The use of the rapid exchange grip test in detecting sincerity of effort, part II: Validity of the test
References (25)
- et al.
Sensitivity of the Jamar dynamometer in detecting submaximal grip effort
J Hand Surg
(1996) - et al.
Measurement of grip strength in the diagnosis of wrist pain
J Hand Surg
(1988) - et al.
Detection of submaximal effort by use of the rapid exchange grip
J Hand Surg
(1989) - et al.
An evaluation of rapid exchange and simultaneous grip tests
J Hand Surg
(1993) - et al.
Identification of low-effort patients through dynamometry
J Hand Surg
(1995) Using the coefficient of variation to detect sincerity of effort of grip strength: a literature review
J Hand Ther
(2000)- et al.
The use of the rapid exchange grip test in detecting sincerity of effort, part I: administration of the test
J Hand Ther
(2000) - et al.
Assessing maximum effort in upperextremity functional testing
Work
(1991) - et al.
Assessing sincerity of effort in maximal grip strength tests
Am J Phys Med Rehabil
(1990) - et al.
Detecting submaximal efforts in grip strength testing with the coefficient of variation
J Occup Rehab
(1993)
Simple method to determine sincerity of effort during a maximal isometric test of grip strength
Am J Phys Med
(1983)
Towards an objective assessment of the “maximal voluntary contraction” component in routine muscle strength measurements
Europ J Appl Physiol
(1980)
Cited by (33)
Evaluation of the Hand and Upper Extremity
2020, Cooper's Fundamentals of Hand Therapy: Clinical Reasoning and Treatment Guidelines for Common Diagnoses of the Upper ExtremityInfluence of Maximal or Submaximal Effort on the Load Distribution of the Hand Analyzed by Manugraphy
2018, Journal of Hand SurgeryExternal biomechanical constraints impair maximal voluntary grip force stability post-stroke
2018, Clinical BiomechanicsEvaluation of the Hand and Upper Extremity
2013, Fundamentals of Hand Therapy: Clinical Reasoning and Treatment Guidelines for Common Diagnoses of the Upper Extremity: Second EditionUsing the "visual target grip test" to identify sincerity of effort during grip strength testing
2012, Journal of Hand TherapyIdentifying sincerity of effort based on the combined predictive ability of multiple grip strength tests
2012, Journal of Hand TherapyCitation Excerpt :In contrast, King and Berryhill3 found that the probability of passing four of five tests was associated with a sensitivity of 0.93 and specificity of 0.86. The 42% error rate is only slightly better than the error rates reported when using the CV, 5R, or REG alone, which range from 47% to 69%.21,33,45 In addition, the area under the ROC curve of the full logit model was 86.5%, a value indicating only fair discriminability,57 which is the test's ability to discriminate between sincere and insincere efforts.
Copyright © 2000 Hanley & Belfus, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.