Protein release from gelatin matrices

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-409X(97)00125-7Get rights and content

Abstract

Gelatin is a denatured, biodegradable protein obtained by acid and alkaline processing of collagen. This processing affects the electrical nature of collagen, yielding gelatin with different isoelectric points (IEPs). When mixed with positively or negatively charged gelatin, an oppositely charged protein will ionically interact to form a polyion complex. This review article describes protein release from charged gelatin matrices on the basis of this polyion complexation. The biodegradable hydrogel matrices are prepared by chemical crosslinking of acidic or basic gelatin and are enzymatically degraded in the body with time. The degradation is controllable by changing the extent of crosslinking, which, in turn, produces hydrogels with different water contents. The time course of protein release is in good accordance with the rate of hydrogel degradation. It is very likely that the protein drug complexed with gelatin hydrogel is released as a result of its biodegradation. This gelatin hydrogel system releases the protein drug under maintenance of biological activity. This article will focus on experimental data that sustained release of growth factor from the gelatin hydrogels is very effective in exerting the biological functions of the growth factor.

Introduction

Recent advances in biotechnology has made it possible to produce various clinically useful peptides and proteins. While this technology has brought about the discovery and mass production of these bioactive macromolecules, several challenges need to be addressed with regard to their sustained delivery in a convenient, controlled manner, and targeting formulations. In contrast to conventional synthetic pharmaceuticals, proteins are susceptible to proteolysis, chemical change and denaturation during storage and administration in the body 1, 2. Significant efforts have been made to improve formulations for better stabilization of proteins over a sufficiently long storage time. Additional research has focused on the development of dosage forms that either prolong the biological activity of protein in the body or assist in targeting the protein to a specific tissue. One possible way to prolong activity is to incorporate a protein drug into an appropriate matrix for achieving sustained release of the drug at the site of action over a long period of time. It is highly possible that protein is protected against proteolysis and antibody neutralization, as far as it is, at least, incorporated in a release matrix for prolonged retention of the protein activity in vivo. There have been a number of research reports on protein release from polymer matrices: poly(l-lactic acid) (PLLA) and its copolymers with glycolic acid (PLGA) 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, PLGA polymer blends 18, 32, 33, PLLA–polyethylene glycol (PEG) copolymers 34, 35, poly(cyanoacrylates) 36, 37, poly(anhydrides) 38, 39, 40, poly(ortho esters) 41, 42, polyphosphazene [43], poly(vinyl alcohol) [44], poly(vinyl pyrrolidone) [45], poly(acrylic acid) [46], poly(ethylene–co-vinyl acetate) 47, 48, cellulose derivatives 49, 50, 51, hyaluronic acid derivatives 52, 53, alginate 54, 55, 56, 57, 58, collagen 59, 60, 61, gelatin 60, 61, 62, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, starch 68, 69, dextran [70]and fibrin [71]. As is stated in other chapters of this special issue, the largest problem of protein release technology is the loss of biological activity of the protein released from a protein–polymer formulation. Thus, unless this problem is solved by a breakthrough, it seems difficult to expect a further research development in the area of protein release. It has been demonstrated that this activity loss results from denaturation and deactivation of protein during the formulation process with a polymer matrix. When exposed to harsh environmental changes, such as heating and exposure to sonication and organic solutions, protein is generally denatured, losing its biological activity 9, 14, 20. Therefore, it is important to exploit a new formulation method of protein carrier with polymers under mild conditions to minimize protein denaturation. From this viewpoint, polymer hydrogel may be a preferable candidate as a protein release matrix because of its biosafety and its high inertness towards protein drugs [72]. However, sustained release of protein over a long time period will not be expected from hydrogels, since the release rate of protein from hydrogels is generally diffusion-controlled through aqueous channels in the hydrogels. Thus, for achieving effective protein release, it will be a key strategy to immobilize the protein drug to polymer carrier molecules constituting the hydrogel through some molecular interactions. For one trial, we have been attempting to take advantage of electrostatic interactions between protein and polymer molecules for the sustained release of protein from the polymer hydrogel.

It has been well recognized in polymer science that a positively or negatively charged polyelectrolyte electrostatically interacts with an oppositely charged partner to form a polyion complex 73, 74. It seems unlikely that all of the ionic interactions between the two polyelectrolytes with many charged groups are dissociated at the same time. As a result, in contrast to low-molecular-weight electrolytes, stable bonding will occur between the oppositely charged polyelectrolytes, which will not be dissociated easily. In the research field of pharmaceutical science, this polyion complexation is not a new technology but has been extensively explored for drug coating and encapsulation. The application of this polyion complexation, which we will describe here, is “Drug complexation with polymer carriers”. This is a new trial that will allow us to pharmaceutically modify a charged polymeric drug to increase its stability, targeting and sustained release, leading to enhanced therapeutic efficacy. Charged drugs available for this trial include proteins and oligo- and polynucleotides, while biodegradable polymers, such as proteins, polysaccharides and poly(amino acid)s, are applicable as the polymer carriers. Another representative research field of “Drug complexation with polymer carriers” that has been reported is gene therapy. It has been demonstrated that complexation with positively charged polymers enabled negatively charged DNA to have an enhanced stability and transfection efficiency to cells 75, 76, 77. However, it is unclear whether or not such a formulation also functions as a matrix for sustained release of polynucleotides. On the other hand, few applications have been reported on polyion complexation for sustained release of macromolecular drugs from polymer matrices. Although low-molecular-weight pharmaceuticals have been shown to release from polymer matrices on the basis of their ionic interaction 78, 79, 80, this is, however, different from polyion complexation.

Fig. 1 shows a conceptual scheme of protein drug release from a biodegradable polymer carrier on the basis of polyion complexation. A positively charged protein drug is electrostatically complexed with negatively charged polymer chains, constituting a carrier matrix. If an environmental change, such as increased ionic strength, occurs, the complexed drug will be released from the drug–carrier complex. Even if such an environmental change does not take place, degradation of the polymer carrier itself will also lead to drug release. Because the latter is more likely to happen in vivo than the former, it is preferable that the drug carrier is prepared from biodegradable polymers. The profile of drug release in this drug–carrier system is regulated by the change of carrier biodegradation.

When we make use of polyion complexation for sustained release of a protein drug, it is absolutely necessary to employ a highly bio-safe polyelectrolyte as the carrier matrix. In addition, if biodegradability is required for the carrier, the material to be used will be restricted to natural polymers with charged groups, such as proteins and polysaccharides. Therefore, as the carrier polymer, we have selected biodegradable gelatin, which is extensively used for industrial, pharmaceutical and medical purposes. The biosafety of gelatin has been proved through its long clinical usage as a plasma expander, in surgical biomaterials and as an ingredient in drugs [81]. Another unique advantage of gelatin as a drug carrier is the electrical nature of gelatin, which can be changed by the collagen processing method [82]. For example, the alkaline process, through hydrolysis of amide groups of collagen, yields gelatin with a high density of carboxyl groups, which makes the gelatin negatively charged. This reduces the isoelectric point (IEP) of gelatin. In contrast, the electrostatic nature of collagen is hardly modified through the acid process because of a less invasive reaction to amide groups of collagen. As a result, the IEP of the gelatin that is obtained will remain similar to that of collagen. In other words, a variety of gelatin samples with different IEP values are available (Fig. 2).

If a protein to be released is acidic, basic gelatin with an IEP of 9.0 is preferable as the carrier material, while acidic gelatin, with an IEP of 5.0, will be applicable to the sustained release of a basic protein. Both gelatins are insolubilized in water to prepare a hydrogel through chemical crosslinking, for instance, with water-soluble carbodiimides and glutaraldehyde. It was reported that a model protein could be immobilized into albumin–heparin microspheres [83]or into a carrier of non-biodegradable synthetic polymer [84], through polyion complexation, and that this protein was released from the carriers upon environmental change. However, these experiments were conducted under in vitro conditions and the biological activity of the protein released was not determined. Edelman et al. [54]reported one trial of sustained release of basic growth factor by using heparin incorporated into alginate beads. The sustained release of various bioactive proteins from a collagen matrix has also been investigated 61, 85, 86and it has been shown that protein release was regulated by collagen swelling, but the contribution of ionic interactions between the proteins and collagen was not studied. Protein release from charged polysaccharides is discussed in another chapter in this issue. Since research on protein release based on polyion complexation has just started, this article mainly describes the preparation of biodegradable hydrogels from gelatin with two different IEP values and their efficacy as a sustained release carrier of a bioactive protein, together with our current findings on hydrogel degradation and protein release.

Section snippets

Block matrices

The gelatin samples used were acidic gelatin with an IEP of 5.0 and basic gelatin with an IEP of 9.0, isolated from bovine bone by the alkaline process and from pig skin by the acid process, respectively. Both of them were chemically crosslinked to prepare gelatin hydrogels with different biodegradation rates. Briefly, various amounts of glutaraldehyde (GA) [66]or a water-soluble carbodiimide (WSC) [65]were added to aqueous gelatin solutions and the crosslinking reaction was allowed to proceed

Polyion complexation in aqueous solution

As a simple method to evaluate polyion complexation between gelatin and protein, turbidity of the mixed solution is measured at different temperatures [87]. Proteins with different IEP values can be used for polyion complexation with charged macromolecules: Bovine milk lactalbumin (MW=14,400; IEP=4.3), soybean trypsin inhibitor (MW=21,000; IEP=4.4), bovine pancreas trypsinogen (MW=24,000; IEP=9.3), chicken egg lysozyme (MW=11,400; IEP=11.0) and basic fibroblast growth factor (bFGF; MW=17,000;

Degradation of gelatin hydrogels

Since gelatin hydrogels undergo enzymatic hydrolysis in the body, it is too difficult to evaluate their degradation profile under in vitro conditions without any enzymes. Even if enzyme is present in the test solution, the in vitro result cannot simulate the in vivo profile of hydrogel degradation because the type and concentration of enzymes for collagen hydrolysis are not clear. Thus, gelatin hydrogels were subcutaneously implanted into the backs of mice and the weights of the hydrogels were

In vitro release

The preparation of hydrogels in the presence of proteins will lead to a loss in their activity through chemical crosslinking of gelatin. In contrast, the present method, in which an aqueous solution of bFGF is dropped onto freeze-dried gelatin hydrogels, followed by leaving them under various conditions to allow bFGF to sorb into the gelatin hydrogels, at least will prevent protein from being chemically deactivated. This method is also effective in quantitatively incorporating bFGF into gelatin

Biological activity

The bFGF used here was originally characterized in vitro as a growth factor for fibroblasts and capillary endothelial cells and in vivo as a potent mitogen and chemoattractant for a wide range of cells. In addition, bFGF is reported to have a variety of biological activities 90, 91, 94and to be effective in enhancing wound healing through induction of neovascularization 95, 96and regeneration of bone 97, 98, 99, cartilage 100, 101and nerve 102, 103, when administrated in the form of a solution.

Conclusions

The need for sustained release of proteins will increasingly become larger in concert with their production on an industrial scale. However, little has been reported on the technology that can achieve the sustained release of proteins with their biological activity maintained. The main reason for this may be that recombinant bioactive proteins are at present expensive and still difficult to obtain, even if they have been commercialized. Our technology for releasing proteins is based on polyion

References (105)

  • W. Lambert et al.

    Development of an in situ forming biodegradable poly-lactide–co-glycolide system for the controlled release of proteins

    J. Control. Release

    (1995)
  • R. Nakaoka et al.

    Adjuvant effect of biodegradable poly(dl-lactic acid) granules capable of antigen release following intraperitoneal injection

    Vaccine

    (1996)
  • C. Tasset et al.

    Polyisobutylcyanoacrylate nanoparticles as sustained release system for calcitonin

    J. Control. Release

    (1995)
  • N.A. Peppas et al.

    Controlled release from poly(vinyl alcohol) gels prepared by freezing–thawing processes

    J. Control. Release.

    (1992)
  • L. Illum et al.

    Hyaluronic acid microspheres as a nasal delivery system of insulin

    J. Control. Release

    (1994)
  • E. Ghezzo et al.

    Hyaluronic acid derivative microspheres as NGF delivery devices: preparation methods and in vitro release characterization

    Int. J. Pharm.

    (1992)
  • D. Maysinger et al.

    Microencapsulated nerve growth factor: effects on the forebrain neurons following devascularizing cortical lesions

    Neurosci. Lett.

    (1992)
  • S. Yamamoto et al.

    Protective effect of NGF atelocollagen mini-pellet on the hippocampal delayed neuronal death in gerbils

    Neurosci. Lett.

    (1992)
  • Y. Tabata et al.

    Enhanced vascularization and tissue granulation by basic fibroblast growth factor impregnated in gelatin hydrogels

    J. Control. Release

    (1994)
  • P. Artursson et al.

    Characterization of polyacryl starch microparticles as carriers for protein drugs

    J. Pharm. Sci.

    (1984)
  • P. Edman et al.

    Immobilization of proteins in microspheres of biodegradable polyacryldextran

    J. Pharm. Sci.

    (1980)
  • H.-S. Ho et al.

    Fibrin-based drug delivery system. III: The evaluation of the release of macromolecules from microbeads

    J. Control. Release

    (1995)
  • E. Tomlinson et al.

    Controllable gene therapy. Pharmaceutics of non-viral gene delivery systems

    J. Control. Release

    (1996)
  • Y. Kawashima et al.

    Novel method for the preparation of controlled-release theophylline granules coated with a polyelectrolyte complex of sodium polyphosphate–chitosan

    J. Pharm. Sci.

    (1985)
  • A. Sawaya et al.

    Binding mechanism of doxorubicin in ion-exchange albumin microcapsules

    J. Pharm. Sci.

    (1987)
  • H.F.M. Cremers et al.

    Albumin–heparin microspheres as carriers for cytostatic agents

    J. Control. Release

    (1990)
  • K. Fujioka et al.

    Long-acting delivery system of interferon: IFN minipellet

    J. Control. Release

    (1995)
  • P. Buntrock et al.

    Stimulation of wound healing, using brain extract with fibroblast growth factor (FGF) activity. II. Histological and morphometric examination of cells and capillaries

    Exp. Pathol.

    (1982)
  • G.S. McGee et al.

    Recombinant basic fibroblast growth factor accelerates wound healing

    J. Surg. Res.

    (1988)
  • P. Cuevas et al.

    Basic fibroblast growth factor (FGF) promotes cartilage repair in vivo

    Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun.

    (1988)
  • M.C. Manning et al.

    Stability of protein pharmaceuticals

    Pharm. Res.

    (1989)
  • Y.J. Wang et al.

    Parenteral formulations of proteins and peptides: stability and stabilizers

    J. Parenter. Sci. Technol. Suppl.

    (1988)
  • M. Asano et al.

    Biodegradability of hot-pressed poly(lactic acid) formulation with controlled release LHRH agonist and its pharmacological influence on rat prostate

    Makromol. Chem., Rapid Commun.

    (1985)
  • F.G. Hutchinson et al.

    Biodegradable polymers for the sustained release of peptides

    Biochem. Soc. Trans.

    (1985)
  • S.-Y. Lin et al.

    Insulin controlled release microcapsules to prolong the hypoglycemic effect in diabetic rats

    Artif. Cells Artif. Org.

    (1988)
  • M.S. Hora et al.

    Release of human serum albumin from poly(lactide–co-glycolide) microspheres

    Pharm. Res.

    (1990)
  • P.J. Watts et al.

    Microencapsulation using emulsion/solvent evaporation: An overview of techniques and applications

    CRC Crit. Rev. Ther. Drug Carrier Syst.

    (1990)
  • M.S. Hora et al.

    Controlled release of interleukin-2 from biodegradable microspheres

    Bio/Technology

    (1990)
  • R.E. Johnson et al.

    Stability of atriopeptin III in poly(d,l-lactide–co-glycolide) microspheres

    J. Control. Release

    (1991)
  • S. Cohen et al.

    Controlled delivery of systems for proteins based on poly(lactic/glycolic acid) microspheres

    Pharm. Res.

    (1991)
  • M. Singh et al.

    Controlled delivery of diphtheria toxoid using biodegradable poly(d,l-lactide) macrocapsules

    Pharm. Res.

    (1991)
  • D. Bodmer et al.

    Factors influencing the release of peptides and proteins from biodegradable parenteral depot systems

    J. Control. Release

    (1992)
  • P.J. Camarata et al.

    Sustained release of nerve growth factor from biodegradable polymer microspheres

    Neurosurgery

    (1992)
  • T.G. Park et al.

    Controlled protein release from polyethyleneimine-coated poly(l-lactic acid)/pluronic blend matrices

    Pharm. Res.

    (1992)
  • W.R. Gombotz et al.

    Controlled release of TGF-β1 from a biodegradable matrix for bone regeneration

    J. Biomater. Sci., Polym. Ed.

    (1993)
  • Y. Tabata et al.

    A formulation method using d,l-lactic acid oligomer for protein release with reduced initial burst

    J. Control. Release

    (1993)
  • M. Alonso et al.

    Determinants of release of tetanus vaccine from polyester microspheres

    Pharm. Res.

    (1993)
  • A. Sopersaxo et al.

    Preformed porous microspheres for controlled and pulsed release of macromolecules

    J. Control. Release

    (1993)
  • H. Okada et al.

    Preparation of three-month depot injectable microspheres of leuprolin acetate using biodegradable polymers

    Pharm. Res.

    (1994)
  • T.G. Park et al.

    Poly(l-lactic acid)/pluronic blends: Characterization of phase separation behavior, degradation, and morphology and use as protein-releasing matrices

    Macromolecules

    (1992)
  • Cited by (739)

    • Hydrogels: An overview of its classifications, properties, and applications

      2023, Journal of the Mechanical Behavior of Biomedical Materials
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text