Elsevier

Polymer

Volume 222, 22 April 2021, 123646
Polymer

Effect of interfacial interactions on static and dynamic behavior of hyperbranched polymers: Comparison between different layered nanoadditives

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2021.123646Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Intercalated nanocomposites for both Hybrane/Na+-MMT and Hybrane/Graphite Oxide.

  • Interfacial interactions affect the characteristic interlayer distances.

  • Suppression of thermal transitions for intercalated chains.

  • The presence of the polymer influences the thermal reduction temperature of GO.

  • Interfacial interactions and confinement affect the dynamic response of the polymer.

Abstract

The structure and dynamics of a hyperbranched poly (ester amide) and its nanocomposites with natural sodium montmorillonite (Na+-MMT) and graphite oxide (GO) are investigated to provide an understanding of the influence of different polymer-inorganic interfacial interactions on the polymer behavior. In both systems, the favorable interactions lead to intercalated structures; however, the different interaction strengths create polymer nanofilms of different thicknesses between the inorganic layers. The composition of the nanohybrids is such that all chains are expected to reside within the galleries of the nanoadditives. Thermal reduction of GO in the presence of the polymer forces the system to lose its periodic structure; nevertheless, the deoxygenation temperature decreases in the presence of the polymer when compared to the respective one for the bare GO. At the same time, the thermal stability of the polymer decreases in the presence of GO. In both cases, the glass transition of the intercalated chains is fully suppressed. The different surface interactions affect polymer dynamics by modifying the number of relaxation processes, their relaxation times which become faster or slower than the bulk, as well as the temperature dependencies of the processes.

Introduction

Polymer nanohybrids, which consist of inorganic, metal/metal oxide or carbon-based nanoadditives (e.g., graphene, nanotubes, silicon dioxide, nanoparticles, clays, etc.) finely dispersed, in most of the times, within a polymer matrix, exhibit enhanced and often innovative physicochemical properties compared to their conventionally filled counterparts [[1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10]]. These optimized properties are ascribed to the size of the additives, which is in the range of nm, that leads to a significant increase of the interfacial area, thus, creating a large proportion of “interfacial” polymer chains, that possess different properties than the corresponding ones of the bulk polymer even at a low content [[11], [12], [13]]. Understanding the correlation between the physicochemical features of the nanoadditives and of the polymer and the final properties of the nanohybrid is of pronounced significance for the design of novel materials with specific functionalities for advanced applications [[14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19]]. Along these lines, the way polymers crystallize close to surfaces and/or under confinement and how one can control their crystallization has attracted scientific interest because it is a fundamental problem and it is very important for technological applications [[20], [21], [22], [23], [24]]. At the same time, the polymer chain conformations are modified close to inorganic surfaces and/or under confinement, as well [20,25,26]. Although the investigation of the structure of the nanohybrid materials and the optimization of their properties have attracted most of the scientific interest, the study of polymer dynamics in the presence of nanoadditives or under confinement has received less attention by the scientific community [[27], [28], [29], [30], [31], [32], [33], [34], [35], [36], [37]].

An especially interesting case among the various nanoadditives is the case of layered additives. In this case, based on the interactions between the polymer chains and the inorganic surfaces, three different structures can be obtained [38]: the phase separated, where there are unfavorable interactions between the chains and the inorganic fillers and each component resides in its own phase, the intercalated, where the polymer can diffuse between the inorganic layers forming a well ordered multilayer with a repeat distance of a few nanometers, and the exfoliated one, where the favorable interactions lead to the destruction of the layered structure of the inorganic material and to the dispersion of individual inorganic platelets within the polymeric matrix. Although the optimal properties of the nanocomposites are anticipated for exfoliated [[39], [40], [41], [42], [43], [44], [45], [46], [47], [48], [49], [50]] or intercalated [20,35,37,[51], [52], [53], [54], [55], [56]] structures because of the good interfacial interactions, the high aspect ratio and the large surface area, the intercalated structure offers the capability to investigate static and dynamic properties of macromolecules in nano-confinement, using, however, conventional analytic techniques on macroscopic samples [57,58]. Two of the most interesting layered materials are natural layered silicates and graphite oxide. Despite the hydrophilic character of both materials, which renders them suitable for mixing with polar polymers, their chemical composition as well as the structure of their surfaces are very different and, thus, different interactions and different affinity with certain polymers are anticipated. Layered silicates, like for example sodium montmorillonite (Na+-MMT), have been often utilized in the past to prepare polymer nanocomposites and study their behavior. An intercalated structure was observed when Na+-MMT was mixed with various hydrophilic linear polymers, like poly (ethylene oxide) [20], PEO, poly (hexa ethylene glycol methacrylate) [32], PHEGMA, biobased polyesters [37] or hydrophilic dendritic and star polymers [25,35]; polymer films with quantized thickness in the range of 0.4–1.2 nm were formed within the galleries of the inorganic material depending on the composition. Moreover, the effect of the additive as well as of the spatial confinement on the polymer morphology, chain conformations and dynamics was investigated. Thermal transitions like glass transition or crystallization were found to be suppressed under confinement, with the degree of crystallinity exhibiting a sharp decrease as a function of composition. Moreover, a significant increase of the gauche conformations in the melt indicated that the confined chains were more disordered and liquid-like [20].

The situation is even more complicated concerning polymer dynamics, where both faster or slower segmental dynamics have been observed compared to that of the bulk polymer, with either Arrhenius or Vogel-Fulcher-Tammann (VFT) temperature dependencies of the relaxation time depending on the polymer molecular weight (i.e., degree of confinement) or on the functional groups of the molecule [29,33,35,37]. Moreover, sub-glass transition temperature processes possess similar or faster relaxation times depending on the ability of the chain to form intra- and/or inter-molecular hydrogen bonds [35].

Many graphitic materials, like graphite itself or graphite oxide, possess a multilayered structure as well. In recent years, graphitic materials are of great interest due to their unique structural and morphological features, their relatively easy chemical modification as well as their excellent electrical, thermal and mechanical properties. Especially polymer/graphitic material nanocomposites have found plethora of applications for energy materials, solar cells, water splitting, biomedical applications, environmental and catalytic technologies as well as for electromagnetic shielding [[59], [60], [61], [62]]. During the last decade, there have been extensive research efforts on the preparation and investigation of the properties of GO, although graphite oxide was synthesized many decades before by the oxidation of graphite [63,64]; thus, a new additive that can exhibit tailored surface properties by functionalization is obtained. Moreover, graphite oxide can be mixed with hydrophilic polymers in order to obtain nanocomposites with either exfoliated or intercalated structures. Although it is mainly graphene or reduced graphene oxide that have been utilized for the preparation of polymer nanocomposites, there are a few works that utilized graphite oxide [[65], [66], [67], [68], [69], [70]]; nevertheless, in the majority of them, just a few percent of additive was used, which precluded the investigation of the polymer structure and dynamics under confinement [34,[71], [72], [73]].

On the other hand, polymer architecture is of great importance in polymer science since it affects physical properties including melt and solution viscosity, glass transition temperature, solubility in various solvents as well as the size of the chains in solution. A relatively new class of non-linear polymers that have attracted the scientific interest are the dendritic ones because of their exceptional characteristics like low viscosity, high density, and the existence of a large number of functional end-groups that allows them to be utilized in many applications [74,75]. They can be divided in dendrimers, which exhibit well-ordered, symmetric, tree-like structure, with arms organized into perfect generations with well-defined molecular weight, and in hyperbranched polymers, HBPs, which have a varying number of arm points, an asymmetric structure and a certain degree of polydispersity. HBPs show similar features with the dendritic macromolecules, in conjunction with the additional benefit of their cost-effective synthesis, feasible by one-pot synthetic methods, and not requiring purification procedures [76,77]. Hyperbranched polyesters [78] are an interesting class of HBPs, which have been investigated mostly regarding their synthesis and their molecular characterization [[79], [80], [81]] and less regarding their structure and their ability for hydrogen-bond networks formation [82], their structure-property relationship [83] and their dynamics [35,[84], [85], [86], [87], [88]].

For hyperbranched polymer/layered silicate nanocomposites, there is only a small number of works, which showed that, for hybrids with low amount of additive, an exfoliated structure is obtained, whereas, for high amounts of layered silicate inclusions, HBPs promote intercalated structures [89]; these findings were attributed to the polymer globular conformations and its high number of functional end-groups. A change in the rheological response of the nanocomposites is obtained, whereas their stiffness, strength and strain at break are found to increase especially in the case when an exfoliated structure is identified. For intercalated hyperbranched polyester nanocomposites, both differences and similarities were observed in the polymer dynamics when compared to the bulk polymer material depending on the relaxation process, its characteristic length scale and the ability to form hydrogen bonds [35,87]. Hyperbranched polyesters have been utilized for the functionalization of graphite oxide surfaces as well [90]; nevertheless, there are no works that investigate the structure, properties and dynamics of the polymers themselves when confined between the GO surfaces. Moreover, there are no works that attempt to compare the static and dynamic behavior of hyperbranched polyesters when they are intercalated in different types of layered materials like layered silicates and graphite oxide.

In this paper, a hyperbranched polyester amide, Hybrane®, is mixed with natural hydrophilic montmorillonite, Na+-MMT, and with graphite oxide in order to compare the effect of the interfacial interactions on the obtained structure and on the polymer thermal properties and relaxation dynamics. Intercalated structures are obtained in both cases; nevertheless, differences in the interlayer distances are observed because of the different polymer/surface interactions. Moreover, thermal reduction of GO in the presence of the polymer shows that the structure of the nanocomposite changes and a further expansion and/or even a full exfoliation of the GO layers is observed; the reduction temperature, where deoxygenation occurs, is found lower in the presence of the polymer than the respective one for the bare GO. In both cases, the glass transition of the intercalated chains is fully suppressed. The different surface interactions affect the polymer dynamics as well. The two sub-Tg secondary relaxation processes are observed in both nanocomposites with characteristic times possessing different temperature dependencies compared to the respective of the neat polymer whereas there is a process related to a branch motion that is observed only in the case of the GO nanocomposite. On the other hand, the segmental dynamics of the confined chains is observed either faster or slower than the one of Hybrane polymer; nevertheless in both cases it shows an Arrhenius temperature dependence.

Section snippets

Materials

Hybrane® S 1200, a hyperbranched poly (ester amide) [78] with a number-average molecular weight Mn = 1200 g/mol, was kindly provided by DSM. A probable chemical structure of the molecule, demonstrating its imperfect structure, is shown in Scheme 1. Hybrane possesses a number of hydroxyl and carboxyl groups that are able to form both intra- and inter-molecular hydrogen bonds. Hybrane is amorphous, with a glass transition temperature, Tg, of 315–320 K (according to its Safety Data sheet).

Structural behavior of hybrane nanocomposites

Fig. 1a shows X-ray diffraction measurements of graphite oxide, GO, to verify the quality of its layered structure. Initial measurement showed a strong peak at 2θ = 10.7° corresponding to an interlayer distance of 0.82 nm, the narrow thickness of which verifies the significant coherence of GO structure with an average of ~15 GO layers/particle (according to the Scherrer equation). Please note that the specific measurement was performed following drying of the GO in vacuum at room temperature

Conclusions

The static and dynamic behavior of two nanocomposites, comprised of a hyperbranched polyester amide and two different layered hydrophilic additives, was investigated to probe the effect of the different polymer/surface interactions. One of the additives was sodium montmorillonite, Na+-MMT, and the other one was graphite oxide, GO. In both cases, an intercalated structure was obtained and, for the compositions investigated, all chains are anticipated to reside within the interlayer galleries.

Declaration of competing interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Acknowledgements

This research has been partially supported by the project “National Research Infrastructure on nanotechnology, advanced materials and micro/nanoelectronics” (MIS 5002772) implemented under the “Action for the Strategic Development on the Research and Technological Sector”, funded by the Operational Programme “Competitiveness, Entrepreneurship and Innovation” (NSRF 2014–2020) and co-financed by Greece and the European Union (European Regional Development Fund). The authors acknowledge the

References (102)

  • S. Biswas et al.

    Mechanical and electrical property enhancement in exfoliated graphene nanoplatelet/liquid crystalline polymer nanocomposites

    Compos. Part A-Appl. Sci. Manuf.

    (2011)
  • A. Farahanchi et al.

    Extreme shear processing for exfoliating organoclay in nannocomposites with incompatible polymers

    Polymer

    (2018)
  • B.N. Jang et al.

    The thermal degradation of polystyrene nanocomposite

    Polymer

    (2005)
  • F.P. La Mantia et al.

    A simple method to interpret the rheological behaviour of intercalated polymer nanocomposites

    Comp. Part B-Eng.

    (2016)
  • D.G. Papageorgiou et al.

    Mechanical properties of graphene and graphene-based nanocomposites

    Prog. Mater. Sci.

    (2017)
  • Z. Li et al.

    The role of functional groups on graphene oxide in epoxy nanocomposites

    Polymer

    (2013)
  • D. Liu et al.

    Effect of oxidation degrees of graphene oxide on the structure and properties of poly(vinyl alcohol) composite films

    Compos. Sci. Technol.

    (2016)
  • F. Barroso-Bujans et al.

    Tunable uptake of poly(ethylene oxide) by graphite-oxide based materials

    Carbon

    (2012)
  • D.A. Tomalia

    The dendritic state, Mater

    Today Off.

    (2005)
  • E. Zagar et al.

    Characterization of commercial hyperbranched aliphatic polyesters

    Polymer

    (2006)
  • G.S. Dritsas et al.

    Investigation of thermodynamic properties of hyperbranched aliphatic polyesters by inverse gas chromatography

    J. Chromatogr. A

    (2009)
  • E. Malmstrom et al.

    Relaxation processes in hyperbranched polyesters: effect of terminal groups

    Polymer

    (1997)
  • M. Rodlert et al.

    Hyperbranched polymer/montmorillonite clay nanocomposites

    Polymer

    (2004)
  • J. Lin et al.

    Oxygen solubility and specific volume of rigid amorphous fraction in semicrystalline poly(ethylene terephthalate)

    Polymer

    (2002)
  • A. Sargsyan et al.

    The amount of immobilized polymer in PMMA SiO2 nanocomposites determined from calorimetric data

    Eur. Polym. J.

    (2007)
  • M. Wübbenhorst et al.

    Analysis of complex dielectric spectra. I. One-dimensional derivative techniques and three-dimensional modelling

    J. Non-Cryst. Sol.

    (2002)
  • S.S. Ray et al.

    Polymer/layered silicate nanocomposites: a review from preparation to processing

    Prog. Polym. Sci.

    (2003)
  • A. Bansal et al.

    Quantitative equivalence between polymer nanocomposites and thin polymer films

    Nat. Mater.

    (2005)
  • M. Moniruzzaman et al.

    Polymer nanocomposites containing carbon nanotubes

    Macromolecules

    (2006)
  • R.J. Tseng et al.

    Digital memory device based on tobacco mosaic virus conjugated with nanoparticles

    Nat. Nanotechnol.

    (2006)
  • P. Akcora et al.

    Anisotropic self-assembly of spherical polymer-grafted nanoparticles

    Nat. Mater.

    (2009)
  • S.K. Kumar et al.

    Nanocomposites: structure, phase behavior and properties

    Annu. Rev. Chem. Biol. Eng.

    (2010)
  • V. Mittal

    Functional polymer nanocomposites with graphene: a review

    Macromol. Mater. Eng.

    (2014)
  • S.K. Kumar et al.

    50th anniversary perspective: are polymer nanocomposites practical for applications?

    Macromolecules

    (2017)
  • A.C. Balazs et al.

    Nanoparticle polymer composites: where two small worlds meet

    Science

    (2006)
  • K.I. Winey et al.

    Polymer nanocomposites

    MRS Bull.

    (2007)
  • A.M. Pourrahimi et al.

    Highly efficient interfaces in nanocomposites based on polyethylene and ZnO nano/hierarchical particles: a novel approach toward ultralow electrical conductivity insulations

    Adv. Mater.

    (2016)
  • S. Ganguly et al.

    Polymer nanocomposites for electromagnetic interference shielding: a review

    J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol.

    (2018)
  • I. Pastoriza-Santos et al.

    Plasmonic polymer nanocomposites

    Nat. Rev. Mat.

    (2018)
  • D. Feldman

    Polymer nanocomposites for tissue engineering, antimicrobials and drug delivery

    Biointer. Res. Appl. Chem.

    (2018)
  • M. Abbas et al.

    (Bio)polymer/ZnO nanocomposites for packaging applications

    A Review of Gas Barrier and Mechanical Properties, Nanomaterials

    (2019)
  • V. Melinte et al.

    Polymer nanocomposites for photocatalytic applications

    Catalysts

    (2019)
  • D. Giliopoulos et al.

    Polymer/metal organic framework (MOF) nanocomposites for biomedical applications

    Molecules

    (2020)
  • K. Chrissopoulou et al.

    Crystallinity and chain conformation in PEO/layered silicate nanocomposites

    Macromolecules

    (2011)
  • J.M. Carr et al.

    Confined crystallization in polymer nanolayered films: a review

    J. Mater. Res.

    (2012)
  • S. Bollas et al.

    Polymer conformations close to surfaces

    Polymers

    (2017)
  • A.N. Rissanou et al.

    Structural and conformational properties of poly(ethylene oxide)/silica nanocomposites: effect of confinement

    Macromolecules

    (2017)
  • S.H. Anastasiadis et al.

    Nanoscopic-confinement effects on local dynamics

    Phys. Rev. Lett.

    (2000)
  • M.M. Elmahdy et al.

    Effect of confinement on polymer segmental motion and ion mobility in PEO/layered silicate nanocomposites

    Macromolecules

    (2006)
  • K. Chrissopoulou et al.

    Quasielastic neutron scattering of poly(methyl phenyl siloxane) in bulk and under severe confinement

    J. Chem. Phys.

    (2007)
  • View full text