Leader behaviors and the work environment for creativity: Perceived leader support
Introduction
Like other crucial organizational outcomes, creativity and innovation stem not only from overall firm strategy and access to resources but, more fundamentally, from the minds of the individual employees who, alone or with others, carry out the work of the organization every day. The extent to which they will produce creative—novel and useful—ideas during their everyday work depends not only on their individual characteristics, but also on the work environment that they perceive around them (Amabile, Conti, Coon, Lazenby, & Herron, 1996). In contemporary knowledge-work-intensive organizations, most projects are done by teams of professionals striving to be both productive and creative in developing new products, new services, new processes, or new ways of doing business. Of all of the forces that impinge on people's daily experience of the work environment in these organizations, one of the most immediate and potent is likely to be the leadership of these teams—those “local leaders” who direct and evaluate their work, facilitate or impede their access to resources and information, and in a myriad of other ways touch their engagement with tasks and with other people.
Previous research presents some intriguing evidence that people's perceptions of the work environment created by their team leaders and, in particular, their perceptions of instrumental and socioemotional support, relate to their creativity (e.g., Oldham & Cummings, 1996, Scott & Bruce, 1994). However, little is known about how, specifically, these positive or negative work environments arise. What is it that leaders say and do, day by day, that leads people to perceive that they do or do not have the leader's support? We tackle this question in an exploratory study, by examining the daily diaries of employees who were working on team projects that required creativity. By studying these subordinates' diaries for evidence of the leader behaviors that stood out in their minds day by day, and the level of leader support that they perceived in their daily work environment, we probe the complex microprocesses through which organizational creativity ultimately rises and falls.
Section snippets
Leader support and creativity
Surprisingly, leadership has not generally been treated as a particularly important influence on creativity (Mumford, Scott, Gaddis, & Strange, 2002), despite the likely impact of leader behavior on the perceived work environment, and the demonstrated impact of the perceived work environment on creativity (e.g., Amabile et al., 1996, Mumford & Gustafson, 1988, Mumford et al., 2002, Witt & Beorkrem, 1989). Each of the three major theories of organizational creativity—the componential theory of
Influences of leader behaviors on perceived leader support
Our second research question focuses on how perceptions of leader support arise. We began our study with the assumption that it should be possible to identify specific leader behaviors associated with higher or lower levels of perceived support—particularly if we could track leader behaviors and subordinates' perceptions of support on a daily basis. Because we aim to link specific day-by-day leader behaviors with the perceived day-by-day leader support that we propose enhances creativity, the
Overview
The data for this study were collected as part of a multistudy longitudinal research program designed to investigate employees' experience of day-by-day organizational events, perceptions of the work environment, and performance. Our primary goal in the present study was to identify the day-by-day leader behaviors that might affect subordinates' perceptions of leader support and, ultimately, their creativity. We began by establishing a relationship between perceived leader support and
Relationship between perceived leader support and subordinate creativity
Research Question #1 asks whether a subordinate's day-by-day perceptions of team leader support relate to the subordinate's overall creativity. Because this question does not involve leader behaviors, we addressed it by using data from all 211 subordinates, regardless of whether they had reported a team leader behavior. The relationship between subordinates' mean daily perceived leader support and their mean peer-rated creativity was positive, moderate, and significant (ρ=.18, p<.05). This
Discussion
This study suggests that a leader who interacts daily with subordinates may, through certain behaviors directed at those subordinates, influence their daily perceptions, feelings, and performance, ultimately influencing the overall creativity of the work that they do. To come to this conclusion, we took advantage of a large and complex database with many unique characteristics. Although a full examination of the database will require a series of studies over a long period of time, this study
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by the Harvard Business School Division of Research and Faculty Development as part of the multistudy research program entitled “The T.E.A.M. Study: Events That Influence Creativity.” We gratefully acknowledge the help of several individuals in carrying out this research and preparing this manuscript: Robin Ely, Scott Snook, Monica Higgins, Jennifer Mueller, Susan Archambault, Debbie Siegel, Rasheea Williams, Talia Grosser, Allison Bonk, Dean Whitney, Jeremiah
References (42)
Leadership and performance outcomes in research organizations
Organizational Behavior and Human Performance
(1975)Combinative aspects of leadership style: The ordering and temporal spacing of leadership behaviors
The Leadership Quarterly
(2001)- et al.
Communication patterns, project performance, and task characteristics: An empirical evaluation and integration in an R&D setting
Organizational Behavior and Human Performance
(1979) - et al.
Relationships of managerial effectiveness and advancement to self-reported and subordinate-reported leadership behaviors from the multiple-linkage model
The Leadership Quarterly
(1995) - et al.
Leading creative people: Orchestrating expertise and relationships
The Leadership Quarterly
(2002) - et al.
Supervisor–subordinate conflict and perceptions of leadership behavior: A field study
The Leadership Quarterly
(2003) A model of creativity and innovation in organizations
Motivating creativity in organizations: On doing what you love and loving what you do
California Management Review
(1997)- et al.
Changes in the work environment for creativity during downsizing
Academy of Management Journal
(1999) - et al.
Assessing the work environment for creativity
Academy of Management Journal
(1996)
Bridging the boundary: External activity and performance in organizational teams
Administrative Science Quarterly
Creative ability, the laboratory environment, and scientific performance
IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management
The empowering leadership questionnaire: The construction and validation of a new scale for measuring leader behaviors
Journal of Organizational Behavior
The collective construction of workgroup moods
Administrative Science Quarterly
Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior
The description of supervisory behavior
Journal of Applied Psychology
A theory of individual creative action in multiple social domains
Academy of Management Review
Multilevel statistical models
A user's guide to MLwiN
Life cycle theory of leadership
Training and Development Journal
A path-goal theory of leader effectiveness
Administrative Science Quarterly
Cited by (904)
How do perceived organizational green climate and corporate energy-saving behaviors promote each other? An integrated evaluation model
2024, Environmental Impact Assessment ReviewInnovative leadership in organizations: Dimensions, measurement, and validation
2024, Journal of Business ResearchInnovation climate for individual motivation and innovation performance: Is innovative behavior a missing link?
2023, Journal of Innovation and Knowledge