Urological Science

Urological Science

Volume 28, Issue 4, December 2017, Pages 200-205
Urological Science

Original article
Comparison of therapeutic efficacy of lipo-doxorubicin and doxorubicin in treating bladder cancer

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.urols.2016.08.001Get rights and content
Under a Creative Commons license
open access

Abstract

Objectives

Doxorubicin is commonly used in the treatment of superficial bladder cancer, but more side effects and shorter intracellular retention time hamper its clinical application. Since lipo-doxorubicin (Lipodox) has the advantages of longer half-life and lower clearance rate than doxorubicin, it should improve the efficacy of tumor therapy and reduce the normal tissue toxicity of doxorubicin.

Materials and Methods

In this study, we compared the cytotoxicity of Lipodox and doxorubicin in different treatment durations on bladder cancer cells by 3-(4, 5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2, 5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) assay. Drug distribution was tracked under fluorescence microscopy. The metabolic rate after treatment was measured by serial flow cytometry. Finally, an in vivo orthotopic MBT-2 bladder tumor model was established for comparing the differences of therapeutic efficacy, including tumor weight and survival rate.

Results

The 50% inhibitory concentration (IC50) of doxorubicin and Lipodox for MBT-2 cells was 0.62 μg/mL and 130 μg/mL, respectively, after 48 hours treatment. Lipo-dox presented higher cytotoxicity than doxorubicin at 6 hours (93% vs 73%) and 12 hours (93% vs 80%) treatment. After drug treatment, Lipodox fluorescence distribution was observed mostly in the cell membrane, lysosomes, and nuclei of tumor cells, while doxorubicin was concentrated in the nuclei. Initial fluorescence intensity of doxorubicin was 27.3 times that of Lipodox (p < 0.001) at time of treatment. The fluorescence intensity of doxorubicin decreased to 12% after 24 hours culture but that of Lipodox remained at 81%. In an orthotopic model, the average tumor weight and survival were: control group: 1.0 ± 0.3 g, 25%; doxorubicin treatment group: 0.7 ± 0.05 g, 43%; and Lipodox treatment group: 0.2 ± 0.1 g, 57%.

Conclusion

Our study demonstrated that Lipodox can enhance doxorubicin cytotoxicity in bladder cancer cells and inhibit tumor growth in orthotopic bladder cancer with improved survival rate. Therefore, we suggest Lipodox may act as an alternative to doxorubicin in the treatment of local bladder cancer.

Keywords

bladder cancer
doxorubicin
endocytosis
lipo-doxorubicin

Cited by (0)

There are 1 CME questions based on this article.

These authors contributed equally to this work.