Elsevier

Sensors and Actuators A: Physical

Volume 263, 15 August 2017, Pages 332-340
Sensors and Actuators A: Physical

Fabrication of a liquid monopropellant microthruster with built-in regenerative micro-cooling channels

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sna.2017.06.028Get rights and content

Highlights

  • The use of micro-cooling channels to cool a liquid propellant microthruster is suggested.

  • A liquid propellant microthruster with micro-cooling channels was fabricated with a photosensitive glass MEMS process.

  • The feasibility of using micro-cooling channels was successfully validated through the design, fabrication and testing of a liquid propellant microthruster.

Abstract

This paper reports a feasibility study of regenerative micro-cooling channels in a liquid microthruster composed of thermally fragile materials. Glass, which is among the most thermally insulating materials, has been used as microthruster fabrication material to suppress excessive heat loss in micro scale thruster. However, the frangibility of glass has remained a challenge to be solved. To thermally manage the fragile structure, the use of regenerative micro-cooling channels in a microthruster is suggested in this work, and the feasibility was tested through design, fabrication and experimental performance of a glass microthruster with microchannels. Nine photosensitive glass layers were wet etched and integrated to fabricate the microthruster. Before integration of the layers, a fabricated Pt/Al2O3 catalyst was inserted into the chamber of the microthruster for propellant decomposition. Hydrogen peroxide (90 wt%) was used as a monopropellant and served as the working fluid for regenerative cooling. A liquid microthruster with micro-cooling channels was successfully fabricated with a photosensitive glass MEMS process. Experimental performance tests were conducted while measuring the microthruster chamber pressure, chamber temperature, and surface temperatures. The test results showed normal operation of the microthruster, which had an estimated thrust of approximately 48 mN and temperature efficiency of approximately 41%. The decreasing surface temperatures of the microthruster during thruster operation successfully validated the cooling effect of the micro-cooling channels and demonstrated their practicality for the regenerative cooling of liquid microthrusters.

Introduction

MEMS technology has resulted in many imaginary suggestions becoming reality. This is also valid for space technology. Nanosatellites that weigh 1–10 kg have been proposed [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8] and provide significant advantages, including extreme cost effectiveness, as compared with traditional satellites, which have the drawback of high costs of launch vehicles. Limitations on the functionality of small-scale satellites, owing to their restricted mass and volume, can be supplemented through constellation group operations involving several small-scale satellites. It is expected that operating constellations of small satellites will result in higher reliability for entire satellite systems, improved revisit times, and the possibility for more versatile mission operations. Those operations are feasible only after meeting the prerequisites associated with down-sized thruster development for attitude control, drag compensation, and orbital transfer. The required thrust depends on the satellite weight and mission profile [9], [10].

Electrical and chemical propulsion are possible for micropropulsion. Electric propulsion has a high specific impulse but requires high electric power, which may be an excessive burden on small-scale satellites. Chemical propulsion has the advantage of high energy density, and it consumes little electrical power. From these choices, many microthruster studies have examined chemical propulsion by using monopropellants [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], bipropellants [20], [21], [22], solid propellants [23], [24], [25], [26], [27], [28], [29], [30], [31], [32], [33], [34], [35], [36], [37], [38], [39], and cold gases [40], [41], [42].

Monopropellant thrusters are among the most appropriate micropropulsion options because they are simpler than bipropellant thrusters and possess re-ignition and throttling abilities, which are difficult to implement in solid propellant thrusters. Monopropellant thrusters also have higher specific impulses than cold gas thrusters.

Most microthrusters have been fabricated using silicon [29], [30], [31], [32], [33], [34], [35], [36]. However, some studies have attempted to use low thermal conductivity materials, such as glasses [37], [38], [39] and ceramics [11], [12], [20], to prevent heat energy losses stemming from the large surface-to-volume ratios of small-scale thrusters. Cheah et al. [43] have fabricated a vaporizing liquid microthruster using a high-temperature co-fired ceramic (HTCC) and have found that using HTCC as the structural material is more efficient and consumes less electrical power than silicon. Wu et al. [11] have successfully manufactured a monopropellant microthruster based on low-temperature co-fired ceramic (LTCC) tape technology and have demonstrated that the thruster operates normally. However, under certain thermal stresses, the combustor wall cracks, and the level of thrust decreases. In [44], a monopropellant microthruster fabricated using glass and a decomposed propellant using a catalyst coated on a spherical support is described, but cracking has been observed near the catalyst chamber wall of the microthruster, where the highest thermal stresses occur. Low thermal conductivity materials have been good choices for conserving the heat energy of thermal devices. However, the thermal frangibility and brittleness of some materials have remained challenges to solve.

In this work, the use of regenerative cooling channels added to a liquid monopropellant microthruster is suggested as an alternative for thermal management of a microthruster structure fabricated by using a thermally fragile material. Glass, as one of the fragile and best low-conduction materials, was selected as a micro-fabrication material for this study. The suggested microthruster was fabricated using a photosensitive glass MEMS fabrication process. The feasibility of regenerative cooling using micro-channels was evaluated through the design, fabrication and performance testing of a glass microthruster with built-in regenerative micro channels.

Section snippets

Propellant considerations

Monopropellant is a propellant that releases energy through an exothermic decomposition reaction by a catalyst and produces high-temperature gases that can be converted to kinetic energy at a nozzle. Hydrazine(N2H4), hydrogen peroxide(H2O2) and ionic propellants, such as HAN(NH3OHNO3), ADN(NH4N(NO2)2), have been generally used as monopropellants. Hydrazine is the most commonly used storable monopropellant with high specific impulse. However, it is difficult to handle because of its high

Experimental testing setup

Experimental testing was performed to evaluate the fabricated microthruster. For the microthruster performance test, propellant, equipment for supplying the propellant, sensors, an imaging device and a data acquisition system were used. A drawing of the microthruster experimental setup is shown in Fig. 9. Owing to the low fluid flow rate of the propellant, additional attention was given to the propellant supply equipment, especially regarding the accuracy of the supplying force for microfluidic

Conclusion

A liquid monopropellant microthruster with built-in regenerative micro-cooling channels is suggested for handling the thermal stresses in microthrusters composed of thermally fragile materials. A microthruster with cooling channels was successfully fabricated with a MEMS photolithography process and experimentally tested in this work. To cool the microthruster structure, propellant was used as the working fluid in the cooling channel before it was fed into the chamber. Repeated pulse operation

Acknowledgment

This work was supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea(NRF) grant funded by the Korea government(MSIP) (No. NRF-2015R1A2A1A15055373).

Jeongmoo Huh received his B.S. degree in Department of Aerospace and Mechanical engineering from Korea Aerospace University, Goyang, Korea, in 2012. He received his M.S./Ph.D. degree in Department of Aerospace Engineering from Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST), Daejeon, Korea, in 2016. Currently he is a postdoctoral researcher at KAIST. His research interests include liquid propellant microthruster, microreactor, and sounding rocket system.

References (64)

  • J. Lee et al.

    Micro PEM fuel cell system with NaBH4 hydrogen generator

    Sens. Actuators A: Phys.

    (2012)
  • M.M. Micci et al.

    Micropropulsion for Small Spacecraft

    (2000)
  • H. Helvajian et al.

    Micro- and Nanotechnology for Space Systems

    (1997)
  • D.J. Barnhart et al.

    Very-small-satellite design for distributed space missions

    J. Spacecraft Rockets

    (2007)
  • A.M.d. Aragon

    Space applications of micro/nano-technologies

    J. Micromech. Microeng.

    (1998)
  • W.C. Tang

    Micromechanical devices at JPL for space exploration

  • S. Janson et al.

    Microtechnology for space systems

  • J. Mueller et al.

    Design and fabrication of MEMS-based micropropulsion deivces at JPL

  • S.W. Janson et al.

    Microthrusters for nanosatellites

  • M.H. Wu et al.

    A novel electrolytic ignition monopropellant microthruster based on low temperature co-fired ceramic tape technology

    Lab Chip

    (2009)
  • D. Plumlee et al.

    Development and simulation of an embedded hydrogen peroxide catalyst chamber in low-temperature co-fired ceramics

    Int. J. Appl. Ceram. Technol.

    (2007)
  • D.L. Hitt et al.

    MEMS-based satellite micrpropulsion via catalyzed hydrogen peroxide decomposition

    Smart Mater. Struct.

    (2001)
  • P. Kundu et al.

    MnO2 nanowire embedded hydrogen peroxide monopropellant MEMS thruster

    J. Microelectromech. Syst.

    (2013)
  • H. Yue et al.

    Vacuum experiment study on a N2O monopropellant micro-thruster

    J. Aerosp. Power

    (2011)
  • J. Lee et al.

    Fabrication of catalyst-insertion-type microelectromechanical systems monopropellant thruster

    J. Propul. Power

    (2013)
  • C.K. Kuan et al.

    Development and ground tests of a 100-millinewton hydrogen peroxide monopropellant microthruster

    J. Propul. Power

    (2007)
  • J. Huh et al.

    Design, fabrication and thrust measurement of a micro liquid monopropellant thruster

    J. Micromech. Microeng.

    (2014)
  • M.H. Wu et al.

    Design, fabrication and characterization of a low-temperature co-fired ceramic gaseous bi-propellant microthruster

    J. Micromech. Microeng.

    (2010)
  • W.S. Cheung et al.

    Testing of a novel propulsion system for micro air vehicles

    P I Mech Eng G-J Aer

    (2001)
  • C. Rossi et al.

    Design, fabrication and modelling of MEMS-based microthrusters for space application

    Smart Mater. Struct.

    (2001)
  • C. Rossi

    Micropropulsion for space-a survey of MEMS-based micro thrusters and their solid propellant technology

    Sensors Updates

    (2002)
  • C. Rossi et al.

    Solid propellant microthrusters on silicon: design, modeling, fabrication, and testing

    J. Microelectromech. Syst.

    (2006)
  • Cited by (22)

    • Room-temperature catalytically reactive ammonium dinitramide–H<inf>2</inf>O<inf>2</inf> monopropellant for microsatellites

      2022, Advances in Space Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      In the similar kind of microthrusters, LMP-103S exhibited a characteristic velocity efficiency of 82% (Lee et al., 2018). In addition, 90-wt% hydrogen peroxide also shows a characteristic velocity efficiency of 26–49% (Huh and Kwon, 2015; Huh et al., 2017). The desired pressure and temperature of the catalyst bed were not achieved due to three reasons.

    • Liquid propellant microthrusters

      2022, Space Micropropulsion for Nanosatellites: Progress, Challenges and Future
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Jeongmoo Huh received his B.S. degree in Department of Aerospace and Mechanical engineering from Korea Aerospace University, Goyang, Korea, in 2012. He received his M.S./Ph.D. degree in Department of Aerospace Engineering from Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST), Daejeon, Korea, in 2016. Currently he is a postdoctoral researcher at KAIST. His research interests include liquid propellant microthruster, microreactor, and sounding rocket system.

    Daeban Seo received the B.S. degree in aerospace engineering from Pusan National University, Busan, Korea, in 2009. He received his M.S. and Ph.D. degrees in Aerospace Engineering from Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST), Daejeon, Korea, in 2011 and 2014, respectively. Currently, he is senior researcher at Korea Aerospace Research Institute and working on the main rocket engine of KSLV-II.

    Sejin Kwon received the B.S. degree from Seoul National University, Seoul, Korea, in 1982. He received his M.S. degree in Aerospace Engineering from KAIST, Seoul, Korea in 1984, and Ph.D. in Aerospace Engineering from University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA, in 1991. In 1997, he joined the Department of Aerospace Engineering at KAIST, where he is now a Full Professor. His current research area includes micro-catalytic reactor, micro-fuel cell, and micro-propulsion devices.

    View full text