Elsevier

Progress in Surface Science

Volume 91, Issue 4, December 2016, Pages 183-202
Progress in Surface Science

Review article
Review on charge transfer and chemical activity of TiO2: Mechanism and applications

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.progsurf.2016.11.001Get rights and content

Abstract

Charge separation and transfer at the interface between two materials play a significant role in various atomic-scale processes and energy conversion systems. In this review, we present the mechanism and outcome of charge transfer in TiO2, which is extensively explored for photocatalytic applications in the field of environmental science. We list several experimental and computational methods to estimate the amount of charge transfer. The effects of the work function, defects and doping, and employment of external electric field on modulating the charge transfer are presented. The interplay between the band bending and carrier transport across the surface and interface consisting of TiO2 is discussed. We show that the charge transfer can also strongly affect the behavior of deposited nanoparticles on TiO2 through built-in electric field that it creates. This review encompasses several advances of composite materials where TiO2 is combined with two-dimensional materials like graphene, MoS2, phosphorene, etc. The charge transport in the TiO2-organohalide perovskite with respect to the electron-hole separation at the interface is also discussed.

Introduction

Titanium dioxide (TiO2), owing to its nontoxicity, stability and intriguing electronic structure, has been extensively explored for its promising applications in waste-water purification, catalysis and solar energy utilization [1]. TiO2 based materials are of great interests in energy storage and conversion devices such as rechargeable lithium ion batteries [2] and dye-sensitized solar cells [3], [4]. Various methods including metal/nonmetal doping and surface functionalization, have been explored to tailor the band gap of TiO2 (∼3.0 eV for rutile and 3.2 eV for anatase) for improving the light adsorption and charge transport [5], [6], [7], [8], [9].

Amongst the various applications based on TiO2, transport of nuclei and flow of charge frequently occur and greatly affect their overall performance. While the mass transport dominates in the growth of materials and lithium battery application, the charge transfer affects the evolution of morphology, interfacial formation, and efficiency of external field excitation [10]. Moreover, the transfer and flow of energy are normally accompanied by the charge separation, transport and recombination. Charge separation occurring in the dye-sensitized solar cells by electron injection from the excited state of the sensitizer to TiO2 dominates the efficiency of the photoelectric conversion [11]. Interfacial charge redistribution directly leads to the band bending occurring in various heterostructures consisting of TiO2. Poor charge transport is also one of the major limitation for the water oxidation [12]. Charging of the molecular adsorbates above TiO2 surface is highly important in catalytic oxidation reactions, chemical sensing, and photocatalysis [13]. For instance, as shown in Fig. 1, Lee et al. demonstrated the electron-induced dissociation of CO2 due to electron injection from the STM tip into the adsorbed CO2 adsorbed at the oxygen vacancy (VO) defect on the TiO2 (1 1 0).

Noble metals supported by TiO2 are intensively explored as the catalysis for low-temperature CO oxidation [14], [15]. The charge states of the noble metals and the charge redistribution at the perimeter [16] between these nano particles and the supports are major factors affecting the catalytic performance. Understanding the mechanism of charge transfer is of utmost importance for improving the energy transfer efficiency [17]. Through examining the charged states of the Au20 clusters supported on TiO2 (1 1 0) surface for CO oxidation, it is found that the charging/discharging of the Au20 cluster controls the amount of O2 intake at the oxide/cluster interface and strongly influences the energetics of reactions[18], [19], [20].

There is a large body of review papers on the surface, structure, and applications of TiO2 [21], [22], [23], [24], [25]. In this review, we focus on the charge transfer with respect to the mechanisms and correlation with performance. While most of the examples are taken from TiO2, the concepts and discussions for the charge transfer illustrated are valid in general and apply to other oxide surface. We start with the introduction of the methods to measure and quantify the amount of charge transfer in Section 2. In Section 3, several physical and chemical processes in TiO2 affected by charge transfer are given. In Section 4, we list the factors affecting the charge transfer. Typical materials systems based on TiO2 are given in Section 5.

Section snippets

Experimental and theoretical approaches to quantify the charge transfer

The redistribution of the charge between different materials can lead to the variation of the structural and electronic properties [26]. In principle, tracing the changes in quantities like bond length, vibrational frequencies, and oxidative state of typical atoms should facilitate the observation of charge transfer. However, due to the structural complexity in the nanoscale, determination of the degree of charge transfer is far from straight forward and normally the combination of experimental

Factors affecting charge transfer

Charge transfer occurs upon contacting different materials at the interface. Driven by the alignment of the Fermi level in the two materials, in principle, any factors that affect the electronic structure of either component of the material may change the magnitude or even the trend of the charge transfer. In the following, we list several typical factors which are proven to play important roles in modulating the charge transfer.

Band bending

Band bending refers to the phenomena of spatially dependent band energies of electrons in the proximity of the surface or interface of a semiconductor. The transport property of carriers is strongly affected by the barrier height of the space charge region due to band bending [100], [101]. The underlying mechanism of the band bending is due to the charge transfer in the vicinity of the surface or interface of a semiconducting material which forms contacts with other materials. Band bending can

TiO2-two dimensional materials

Two-dimensional (2D) materials have attracted extensive attention owing to their intriguing electronic properties. Although TiO2 has excellent electrical conductance for applications in photocatalysis and photovoltaic, the relatively large band gap of pristine TiO2 (3.2 eV for anatase and 3.0 eV for rutile) limits the lifetime of the generated photoexcited electrons and holes. Interfacing wide-band gap TiO2 with 2D materials may improve the charge separation and increase the light absorption

Conclusion

Charge transfer at TiO2 not only affects the electronic properties, but also phenomena involving coupled electron-ion dynamics such as resistive switching, chemical sensing and catalysis. The efficiencies of photon adsorption and photocatalysis strongly rely on the fast transport of photo excited carriers across the interface between the sensitizer or the reactants to the TiO2. In this review, various techniques including both experimental and theoretical methods to estimate the degree of

Acknowledgement

Cai Y. gratefully acknowledge the financial support from the Agency for Science, Technology and Research (A∗STAR), Singapore.

References (200)

  • Y. Yoon et al.

    ACS Catal.

    (2015)
  • U. Diebold

    Surf. Sci. Rep.

    (2003)
  • V. Etacheri et al.

    J. Photochem. Photobiol. C Photochem. Rev.

    (2015)
  • Z. Dohnálek et al.

    Prog. Surf. Sci.

    (2010)
  • N. Nakajima et al.

    Surf. Sci.

    (2004)
  • N. Nakajima et al.

    Surf. Sci.

    (2004)
  • K. Yang et al.

    Appl. Catal. B

    (2016)
  • D. Panayotov et al.

    Surf. Sci.

    (2016)
  • N.G. Petrik et al.

    Surf. Sci.

    (2016)
  • P. Rodriguez et al.

    J. Catal.

    (2014)
  • S. Chabungbam et al.

    Chem. Phys. Lett.

    (2016)
  • H. Lin et al.

    Appl. Catal. B

    (2014)
  • M. Bauer et al.

    Prog. Surf. Sci.

    (2015)
  • H. Jung et al.

    A.C.S. Appl. Mater. Interfaces

    (2015)
  • Z.W. Seh et al.

    Nat. Comm.

    (2013)
  • M. Buchalska et al.

    ACS Catal.

    (2015)
  • S.S.K. Raavi et al.

    J. Phys. Chem. C

    (2014)
  • A. Sasahara et al.

    J. Phys. Chem. C

    (2016)
  • H. Ren et al.

    Inorg. Chem.

    (2016)
  • C. Marchiori et al.

    J. Phys. Chem. C

    (2014)
  • D.G. Mieritz et al.

    Inorg. Chem.

    (2016)
  • C.D. Valentin et al.

    Acc. Chem. Res.

    (2014)
  • D. Mandal et al.

    A.C.S. Appl. Mater. Interfaces

    (2016)
  • T.H. Tan et al.

    ACS Catal.

    (2016)
  • A.P. Singh et al.

    ACS Catal.

    (2016)
  • M. Setvín et al.

    Science

    (2013)
  • D. Widmann et al.

    ACS Catal.

    (2016)
  • J. Li et al.

    J. Am. Chem. Soc.

    (2014)
  • Y. Cai et al.

    J. Chem. Phys.

    (2013)
  • Y.-G. Wang et al.

    J. Am. Chem. Soc.

    (2013)
  • M.A. Henderson et al.

    Chem. Rev.

    (2013)
  • J. Lee et al.

    J. Am. Chem. Soc.

    (2011)
  • S. Bagheri et al.

    Sci. World J.

    (2014)
  • Q. Guo et al.

    Chem. Soc. Rev.

    (2016)
  • J. Onoda et al.

    J. Phys. Chem. C

    (2014)
  • J. Jiang et al.

    J. Phys. Chem. C

    (2007)
  • Z. Jiang et al.

    J. Phys. Chem. C

    (2007)
  • B. Yoon et al.

    Science

    (2005)
  • Y. Cai et al.

    Nanotechnology

    (2011)
  • A.M. Márquez et al.

    Theor. Chem. Acc.

    (2010)
  • M. McEntee et al.

    J. Am. Chem. Soc.

    (2015)
  • I.X. Green et al.

    J. Am. Chem. Soc.

    (2012)
  • Y. Cao et al.

    Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys.

    (2016)
  • A.S. Wörz et al.

    J. Phys. Chem. B

    (2005)
  • N.G. Petrik et al.

    J. Phys. Chem. Lett.

    (2010)
  • D. Sporleder et al.

    J. Phys. Chem. C

    (2009)
  • Z. Zhang et al.

    J. Phys. Chem. C

    (2010)
  • M.A. Henderson et al.

    J. Phys. Chem. C

    (2013)
  • E. Lira et al.

    J. Am. Chem. Soc.

    (2011)
  • N.G. Petrik et al.

    J. Phys. Chem. C

    (2011)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text