Elsevier

Technology in Society

Volume 59, November 2019, 101153
Technology in Society

The decline of yuck: Moral judgment in the anthropocene

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techsoc.2019.101153Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Some ethicists believe disgust should play a decisive role in guiding moral judgment.

  • The transformation of disgust as a moral emotion may be an appropriate human adaption.

  • Evidence suggests technological change is impacting the role of disgust as a moral emotion.

  • The decline of disgust would signal a fundamental change to the human condition.

Abstract

The status and development of disgust as a moral emotion is gaining attention from scholars. This increased consideration largely rests on the question of whether disgust can and should play a role—even a decisive role—in moral judgment. Some ethicists believe that disgust manifests the emotional expression of a “deep wisdom,” and in this respect may constitute the last bulwark against eroding social norms associated with technological development. Others see the transformation or displacement of disgust as an appropriate human adaption to the times. This essay investigates the precarious status of disgust in the Anthropocene, a global age of artifice and engineering that increasingly challenges the “natural order” of things. The decline of disgust as a moral emotion presents a critical challenge to ethicists, legal theorists, and scholars of society, culture and technology.

Section snippets

Made out of meat

Imagine the following scenario, as a preparation for this investigation. A craft of extraterrestrials lands on Earth and interacts with human beings from various regions of the planet. According to Bison [10]; the conversation between the visiting aliens and their senior officer once the reconnaissance mission is completed would go something like this:

“They're made out of meat.”

“Meat?”

“Meat. They're made out of meat.”

“Meat?”

“There's no doubt about it. We picked up several from different parts

The nature of disgust

Etymologically, disgust means bad taste, from the French dégoûter. Both the emotion of disgust and taste are processed in the brain by the anterior insula, and people who have acute senses of taste also tend to find more things disgusting. The experience of disgust is typically accompanied by the “gape face,” in which the nose and upper brow are wrinkled and the tongue is extruded, which mimics the facial movements associated with retching.

There is a widespread tendency of disgust at exposure

Disgust in the Anthropocene

The Anthropocene, commonly considered the current geological age, is defined by the dominant and enduring impact of human beings on the planet's biomes, atmosphere, and geological strata. Owing to the technological supplementation, alteration, augmentation and supersession of human traits and capacities, the Anthropocene is also widely understood to signal the enduring impact of technology on humanity. The Anthropocene marks a demonstrably humanized and synthetized world, a global age of

Conclusion

Millennia ago, the fur-like hair covering our ancestors’ short, stooped bodies began to thin once they dropped down from the trees to amble about on the African savannah and eventually migrate to other continents. Fur-covered bodies no longer served hominins well, and was selected out. In like manner, the capacity for disgust will wane as human beings become more immersed in technology and less beholden to the emotional reactions of thinking meat.

Given its origins as a selective force, we would

Leslie Paul Thiele is a Distinguished Professor in the Department of Political Science at the University of Florida. He serves as Director of the Sustainability Studies program and the Center for Adaptive Innovation, Resilience, Ethics and Science (UF CAIRES). His interdisciplinary research and teaching focus on political thought, sustainability, technology, and the intersection of political philosophy and the natural sciences. His central concerns are the responsibilities of citizenship and

References (40)

  • Paul Rozin et al.

    Disgust

  • Leon Kass

    The Wisdom of Repugnance: Why We Should Ban the Cloning of Humans

    (1998)
  • Dan M. Kahan

    The progressive appropriation of disgust

  • William Ian Miller

    The Anatomy of Disgust

    (1997)
  • Charles Fethe

    The yuck factor

    Philos. Now.

    (2000)
  • Victor Kumar

    Foul Behavior.s

    Philosophers' Impr.

    (2017)
  • Martha Nussbaum

    Secret sewers of vice’: disgust, bodies and the law

  • Martha Nussbaum

    Hiding from Humanity: Disgust, Shame, and the Law

    (2004)
  • Daniel Kelly et al.

    Against the yuck factor: on the ideal role of disgust in society

    Utilitas

    (2014)
  • T. Bison

    They’re made out of meat

    Omni

    (1990)
  • Daniel Kelly

    Yuck! the Nature and Moral Significance of Disgust

    (2011)
  • Randy Thornhill et al.

    The parasite-stress theory of sociality, the behavioral immune system, and human social and cognitive uniqueness

    Evol. Behav. Sci.

    (2014)
  • Rachel Herz

    That's Disgusting: Unraveling the Mysteries of Repulsion

    (2012)
  • Paul Rozin et al.

    The nature of aversion to indirect contact with other persons

    J. Abnorm. Psychol.

    (1994)
  • Robert Sapolsky

    Behave: the Biology of Humans at Our Best and Worst

    (2017)
  • Sam Harris

    The Moral Landscape: How Science Can Determine Human Values

    (2010)
  • Norbert Elias

    The Civilizing Process

    (1978)
  • Paul Rozin

    Hedonic ‘adaptation

    Judgement Decis. Mak.

    (2008)
  • Paul Rozin et al.

    “Moralization and becoming a vegetarian: the transformation of preferences into values and the recruitment of disgust.”

    Psychol. Sci.

    (1997)
  • A. Egolf et al.

    When evolution works against the future: disgust’s contributions to the acceptance of new food technologies

    Risk Anal.

    (2019)
  • Cited by (3)

    • Moralization and Mismoralization in Public Health

      2022, Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy

    Leslie Paul Thiele is a Distinguished Professor in the Department of Political Science at the University of Florida. He serves as Director of the Sustainability Studies program and the Center for Adaptive Innovation, Resilience, Ethics and Science (UF CAIRES). His interdisciplinary research and teaching focus on political thought, sustainability, technology, and the intersection of political philosophy and the natural sciences. His central concerns are the responsibilities of citizenship and the opportunities for leadership in a world of rapid technological, social, and ecological change. He has published 9 books, including The Art and Craft of Political Theory (Routledge 2019).

    View full text