Learning in Networks
Introduction
During the last decades, companies have become aware of the importance of competence and knowledge. This has resulted, among other things, in some companies appointing special “knowledge managers”. One of the reasons behind this focus on knowledge is probably that companies, in general, have access to the same kind of equipment, products, and technology. The question is more how to use these resources more efficiently than is done in other companies [1]. The increased interest in knowledge and competence has meant that learning has become a key question for managers.
Basically companies learn in two ways: through their own experiences or through the experiences of other organizations [2]. Learning from own experiences includes experimenting and interpreting earlier outcomes. Learning from others means the transfer of knowledge embedded in products or processes or the transfer of knowledge in a more pure form. Here we will concentrate on this second alternative: learning directly from others. Studies showing the importance of this type of learning are increasing in number 3, 4, 5. Learning from others implies a number of managerial considerations. One is choosing from whom to learn; another is the form in which learning should take place. Some companies have tried to solve these issues by developing a very deliberate strategy. They have tried to develop special relationships with universities, with other knowledge producers, or with special customers (lead users) or suppliers [6]. Less interest until now has been given to everyday learning. Every company has a number of business relationships with customers and suppliers where certainly some learning takes place. Our ambition with this article is to investigate the degree to which everyday learning is visible in such relationships and also to identify which factors influence learning within these relationships. The empirical base in this article is a study of a construction project. The results ought to be relevant both for selling and buying companies and for their way of building, organizing, and maintaining business relationships.
Section snippets
Company learning within business relationships
Earlier studies of business relationships have indicated that there is a large variation among companies' business relationships with their customers and suppliers. Variation has been found in terms of both depth and width. Some business relationships develop into very extensive and close ones, focusing on both technological development and efficiency improvement, whereas others are characterized by being more limited or focused on some few aspects 7, 8, 9, 10, 11.
In a dyadic setting, two
Relationship context and company learning
Earlier studies have shown that a dyadic business relationship is influenced by other relationships that are connected to it 19, 20. In every business relationship, there are two parties who in turn have relationships to other parties. Each of these relationships can be more or less connected to the focal one. This network of connected business relationships can be seen to constitute the “context of the focal business relationship.” Furthermore, the context of the business relationship gives
The Empirical Base
The empirical base for the discussion in this article is a study of a Swedish construction project, a commercial building that was built during 1996. The main contractor, one of the large Swedish construction firms, engaged 16 suppliers and 26 subcontractors for the project, that is, in all 42 different companies. Data has been collected in two different ways: (1) through open-ended personal interviews with involved persons from the main contractor side; and (2) through structured personal
Company Learning and the Relationship Context
It is clear from both the qualitative and the quantitative analyses (see Appendix) that the dimension that is in this case the most influential to what degree learning takes place is the relationship context in terms of the number of connected relationships. That this variable is number one in the quantitative analysis is easy to understand from Figure 1. The figure shows how the different suppliers/subcontractors were related to each other and to the buying company.1
Conclusions and managerial implications
The most significant result of this study is the importance for company learning of connections between relationships. The case study very distinctly suggests that there is a much greater probability for a supplier to learn in a business relationship when it is connected to a number of the buyer's other supplier relationships. The other two variables studied here—the characteristics of the supplier and the type of relationship—seem to have less significant effect on the supplier company
HÅKAN HÅKANSSON is professor in business administration at the University of Uppsala. He has published books and articles in the fields of purchasing, business-to-business marketing, and technological development. He has been involved in IMP since its origin.
References (24)
- et al.
Marketing Investments and Market Investments in Industrial Networks
International Journal of Research in Marketing
(1985) - et al.
No Business Is an Island
Scandinavian Journal of Management
(1989) The Knowledge-Creating Company
Harvard Business Review
(1991)- et al.
Organizational Learning
Annual Review Sociology
(1988) Managing Innovation Within Networks
(1992)Innovation as an Interactive ProcessFrom User-Producer Interaction to the National System of Innovation
Technological Change and the Nature of the Firm
The Sources of Innovation
(1988)- et al.
A Model of Distributor Firm and Manufacturer Firm Working Partnerships
Journal of Marketing
(1990) - et al.
Developing Buyer-Seller Relationships
Journal of Marketing
(1987)
Managing Business Relationships
Just-In-Time Exchange Relationships in Industrial Markets
Journal of Marketing
Cited by (0)
HÅKAN HÅKANSSON is professor in business administration at the University of Uppsala. He has published books and articles in the fields of purchasing, business-to-business marketing, and technological development. He has been involved in IMP since its origin.
VIRPI HAVILA received her Ph.D. from Uppsala University in 1996. Her research interests are in industrial marketing, and she is currently working on a research project on dynamics in industrial business networks and another on termination of business relationships.
ANN-CHARLOTT PEDERSEN received her Ph.D. in industrial management from the Norwegian University of Science and Technology where she holds a postdoc position in industrial purchasing. She is doing research within the areas of industrial purchasing and supplier relationship management, in addition to technological development in industrial networks.