Elsevier

Soil Biology and Biochemistry

Volume 112, September 2017, Pages 127-139
Soil Biology and Biochemistry

Is the rate of mineralization of soil organic carbon under microbiological control?

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soilbio.2017.05.003Get rights and content

Highlights

  • CHCl3 fumigation killed >90% of microbial biomass. SOC mineralization unaffected.

  • CHCl3 greatly changed biomass, community structure and biomass specific activity.

  • Suggests SOC mineralization rate independent of biomass size and structure while accessibility of microorganisms is limited.

  • Suggests rate limiting step in SOC mineralization is abiotic.

Abstract

A theory called the Regulatory Gate Hypothesis was previously proposed to considers that the rate limiting step in soil organic carbon (SOC) mineralization is independent of the size, community stricture or specific activity (mg CO2-C evolved g−1 biomass C) of the soil microbial biomass. Here we report new experiments to test this hypothesis. In the first experiment, six different soils were perfused with CHCl3-saturated water to model SOC release and to stop microbial activity. Apart from one highly organic soil, they all released SOC at low and roughly constant rates, over sixty three days. In the second experiment, when the freeze-dried perfusates were returned to the parent soils, their % mineralization ranged from 17 to 35% over ten days, in contrast to bulk SOC (range 0.46–0.77%). In the third experiment, two soils were given three consecutive fumigations, each followed by 10 days aerobic incubation. The microbial biomass was decreased by > 90%, yet SOC mineralization proceeded at the same rate as in nonfumigated soil. In the fourth experiment, the six soils were subjected to various perturbations, including non-perturbed controls, fumigation-incubation, air-drying rewetting, freeze-thaw (−20 °C and −80 °C) and sieving < 0.3 mm. After an initial flush due to the perturbations, the rates of mineralization became roughly equal in nearly all soil treatments and comparable to the control, despite significant declines in biomass. This shows that basal respiration was little affected by the perturbations. In Experiment five the effects of the perturbations on the microbial communities in the different soils and perturbations were determined. The bacterial community was significantly modified by both fumigation and air drying-rewetting, due mainly to increased Firmiculites and decreased Proteobacteria populations. Our findings suggest that mineralization of SOC is a two-stage process: firstly, non-bioavailable forms are converted abiologically to bioavailable forms (termed the Regulatory Gate), which, only then, undergo second process, biological mineralization. This finding has serious implications for theories of e.g. SOC dynamics, effects of global warming and soil nutrient cycling.

Introduction

Stabilized soil organic carbon (C) comprises around 1500 Pg C, twice that in the atmosphere (Lal, 2004). It is therefore vital that we have a correct understanding of the key processes involved in the dynamics of this huge C pool if we are to better manage it. It is remarkable that no one has yet satisfactorily explained a particular characteristic of soil organic C mineralization. Thus, even if > 90% of the soil microorganisms are destroyed by CHCl3 fumigation, following fumigant removal and the initial flush of mineralization of fumigant-killed biomass C, soil organic C mineralization continues at the same rate (defined as μg CO2-C evolved g−1 soil day−1) as in the nonfumigated soil (Jenkinson and Powlson, 1976, Wu et al., 1996, Kemmitt et al., 2008). This phenomenon has been known for nearly 60 years but has never been satisfactorily explained, even though CHCl3 fumigation has formed the basis of the widely used Fumigation Incubation method for measuring soil microbial biomass C over this period (Jenkinson and Powlson, 1976).

The long held belief that SOC consists of large, structurally nonspecific, moieties that are largely resistant to microbial attack (loosely termed humified material), is currently being strongly challenged. Instead, an alternative model is emerging that considers the stability of SOC to mainly depend upon its interactions with the biotic and abiotic environment e.g. chemical interactions, reactive mineral surfaces, climate, water availability, pH and presence of microbial degraders (Schmidt et al., 2011, Dungait et al., 2012, Lehmann and Kleber, 2015). However, this debate still does not yet reveal how a small, CHCl3 depressed, species poor, microbial population can mineralize the same amount of highly biologically resistant SOC to CO2-C as the large, intact population in nonfumigated soil. This suggests that the SOC-derived substrate is being made available to these two, very different, populations in the same way, rate, time, and in the same chemical forms, for weeks or even months, without any fresh substrate inputs (e.g. Joergensen et al., 1990, Kemmitt et al., 2008). The question is, how can this be?

Kemmitt et al. (2008) proposed a new theory to explain this phenomenon. They considered that soil organic C had to first undergo an abiotic process, or processes, before it could be mineralized by the microbial biomass. They termed this the Regulatory Gate Hypothesis (SI Fig. 1). K1 is the abiological transformation of non-bioavailable soil organic C. K2 is the biological mineralization of (now) bioavailable soil organic C. Arrows indicate that the soil microbial biomass may create both non-biologically available and biologically available soil organic C but is not able to directly influence the rate of K1. The precise nature of K1 is not known. It may include processes such as desorption, chemical oxidation, free radical activity, cleavage of phenolic rings (Majchner et al., 2000) or stabilized exocellular enzymes. Probably, several mechanisms operate simultaneously.

Kuzyakov et al. (2009) suggested that enzymes released from the CHCl3-induced lysis of microbial cells remained active and could mineralize soil organic C for several months. However, it seems more likely that exocellular non-stabilized enzymes would be utilized as substrate and have a short half-life in soil (Burns, 1982, Nannipieri, 2003). The Regulatory Gate Hypothesis does not necessarily conflict with the view of Kuzyakov et al. (2009) that exoenzymes are involved, as the water soluble C could, presumably, diffuse to them along a concentration gradient. However, it is difficult to reconcile the random activity of exoenzymes, either stabilized in bulk soil organic matter, or freshly released from microbial cells, after, for example, CHCl3 fumigation (Brookes et al., 1982) with the highly regulated metabolic processes involved in (say) the mineralization of a tertiary protein to CO2. This also agrees with the view of Paterson (2009) that although it might be possible for high rates of soil organic matter mineralization to be maintained in fumigated soil by the activity of stabilized enzymes, this would be “a striking and, in my view, sic, an improbable uncoupling of soil biological activities and functions”.

It is also theoretically possible that the small recolonizing microbial population that survives CHCl3 fumigation has the same community structure, comprising the same population of organic matter mineralizing organisms, as that in the intact non-fumigated soil. We also discount this for two reasons. Firstly, adenosine triphosphate (ATP) concentrations in fumigated soil before CHCl3 removal are very small (Kemmitt et al., 2008) so the recolonizing population must develop after, rather than survive, fumigation. Secondly, it implies that most of the soil microbial biomass is redundant, at least in terms of soil organic C mineralization, in non-fumigated soil. The Regulatory Gate Hypothesis offers an explanation why the mineralization of soil organic C proceeds at the same rate in both nonfumigated and fumigated soil, even if the microbial population size has been decimated, and specific activity and diversity drastically changed. If correct, both the large, intact population and the damaged small population are mineralizing precisely the same small, but constant, supply of soil organic C, which has been transformed from non-available soil organic C, by processes that we do not yet really understand, to biologically available substrates, and which has been brought to both of them via diffusion in soil solution. We believe the alternative possibility, that the soil organic C is being mainly mineralized directly by the microbial population, without firstly undergoing an abiotic transformation from non-available to available, is unlikely in the light of the above evidence. Curtin et al. (2012) reviewed data which agreed with this hypothesis, and similarly considered that chemical factors must be controlling soil organic C desorption rather than biotic ones. In particular, chemical factors causing decreased soil anion absorption capacity can increase soluble organic C concentrations. For example, increasing soil pH can increase desorption of SOC, which can increase mineralization. Similarly, Dungait et al. (2012) cited work which suggested that there must be a transport mechanism which enabled substrate to be transported to the microbial biomass. This suggests that the initial step in the mineralization rate of soil organic C is not under microbial control, i.e. abiotic processes convert non-biologically available to biologically available soil organic C, which then undergoes mineralization. If so, the question is; how could abiotic mechanisms operate?

A main aim of this work was to investigate the phenomenon that if a soil is given a 24 h CHCl3 fumigation, followed by its removal and then an anaerobic incubation, then the rate of SOC mineralization in the previously fumigated soil is very similar to that in the corresponding nonfumigated soil. This observation forms the basis of the Regulatory Gate Hypothesis. This is despite most (around 90% or more) of the microbial population in the fumigated soil being killed by the fumigant. A second aim was to confirm the findings apparently non-biologically available SOC could be mobilized independently of the soil microbial biomass and subsequently mineralized. This was done by slowly perfusing CHCl3 saturated water, to inhibit microbial activity, through soil columns and measuring the soluble C in the perfusates at intervals up to 60 days. The perfusates were then freeze dried, added back to the parent soils and their mineralization measured. Other experiments were done to investigate the effects of air-drying-rewetting, freeze-thaw (−20 and −80 °C) and sieving (<0.3 mm) on basal soil organic matter mineralization and soil microbial community structure.

Section snippets

Soils

The six soils were sampled from non-experimental sites around Hangzhou, China, selected to give as wide a range of pH, management, clay and organic matter as possible (SI Table 1). They were sampled (0–10 m cm depth) with 2 cm augers and bulked at each site. The soils were sieved field moist and visible soil fauna, plant material and stones removed. They were then adjusted to 40% Water Holding Capacity (WHC) and given a conditioning incubation as described by Kemmitt et al. (2008) prior to use.

Soil perfusion experiments with CHCl3-saturated water (Experiment1)

The six soils (A-F) were very slowly perfused with CHCl3 saturated water (Fig. 1) using the procedure of Kemmitt et al. (2008) except that as much as possible of the initial soluble C pool was first removed (section 2.2). The Water Soluble C, extracted by perfusion of CHCl3 saturated water, generally declined during the first five to twenty days of perfusion (results not given) due to incomplete removal of the CHCl3 released C. Then the rates of release of C remained constant (Soils A and C),

Discussion

The paradox of soil organic matter mineralization (Kemmitt et al., 2008), whereby the mineralization of humified soil organic matter proceeds at the same rate in a nonfumigated and CHCl3-fumigated soil for long periods, once the fumigant is removed, was first reported by Jenkinson (1966), then by Jenkinson and Powlson (1976) and in numerous scientific papers since then. Usually, this phenomenon had, until Kemmitt et al. (2008), been largely overlooked, as the main aim with CHCl3 fumigation is

Conclusions

The Regulatory Gate Hypothesis has serious implications for theories of e.g. SOC dynamics, effects of global warming and soil nutrient cycling. We consider that the data we present, and that of others discussed, is very consistent with the Regulatory Gate Hypothesis. This has serious implications for understanding the peculiar features of the mineralization of stabilized soil organic matter. We show that the mineralization of SOC is independent of microbial activity or the size of the soil

Acknowledgements

We wish to thank Dr. Xianjin Tang, Zhejiang University, China for help with the experiments and the late Professor David Jenkinson, FRS and Professor David Powlson, Rothamsted Research, for helpful discussion. PCB received funding under The Chinese Government 1000 Talents Programme, which is also gratefully acknowledged. This work was also supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (41371246, 41671233). We also acknowledge the valuable contributions of two very able and

References (55)

  • M. Kaiser et al.

    How air-drying and rewetting modify soil organic matter characteristics: an assessment to improve data interpretation and inference

    Soil Biology & Biochemistry

    (2015)
  • S.J. Kemmitt et al.

    Mineralization of native soil organic matter is not regulated by the size, activity or composition of the soil microbial biomass

    Soil Biology & Biochemistry

    (2008)
  • Y. Kuzyakov et al.

    Comments on the paper by Kemmitt et al., 2008 ‘Mineralization of native soil organic matter is not regulated by the size, activity or composition of the soil microbial biomass-a new perspective’

    Soil Biology & Biochemistry

    (2009)
  • Y. Luo et al.

    Soil priming effects and the mineralisation of biochar following its incorporation to soils of different pH

    Soil Biology & Biochemistry

    (2011)
  • K. Mason-Jones et al.

    “Non-metabolizable” glucose analogue sheds new light on priming mechanisms

    Soil Biology & Biochemistry

    (2017)
  • J.M. Oades et al.

    Adenosine-triphosphate content of the soil microbial biomass

    Soil Biology & Biochemistry

    (1979)
  • E. Paterson

    Comments on the regulatory gate hypothesis and implications for C cycling in soil

    Soil Biology & Biochemistry

    (2009)
  • J. Pathma et al.

    Molecular and functional characterization of bacteria isolated from straw and goat manure based vermicompost

    Applied Soil Ecology

    (2013)
  • C. Poll et al.

    Dynamics of litter carbon turnover and microbial abundance in a rye detritusphere

    Soil Biology & Biochemistry

    (2008)
  • M. Redmile-Gordon et al.

    Evaluation of substitutes for paraquat in soil microbial ATP determinations using the trichloroacetic acid based reagent of Jenkinson and Oades (1979)

    Soil Biology & Biochemistry

    (2011)
  • B. Scaglia et al.

    Biodegradability of soil water organic carbon extracted from seven different soils

    Journal of Environmental Science

    (2009)
  • E.D. Vance et al.

    Microbial biomass measurements in forest soils: the use of the chloroform fumigation-incubation method in strongly acid soils

    Soil Biology & Biochemistry

    (1987)
  • E.D. Vance et al.

    An extraction method for measuring soil microbial biomass C

    Soil Biology & Biochemistry

    (1987)
  • Y. Wang et al.

    A novel lignin degradation bacterial consortium for efficient pulping

    Bioresource Technology

    (2013)
  • J. Wu et al.

    Measurement of soil microbial biomass C byfumigation-extraction - an automated procedure

    Soil Biology AndBiochemistry

    (1990)
  • J. Wu et al.

    Evidence for the use of a control in the fumigation-incubation method for measuring microbial biomass carbon in soil

    Soil Biology & Biochemistry

    (1996)
  • J. Wu et al.

    The proportional mineralization of microbial biomass and organic matter caused by air-drying and rewetting of a grassland soil

    Soil Biology & Biochemistry

    (2005)
  • Cited by (52)

    • The regulators of soil organic carbon mineralization upon lime and/or phosphate addition vary with depth

      2022, Science of the Total Environment
      Citation Excerpt :

      Instead, these studies suggest that OC availability controls the rate of its mineralization. Accordingly, the processes that convert non-bioavailable OC into bioavailable OC have been proposed as the rate-limiting step in C mineralization (i.e. “Regulatory Gate hypothesis”) (Kemmitt et al., 2008; Brookes et al., 2017). Given the complex nature of soil OC and its interactions with the surroundings, the discrepancies between studies on key regulators governing C mineralization are not irreconcilable.

    • Three source-partitioning of CO<inf>2</inf> fluxes based on a dual-isotope approach to investigate interactions between soil organic carbon, glucose and straw

      2022, Science of the Total Environment
      Citation Excerpt :

      In contrast, Kemmitt et al. (2008) attributed the potential constant mineralization of humified SOM to be initiated by abiotic processes: the Regulatory Gate Hypothesis. This also attempted to explain why, even if most of the soil microorganisms are killed (without their mediated substrates degradation), the very large pool of native SOC will mineralize at the same rate as in intact soil for long periods (Brookes et al., 2017), thereby leading to the continuous the loss of SOM rather than substrates. The decomposition of substrate from three C sources is complicated, with unequal simultaneous interactions.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text