Evaluation of red mud as surface treatment for carbon steel prior painting
Introduction
Red mud (RM) is the insoluble residue remaining after the caustic digestion of bauxite, the ore used in the production of alumina through the Bayer process. This highly alkaline residue (pH = 10–12.5) is composed primarily of fine particles containing silica, aluminium, iron, calcium and titanium oxides and hidroxides (along with other minor components). The iron impurities are responsible for the brick red colour of the mud [1]. For every tonne of alumina produced, between 1 and 2 t (dry weight) of red mud residues are generated. This waste is a major environmental problem for areas where alumina industries are installed because of the alkaline nature and the chemical and mineralogical species present in RM [2].
Many attempts have been made over the years to find a use for this residue; some have been based on its possible usage as a partial substitute of clay in ceramic products (bricks, tiles, etc.) [3] or as an additive for mortar and concrete [4]. Attempts have also been made to use bauxite residue in agricultural applications, such as, in acidic soils or as a treatment for iron deficient soils [5]. Toxic heavy metals have been removed from aqueous solutions using red mud as an absorbent [6], [7]. Unfortunately, those applications have proven to be economically unsatisfactory and research should be continued.
The surface properties of red mud particles will strongly determine its behaviour, not only the composition but also the particle size that ranges between 50 Å and 1 μm. The caustic insoluble bauxite minerals are hematite (Fe2O3), aluminium goethite ((Fe, Al)OOH), and titanium oxides; occasionally, boehmite (AlOOH) may be present depending on the extraction conditions. The aluminium loss in the Bayer process is due to the formation of a insoluble by-product named “Bayer sodalite”, 3(Na2O·Al2O3·2SiO2·nH2O)·Na2X, where X may be CO3−, SO4−, 2OH−, 2Cl− or a mixture of them, depending on the digesting liquor composition. The n value ranges from 0 to 2 [8]. Most of these minerals and oxides exhibit acid/base type behaviour [9], which is expected to occur on the surface of red mud particles. Surface charge properties of red mud have been studied by means of potentiometric titration, the RM particles in alkaline aqueous solutions carry ionised surface hydroxyl groups, SO− (S denotes red mud surface), these active sites can favour the adhesion between red mud particles and a metallic surface. On the other hand, when protons are added to RM aqueous solutions, the surface hydroxyl groups adsorb H+ ions, resulting in a nearly constant pH in the bulk solution, which indicates a certain buffering character [8], [10], [11]. Besides, Cl− ions can replace the surface OH groups, i.e., RM particles can capture aggressive ions, like Cl−, from the environment. In this field, previous studies have been carried out to evaluate the steel corrosion inhibition using RM aqueous solutions or red mud as an additive to cement paste (steel embedded in mortar) when Cl− ions are present [12], [13], [14]. The obtained results indicate that red mud is good corrosion inhibitor against chloride attack in this alkaline media.
Finally, the presence of Fe3+ species indicates a certain redox activity; in this way, attempts to use RM as an anodic pigment in anticorrosive paints have been reported [15], [16].
Following those experiences, and based on the previous works by our group, the present paper deals with the possible use of RM as an alternative pre-treatment of carbon steel. The traditional treatments, based on chromate conversion layers, are hazardous and new environment-friendly alternatives are being investigated [17], [18]. Bearing this in mind, the first part of this study is focused on the assessment of the conditions which enable optimal surface passivation. Once those parameters were defined, the second part was devoted to the evaluation of such pre-treatment with a comparative study between painted samples previously treated, and grinded carbon steel without treatment.
Section snippets
Experimental
Carbon steel samples (S = 4 cm2) were prepared with different surface finishing: ground, pickled with HCl acid or degreased with trichloroethylene. The passivation procedure was direct immersion in a red mud suspension. The RM was supplied by ALCOA factory located in San Cibrao (Northwest of Spain) with a chemical composition (w/w, %): Fe2O3 (37%), TiO2 (20%), Al2O3 (12%), SiO2 (9%), CaO (6%), Na2O (5%), H2O (1000 °C) (11%). The RM suspensions were prepared by adding 20 g of solid to 1 l of distilled
Surface passivation conditions
Fig. 1 depicts the corrosion potential evolution with immersion time for carbon steel samples immersed in stirred and decanted RM suspensions, with different steel surface finishing. This parameter seems to be critical: the higher initial potentials correspond to the ground sample, where the pre-existing oxides are mechanically removed. In the case of degreased and pickled samples, cleaning is less effective and some oxides may remain on the steel surface. In alkaline media, those oxides,
Conclusions
The study of different parameters which can affect the steel surface passivation indicates that the better conditions correspond to ground surfaces immersed for about 24 h in stirred and decanted red mud suspensions. Based on the X-ray diffraction results, iron and aluminium oxo-hidroxides are the only RM components deposited on the metallic surface, not as a continuous layer but as discrete distribution of particles.
The presence of RM particles promote Cl− ions adsorption on the steel surface
References (22)
- et al.
Colloids Surf. A
(1999) - et al.
Cem. Conc. Res.
(1997) - et al.
Water Res.
(1998) - et al.
Colloids Surf. A
(2001) - et al.
Electrochim. Acta
(2004) - et al.
Prog. Org. Coat.
(2001) - et al.
Corros. Sci.
(2003) - et al.
Corros. Sci.
(1997) - et al.
Electrochim. Acta
(2002) - et al.
Light Met.
(1992)
Res. Ind.
Cited by (54)
Toward sustainable green alumina production: A critical review on process discharge reduction from gibbsitic bauxite and large-scale applications of red mud
2023, Journal of Environmental Chemical EngineeringA review of the sustainable utilisation of red mud and fly ash for the production of geopolymer composites
2022, Construction and Building MaterialsSustainable utilization of red mud waste (bauxite residue) and slag for the production of geopolymer composites: A review
2022, Case Studies in Construction MaterialsCharacteristic, hazard and iron recovery technology of red mud - A critical review
2021, Journal of Hazardous MaterialsEvaluation of red mud as filler in Brazilian dense graded asphalt mixtures
2020, Construction and Building MaterialsA review on advances in sustainable energy production through various catalytic processes by using catalysts derived from waste red mud
2019, Renewable EnergyCitation Excerpt :Normally, different composition of RM includes Fe2O3, Al2O3, SiO2, Na2O, TiO2, CaO, MgO and other constituents such as K, V, Cr, Mn, P, Ga, Mg, Zn, Nb, Th, and Ni dispersed in smaller amounts in an alkaline medium [11,67,75–78]. The composition of RM originated from different plants across the world are shown in Table 2 [12,13,16,17,20,22–24,27,34,38,40,49,50,56,69,79–88]. The X-ray diffraction analysis (Fig. 2) confirmed different mineralogical phases of various elements in RM, such as hematite (α- Fe2O3), gibbsite (Al(OH3), quartz (SiO2), calcite (CaCO3), calcium silicate (Ca2(SiO4), sodium aluminate (NaAlO2) and sodalite (Na8Al6(SiO4)6Cl2) [89].