Comparison of the thermal properties of AM20 and AS21 magnesium alloys
Introduction
Magnesium alloys, owing to their low density and high specific stiffness, are used as lightweight structural materials in various applications. Mg–Al-based alloys such as the AM and AZ series offer high specific stiffness and strength at room temperature. However, the AM and AZ type magnesium alloys exhibit low creep strength and hence, are not suitable for service at temperatures of 150–200 °C. Si addition may improve the thermal properties of Mg alloys at elevated temperature [1], [2]. Therefore, for applications in service conditions above 150 °C, the Mg–Al–Si (AS series) alloys may be considered as creep resistant magnesium alloys [3], [4]. Silicon in the AS series alloys forms stable Mg2Si precipitates. The stable Mg2Si phase can be present in two morphologies: Chinese-script type and massive type. The formation of the stable phase Mg2Si with its fine dispersion in the AS21 (Mg–2Al–1Si) alloy – (reduction in aluminium content decreases the amount of the Mg17Al12 phase in the alloy) – is why AS21 exhibits better creep strength than the commercial AM and AZ type magnesium alloys [4]. The Mg2Si phase has low density, high hardness and a high melting temperature. It is interesting to note that the density of Mg2Si is 1.88 g cm−3, which is close to that of Mg. On the other hand, the values of the CTE and thermal conductivity of Mg2Si at room temperature are 7.5 × 10−6 K−1 and 8.0 W m−1 K−1, respectively; they are much lower than those for Mg (25 × 10−6 K−1 and 156 W m−1 K−1). The Mg2Si phase has a higher strength at elevated temperatures than Mg17Al12 and the Mg2Si phase has a higher thermal stability than the Mg17Al12 phase.
The coefficient of thermal expansion of alloys and metal matrix composites (MMCs) is an important thermomechanical property. Structural components in service can be subjected to temperature changes and it may be important to minimise dimensional changes. Thermal conductivity plays an important role in the performance of alloys and MMCs in structures. The values of thermal conductivity may be essential for the selection of alloys for certain applications. However, very few papers give information about thermal properties of Mg-based alloys [5], [6], [7].
The aim of the present study is to measure the thermal properties CTE and thermal diffusivity of AS21 alloy in a wide temperature range and to calculate its thermal conductivity. This paper also reports temperature dependencies of the CTE, and thermal conductivity for the AM20 alloy as obtained elsewhere [7]. An attempt is made in the present study to account for the difference in the thermal properties behaviour between the AS21 and AM20 alloys.
Section snippets
Experimental
The materials for the present study were two magnesium alloys AM20 (Mg–2Al–0.5Mn) and AS21 (Mg–2Al–1Si–0.5Mn). The alloys were supplied by the Centre of Advanced Materials, Clausthal, and were prepared by squeeze casting. The molten alloys (700 °C) were poured from the melting crucible into a preheated die (350 °C) and a ram squeezes it. The two-stage application of pressure was used (40 MPa for 15 s followed under 70 MPa for 90 s). The ingot dimensions were 100 mm × 100 mm × 30 mm.
Samples for the thermal
Results
The temperature dependency of the thermal diffusivity of the AS21 magnesium alloy is shown in Fig. 1. The thermal diffusivity of the alloy increases with increasing temperature. The values for thermal diffusivity measured in the first thermal cycle are lower than those in the following thermal cycles. Fig. 2 shows the temperature dependency of the thermal diffusivity for the AM20 alloy. This alloy does not contain Si in comparison to the AS21 alloy, but otherwise they have the same content of
Discussion
The AS21 and AM20 magnesium alloys are usually used without thermal treatment. There are, however, differences between the corresponding physical properties, such as the thermal diffusivity, thermal conductivity and thermal expansion estimated in the as-cast state and those measured after heat treatment and thermal cycling.
It can be seen from the phase diagram [11] that changes in the microstructure of the AM20 alloy may also be expected during heating. The concentration of Al in solid solution
Conclusions
The thermal diffusivity and thermal conductivity of the AS21 alloy are about 30% lower than those of the AM20 alloy. The presence of Si in the AS21 alloy reduced the creation of Mg17Al12 precipitates. Aluminium stays dissolved and reduces the mean free path of electrons and phonons, and therefore the thermal diffusivity and thermal conductivity are decreased. Further decrease in the thermal diffusivity (and thermal conductivity) in the AS21 alloy occurs as a result of the existence of very fine
Acknowledgements
This work is a part of the research program MSM 0021620834 that is financed by the Ministry of Education of the Czech Republic. The authors acknowledge financial support from the Grant Agency of the Academy of Sciences under Grant A2112302 and from the Grant Agency of the Czech Republic under Grant 106/03/0901.
References (13)
- et al.
Mater. Sci. Eng. A
(2003) Mater. Res. Bull.
(1991)- et al.
Mater. Sci. Eng.
(2001) - et al.
Metall. Mater. Trans. A
(2004) - et al.
Adv. Eng. Mater.
(2003) - et al.
Adv. Eng. Mater.
(2003)