The use of magnetite-doped polymeric microspheres in calibrating cell tracking velocimetry
Introduction
The separation of subsets of cells depending on their surface expression of specific molecules has broad application in biological and medical practice [1], [2]. To achieve these separations, a host of immunological methods have been developed, including immunofluorescent, immunomagnetic and immunomatrix methods. Due to recent advances in magnetic bead synthesis, immunomagnetic cell separation is gaining rapidly in popularity. Monodisperse colloidal immunomagnetic beads (or ferrofluids), much smaller in size than cells, enable magnetic labeling proportionate to the number of expressed antigens. Thus, distribution in molecule expression gives rise to a proportional distribution in cell mobility when the suspension of cells is exposed to a magnetic field gradient [3]. This variation in mobility is the principal means of sorting cells into two or more fractions in a continuous process [4]. We have devised continuous cell sorters and fractionators at The Cleveland Clinic Foundation, in collaboration with The Ohio State University, which take advantage of mobility distributions [5], [6], [7], [8].
To characterize the efficacy of immunomagnetic labeling as well as to assist the operators of continuous, magnetic cell-sorting devices, there is a need for measuring cell mobilities. The cell tracking velocimetry (CTV) technique, developed at The Ohio State University, measures cell (or particle) mobilities by computing their velocities as they migrate in a magnetic field of constant energy gradient [9]. Currently, this technique is semi-automated and capable of tracking hundreds to thousands of cells (or particles) on an individual basis. The data are then used to generate frequency versus mobility (increment) histograms of immunomagnetically labeled cell populations.
Our initial studies using the CTV technique are promising, with results that are consistent with expectations. However, as with any analytical instrument, calibration of the instrument’s performance against independently known standards is essential. Labeled cells are unsuitable as standards because of their instabilities, the difficulties of the labeling process, the variations from one population to another, and the lack of any means of predicting their magnetizations beforehand.
Ideal calibration particles should have the following properties. (1) They should consist of spheres with a high degree of sphericity, monodisperse in size with diameters similar to our cell models. (2) They should consist of a pure homogeneous material that is stable in aqueous media. (3) The constituent material should be paramagnetic with no saturation magnetization up to about 2 Tesla. (4) The magnetic susceptibilities should be widely tabulated and accurately known, alleviating the need for user testing and the associated uncertainties, and the range of susceptibilities should roughly coincide with that of our labeled cell populations. (5) They should have densities not too dissimilar from that of water, preventing the problems of rapid sedimentation in the CTV system.
Such ideal particles have not been identified; however, some monodisperse magnetic microspheres have been synthesized that meet many of these criteria [11], [12]. These monodisperse microspheres are good candidates for calibration purposes for several reasons. (1) The microspheres have narrow distributions in diameter, in density, and in magnetization, reducing the dispersions in migration and sedimentation velocities; see , , below. (2) The velocities of the four magnetite-containing samples have a range from approximately 0.001 to 1 mm/s, comparable to the range observed for labeled cells. (3) The size and refractive index of the microspheres make visualization easy, without any modification of the CTV apparatus. (4) Compared to cells, they are stable, reproducible, and require no pre-processing.
Section snippets
Theory
In this document, ‘volumetric magnetization’ and ‘magnetization’ are used interchangeably to mean volumetric magnetization. For a particle with inducible magnetization (paramagnetic), M, in an external field, B, the force, Fm, on the particle is given by the gradient of the magnetostatic potential energy, ∇Um, as [13]where the particle volume is V. If we assume that the particle is free to rotate to the position of lowest potential energy, so that M and B are parallel, and
Results
Fig. 4 presents magnetization curves for the four silica- and magnetite-coated polystyrene microspheres. Intrinsic magnetization per unit mass of dry sample is determined by the vibrating sample magnetometer in 200 Gauss (15,915 A/m) intervals, from 15,000 to −15,000 Gauss (1.19×106 to −1.19×106 A/m). Two measurements are performed for each microsphere, with average values plotted. The curves are symmetrical about both axes, indicating a lack of hysteresis, which characterizes non-ferromagnetic
A simplified description of the method and its (future) applications
For measuring mobilities of labeled cells for sorting in our continuous cell separation devices, we employ an apparatus and method called cell tracking velocimetry. A new kind of monodisperse magnetic microsphere has been synthesized for the purpose of providing a calibration tool for CTV. The microspheres have a range of magnetizations comparable to those of immunomagnetically labeled cells. The CTV method predicts particle magnetizations that are in good agreement with independent results
Acknowledgements
This work is supported by grants from the NIH (number CA62349 to M.Z.), from the U.S.–Israel Binational Science Foundation (number 96-00486 to S.M. and M.Z.), and the NSF (number BES-9731059 to J.J.C.).
References (23)
- et al.
Lymphocyte fractionation using immunomagnetic colloid and a dipole magnet flow cell sorter
J Biochem Biophys Methods
(1998) - et al.
Continuous cell separation using novel magnetic quadrupole flow sorter
J Magnetism Magnetic Materials
(1999) - et al.
An instrument to determine the magnetophoretic mobility of labeled biological cells and paramagnetic particles
J Magnetism Magnetic Materials
(1999) - et al.
Determination of the magnetic susceptibility of labeled particles by video imaging
Chem Eng Sci
(1996) - et al.
Controlled growth of monodispersed silica spheres in micron-size range
J. Colloid Interface Sci
(1968) - et al.
High gradient magnetic cell separation with MACS
Cytometry
(1990) - et al.
Monodisperse polymer particles: preparation and new biochemical and biomedical applications
- et al.
Theoretical analysis of cell separation based on cell surface marker density
Biotechnol Bioeng
(1998) - et al.
Flow through, immunomagnetic cell separation
Biotechnol Prog
(1998) - et al.
Rapid cell isolation by magnetic flow sorting for application in tissue engineering
Americal Society of Artifical Interal Organs J
(1999)
Continuous, flow-through immunomagnetic cell sorting in a quadrupole field
Cytometry
Cited by (52)
Optical characteristics and biosensing application of core@shell nanomaterials
2023, Materials Letters: XSimultaneous, single particle, magnetization and size measurements of micron sized, magnetic particles
2012, Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic MaterialsThe use of a linear Halbach array combined with a step-SPLITT channel for continuous sorting of magnetic species
2011, Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic MaterialsMotions of magnetic nanosphere under the magnetic field in the rectangular microchannel
2007, Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic MaterialsBasic magnetic field configurations
2007, Laboratory Techniques in Biochemistry and Molecular BiologyCitation Excerpt :The isodynamic field is generated by two pole pieces of hyperbolic cross section (Fig. 4.16) and is limited to a relatively small fraction of the gap volume (Fig. 4.17). The condition F =const is typically maintained to within 1% of its average value over the isodynamic field domain [24, 25]. An ideal quadrupole field is strictly a linear function of spatial coordinates, B =B(r) = αix + βjy + γkz, where α, β, and γ are constants; r = [x,y,z] is the position vector; and i, j, and k are the unit vectors along the Cartesian coordinates axes 0x, 0y and 0z, respectively.
New challenges and opportunities
2007, Laboratory Techniques in Biochemistry and Molecular BiologyCitation Excerpt :A typical leukapheresis sample CD34 analysis result by FCM is shown in Fig. 12.10. Magnetophoretic mobility measurements were made on an instrument referred to as a CTV (reviewed in Chapter 8) [72, 73]. The schematics of CTV are shown in Fig. 8.1.