Elucidation of the mode of binding of oxygen to iron in oxyhemoglobin by infrared spectroscopy

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0006-291X(73)80063-4Get rights and content

Summary

The infrared difference spectrum of packed human erythrocytes treated with 16O2 vs 18O2 or with 16O2 vs CO has a unique band at 1107 cm−1 assigned to 16O-16O stretch for bound 16O2. The frequency and intensity of this band prove non-linear end-on binding of O2 to Fe(II) in oxyhemoglobin. An O-O bond order of ca. 1.5 is indicated. This is analagous to the change in bond order when CO, NO, and N2 are similarly bound to iron. In consequence it seems unnecessary to use a bond description for O2 bound to iron which is fundamentally different from that used for CO, NO, and N2. The preferred bonding description is

. The strong covalent bonding between Fe and O2 that results upon π-donation from Fe(II) to O2 represents a quite sufficient reason for dioxygen to dissociate from oxyhemoglobin as O2 rather than O2 and relegates the presence or absence of a nonpolar or hydrophobic environment to a minor role.

References (17)

  • PaulingL. et al.
  • CaugheyW.S.

    Ann. Rev. Biochem.

    (1967)
  • AntoniniE. et al.

    Hemoglobin and Myoglobin in Their Reactions with Ligands

  • ValentineJ.S.

    Chem. Rev.

    (1973)
  • McGinnetyJ.A. et al.

    Inorg. Chem.

    (1967)
  • NakamuraA. et al.

    J. Amer. Chem. Soc.

    (1971)
  • RodleyG.A. et al.

    Nature

    (1972)
  • CrumblissA.L. et al.

    J. Amer. Chem. Soc.

    (1970)
There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (111)

  • Structure and function of haemoglobins

    2018, Blood Cells, Molecules, and Diseases
    Citation Excerpt :

    The precise electronic structure of the FeO2 bond has been debated since the 1936 papers on this subject were first published by Pauling and Coryell [29,30,34,35,128–134]. Infrared spectroscopy of the OO bond clearly supports formal reduction of bound oxygen to superoxide; thus the νOO frequency in Hb(O2) (1107 cm− 1) [135], Mb(O2) (1103 cm− 1) [136] and synthetic (porphinato)Fe(II)(O2) complexes (1150 cm− 1) [137] are clearly in a range expected for O2− (1150–1100 cm− 1) [29,137], and not for molecular O2 (1555 cm− 1) or peroxide (O22 −; 842 cm− 1) [29]. This is consistent with the formal superoxo model, Fe(III)+(O2−), proposed by H. G. Weiss [128,129].

  • [11] Infrared Spectroscopy

    1993, Methods in Enzymology
View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text