Review
Role of polyanhydrides as localized drug carriers

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jconrel.2004.12.021Get rights and content

Abstract

Many drugs that are administered in an unmodified form by conventional systemic routes fail to reach target organs in an effective concentration, or are not effective over a length of time due to a facile metabolism. Various types of targeting delivery systems and devices have been tried over a long period of time to overcome these problems. Targeted delivery or localized drug delivery offers an advantage of reduced body burden and systemic toxicity of the drugs, especially useful for highly toxic drugs like anticancer agents. Local drug delivery via polymer is a simple approach and hypothesized to avoid the above stated problems. Polyanhydrides are a unique class of polymer for drug delivery because some of them demonstrate a near zero order drug release and relatively rapid biodegradation in vivo. Further, the release rate of polyanhydride fabricated device can be altered over a thousand fold by simple changes in the polymer backbone. Hence, these are one of the best-suited polymers for drug delivery, with biodegradability and biocompatibility. The review focuses on the advantages of polyanhydride carriers in localized drug delivery along with their degradability behavior, toxicological profile and role in various disease conditions.

Introduction

The constant efforts of drug delivery scientists have been to maximize the therapeutic effect of the drug and minimize the adverse effects. Drugs given by conventional routes like oral, IV, IM injections are distributed to all body parts which include both, target and non-target sites. This creates a burden on the whole body system, while the requirement is only at a particular site in the body. There are many drugs, both old and new pharmaceuticals and new molecular entities, that can be administered in a way that it not only improves safety and efficacy but also in some cases, results in new therapies [1]. Many disease conditions like cancer (especially solid tumors) [2], thrombosis, restenosis [3], osteomyelitis [4], local infection [5], glaucoma and retinal disorders [6] are difficult to treat by systemic therapy. The complexity of these diseases and the serious consequences limit the systemic therapy. For example, diseases of the retina are difficult to treat with systemically administered drugs because of the blood-retinal barrier and potential systemic toxicity; hemorrhagic complications arise when antithrombotic agents are administered systemically; and cancer treatments such as systemic therapy for a localized tumor often results in serious side effects [7]. The last decade witnessed a huge amount of research aimed at creating new drug delivery systems, because of the disadvantages associated with systemic drug delivery. Several strategies have been explored to deliver the drug to a specific site or body compartment but delivery via polymer is one of the simplest approaches. Polymers find a widespread application in therapeutics and localized use of polymers has its own importance. Polymers for localized application can play structural, functional or both structural and functional roles. Functionally active classes of the polymers are used to improve the biocompatibility and the operation of a medical device or to deliver the pharmacologically active agents [8]. Though there is an enormous amount of work done for localized drug delivery using polymers, the advantages of using polymers should be weighed against following concerns: (1) the toxicity of polymers and their degradation products in the body i.e. biocompatibility (2) the overall cost of polymeric drug delivery systems (3) problems associated with release, i.e. dose dumping or release failure, and (4) the discomfort caused by the system itself or the means of insertion of the delivery system [9]. The polymers used in drug delivery can be broadly divided into two types: non-biodegradable and biodegradable [10]. Biodegradable polymers enjoy the advantages of self-elimination, avoiding the need to remove the polymer system from the site of implantation after its use. The wide acceptability of the biodegradable system can be appreciated from the fact that biodegradability can be manipulated by incorporating a variety of labile groups. Biodegradation can be enzymatic, chemical or of microbial origin or simply by hydrolysis [11].

The most desirable polymeric matrix for drug delivery is one that is hydrophobic, stable, strong, flexible, soluble in organic solutions, has a low melting point and degrades linearly over time in an aqueous environment [12]. Polyanhydrides are best suited to this class of polymers and are useful for controlled drug delivery as they degrade uniformly into non-toxic metabolites that are non-mutagenic, non-cytotoxic and non-inflammatory [12]. In 1980, Langer was the first to exploit the hydrolytically unstable nature of polyanhydrides for sustained release of drug in controlled drug delivery applications [13]. Since then, few polyanhydride products have reached the market or are in different clinical stages. Gliadel®, a device to deliver carmustine (BCNU) to the malignant glioma tumor, is the most successful story of polyanhydrides [14]. Polyanhydrides are the class of biodegradable polymers that release the drug majorly by simple hydrolysis, hence, ethnic enzymatic variation does not play an effective role on the polymer erosion and drug release or its pharmacological effects [15]. These have been investigated as an important biomaterial, used for short-term release of drugs and have been thoroughly investigated for their chemical and physical properties, degradation and stability, toxicity and applications in delivery of bioactive agents [16]. The degradation profile of these polymers can be modulated from days to months by varying the type and ratio of the monomers [12], [17]. Looking at all the aspects of localized delivery and disease conditions, this review focuses on the use of polyanhydrides in localized delivery with special attention to their degradability behavior in vitro and in vivo; toxicological profile; their uses in different disease conditions and recent advances in this field.

Section snippets

Advantages of localized delivery

While the search for new therapeutic targets and drugs is in continuous progress, maximization of delivery efficacy of existing drugs can also remarkably improve the current scenario in the management of disease. An attractive approach for the delivery of pharmacologically active compound is the controlled and sustained release of active agents from a resorbable polymeric delivery system that is implanted next to the diseased tissue [18]. The main advantage of localized drug delivery is high

Why polyanhydrides

There has been a need to develop more rational approaches for creating improved biomaterials for drug delivery, especially biodegradable polymers. For such polymers, to maximize control over release, it is often desirable for a system to degrade only from its surface. These surface eroding polymers are expected to release the drug at a constant release rate thus, the rate is directly proportional to the polymer erosion rate. For a surface-eroding device, the polymer must be hydrophobic but

Types of polyanhydrides

In the development of erodible materials, the use of copolymers is important and these copolymers can be obtained by using different monomer ratios for their different erosion rates which enables them to achieve different target times with the same monomers [16]. This versatility of the polyanhydrides is due to the hydrophobicity of the polymer backbone, which provides the basis of using a wide range of backbones and yet ensures biodegradability of the polymer. Due to hydrolytic sensitivity of

In vitro degradation and erosion of polyanhydrides

Polyanhydrides are made of sparingly water-soluble diacid monomers connected to each other by anhydride bonds, which are hydrolytically very labile and split readily into two carboxylic acids in the presence of water molecules. Hydrolysis of the anhydride bond is base catalyzed and thus, the rate of degradation of the polymer and the diffusion of oligomers and monomers formed by polymer degradation depends on the pH of the surrounding medium and solubilities of these compounds in the medium.

In vivo degradation and elimination of polyanhydrides

Polyanhydrides were initially developed in matrix form as implantable drug carrier systems. It is critical to understand the processes involved in degradation and erosion of polyanhydrides in an in vivo environment and the differences between in vitro and in vivo degradation. Surface erosion of polyanhydrides depends on the penetration of water into the matrix system to hydrolyze the anhydride bonds. After hydrolysis, matrices degrade into degradation products of polyanhydrides which

Toxicological aspects of polyanhydrides

Toxicological aspects of polyanhydride deals with the host response in terms of cytotoxicity, allergic responses, irritation, inflammation, and systemic and chronic toxicity. Cytotoxicity tests are the first in a sequential program of tests for assessing the biocompatibility of a polymer for which, tissue culture methods are used [61]. In a study, bovine aortic endothelial cells and bovine smooth muscle cells were used to evaluate the in vitro biocompatibility of three polyanhydrides P(CPP-SA)

Polyanhydrides and disease conditions

Different polyanhydrides and their copolymers have proven to play an important role as drug carriers in localized drug delivery applications in various disease conditions as shown in Table 3.

Conclusion

Localized delivery is preferred over the systemic delivery in certain disease conditions like cancer, osteomyelitis, local anesthesia, glaucoma, restenosis, gene delivery and others. It is beneficial where high drug concentration is required at the site of action to increase the therapeutic effect and reduce the systemic side effects. Among the different polymers used in drug delivery applications, polyanhydrides have gained a lot of popularity in the recent years due to its unique

References (156)

  • W. Vogelhuber et al.

    Programmable biodegradable implants

    J. Control. Release

    (2001)
  • P.P. Wang et al.

    Local drug delivery to the brain

    Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev.

    (2002)
  • J.S. Deng et al.

    Effect of gamma-radiation on a polyanhydride implant containing gentamicin sulfate

    Int. J. Pharm.

    (2002)
  • B.M. Vogel et al.

    Synthesis of novel biodegradable polyanhydrides containing aromatic and glycol functionality for tailoring of hydrophilicity in controlled drug delivery devices

    Biomaterials

    (2005)
  • M.J. Kipper et al.

    Understanding polyanhydride blend phase behavior using scattering, microscopy, and molecular simulations

    Polymer

    (2004)
  • J. San Roman et al.

    Thermal degradation of poly(o-methacryloyloxybenzoic acid)

    Polym. Degrad. Stab.

    (1987)
  • H. Akbari et al.

    Effect of geometry on the erosion characteristics of polyanhydride matrices

    Int. J. Pharm.

    (1998)
  • J. Siepmann et al.

    Mathematical modeling of bioerodible, polymeric drug delivery systems

    Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev.

    (2001)
  • K. Zygourakis

    Development and temporal evolution of erosion fronts in bioerodible controlled release devices

    Chem. Eng. Sci.

    (1990)
  • K. Zygourakis et al.

    Computer-aided design of bioerodible devices with optimal release characteristics: a cellular automata approach

    Biomaterials

    (1996)
  • A.J. Domb et al.

    In vivo and in vitro elimination of aliphatic polyanhydrides

    Biomaterials

    (1995)
  • D.S. Katti et al.

    Toxicity, biodegradation and elimination of polyanhydrides

    Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev.

    (2002)
  • A.J. Domb et al.

    Metabolic disposition and elimination studies of a radiolabelled biodegradable polymeric implant in the rat brain

    Biomaterials

    (1994)
  • Y. Li et al.

    Treatment of intracranial rat glioma model with implant of radiosensitizer and biomodulator drug combined with external beam radiotherapy

    Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys.

    (2004)
  • M. Berrada et al.

    Tumor treatment by sustained intratumoral release of 5-fluorouracil: Effects of drug alone and in combined treatments

    Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys.

    (2002)
  • M. Maniar et al.

    Controlled release of a local anesthetic from fatty acid dimer based polyanhydride

    J. Control. Release

    (1994)
  • W.-x. Guo et al.

    New polyanhydrides derived from C12,C13,C14,C15 dibasic acid: synthesis and characterization

    Polymer

    (2004)
  • D. Teomim et al.

    Perivascular delivery of heparin for the reduction of smooth muscle cell proliferation after endothelial injury

    J. Control. Release

    (1999)
  • L.A. Orloff et al.

    Biodegradable implant strategies for inhibition of restenosis

    Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev.

    (1997)
  • D.J. Quick et al.

    Delivering DNA from photocrosslinked, surface eroding polyanhydrides

    J. Control. Release

    (2004)
  • C.C. Mylonas et al.

    Preparation and evaluation of polyanhydride microspheres containing gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH), for inducing ovulation and spermiation in fish

    J. Control. Release

    (1995)
  • A.K. Singla et al.

    Paclitaxel and its formulations

    Int. J. Pharm.

    (2002)
  • S.K. Dordunoo et al.

    Release of taxol from poly(ε-caprolactone) pastes: effect of water-soluble additives

    J. Control. Release

    (1997)
  • K. Senior

    Glioblastoma: encouraging the body to fight back

    PSTT

    (2000)
  • D.S. Mohan et al.

    Outcome in elderly patients undergoing definitive surgery and radiation therapy for supratentorial glioblastoma multiforme at a tertiary care institution

    Int. J. Radiat. Oncol. Biol. Phys.

    (1998)
  • N.H. Greig

    Optimizing drug delivery to brain tumors

    Cancer Treat. Rev.

    (1987)
  • N.J. Abbott et al.

    Transporting therapeutics across the blood-brain barrier

    Mol. Med. Today

    (1996)
  • R. Langer

    New methods of drug delivery

    Science

    (1990)
  • H.D. Jampel et al.

    Glaucoma filtration surgery in nonhuman primates using taxol and etoposide in polyanhydride carriers

    Invest. Ophthalmol. Visual Sci.

    (1993)
  • Surmodics, Enabling local drug delivery/implant device combination therapies, www.surmodics.com Accessed on July 15,...
  • R. Langer

    Drug delivery and targeting

    Nature

    (1998)
  • N. Angelova et al.

    Rationalizing the design of polymeric biomaterials

    TIBB, Tech. Innov. Berufl. Bild.

    (1999)
  • K.E. Uhrich et al.

    Polymeric systems for controlled drug release

    Chem. Rev.

    (1999)
  • A.J. Domb, M. Maniar, A.S.T. Haffer. Biodegradable polymer blends for drug delivery, U.S. patent 5, 919, 835,...
  • Guilford Pharmaceuticals, About GLIADEL® Wafer, www.gliadel.com Accessed on July 10,...
  • V.R. Bapat et al.

    Novel methods of drug delivery to solid tumors

  • A.M. Lincoff et al.

    Local drug delivery for the prevention of restenosis. Fact, fancy, and future

    Circulation

    (1994)
  • M.S. Lesniak et al.

    Targeted therapy for brain tumors

    Nature Rev. Drug Discov.

    (2004)
  • A.J. Domb et al.

    Polyanhydrides. I. Preparation of high molecular weight polyanhydrides

    J. Polym. Sci., A, Polym. Chem.

    (1987)
  • A.J. Domb et al.

    Poly(anhydrides). 3. Poly(anhydrides) based on aliphatic-aromatic diacids

    Macromolecules

    (1989)
  • Cited by (167)

    • Biodegradable nanomaterials

      2020, Nanomaterials for Clinical Applications: Case Studies in Nanomedicines
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text