Impaired Trail-Making Test-B performance in patients with acute schizophrenia is related to inefficient sequencing of planning and acting
Introduction
Neuropsychological research on schizophrenia patients has revealed a wide range of cognitive impairments (e.g. Heinrichs and Zakzanis, 1998), sometimes considered to be the core of schizophrenia (Elvevag and Goldberg, 2000). Beyond generalized deficits, considerable evidence points to an additional differential impairment of executive functions at least in more severely impaired patients (Robbins, 1990, Liddle & Morris, 1991, Morrison-Stewart et al., 1992, Hutton, 1998, Velligan & Bow-Thomas, 1999, Riley et al., 2000, but also see Saykin et al., 1991, Mohamed et al., 1999). Executive functions are controlled by brain systems involving the prefrontal cortex and comprise in particular the planning, sequencing or temporal structuring of behavior (e.g. Perecman, 1987, Daigneault et al., 1992, Fuster, 1999). However, executive functions draw from and rely upon many other cognitive components such as attention, perception and memory (Tranel et al., 1994) partly related to other brain areas. Accordingly, neuropsychological tests of so-called frontal lobe functions, such as the frequently used Wisconsin Card Sorting Test (WCST; Heaton, 1981), the Tower of London (Shallice, 1982), and the Trail-Making-Test (TMT; Reitan, 1958), involve several different basic functions (David, 1992, O’Donnell, 1994). Therefore, global performance measures such as performance time or error scores do not directly reveal the kind of cognitive deficit causing the observed impairment and are insufficient starting points for the investigation of brain–behavior relationships in the growing field of cognitive neuroscience.
It is therefore necessary, in order to pinpoint the underlying dysfunction and to delineate consistent functional syndromes, to develop neuropsychological paradigms more specific to psychological (dys-)functions and to perform a detailed analysis of the process of task performance, i.e. the contribution of and the synergy between functions (Levin et al., 1989),
The recording and analysis of eye (and hand) movement behavior may provide a clue to a better understanding of the performance process and its deviations in so-called frontal lobe tests: frontal structures (dorsolateral prefrontal cortex, frontal eye fields) within the “oculomotor loop” (Alexander et al., 1986) play a crucial role in the control of voluntary eye movements, being modulated via dopaminergic fibres (Gaebel and Wölwer, 1996). There is a great body of evidence pointing to dysfunctional eye movements in schizophrenia patients. Besides disturbances in basic eye movements such as an instability of fixation, dysmetric saccades (Gaebel, 1989, Holzman, 1991) and disturbances of smooth pursuit eye movements (SPEM; Clementz & Sweeney, 1990, Levy et al., 1994) there are also numerous reports regarding dysfunctional scanning behavior (e.g. Gaebel & Ulrich, 1987, Kojima et al., 1981, Kurachi et al., 1994, Phillips & David, 1997).
Given that test performance depends on the processing of continuously and externally available information, and brings about overt results, scan path analysis give clues about the mode of cognitive processing. The TMT as a visual search paradigm with a manumotor component, is a prototypical test fulfilling these criteria. However, to our knowledge, scan paths during TMT performance have never been investigated. Form A of the test requires searching and connecting irregularly arranged targets containing digits in ascending order; in form B, digits and letters have to be connected alternately. Efficient visual search, visuospatial sequencing, visuomotor integration and—in form B—executive components such as the ability to alternate between and maintain two sets of stimuli are needed to perform the task successfully (desRosiers & Kavanagh, 1987, Asarnow & MacCrimmon, 1982). More generally, sequencing and temporal structuring of behavior seem to be crucial particularly for TMT-B performance. Despite the variety of psychological functions and brain areas involved (Lorig et al., 1986), TMT-B performance seems to be most sensitive to lesions of the frontal lobe (Reitan & Tarshes, 1959, Stuss & Benson, 1986). Nevertheless, the functional specificity of the test, i.e. the kind of functional impairment underlying the performance deficit, remains unclear.
Impaired TMT-performance in schizophrenia—especially in the B-version of the test—has been reported for different phases of the illness (e.g. Gatynker & Harvey, 1992, Saykin et al., 1994, Hoff et al., 1992, Levander et al., 1985, Grawe & Levander, 1995, Goldberg et al., 1988, Levin et al., 1989, Breier et al., 1991, Liddle & Morris, 1991) as well as for healthy relatives of schizophrenia patients (Franke et al., 1993, Pogue-Gelie, 1991), and schizotypal personality disorders (Thaker et al., 1991, Trestman et al., 1995), suggesting a trait characteristic or even a status as vulnerability marker. Findings of a correlation to potential vulnerability markers such as SPEM (Grawe and Levander, 1995) may support this hypothesis, but results remain contradictory (Bartfai et al., 1985, Litman w et al., 1991, Radant et al., 1997).
Related to the obscure functional specificity, the nosologicat specificity of schizophrenia patients’ TMT-B deficit with regard to other psychiatric patients is not clear either: whereas Franke et al. (1993) found impairments in schizophrenia patients in a variety of “frontal tasks” with significant differences between schizophrenia patients and depressives only in TMT-B, others reported no significant differences between schizophrenia patients and depressives (Goldberg et al., 1993) or schizophrenia patients and alcohol dependent patients (Nixon et al., 1996). However, comparable impairments in performance time may rely on completely different functional disturbances in schizophrenia patients and other psychiatric patients.
Therefore, the aim of the present study was to provide a means for the analysis of the performance process, in order to generate hypotheses on the critical functional components in the performance process underlying schizophrenia patients’ difficulties in the TMT. For this purpose, scan paths during TMT performance were assessed using infrared-oculography. The continuous recording of both the movement of the eyes and the hand allows their interaction to be examined and for indicators critical for task performance to be extracted. Such process variables could be used in future for more differentiated analyses of the TMT-performance by combining them with additional experimental variations of the task conditions. Thus, in this first step it was of special interest, whether the poorer TMT-performance described in schizophrenia patients is due to difficulties in connecting targets themselves (e.g. more resting, accessing wrong targets, slower connection) or in the superordinate scheduling of the performance process (e.g. point of time to search targets during performance, duration to find next target, integration of searching and connecting targets during performance), or both. With respect to the hypothesis of executive dysfunctioning in schizophrenia patients, particularly the scheduling of the performance process—in the sense of planning, sequencing or temporal structuring of behavior—should be affected. To control for nosological and state/trait specificity of the process variables extracted, TMT performance in schizophrenia patients was compared with that in a depressive and a healthy control group with all subjects assessed twice within 4 weeks.
Section snippets
Subjects
Twenty-three acute inpatients with schizophrenia (S), 17 acute inpatients with major depression (D), and 21 healthy controls (N) participated in the longitudinal study after giving informed consent. Four of the schizophrenia patients and five of the depressive patients experienced their first episode. Further subject characteristics are given in Table 1. All subjects were assessed twice four weeks apart, with the patients being tested during the acute state of illness (T0, within 3 days of
Performance time
The analyses of performance times revealed significant main effects “group” both for TMT-A and for TMT-B, with schizophrenia patients performing significantly slower than normal controls, both at T0 and T1 (see Table 2, Table 3). Depressive patients showed poorer performance only in TMT-B. Performance times in TMT-A were significantly improved across all groups at the second time of assessment at T1.
No group differences could be obtained regarding the number of wrongly accessed targets (“number
Discussion
The general purpose of the present study was to develop a means to analyze the process of TMT performance, aiming at the generation of hypotheses on the critical functional components in the performance process underlying schizophrenia patients’ difficulties in neurocognitive tasks such as the TMT. According to what is known from the literature, acute schizophrenia inpatients performed persistently poorer in both TMT-versions than healthy controls. However beyond that, in the present study, the
Acknowledgments
The study was supported by the German Research Association DFG (Ga 371/2).
References (63)
- et al.
Attention/information processing, neuropsychological functioning, and thought disorder during the acute and partial recovery phases of schizophreniaa longitudinal study
Psychiatry Research
(1982) - et al.
Smooth pursuit eye tracking, neuropsychological test performance and computed tomography in schizophrenia
Psychiatry Research
(1985) - et al.
An empirical test of two opposing theoretical models of prefrontal function
Brain Cognition
(1992) - et al.
Cognitive functioning and anhedonia in subjects at risk for schizophrenia
Schizophrenia Research
(1993) - et al.
Neuropsychological screening in the psychiatric emergency room
Comprehensive Psychiatry
(1992) - et al.
Limited visual search on the WAIS picture completion test in patients with schizophrenia
Schizophrenia Research
(1994) - et al.
Neurocognitive function in alcoholic, schizophrenic, and dually diagnosed patients
Psychiatry Research
(1996) - et al.
Visual scan paths are abnormal in deluded schizophrenics
Neuropsychologia
(1997) - et al.
Neuropsychological impairments are increased in siblings of schizophrenic patients
Schizophrenia Research
(1991) - et al.
Relationships between neuropsychological and oculomotor measures in schizophrenia patients and normal controls
Biological Psychiatry
(1997)
Neuropsychological functioning in first-episode psychosis-evidence of specific deficits
Schizophrenia Research
Cognitive function and biological correlates of cognitive performance in schizotypal personality disorder
Psychiatry Research
Parallel organization of functionally segregated circuits linking basal ganglia and cortex
Annual Review of Neuroscience
Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (DSM-III-R)
Negative symptoms in schizophrenia. Definition and reliability
Archives of General Psychiatry
“Cognitive Dysmetria” as an integrative theory of schizophrenia: a dysfunction in cortical-subcortical-cerebellar circuitry?
Schizophrenia Bulletin
The Bech–Rafaelsen Mania Scale and the Hamilton Depression Scale
Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica
National Institute of Mental Health longitudinal study of chronic schizophrenia. Prognosis and predictors of outcome
Archives of General Psychiatry
Neurolepticseffects on neuropsychological function in chronic schizophrenic patients
Schizophrenia Bulletin
Is eye movement dysfunction a biological marker for schizophrenia?
Psychological Bulletin
Frontal Lobology—psychiatry’s new pseudoscience
British Journal of Psychiatry
Cognitive assessment in closed head injurystability, validity and parallel forms for two neuropsychological measures of recovery
International Journal of Clinical Neuropsychology
Cognitive impairment in schizophrenia is the core of the disorder
Critical Reviews in Neurobiology
Synopsis of function and dysfunction of the frontal lobe
Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica
Visumotor behavior in schizophrenia
Pharmacopsychiatry
Visumotor tracking performance in schizophreniarelationship with psychopathological subtyping
Neuropsychobiology
Okulomotorik und dopaminerges system—ein funktionsmodell zur analyse schizophrener verhaltensstörungen
Contrasts between patients with affective disorders and patients with schizophrenia on a neuropsychological test
American Journal of Psychiatry
Performance of schizophrenic patients on putative neuropsychological tests of frontal lobe function
International Journal of Neuroscience
Dual-task performance operating characteristics, resource limitations, and automatic processing in schizophrenia
Neuropsychology
Smooth pursuit eye movements and neuropsychological impairments in schizophrenia
Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica
Cited by (36)
Selective impairment of timing in a NMDA hypofunction animal model of psychosis
2022, Behavioural Brain ResearchCitation Excerpt :Cognitive flexibility is the ability to adapt one's behavior to a dynamically changing environment [19,20]. Both cognitive coordination and flexibility were reported to be impaired in schizophrenia [3,34,44,58]. Deficits in working memory, attention and cognitive flexibility are closely connected to structural and functional abnormalities in brains of schizophrenia patients [14,17,52].
Psychomotor slowing in Schizophrenia: Implications for endophenotype and biomarker development
2020, Biomarkers in NeuropsychiatryThe role of set-shifting in auditory verbal hallucinations
2017, Comprehensive PsychiatryNeurocognitive predictors of source monitoring in schizophrenia
2012, Psychiatry ResearchEvaluating the human ongoing visual search performance by eye tracking application and sequencing tests
2012, Computer Methods and Programs in BiomedicineElectrophysiological correlates of planning and monitoring in first episode schizophrenia
2012, Psychiatry Research - NeuroimagingCitation Excerpt :Schizophrenia is associated with a wide range of cognitive impairments, affecting attention and memory as well as the planning and guidance of eye movement representative of executive functions (Heinrichs and Zakzanis, 1998; Aleman et al., 1999; Wölwer and Gaebel, 2002).