Elsevier

Cognitive Brain Research

Volume 8, Issue 3, 25 October 1999, Pages 229-239
Cognitive Brain Research

Research report
Automatic activation in the human primary motor cortex synchronized with movement preparation

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0926-6410(99)00024-5Get rights and content

Abstract

The human primary motor cortex during a unilateral finger reactive movement to visual stimuli was examined by magnetoencephalography (MEG) measurement. The brain activity related to movement execution (the motor activity contralateral to the movement side) was estimated based on movement onset conditions and reaction times. The movement onset conditions were: (1) a simple reaction time task with a visual stimulus, (2) a Go/NoGo task with different colored stimuli and (3) a Go/NoGo task with different position stimuli. Dipole source estimation was done, and the time course of the motor activity was calculated. The results showed that not only the visual response but also the contralateral motor activity was evoked by the stimulus in all cases, and even when the NoGo stimulus was given. The motor activity in the primary motor cortex was conjectured to consist of two dominant components: the first component for the movement preparation and the second component for the movement execution. Because the first component happened with a constant delay time from the stimulus even in the NoGo case, the first component, coming through a fast pathway for signals from visual stimulus processing to the motor cortex without any intervening cognitive processing, was conjectured to make the motor cortex prepare for the forthcoming movement onset automatically regardless of the stimulus instruction.

Introduction

It has been known, through both invasive and non-invasive measurements, that a variety of brain motor areas, including the supplementary motor area (SMA), pre-motor area and primary motor area, are active during a movement and that the sensory area is also activated by the movement. Invasive recordings in primates, which measure specific neuron discharges, have examined the neuron activity associated with the movements, the projections between each area, and their functional role 2, 33. In humans, attempts to clarify the role of each area have been made by recordings with chronically implanted subdural electrodes 19, 20, 26. These invasive recordings have shown the effectiveness of measuring the brain activity and the functional anatomy directly, but there are restrictions in the experimental procedure. In contrast, PET and fMRI are useful non-invasive methods where most activity related to regional cerebral blood flow can be identified 3, 4, 11, 25, 32. However these methods measure signals caused by changes in blood flow and have limitations of temporal resolution. EEG recording is also a useful non-invasive method that reveals the time course of activities through overlapped potentials 10, 16, 37, 41and recently has been analyzed by dipole source modeling 5, 31, 42. However, the data of these potentials most likely contain the activities of several areas, and it has been difficult to discriminate precisely the location and contribution of each activity. Consequently, these non-invasive measurements have serious limitations of spatial or temporal resolution.

Magnetoencephalography (MEG) measurement is another useful non-invasive measurement method that has made it possible to map activity sources at their peak latencies with high spatio-temporal resolution and which has been used in human brain research. Because MEG measurement has high sensitivity only for the tangential components of neuron activities in the brain [35], the sources in the primary sensorimotor cortex have been investigated for movement-related activity 6, 7, 8, 12, 18, 21, 24, 28. In a self-paced brisk movement, a slow magnetic field shift called the readiness field (RF) starts 500–1000 ms prior to the movement onset, and it shows a slight increase in amplitude around EMG onset (the motor field (MF)). RF and MF have been interpreted as the activity generated from the primary motor cortex (MI), since SMA is not detectable in normal subjects [24]and the premotor area (PMA) has been said to be difficult to measure because of its radial orientation [21]. After EMG onset, a peak in the movement-evoked field is observed at 100 ms (MEFI) and at 200 ms (MEFII) 6, 12, 18, 21. MEFI is the most prominent activity that has been identified as activity in the primary sensor cortex (SI). MEFI is known to be a reafferent input to the contralateral sensory area from the moving muscles, e.g., from the deep receptors of muscle spindles 9, 21.

However, despite the many MEG studies related to movement execution, not much is known about temporal features in the human sensorimotor cortex. Although a few studies to extrapolate the time course of activity have been done in self-paced movements (SPM) 7, 8, 13, 18, few estimations of activity have been done for a signal-triggered movement 14, 28. Only one report of a simple reaction time (RT) task with an LED visual stimulus has shown that motor activity synchronized with the stimulus onset was observed [14]. The purpose of the present investigation is to elucidate the temporal features of the activities in the primary motor cortex. This study focuses on the brain activity related to the movement execution (the motor activity contralateral to the movement side) and reports how the time course of this motor activity changes depending on the movement onset conditions. In this study, a visual stimulus was used as an external instruction to elicit the motor activity synchronized not only with the movement onset (EMG onset) but also with the movement initiation (stimulus onset). In order to examine whether the motor activity depends on the movement condition or not, a comparison between the self-paced and stimulus triggered movement, and an analysis based on the RT were done.

Section snippets

Subjects and methods

The experiments were carried out on six right-handed normal subjects (male, aged 24–34). Informed consent stipulated by the ethical committee at our institute was obtained from all the subjects. Five different experimental conditions were studied. Three test conditions were RT movements to visual stimuli, and two control conditions where simple motor and visual responses were recorded. The movement was a brisk index finger abduction. Test conditions were as follows.

(1) Visually triggered

Control conditions

In the SPM task, RF started bilaterally 500–1000 ms prior to the movement onset and isocontour maps of the magnetic field from the start of RF to EMG onset did not change in pattern. The rectified EMG reached its peak around 100–200 ms and no subject showed strongly lasting EMG activity. Fig. 1 shows the measured magnetic fields for right finger movement of three subjects (subjects A, D and F). Superimposed waveforms of 32 sensors above the right and left hemisphere, the rectified EMG and

The motor activity in the SPM task

Bilateral and slowly increasing motor activity starting 0.5–1 s prior to the EMG onset was observed in the unilateral self-paced finger movement. The origin of the contralateral activity source was estimated in the primary motor cortex as had been reported by previous studies 18, 21and did not change during RF and MF [8]. Though it has been indicated that SMA and PMA are active not only in the stimulus triggered movement task but also in the SPM task 3, 25, it is difficult to measure these

References (44)

  • P Praamstra et al.

    Dipole source analysis suggests selective modulation of the supplementary motor area contribution to the readiness potential

    Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol.

    (1996)
  • G Rizzolatti et al.

    The organization of the cortical motor system: new concepts

    Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol.

    (1998)
  • H Shibasaki et al.

    Components of the movement-related cortical potential and their scalp topography

    Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol.

    (1980)
  • J Suk et al.

    Anatomical localization revealed by MEG recordings of the human somatosensory system

    Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol.

    (1991)
  • I.M Tarkka et al.

    Cortical topography of premotor and motor potentials preceding self-paced voluntary movement of dominant and non-dominant hands

    Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol.

    (1990)
  • C Toro et al.

    Source analysis of scalp-recorded movement-related electrical potentials

    Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol.

    (1993)
  • C.J Aine et al.

    Retinotopic organization of human visual cortex: departures from the classical model

    Cereb. Cortex

    (1996)
  • H Aizawa et al.

    Corticocortical and thalamocortical responses of neurons in the monkey primary motor cortex and their relation to a trained motor task

    J. Neurophysiol.

    (1994)
  • H Boecker et al.

    Functional cooperativity of human cortical motor areas during self-paced simple finger movements: a high-resolution MRI study

    Brain

    (1994)
  • H Boecker et al.

    Role of the human rostral supplementary motor area and the basal ganglia in motor sequence control: investigations with H2 15O PET

    J. Neurophysiol.

    (1998)
  • D Cheyne et al.

    Neuromagnetic fields accompanying unilateral finger movements: pre-movement and movement-evoked fields

    Exp. Brain Res.

    (1989)
  • D. Cheyne, J. Vrba, T. Cheung, M. Burbank, H. Weinberg, G. Lindinger, Source models of slow magnetic fields...
  • Cited by (37)

    • Have we been asking the right questions when assessing response inhibition in go/no-go tasks with fMRI? A meta-analysis and critical review

      2013, Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews
      Citation Excerpt :

      Indeed, there is now abundant evidence that no-go stimuli trigger automatic motor activations that require active inhibition to avoid overt erroneous responses, regardless of their relative frequency. These no-go locked motor activations were clearly observed centrally using MEG (e.g., Endo et al., 1999), fMRI (e.g., Jaffard et al., 2007) or even EEG (e.g., Boulinguez et al., 2009), and peripherally by means of subthreshold electromyographic activity in the muscles involved in the response (e.g., Boulinguez et al., 2008). In other words, these studies strongly suggest that there could be no better way to evoke a strong tendency to produce automatic motor responses than using simple reaction time tasks mixing equiprobable go and no-go stimuli.

    • Response inhibition in adults and teenagers: Spatiotemporal differences in the prefrontal cortex

      2012, Brain and Cognition
      Citation Excerpt :

      MEG provides excellent time resolution and allows better source localisation than ERPs, as the magnetic signal, unlike electrical brain activity, is not distorted by conduction through scalp and skull, offering numerous advantages for studying cognitive processes (Hari, Levanen, & Raij, 2000). Relatively few MEG studies have, however, been conducted on response inhibition and most included only a small number of sensors and/or adult subjects (Endo, Kizuka, Masuda, & Takeda, 1999; Fenwick et al., 1993; Sasaki et al., 1993; Shibata & Ioannides, 2001). The adult data are also not consistent, with inhibition being related to a right inferior frontal source at 350 ms (Brunetti et al., 2008) or a source in the left posterior frontal sulcus at 160 ms (Nakata et al., 2005).

    • Functional motor-cortex mapping using corticokinematic coherence

      2011, NeuroImage
      Citation Excerpt :

      MEG offers the best compromise between a very high temporal resolution of the order of the millisecond and a good spatial resolution of the order of 5 mm for local cortical sources (Hämäläinen et al., 1993). MEG mapping of the human M1 cortex has until now mainly relied on the use of premovement readiness or motor fields, corticomuscular coherence (CMC), and stimulation of peripheral nerves (Baker, 2007; Conway et al., 1995; Endo et al., 1999; Korvenoja et al., 2006; Mäkelä et al., 2001). The readiness and motor fields are magnetic fields generated at the M1 cortex.

    • The paradoxical effect of warning on reaction time: Demonstrating proactive response inhibition with event-related potentials

      2009, Clinical Neurophysiology
      Citation Excerpt :

      This feature strongly suggests that the visuomotor system monitors any changes in sensory energy that could potentially trigger a motor response, and by extension that inhibition is necessary at some point in order to prevent undesired automatic responses to this warning signal. Although the idea that automatic motor activations can be elicited by visual information is not new (e.g., Sperry, 1952; Endo et al., 1999; Tipper, 2001), the notion that higher order processes of inhibition underlie cognitive control is still debated (e.g., Aron, 2007). We recently hypothesized that tonic top-down inhibitory control, which might originate in prefrontal cortical structures, prevents automatic responses to cues (Jaffard et al., 2008).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text