Elsevier

Biomass and Bioenergy

Volume 19, Issue 4, October 2000, Pages 209-227
Biomass and Bioenergy

Miscanthus: European experience with a novel energy crop

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0961-9534(00)00032-5Get rights and content

Abstract

Miscanthus is a tall perennial rhizomatous grass with C4 photosynthesis which originated in East Asia. This article provides an overview of the most important results and experience gained with miscanthus in Europe over the past 10 years. Field trials have been established throughout Europe from the Mediterranean to southern Scandinavia. Most reported trials have used a vigorous sterile clone Miscanthus x giganteus, which has been propagated vegetatively either by rhizome cutting or in vitro culture. Yields in autumn have been reported in excess of 30 t ha−1 (12 t acre−1) for irrigated trials in southern Europe. Without irrigation autumn yields of 10–25 t  ha−1 (dry matter) can be expected. The quality of miscanthus biomass for combustion is in some respect comparable to woody biomass and normally improves by delaying harvesting until the spring, although harvestable yields are thus reduced by 30–50% compared with autumn yields. Different technical options for establishment, harvesting and handling of miscanthus have been developed and these significantly effect production costs. Miscanthus production is characterized by low fertilizer and pesticide requirements making it a relatively benign crop environmentally. The main limitations to miscanthus production from M. x giganteus are the high establishment costs, poor over-wintering at some sites and insufficient water supply in southern regions of Europe. New agronomic techniques and new genotypes with improved characteristics are being developed and screened over the wide range of ecological conditions in Europe. Against this background of European experience the prospects for growing miscanthus in North America are discussed.

Introduction

Miscanthus is a perennial rhizomatous grass with the C4 photosynthetic pathway. The genus Miscanthus has its origins in the tropics and subtropics, but different species are found throughout a wide climatic range in East Asia [1]. The remarkable adaptability of miscanthus to different environments [2] makes this novel crop suitable for establishment and distribution under a range of European and North American climatic conditions.

Miscanthus was first cultivated in Europe in the 1930s, when it was introduced from Japan. A number of ornamental varieties of miscanthus are known to exist under various common names. A sterile hybrid horticultural genotype, Miscanthus x giganteus1 GREEF et DEU [1] was brought back to Denmark by Aksel Olsen in 1935, and was observed to have exceptionally vigorous growth [5]. Extensive field trials of M. x giganteus GREEF et DEU have been carried out in northern Europe since 1983, and have shown the capacity for high yields, over 20 t dry matter ha−1year−1 [6], [7] (Fig. 1). Based upon promising preliminary results, an international research project funded under the European JOULE program was initiated in 1989. Field trials were established in Denmark, Germany, Ireland and the UK to investigate the biomass potential of M. x giganteus across northern Europe. In 1993, a larger project was set up under the European AIR program, which extended the distribution of field trials into southern Europe, including Greece, Italy and Spain [8]. Nationally funded projects in Denmark, Netherlands, Germany, Austria and Switzerland supported research on propagation and establishment, management practices, harvest and handling of miscanthus.

These trials have shown both the potential of M. x giganteus in Europe, and its limitations. Key agronomic advantages are its high yields, and its low fertilizer and pesticide inputs. Tests have shown that M. x giganteus biomass can be used as solid fuel, in construction materials such as pressed particle-board, and as a source of cellulose. Key disadvantages include relatively high establishment costs, narrow genetic base, and low hardiness in the first winter following establishment of M. x giganteus.

The aim of this article is to review European research results and to describe the current options for miscanthus production. From the experience gained with miscanthus in Europe, conclusions can be drawn for transfer and application in other parts of the world, such as North America.

Section snippets

Crop biology

The genus Miscanthus occurs within the orthoseral (tall) grasslands of East Asia, from the tropics and subtropics to the Pacific Islands, the warm temperate regions and the subarctic [1], [2], [9], [10]. Taxonomically this genus belongs to the subtribe Saccharineae of the tribe Andropogoneae, which is in the family Graminae (Poaceae). However, the taxonomy is confused within the Miscanthus genus [11].

Since miscanthus has a basic chromosome number of 19, the triploid genotype Miscanthus x

Varieties cultivated

Although the majority of European trials have involved clones of M. x giganteus, other genotypes are now being evaluated (see Table 1). The contribution of M. sacchariflorus to the genome of M. x giganteus is thought to provide adaptation to warmer climates, whereas M. sinensis provides genetic resources for cooler regions [26]. Indeed, an important advantage of M. sinensis genotypes over M. x giganteus is their improved winter hardiness [27], [28]. Financed by the European Commission (EC), the

Propagation

As a sterile hybrid, M. x giganteus does not form seeds and has to be propagated vegetatively. Mechanically divided rhizomes, plants grown from rhizome pieces divided manually, or plantlets micro-propagated in tissue culture are used. Methods for mechanical division of rhizomes in the field, so-called macro-propagation, were first developed in Denmark [30]. According to this method, nursery fields are subjected to 1–2 passes of a rotary tiller after 2–3 years, breaking up rhizomes into 20–100 g

Yield potential

The full establishment of a miscanthus stand takes 3–5 years [45], [46], during which time the yield increases in each successive year. In addition, yield varies according to the date and method of harvest and these are discussed in the sections below.

Yields reported for trials all over Europe are presented along with some information on management conditions (Table 1). Yields of up to 25tha−1 year−1 (dry matter) have been obtained from the third year onwards in the spring harvest for M. x

Harvest and storage

Harvesting can commence when the crop has senesced, which is determined by minimum temperatures in colder climates. The later that the harvest can be performed, the lower are both the moisture content and the mineral content (both of which are desirable); however, there is a trade-off, since the biomass yield decreases as well. Table 2 {3pt shows an example of the decrease in mineral contents between November and January. In Germany and the Netherlands, moisture content has been shown to

Combustion characteristics

The chemical composition of miscanthus biomass is favorable for combustion. The mineral content is low compared with wheat straw, but higher than for willow/poplar coppice. Mineral concentrations are reported to be low at the time of the early spring harvest: 0.2–0.6% N; 0.5–1.3% K; 0.1–0.5% Cl and 1.6–4.0% ash (see Table 3). Like other biomass fuels, reactivity and ignition stability are high compared with coal.

The composition of miscanthus ash includes approximately 25–40% SiO2, 20–25% K2O,

Energy and CO2 balance

In an analysis by Lewandowski et al. [81], a yield of 20 t  ha−1 (dry matter) was assumed. Energy inputs were 1251 MJ t−1, and 112 kg CO2 emissions per tonne dry matter were estimated for the production, harvest, transport and milling of the biomass, before it was burned in a pulverized fuel combustor. Assuming that 100kgha−1 N was applied yearly, 23% of the CO2 emissions (374MJt−1) were due to the input of nitrogen fertilizer. Seventeen percent of the CO2 emissions (324 MJ t−1) were spent on fuel

Economics

As may be concluded from the preceding information, the economics of miscanthus depend very much upon a number of assumptions: the yield, the chosen production “chain”, the propagation method, the number of years of assumed production, whether costs are annualized or not, transport and land-use costs, and the farmer's own profit margin. Note that the cost of land is often not included when comparisons are made, for example, with woody biomass production from short-rotation forestry.

Huisman et

Prospects for miscanthus production in North America

The sustained European interest in miscanthus suggests that this novel energy crop deserves serious investigation as a possible candidate biofuel crop in North America and elsewhere, perhaps alongside switchgrass. No agronomic trials or trial results for miscanthus are yet known from the conterminous USA, so its performance under US conditions is virtually unknown [92]. Limited experience has been gained by the US Department of Agriculture/ Natural Resource Conservation Service (USDA/ NRCS)

Note on currency conversion

Although costs determined in Euros have been given also as the equivalent in US dollars (at the exchange rate of Euro 0.91/US$1.00 for May 2000), the authors note that this exchange rate has varied over the range 0.89–1.17 during the writing of this paper, so exact cost comparisons in US dollars are difficult. Note also that many European currencies have a fixed exchange rate to the Euro, so that prices in Euros reflect actual costs incurred in local currency.

Acknowledgements

The European Commission substantially funded the miscanthus research under the following projects: “Perennial rhizomatous grasses as low-input ligno-cellulosic biomass crops in the north of the European community” JOUB-CT90-0069, “European Miscanthus Productivity Network” AIR-CT-92-0294; “European Miscanthus improvement” FAIR3 CT-96-1392. Jonathan Scurlock was supported by the US Department of Energy under contract DE-AC05-96OR22464 with Lockheed Martin Energy Research Corporation. The authors

References (98)

  • J. Burvall

    Influence of harvest time and soil type on fuel quality in reed canary grass (Phalaris arundinacea L.)

    Biomass and Bioenergy

    (1997)
  • I. Lewandowski et al.

    CO2-balance for the cultivation and combustion of Miscanthus

    Biomass and Bioenergy

    (1995)
  • J.M. Greef et al.

    Syntaxonomy of Miscanthus x giganteus GREEF et DEU

    Angewandte Botanik

    (1993)
  • Numata M, editor. Grassland vegetation. The flora and vegetation of Japan. Tokyo: Elsevier, 1974. p....
  • J. Hansen et al.

    Short-term in vitro storage of Miscanthus x ogiformis Honda ‘Giganteus’ as affected by medium composition, temperature, and photon flux density

    Plant Cell, Tissue and Organ Culture

    (1997)
  • I.B. Linde-Laursen

    Cytogenetic analysis of Miscanthus ‘Giganteus’, an interspecific hybrid

    Hereditas

    (1993)
  • P.N. Nielsen

    The productivity of the Miscanthus cultivar Giganteus

    Tidsshr Planteavl

    (1987)
  • K.-.U. Schwarz et al.

    Studies of the growth and yield of Miscanthus x giganteus in Germany

    Aspects of Applied Biology

    (1994)
  • M. Walsh

    Miscanthus handbook. Eu project FAIR 3-CT96-1707

    (1997)
  • I. Hayashi et al.

    Structure and functioning of Miscanthus sinensis grassland in Sugadaira

    Central Japan. Vegetatio

    (1981)
  • N. Mutoh et al.

    Special diversity and primary productivity in Miscanthus sinensis grasslands. I. Diversity in relation to stand and dominance

    Botanical Magazine

    (1985)
  • Renvoize S, Gilbert D. Taxonomy and cultivars. In: Rutherford I, Heath MC, editors. The potential of Miscanthus as a...
  • S.P. Long

    C4 photosynthesis at low temperature

    Plant, Cell and Environment

    (1983)
  • Clifton-Brown JC. The importance of temperature in controlling leaf growth of Miscanthus in temperate climates. Ph.D....
  • J.C. Clifton-Brown et al.

    The thermal response of leaf extension rate in genotypes of the C4-grass Miscanthus: an important factor in determining the potential productivity of different genotypes.

    Journal of Experimental Botany

    (1997)
  • C.V. Beale et al.

    Can perennial C4 grasses attain high efficiencies of radiant energy conversion in cool climates?

    Plant, Cell and Environment

    (1995)
  • Tayot X, Chartier M, Varlet-Grancher C, Lemaire G. Potential above-ground dry matter production of Miscanthus in...
  • H.M.G. Van der Werf et al.

    Potential dry matter production of Miscanthus sinensis in The Netherlands.

    Industrial Crops and Products

    (1993)
  • Clifton-Brown JC, Neilson BM, Jones MB. The potential of Miscanthus as an energy crop in Ireland. In: Chartier P,...
  • Jacks-Sterrenberg I. Untersuchungen zur Ertragsphysiologie von Miscanthus sinensis Anderss. hinsichtlich einer...
  • U.-.B. Dressler

    Produktivität, Wasserhaushalt und Nitratauswaschung von Miscanthus sinensis “Giganteus” (Riesenchinaschilf).

    Mitteilungen der Gesellschaft für Pflanzenbauwissenschaften

    (1993)
  • C.V. Beale et al.

    The effects of nitrogen and irrigation on the productivity of C4 grasses Miscanthus x giganteus and Spartina cynosuroides.

    Aspects of Applied Biology

    (1997)
  • V. Mediavilla et al.

    Biomasseproduktion mit Chinaschilf und einheimischen Gräsern.

    Agrarforschung

    (1997)
  • Lewandowski I, Clifton-Brown JC, Deuter M. Potential of Miscanthus genotypes in Europe: over-wintering and yields. In:...
  • J.C. Clifton-Brown et al.

    Frosttoleranz der Rhizome verschiedener Miscanthus Genotypen.

    Mitteilungen der Gesellschaft für Pflanzenbauwissenschaften

    (1998)
  • Eppel-Hotz A, Jodl S, Kuhn W, Marzini K, Munzer W. Miscanthus: new cultivars and results of research experiments for...
  • Jørgensen U, Venendaal R. European energy crops overview: species, costs and commercial development. In: Overend RP,...
  • Jørgensen U. Macro propagation of Miscanthus. In: Symposium Miscanthus — Biomassebereitstellung, energetische und...
  • Schwarz K-U, Kjeldsen JB, Munzer W, Junge R. Low cost establishment and winter survival of Miscanthus x giganteus. In:...
  • Pari L. First trials on Arundo donax and Miscanthus rhizomes harvesting. In: Chartier P, Ferrero GL, Henius UM,...
  • Huisman W, Kasper GJ, Venturi P. Technical and economic feasibility of the complete production – transport chain of...
  • Wilkins C, Redstone S. Biomass production for energy and industry in the far South-West of England. In: Chartier P,...
  • Lewandowski I. Micropropagation of Miscanthus x giganteus. In: Bajaj YPS, editors. Biotechnology in agriculture and...
  • Deuter M, Biotechnik und Pflanzenvermehrung GmbH. Klein-Wanzleben, Germany, personal...
  • Boelcke B, Buech S, Zacharias S. Effects of Miscanthus cultivation on soil fertility and the soil water reservoir, In:...
  • R. Pude et al.

    Ursachen der Auswinterung von einjähringen Miscanthus — Beständen.

    Pflanzenbauwissenschaften

    (1997)
  • Schwarz K-U, Greef JM, Schnug E. Untersuchungen zur Etablierung und Biomassebildung von Miscanthus giganteus unter...
  • Jørgensen U, Research Center Foulum. Tjele, Denmark, personal...
  • Pude R. Winterfestigkeit von Miscanthus in der Etablierungsphase. Beiträge zu den Agrarwissenschaften, Band 14, Verlag...
  • Cited by (787)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text