Application of polyethyleneglycol (PEG)-modified liposomes for oral vaccine: effect of lipid dose on systemic and mucosal immunity

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0168-3659(03)00093-2Get rights and content

Abstract

To examine the systemic and mucosal immunity towards a liposomal antigen in an oral vaccine, we prepared ovalbumin (OVA)-encapsulating polyethyleneglycol (PEG)-modified liposomes and unmodified ones, and orally administered two different concentrations of them to mice. Unmodified liposomes tended to induce a stronger systemic immune response than the PEG-modified ones especially at the higher concentration of liposomes. Whereas at the lower liposome concentration the mucosal immune response was stronger for the PEG-modified liposomes than for the unmodified ones but nearly the same at the higher concentration. The relative amount of immunoglobulin G (IgG) against OVA in the plasma was 1.7-fold higher for a 12.5 μmol phospholipid dose of PEG-liposomes encapsulating OVA than for a 5.0 μmol one encapsulating the same amount of OVA. On the contrary, the relative amount of IgA in the intestinal wash was 2.6-fold higher for the 5.0 μmol phospholipid dose than for the 12.5 μmol one. These results indicate that OVA encapsulated in a small number of liposomes, especially the PEG-modified ones, is favorable for inducing a mucosal immune response and that the same amount of OVA in a large number of liposomes tends to improve the systemic immune response. A possible explanation for this tendency is the differential release rate of OVA from the liposomes at the intestinal mucosa. Our present study suggests that the dose of liposomes containing antigen is an important factor for controlling the response of systemic and mucosal immune systems.

Introduction

Vaccine is one of the best preventive strategies against infectious diseases. Infusion vaccines chiefly used are not fully beneficial, since they require trained persons to administer them. In comparison, oral vaccines have the advantages of self-administration at ease, low risk of contamination, and a reduced cost. Therefore, the development of oral vaccines has become noticed. Oral immunization acts mainly in the gut-associated lymphoid tissue (GALT), forms a network with other mucosal sites such as respiratory and urogenital mucosa, and represents the first line of defense against colonization by viral and bacterial pathogens. A certain foreign substance is taken up into Peyer’s patches, which are epithelia enriched with phagocytic microfold (M) cells. Then the substance is transmited to macrophages and lymphocytes following secretion of immunoglobulin A (IgA) from antigen-specific B cells at general mucosal sites. IgA can neutralize biologically active antigens to prevent pathogens from invading the body [1], [2].

Oral immunization, however, has a problem of low bioavailability: antigens are degraded by gastric acidity and proteolytic enzymes in the intestinal lumen and therefore extremely large doses are required to achieve an adequate immune response. In recent years, the use of microparticles such as liposomes as a carrier of antigens for inducing immunity has been explored; and microparticles were found to prevent the degradation of antigens in the gut [3]. Oral immunization with antigen incorporated in microparticles was also reported to induce not only mucosal but also systemic immunity [4], [5]. Therefore, the development of optimum microparticle formulations enabling the prevention of infections by activating the systemic and mucosal immune systems has been attempted. Among the microparticles evaluated, liposomes are notable, since they can be easily controlled in terms of size, charge, membrane fluidity, etc. The change in liposomal properties such as particle size, surface charge, saturation degree of structural lipids, and lipid doses is known to affect the pharmacokinetics of the encapsulated drugs after systemic administration [6], [7]. Furthermore, particle size, surface charge and lipid composition were reported to affect liposomal uptake by Peyer’s patches [8], [9]. However, the effect of liposomal lipid doses on the induction of immunity has not yet been fully examined.

In the present study, the effect of two liposomal lipid doses on systemic and mucosal immunity following oral administration was examined by use of ovalbumin-containing unmodified or polyethyleneglycol-modified liposomes.

Section snippets

Materials

Distearoylphosphatidylcholine (DSPC) and distearoylphosphatidylethanolamine–polyethyleneglycol 2000 (DSPE–PEG) were the gifts from Nippon Fine Chemical Co., Ltd. (Hyogo, Japan). Grade V ovalbumin (OVA), bovine serum albumin (BSA), and cholesterol (Chol) were purchased from Sigma Chemical Co. (St. Louis, MO, USA). Horseradish peroxidase (HRP)-immobilized goat antibodies against mouse IgG (γ-chain specific) and mouse IgA (α-chain specific) antibody were obtained from Sigma Chemical Co. and

Release of OVA from liposomes in vitro

To examine the integrity of liposomal OVA during passage through the oral–gastrointestinal route, we studied the release of OVA from liposomes in artificial gastric fluid. The release of OVA from liposomes in HCl solution containing 0.9% NaCl at pH 2.0, which solution mimics gastric fluid, was not observed with any liposomal compositions or concentrations tested (data not shown). On the contrary, OVA was released from liposomes in 10 mM sodium taurocholate, which concentration is usually used

Discussion

Since oral vaccines have the attractive attributes of easy administration, safety, and low cost, many trials to develop such vaccines have been performed. However, for the development of oral vaccines, one of the utmost hurdles is their instability in the gastrointestinal lumen. Therefore, to overcome this hurdle, microparticles such as liposomes [3] and biodegradable microspheres [13] have been tried as a carrier for antigens in order to protect them from degradation in the gastrointestinal

Conclusions

In the application of liposomes for use as oral vaccines, the relations between liposomal formulations and immune responses should be clarified. In the present study, we examined the effect of liposomal doses on the immune response. As a result, a small number of liposomes with concentrated OVA tend to improve mucosal immunity, perhaps due to the moderate release of antigen from the liposomes at the immune site. For this purpose, PEG-modification is useful because it endows liposomes with a

Acknowledgements

This work was supported in part by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research from Japan Society for the Promotion of Science.

References (28)

  • S.M. Michalek et al.

    Liposomes as oral adjuvants

    Curr. Top. Microbiol. Immunol.

    (1989)
  • N.K. Childers et al.

    Mucosal and systemic responses to an oral liposome–Streptococcus mutants carbohydrate vaccine in humans

    Reg. Immunol.

    (1990)
  • D. Wachsmann et al.

    Local and systemic immune response to orally administered liposome-associated soluble S. mutants cell wall antigens

    Immunology

    (1985)
  • P. Laverman et al.

    Preclinical and clinical evidence for disappearance of long-circulating characteristics of polyethylene glycol liposomes at low lipid dose

    J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther.

    (2000)
  • Cited by (70)

    • PEGylated liposomes as an emerging therapeutic platform for oral nanomedicine in cancer therapy: in vitro and in vivo assessment

      2020, Journal of Molecular Liquids
      Citation Excerpt :

      PEGylation is an advanced drug delivery technique using polyethylene glycols (PEGs) with different molecular weights which provides a feasible strategy to shield the accessibility of enzymes to lipid vesicles [21]. Furthermore, PEG molecules are well hydrated [22]; a thick water layer is formed on the surface of PEGylated liposomes which prevent the direct interaction of the gastric enzymes to the liposomal lipid membranes [23,24]. A study performed by Iwanaga et al. [25] showed that PEG-coated insulin loaded liposomes had a longer duration of action than that of uncoated liposomes.

    • Nanoparticles for mucosal vaccine delivery

      2020, Nanoengineered Biomaterials for Advanced Drug Delivery
    • Adapting liposomes for oral drug delivery

      2019, Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica B
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text