Sample preparation for residue determination of gentamicin and neomycin by liquid chromatography

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0021-9673(00)00980-8Get rights and content

Abstract

The effect of sample preparation on the determination of gentamicin and neomycin residues in animal tissues was investigated. The extract was mixed with an ion-pair reagent and applied to an octadecyl cartridge. The cartridges were washed with buffer followed by water, and analytes were eluted with ion-pair buffer–acetonitrile mixture. The aminoglycosides were derivatized with 9-fluorenylmethyl chloroformate prior to liquid chromatography using a reversed-phase column and fluorescence detection. Under the conditions applied neomycin was fully separated from all the gentamicin compounds. The highest recoveries of gentamicin and neomycin from spiked tissues were obtained using trichloroacetic acid after initial extraction with phosphate-buffered saline. No interfering peaks from endogenous compounds of matrix were noted at the elution position of the analytes. An intra-laboratory validation of the whole procedure was performed. The calibration graphs were linear from 0.1 to 1.0 mg/kg for gentamicin, and from 0.2 to 1.0 mg/kg for neomycin. Limits of detection were 0.05 mg/kg and 0.10 mg/kg for gentamicin and neomycin, respectively. Limits of quantitation for gentamicin and neomycin were 0.1 and 0.20 mg/kg muscle, liver or kidney tissue, respectively. Recoveries of gentamicin spiked at levels of 0.1 mg/kg porcine tissues ranged from 76 to 86%. Recoveries of neomycin spiked at levels of 0.2 mg/kg porcine tissues ranged from 77 to 83%. The validated procedure was used to determine gentamicin concentrations in porcine tissue after dosing with gentamicin at a level of 5 mg/kg body mass.

Introduction

Gentamicin and neomycin are aminoglycoside antibiotics used to treat bacterial infections in animals because of their good spectrum of activity against gram-negative bacteria. Aminoglycosides are rapidly absorbed from an injection site but poorly absorbed after oral administration. They are not inactivated in the intestine and are eliminated quantitatively in feces. Gentamicin and neomycin, systemic compounds, are excreted almost entirely as parent compound. Aminoglycosides bind to tissue proteins and macromolecules via ionic bonds, but binding to plasma proteins is low (<25%). Gentamicin and neomycin in tissues are usually found in low concentrations, except in the renal cortex where they tend to concentrate. There is a human health risk associated with the use of gentamicin and neomycin, since they have both been found to cause damage to the cranial nerves, resulting in hearing loss [1], [2]. To keep harmful aminoglycoside residues out of the human food chain, international authorities require long withdrawal periods before dosed animals may be slaughtered. The maximum residue levels (MRLs) recommended by the Joint FAO/WHO Expert Committee on Food Additives (JECFA) are 0.50–10.0 mg neomycin/kg, and 0.10–5.0 mg gentamicin/kg, depending on the different tissues [2]. The European Union [3] has fixed the MRLs in edible animal products for gentamicin from 0.1 to 1.0 mg/kg. In the case of neomycin the MRLs were set from 0.5 to 5.0 mg/kg. Regulatory methods for gentamicin and neomycin that could perform at these concentrations were needed, but development of such a method required overcoming challenges in sample preparation and analysis of drug content.

Chromatographic methods are capable of simultaneous determination of gentamicin and neomycin in animal tissues. However, separations are difficult to achieve because of the structural similarity of aminoglycoside moieties and some endogenous compounds. Additionally, gentamicin and neomycin have no UV or visible absorption and most procedures have to use pre- or post-column derivatization. The derivative reaction with o-phthaldialdehyde (OPA) [1], [4], [5], dansyl chloride [6], fluorescamine [7] or 9-fluorenylmethyl chloroformate (FMOC-Cl) [8], [9], [10] is the most desirable because fluorescence detection generally provides better sensitivity and selectivity than UV absorption.

The purpose of this study was to develop a simple and rapid method for the extraction of gentamicin and neomycin from tissue samples and a solid-phase extraction (SPE) as a clean-up procedure, which would yield a very high rate of analyte recovery and clean sample extracts for analysis by high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC).

Section snippets

Materials and reagents

All reagents were analytical or HPLC grade. Acetonitrile and Bakerbond octadecyl SPE cartridges were obtained from J.T. Baker (Deventer, The Netherlands). The cartridges were filled with 100, 500 or 1000 mg of packing material. FMOC-Cl, sodium hexane-1-sulfonic acid (HSA), gentamicin sulfate and neomycin sulfate were obtained from Sigma (Poole, UK).

Solutions

Phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) solution was made by dissolving 8.5 g sodium chloride, 1.1 g dibasic sodium phosphate and 0.27 g monobasic sodium

Chromatographic conditions

Both gentamicin and neomycin showed strong fluorescence after derivatization with FMOC-Cl. The pre-column procedure was very simple, fast and occurred at room temperature. Reactions ensued quantitatively at pH 8 and derivatives were stable for 12 h. Optimal reactions of neomycin and gentamicin with FMOC-Cl occurred similarly to those reported previously [8], [9]. The structural differences between these aminoglycosides and the ion-pair reagent did not show important dependence on the reaction

Conclusions

The described sample preparation procedure for determination of gentamicin and neomycin is rapid, sensitive, reproducible and simple. Following an extraction and deproteination the extracts were cleaned up by SPE. Analytes were separated and detected by HPLC with fluorescence detection followed by pre-column derivatization with FMOC. No internal standards were used. The method described allowed determination of gentamicin and neomycin at concentrations of 0.1 and 0.2 μg/g, respectively.

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by grant No. 5 PO6K 017 17 from the State Committee for Scientific Research, Warsaw, Poland.

References (20)

  • S.E Walker et al.

    J. Chromatogr.

    (1981)
  • D.A Stead et al.

    J. Chromatogr. B

    (1996)
  • D.A Stead et al.

    J. Chromatogr. B

    (1997)
  • F Sar et al.

    Anal. Chim. Acta

    (1993)
  • N Isoherranen et al.

    J. AOAC Int.

    (1999)
  • European Union, Regulation 2377/90,...
  • J.P Anhalt

    Antimicrob. Agents Chemother.

    (1977)
  • B Shaikh et al.

    J. Chromatogr.

    (1997)
  • G.W Peng et al.

    Clin. Chem.

    (1977)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (0)

View full text