Elsevier

Marine Policy

Volume 59, September 2015, Pages 85-93
Marine Policy

Economic gains from introducing international ITQs—The case of the mackerel and herring fisheries in the Northeast Atlantic

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2015.05.002Get rights and content

Abstract

Achieving a balance between fishing capacity and fishing opportunities is one of the major challenges in European fisheries. One way to achieve this is to introduce individual tradable quotas or similar management measures. In several mackerel and herring fisheries in the Northeast Atlantic, such systems have already been introduced on a national basis and the long term economic gains of this have been acknowledged. This paper takes this a step further and investigates the potential economic gains from introducing individual tradable quotas between countries. Overall, the results show that the gross cash flow can be improved by 21% by allowing the mackerel and herring quotas to be traded internationally in the Northeast Atlantic. This rent gain arises mainly from increased productivity by allowing tradability between areas and fleets. The analysis also shows that the Danish pelagic fleet will gain from increasing its share of mackerel and herring quotas, whereas the Irish fleets are incentivised to sell quota, if individual quotas are allowed to be traded among countries. This result is in line with the qualitative analyses that show that Irish fishermen targeting herring in the Celtic Sea are negatively oriented towards international individual tradable quotas, whereas the Danish pelagic fishermen have strong preferences for international individual tradable quotas.

Introduction

One of the main challenges facing the EU Common Fisheries Policy is the overcapacity of European fleets [1], which is generally perceived as a major obstacle to achieving economically efficient fisheries [2]. One theoretically acknowledged method of reducing overcapacity is the implementation of individually tradable quota (ITQ) systems [3], [4], [5]. Impact assessment has also shown that in practice the ITQ system is an efficient way of both reducing overcapacity and of increasing economic performance of fleets [1]. A significant change in fleet structure (mainly a reduction in vessel numbers) is a generally observed response to the transition from more open-access fisheries to ITQ regimes, and is considered the main mechanism of capacity reduction [6]. A reduction in the number of vessels does not necessarily imply a reduction in the catching ability of the fleet, as quota-holders are liable to invest in larger vessels and engines, and in advanced technology [6]. As a consequence, fishing power and thus economic performance of the remaining ITQ-managed fleet is likely to improve [7]. Overcapacity reductions and fleet efficiency increases have been demonstrated following the introduction of national ITQ systems in a number of fisheries [6], [8] and an obvious question is whether similar changes can be expected if the tradability of individual quotas is introduced at the international level. To offer insights to this question, a model-based evaluation of a management scenario that introduces international ITQs for a sub-set of the European pelagic fishing fleets has been conducted.

This paper simulates the possible rent gains from expanding the current mackerel and herring quota management regimes in the Northeast Atlantic, many of them ITQ- or ITQ-like systems, to an international ITQ system, where mackerel and herring quotas can be traded across countries. The model is based on cost and earnings data from relevant pelagic fleets in Denmark, Great Britain, Ireland, Norway and Iceland and evaluates who may be likely to buy and sell quotas, if such a system were introduced. The investigated scenario integrates the North Sea and Northern management areas for mackerel into one large area in order to better reflect that mackerel is a migratory species with Western and North Sea spawning stock populations interconnected by straying mackerel [9]. A central question is how large the economic gains/losses will be by introducing an international ITQ-system for mackerel and herring in the Northeast Atlantic and how the distribution of quotas is expected to change.

Another topic of this analysis is the appraisal of which access and quota allocation systems the fishermen actually prefer and whether these preferences and expectations correspond to the development of landings of mackerel and herring across fleets in the simulated international ITQ system. Therefore, the results of the international ITQ scenario evaluation are contrasted with the outcomes of a choice experiment survey to evaluate fishermen’s preferences for new management measures, where Irish and Danish pelagic fleets have formed the basis of the interview survey [17].

The next Section 2 introduces the current management of herring and mackerel in the Northeast Atlantic. Section 3 describes the ITQ-model, which is used to estimate the economic gains from introducing international ITQs in selected pelagic fisheries in the Northeast Atlantic in addition to the methods used to assess fishermen preferences for fisheries management. Section 4 describes the data used in the bio-economic model, and Section 5 describes the economic gains and distributional changes from introducing international ITQs. These results are compared with the main results of the fishermen’s interviews, giving insight to their preferences for various management measures. Section 6 presents the paper’s conclusions and discussion.

Section snippets

Management of mackerel and herring in the Northeast Atlantic

The Icelandic herring fishery was one of the first fisheries in major oceans to be managed by ITQs and has existed since 1979 [10], [11]. The Dutch pelagic fishery for mackerel became an ITQ managed system in 1985, followed by the Dutch herring fishery in 1993 [11] and subsequently the Danish and Swedish pelagic fisheries for mackerel and herring have also introduced ITQs [12], [13]. Some major European pelagic fisheries of the Northeast Atlantic have been managed differently. The Norwegian

The ITQ-model

The ITQ model is based on the VQS-model developed for the IMPSEL project [16], which was financed by the Danish AgriFish Agency and was conducted in order to simulate the individual vessel-based gains from national vessel quota shares (VQS) in the Danish demersal fishery. The original model is different from the current model, because the latter includes more countries and is based on fishing fleets rather than individual vessels. The overall framework of the ITQ model is the same as the VQS

Model input data

The mackerel quota in the Northeast Atlantic is currently divided into three main management areas (see Table 1). In this paper, the areas within the North Sea (MAC/2A34) and Northern (MAC/2CX14) management area are analysed. A major reason for having both a North Sea management area and a Northern management area is the existence of a western spawning stock and a North Sea spawning stock, which were believed to be independent. However, recent research has shown a negative relationship between

Results

In this section, the economically optimal quota allocation among fleets and countries are estimated under the constraints that the quotas for each area are not exceeded. The production economic gains from such a scenario are also estimated. These results are compared with the main results of the interviews with Danish and Irish fishermen, giving insight to their preferences for various management measures.

Discussion and conclusion

This paper presents the economic gains of introducing international ITQs in the pelagic mackerel and herring fishery in the Northeast Atlantic. A full implementation of international ITQs is expected to make an economic gain of €74 million for the seven largest fleets that had a majority of mackerel and herring in their catches. This figure corresponds to 21% of the current gross cash flow. The private economic gains from introducing international ITQs of herring and mackerel are based on

Acknowledgements

This study was funded by the EU FP7 SOCIOEC project (Grant no. 289192); this financial support is gratefully acknowledged.

References (24)

  • Runolfsson B. On the management measures to reduce overcapacity in Iceandic fisheries. A short report of the Ministry...
  • R. Arnason

    Property rights in the fisheries: Iceland’s experience with ITQs

    Rev Fish Biol Fish

    (2005)
  • Cited by (5)

    • A game theoretic perspective on the management of shared North Sea fishery resources: Pre and post Brexit

      2021, Marine Policy
      Citation Excerpt :

      In terms of the economic returns from the fisheries, it is fair to say that they have improved. Over time, there has been a reduction in over-capacity in many of the fleets, which has also been helped by a move towards rights-based fishing with a positive impact on profitability (Thøgersen et al. [26]). Although the net economic surplus from cooperation may not have been maximised, it is obviously positive.

    • The Icelandic fishing industry: Its development and financial performance under a uniform individual quota system

      2016, Marine Policy
      Citation Excerpt :

      Also, the system encourages fishermen to focus on quality instead of quantity; that is, they will try to maximize the price obtained for the catch [11–13]. Trading in fishing rights results in enterprises able to catch at the lowest cost buying the rights from other less efficient companies, thus improving the profitability of the industry [14,15]. This also increases debt, but not necessarily the debt burden, because lower cost should increase cash flow; thus offsetting the negative impact of additional debt on financial costs and profitability [14,16].

    • The economics of the Swedish individual transferable quota system: Experiences and policy implications

      2016, Marine Policy
      Citation Excerpt :

      The profitability of the affected fisheries rose dramatically and excess capacity declined. Since then, similar systems have been introduced or considered for numerous fisheries around the world (see e.g. [2,30,35]). Surveys (see e.g. [9,15,23]) indicate socio-economically beneficial effects in most fisheries in which ITQ systems are in place.

    View full text