Elsevier

Soil and Tillage Research

Volume 170, July 2017, Pages 157-166
Soil and Tillage Research

Minimum tillage, tied ridging and mulching for better maize yield and yield stability in the Central Highlands of Kenya

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.still.2017.04.001Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Conservation-effective management techniques increases maize (Zea Mays L.) and yield stability.

  • Tied ridging led to highest yields and yield stability in semi-arid site.

  • Mulching enhanced grain yields and yield stability in sub-humid site.

  • On-farm trials provide suitable platforms for uptake of agricultural techniques.

Abstract

Most smallholder farmers in Sub-Saharan Africa and in Kenya have been experiencing a decrease in crop yields in the recent decades. Droughts and prolonged dry spells are common and water is becoming the main limiting factor during crop growing seasons threatening smallholder farmers’ livelihood. Hence, availability and adoption of conservation-effective management practices (CEM) that foster soil conservation, water retention, improved crop yield and yield stability under the small-holder rainfed farming system is desirable. Based on this, we evaluated effects of selected CEM techniques on maize (Zea mays L.) yields, yield stability and farmers’ willingness to take up the techniques. We hypothesized that, the CEM techniques will not only increase maize yield but also the yield stability. The selected CEM were minimum tillage (MT), mulching (MC) and tied ridging (TR) tested alongside a control (conventional tillage) (CT) in two sites, a semi-arid (with predominant soil type being Cambisols with cambic B horizons) and sub-humid agro-ecologies (with predominant soil type being Humic Nitisols), in the Central Highlands of Kenya. We implemented field trials on-farm for four seasons: short rains 2011 (SR11), long rains 2012 (LR12), short rains 2012 (SR12) and long rains 2013 (LR13). The test crop was Maize (Zea Mays L.). A key informant’s interview with the farmers who implemented the field trial was conducted to assess their willingness to take up CEM techniques. Rainfall distribution and amount varied widely between the two sites. Maize grain yields were significantly higher in TR and MC treatments during the LR12, SR12 and LR13 seasons in the semi-arid site compared to CT. Tied ridging doubled grain yields during SR12 season in the semi-arid site. In the sub-humid site, grain yields significantly increased under all the tested CEM techniques during SR11, LR12 and SR12 seasons. Maize grain yields were more stable under TR and MC with residual variances of 0.107 and 0.183 Mg ha−2, respectively in the semi-arid site. Mulching, MT and TR techniques indicated yield stability with residual variances of 0.017, 0.039 and 0.155 Mg ha−2, respectively, in the sub-humid site. We concluded that, under semi-arid conditions, tied ridging is a better CEM technique that not only positively affect maize yields but it also enhances yield stability. Under sub-humid agro-ecological conditions, mulching technique performed comparatively well in terms of increasing maize grain yields and yield stability. The n were further affirmed by the farmers’ willingness to continue practicing TR and MC practice in Mbeere South and Meru South, respectively.

Introduction

In Sub-Saharan Africa (SSA), rain-fed agriculture is the dominant source of food production practice by most smallholder farmers (Rockström, 2000, Cooper et al., 2008). Droughts and dry spells are common in the tropics and water is becoming the main limiting factor during crop growing seasons threatening smallholder farmers’ food security (Wadzanayi and Stroosnijder, 2015, Mafongoya et al., 2016). The reliance on erratic rainfall and exposure to climate risk illustrate the livelihoods of smallholder farmers in the SSA region (Patt et al., 2010). These constraints exacerbate efforts to sustainably increase agricultural production, reduce poverty and enhance food security (Hansen et al., 2011). Additionally, farmers practice rigorous soil preparation by hoe or plough together with removal or burning of crop residues which exposes the land to climatic hazards such as torrential rain and wind leading to land degradation and low crop yield (Benites et al., 1998). Hence, adoption of conservation-effective management practices (CEM) that foster soil conservation, water retention, improved crop yield and yield stability under the small-holder rainfed farming system is desirable.

Maize yields from smallholder farms in semi-arid and sub-humid areas of Kenya are usually below 1.0 Mg ha−1 against a potential of 6 to 8 Mg ha−1. These areas experience frequent crop failures as a result of drought (Rockström et al., 2009). The impact of drought stress on crop productivity is severe since farmers have limited management alternatives (FAO, 2002) for soil water content. In the study region, there has been a decline in maize crop yield in the recent past (Mucheru-Muna et al., 2007, Mucheru-Muna et al., 2014, Mugwe et al., 2009). This is attributed to erratic rainfall, poor agricultural water management practices and degraded soil quality (Ngetich et al., 2014a, Ngetich et al., 2014b, Okeyo et al., 2014, Kisaka et al., 2015). Practices that increase maize yields are therefore required.

Mbeere South and Meru South sub-counties in Kenya are experiencing low and erratic rainfall as well as high evapotranspiration rates (Jaetzold et al., 2007). The majority of the smallholder farmers in these areas depend on rain-fed agricultural production systems (Mugwe et al., 2009). Implementing a conservation-effective management system that can have a direct bearing on crop production and soil quality (Kuotsu et al., 2014) are key adaptation practices that can mitigate growing water shortages, deteriorating soil conditions (Kurukulasuriya and Rosenthal, 2003) and crop production risks (Bennie and Hensley, 2001). Mulching, tied ridging, and minimum tillage are examples of CEM techniques that have the potential to enhance soil water storage and availability for crop use. Besides soil water content conservation, mulching using crop residues, increases soil organic matter concentration and recycle plant nutrients upon decomposition. This, in turn, affects crop growth and yield directly by supplying crop nutrients and indirectly by improving soil physical properties (e.g., stability of aggregates and porosity) which enhance soil quality and stimulate plant growth (Celik et al., 2004). Tied ridging can reduce runoff, increase profile water content and hence root growth and development. Increased soil water content enhances crop response to rainfall, fertilizer, and nitrogen availability to plants (Jensen et al., 2003). Management of soil through minimum tillage affects the storage of water and evaporation and thus has a beneficial effect on the conservation of rain water and crop production (Lenssen et al., 2007). Additionally, crop yield stability or the ability of a crop to perform consistently, whether at high or low yield, across a range of environments (De Vita et al., 2010), is also influenced by agricultural management and environmental factors (Berzsenyi and Dang, 2008).

In response to the rain-fed related challenges and growing pressures on Africa’s soil fertility and water retention capacity (Grabowski et al., 2014) interest in conservation agriculture (CA) uptake by smallholder farmers has increased. Conservation agriculture is practiced on about 125 M ha worldwide (Kassam and Brammer, 2013). Minimum tillage is one of the three core elements of conservation tillage (the other two being crop residue retention and legume rotations). Reduced energy requirements under minimum tillage as well as significant yield gains attributed to early planting, improved water retention and consequently increased fertilizer responsiveness (Grabowski et al., 2014) are some of the major benefits attributed to conservation agriculture. Of the three core elements of CA, adoption of minimum tillage by smallholder farmers in the tropics remains low leading to limited empirical evidence on lauded benefits of CA under smallholder farming systems of the tropics.

Soil water, whose major input is rainfall in the study area, is a basic requirement for crop growth and development from sowing to maturity (Khuram and Rasul, 2011, Ngetich et al., 2014a). Conservation-effective management techniques have the potential of improving rainfall use efficiency, increase and stabilize maize yields (African Conservation Tillage Network, 2008, Giller et al., 2009). A meta-analysis by Bouma et al. (2016) outlined that water harvesting technologies increases crop yields significantly although smallholder farmers are still reluctant to invest in the technologies. They recommended that more work is needed to build up the scientific knowledge base. According to Gicheru et al. (2004) efficient use of any rainfall requires appropriate soil management and tillage that enhance rainfall penetration and conserve adequate soil water for plant growth.

Increasing yields at farm level is usually a major objective in most crop production systems; however, improving yield stability is also an important objective of agricultural progress (Slafer and Kernich, 1996). In the study area, maize performance under the selected CEM techniques have been tested successfully under researcher designed and managed field trials by Ngetich et al. (2014b) and Okeyo et al. (2014) but their performance under smallholder farmers’ conditions has not been established. Most studies overlook stability of yields over time, which is one of the important factors for food security (Piepho, 1998). Crop yield stability with less risk of crop failure is of great importance as it may provide an incentive to invest in crop management practices that improve yields (Barron, 2004), implying more predictable returns. Therefore, in order to evaluate the performance of potential yield enhancing CEM techniques effectively, there is a need to assess them at the smallholder farmers' level and incorporate yield stability evaluation. Such evaluation can facilitate derivation of accurate best-fit recommendations for ailing agro-ecology conditions. Moreover, on-farm trials ensure that research results accurately incorporate the effects of farmer management, which could otherwise be different when technologies are implemented onto farms. Also, technologies that perform well during on-farm trials are most likely to be taken up by farmers. We, therefore, set to evaluate the effects of the selected CEM techniques on maize yields and yield stability in on-farm conditions and determine the willingness of farmers to uptake them. We hypothesized that, the CEM techniques will not only increase maize yield but also the yield stability.

Section snippets

Study area

The study was carried out in Mbeere South sub-county, Embu County and Meru South sub-county, Tharaka-Nithi County. Maize (Zea Mays L.) is the predominant annual crop in the two regions. The rainfall pattern is bimodal in the two sub-counties with a long rain season (LR) lasting from March to June and a short rain season (SR) from late October to December, hence two cropping seasons per year (Jaetzold et al., 2007).

Mbeere South sub-county is located in the lower midland zone four (LM4) and lower

Maize grain yields

The maize grain yields were higher in Meru South than in Mbeere South (Table 3). At the beginning of the on-farm trials during the SR11 season, maize yields were not significantly influenced by the CEM treatments (p = 0.2) in Mbeere South. Conversely, during LR12 season, maize grain yields increased by 50% and 28% under TR and MC, respectively, compared with CT. In the SR12 season, TR doubled grain yields while MC increased grain yields 33% compared with CT. The yields also increased during LR13

Discussion

Generally, grain yields in Meru South were more than in Mbeere South for the four consecutive cropping seasons. This is attributed to the differences in climatic conditions in the two sub-counties which are in different agro-ecological zones considering the rainfall amount and distribution, and soil physical and chemical characteristics. In on-station trials conducted in the same study region, Ngetich et al. (2014b) reported that yield differences observed between the sites were due to the

Conclusion

The farmer-managed trials revealed that, under semi-arid conditions (Mbeere South sub-county), tied ridging is a better CEM technique that not only positively affect maize yields but it also enhances yield stability. We also noted that, under the same conditions, minimum tillage technique had no comparative advantage over conventional tillage technique. In the sub-humid site (Meru South sub-county), mulching technique performed comparatively well leading to increase in both maize grain yields

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank the Flemish Interuniversity Council-University Development Co-operation (VLIR-UOS) for providing financial support for the on-farm experimentation and soil analysis (through Project No. ZEIN2008PR349). We also thank the farmers from Mbeere South and Meru South sub-counties who conducted the trials in their farms to implement the practices and recorded the observations during crop growth.

References (79)

  • Y.T. Gan et al.

    Ridge-furrow mulching systems – an innovative technique for boosting crop productivity in semiarid rainfed environments

    Adv. Agron.

    (2013)
  • Y. Gao et al.

    Soil water status and root distribution across the rooting zone in maize with plastic film mulching

    Field Crops Res.

    (2014)
  • P. Gicheru et al.

    Effects of soil management practices and tillage systems on surface soil water conservation and crust formation on a sandy loam in semi-arid Kenya

    Soil Tillage Res.

    (2004)
  • K.E. Giller et al.

    Conservation agriculture and smallholder farming in Africa: the heretics’ view

    Field Crops Res.

    (2009)
  • P.P. Grabowski et al.

    Minimum tillage adoption among commercial smallholder cotton farmers in Zambia, 2002 to 2011

    Agric. Syst.

    (2014)
  • J. Hassink

    Density fractions of soil macroorganic matter and microbial biomass as predictors of C and N mineralization

    Soil Biol. Biochem.

    (1995)
  • R. Jara-rojas et al.

    An analysis of the joint adoption of water conservation and soil conservation in Central Chile

    Land Use Policy

    (2013)
  • J.R. Jensen et al.

    Productivity in maize based cropping systems under various soil-water management practices in a semi-arid, alfisol environment in East Africa

    Agr. Water Manage.

    (2003)
  • K. Kuotsu et al.

    Land forming and tillage effects on soil properties and productivity of rainfed groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.)-rapeseed (Brassica campestris L.) cropping system in northeastern India

    Soil Tillage Res.

    (2014)
  • J.K. Ladha et al.

    Efficiency of fertilizer nitrogen in cereal production: retrospects and prospects

    Adv. Agron.

    (2005)
  • A.W. Lenssen et al.

    Cropping sequence and tillage system influences annual crop production and water use in semiarid Montana

    USA. Field Crops Res.

    (2007)
  • C.A. Liu et al.

    Effects of plastic film mulch and tillage on maize productivity and soil parameters

    Eur. J. Agron.

    (2009)
  • P. Mafongoya et al.

    Maize productivity and profitability in conservation agriculture systems across agro-ecological regions in Zimbabwe: a review of knowledge and practice

    Agric. Ecosyt. Environ.

    (2016)
  • J.M. Miriti et al.

    Yield and water use efficiencies of maize and cowpea as affected by tillage and cropping systems in semi-arid Eastern Kenya

    Agr. Water Manage.

    (2012)
  • F. Mo et al.

    Ridge furrow mulching system in semiarid Kenya: a promising solution to improve soil water availability and maize productivity

    Eur. J. Agron.

    (2016)
  • M. Mucheru-Muna et al.

    A staggered maize-legume intercrop arrangement robustly increases crop yields and economic returns in the highlands of Central Kenya

    Field Crops Res.

    (2010)
  • L.N. Mulumba et al.

    Mulching effects on selected soil physical properties

    Soil Tillage Res.

    (2008)
  • W. Mupangwa et al.

    Reduced tillage, mulching and rotational effects on maize (Zea mays L.): cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (Walp) L.) and sorghum (Sorghum bicolour L.) (Moench) yields under semi-arid conditions

    Field Crops Res.

    (2012)
  • H.J.W. Mutsaers et al.

    Farmers' maize yields in S.W. Nigeria and the effect of variety and fertilizer: an analysis of variability in on-farm trials

    Field Crops Res.

    (1990)
  • K.F. Ngetich et al.

    Effects of selected soil and water conservation techniques on runoff, sediment yield and maize productivity under sub-humid and semi-arid conditions in Kenya

    Catena

    (2014)
  • K.F. Ngetich et al.

    Length of growing season, rainfall temporal distribution, onset and cessation dates in the Kenyan highlands

    Agric. For. Meteorol.

    (2014)
  • A. Patt et al.

    How do smallholder farmers understand insurance, and how much do they want it? Evidence from Africa

    Global Environ. Change

    (2010)
  • J. Rockström et al.

    Rainwater management for increased productivity among small-holder farmers in drought prone environments

    Phys. Chem. Earth

    (2002)
  • J. Rockström et al.

    Conservation farming practices in East and Southern Africa: yields and rain water productivity from on-farm action research

    Soil Tillage Res.

    (2009)
  • J. Rockström et al.

    Managing water in rainfed agriculture-The need for a paradigm shift

    Agric. Water Manage.

    (2010)
  • J. Rockström

    Water resources management in smallholder farms in Eastern and Southern Africa: an overview

    Phys. Chem. Earth

    (2000)
  • C. Shisanya et al.

    Effect of organic and inorganic nutrient sources on soil mineral nitrogen and maize yields in central highlands of Kenya

    Soil Tillage Res.

    (2009)
  • M. Tollenaar et al.

    Yield potential, yield stability and stress tolerance in maize

    Field Crops Res.

    (2002)
  • C.F. Yamoah et al.

    Trend and stability analyses of millet yields treated with fertilizer and crop residues in the Sahel

    Field Crops Res.

    (2002)
  • Cited by (60)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text