic IS planning: understanding consistency, validity, and IS markets

    MIS Quarterly

    (1988)
  • J.C Henderson et al.

    Strategic alignment: leveraging information technology for transforming organizations

    IBM Systems Journal

    (1993)
  • Hibbard, J., Engler, N., 1999. No Legacy for National Airlines. Computer Reseller News 03/29/99 (835),...
  • R.H Hoyle

    Structural Equation Modeling: Concepts, Issues, and Applications

    (1995)
  • Cited by (209)

    • Evolving strategic IS themes

      2024, Journal of Strategic Information Systems
    • Technology alignment in the presence of regulatory changes: The case of meaningful use of information technology in healthcare

      2018, International Journal of Medical Informatics
      Citation Excerpt :

      The recognition and legitimation of IT planning by top management provides the channel for promoting interests of multiple constituents within hospitals. Kearns and Lederer [41] assert the difference between information systems plan (ISP)–business plan (BP) and BP–ISP model of alignment by noting that while the former type of alignment refers to IS management’s understanding of the business strategy [10], the latter relates to the top management’s understanding and commitment [42]. This BP-ISP model of alignment characterized in terms of the participation of top management enhances IT planning sophistication by aligning the plans with business strategy [43–45] and stimulates exchange and integration of information [46].

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    1

    Tel.: +1-859-257-2536.

    View full text