Elsevier

Journal of Catalysis

Volume 271, Issue 2, 4 May 2010, Pages 178-185
Journal of Catalysis

Glycine–nitrate combustion synthesis of CuO–ZnO–ZrO2 catalysts for methanol synthesis from CO2 hydrogenation

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcat.2010.01.009Get rights and content

Abstract

A series of CuO–ZnO–ZrO2 (CZZ) catalysts were synthesized by a glycine–nitrate combustion method and characterized by XRD, BET, N2O chemisorption, SEM and TPR techniques. The results show that the physicochemical properties of the catalysts are strongly influenced by the fuel content used in the combustion process. The dispersion of CuO exhibits an inverse-volcano variation trend with an increase in the glycine amount from 50% to 150% of the stoichiometry. The relationship between physiochemical properties and the fuel content is discussed in detail in terms of combustion temperature. The catalytic performance for the synthesis of methanol from CO2 hydrogenation was examined. The CZZ catalyst exhibits an optimum catalytic activity when 50% of stoichiometric amount of glycine was used. The turnover frequency has been calculated for various CZZ catalysts, and it reveals that the catalytic activities depend not only on the surface area of metallic copper but also on the phase state of ZrO2.

Graphical abstract

The fuel content used for the preparation of CuO–ZnO–ZrO2 catalysts by combustion method had significant effect on CO2 conversion and methanol yield for the synthesis of methanol from CO2 hydrogenation.

  1. Download : Download high-res image (74KB)
  2. Download : Download full-size image

Introduction

It is well known that carbon dioxide is the most important greenhouse gas. With the increase in carbon dioxide concentration in the atmosphere, global warming problems are becoming more and more serious in recent years. Conversion of carbon dioxide to useful chemicals and fuels is one of the most promising ways to mitigate the problem. Most of the existing research focuses on methanol synthesis from CO2 because methanol is a common chemical feedstock for several important chemicals and a potential alternative energy to fossil fuels [1], [2].

CuO–ZnO–Al2O3 catalysts have been widely used for methanol synthesis from syngas (CO + H2); however, they exhibited a poor catalytic performance for the hydrogenation of CO2 [3], [4]. The reason can be ascribed to the negative effect of water on the rate of methanol formation and the strong hydrophilic characteristic of alumina [3]. Zirconia-supported copper catalysts, which show an interesting catalytic behavior for CO2 hydrogenation, have been well documented [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14]. Among them, CuO–ZnO–ZrO2 (CZZ) or modified-CZZ has gained an increasing interest for its high activity in recent years [3], [4], [8], [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14]. Apart from catalyst compositions, preparation methods have a considerable influence on the catalytic performance [3], [15], [16]. Numerous methods such as co-precipitation [7], [8], [9], [10], [14], impregnation [17] and sol–gel [5], [18] have been developed to prepare copper-based oxide catalysts. However, these methods are pH sensitive, time consuming or restricted by the deviation from stoichiometry and the requirement of expensive precursors [15], [19], [20]. Compared with those traditional methods, the combustion synthesis method, based on the principles of the propellant chemistry, has many advantages such as precise stoichiometric ratio, homogeneous component, low cost and short reaction time. Therefore, it has been an attractive technique for the synthesis of metal oxide powders in recent years [13], [21], [22], [23], [24], [25], [26]. In the combustion synthesis process, a thermally induced redox reaction takes place between an oxidant and a fuel. In general, the metal nitrates acting as cation sources are used as oxidants, whereas organic compounds such as citric acid, urea and glycine are employed as fuels [27], [28], [29]. The combustion characteristics are closely related to the selection of fuel. A good fuel should react non-violently and act as a complexant for metal cations [27]. Glycine, one of the simple amino acids, is known to act as a complexing agent for a number of metal ions since it has a carboxylic acid group at one end and amino group at the other end. Such types of zwitterionic character of a glycine molecule can effectively complex metal ions of varying ionic sizes, which helps in preventing their selective precipitation and maintaining compositional homogeneity among the constituents [27], [28]. Therefore, glycine-nitrate combustion synthesis has been a very popular combustion method for the preparation of metal oxide powders [22], [27], [28]. Arena et al. [13] prepared CZZ catalyst with a combustion method and investigated its catalytic action for methanol synthesis via CO2 hydrogenation. However, the fuel of oxalic-di-hydrazide employed in their work is toxic (carcinogenic), and no related discussion about the combustion reaction was reported.

In this paper, we report the synthesis of CZZ catalysts using the glycine-nitrate combustion method and examine their catalytic properties for methanol synthesis from CO2 hydrogenation. The combustion reactions are analyzed in terms of propellant chemistry, and the combustion behaviors are described as well. The prepared CZZ catalysts have been characterized by XRD, BET, SEM, H2-TPR and reactive N2O adsorption techniques. Since fuel content is an important parameter in combustion synthesis, the effect of different glycine amounts on the properties of the derived CZZ catalysts is discussed in detail. Furthermore, the catalytic performances of the CZZ catalysts are discussed in relation to the results of physicochemical characterization.

Section snippets

Catalyst preparation

First, analytical-grade Cu(NO3)2·3H2O, Zn(NO3)2·6H2O and Zr(NO3)4·5H2O were dissolved in deionized water to form a transparent solution in which Cu2+, Zn2+ and Zr4+ concentrations meet the formula of (CuO)0.5(ZnO)0.2(ZrO2)0.3 (CZZ). Then, the glycine solution was slowly added to the metal nitrate aqueous solution under constant stirring. The resulting mixture was kept in an ultrasound bath operating at 47 kHz with a power of 30 W until a blue and transparent sol was obtained. Afterwards, the

Combustion reaction analysis and combustion behavior

For glycine-nitrate combustion, primarily N2, CO2 and H2O are evolved as the gaseous products [28], [31]. Thus, the combustion reaction in the present paper can be represented as follows:1/2Cu(NO3)2·3H2O+1/5Zn(NO3)2·6H2O+3/10Zr(NO3)4·5H2O+mH2NCH2COOH+(9m/4-13/4)O2·(CuO)0.5(ZnO)0.2(ZrO2)0.3+(m/2+13/10)N2+(5/2m+21/5)H2O+2mCO2

According to the principle of propellant chemistry [32], for stoichiometric redox reaction between a fuel and an oxidizer, the ratio of the net oxidizing valence of the

Conclusions

A series of CuO–ZnO–ZrO2 catalysts were prepared via the glycine–nitrate combustion method with glycine from 50% to 150% of stoichiometric amount. The combustion processes and physicochemical properties of catalysts are greatly influenced by the glycine amount. The intensity of combustion and particle size of catalysts show volcano variation trends with the increase in the glycine amount, whereas opposite trends were observed for BET surface, metallic copper surface and dispersion of CuO.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Shanghai Educational Development Foundation (06SG35), Science and Technology Commission of Shanghai Municipality (08520513600) and Shanghai Municipal Education Commission (J51503) for financial support. The helpful suggestions and linguistic revision of the manuscript provided by the editor (Prof. S. Ted Oyama) and anonymous reviewers are also gratefully acknowledged.

References (54)

  • R. Raudaskoski et al.

    Catal. Today

    (2009)
  • F. Arena et al.

    J. Catal.

    (2007)
  • Y. Ma et al.

    Appl. Catal. A: Gen.

    (1998)
  • R.A. Köppel et al.

    J. Catal.

    (1998)
  • J. Słoczyński et al.

    Appl. Catal. A: Gen.

    (2004)
  • J. Słoczyński et al.

    Appl. Catal. A: Gen.

    (2003)
  • J. Słoczyński et al.

    Appl. Catal. A: Gen.

    (2006)
  • F. Arena et al.

    Appl. Catal. A: Gen.

    (2008)
  • F. Arena et al.

    Catal. Today

    (2009)
  • F. Arena et al.

    Stud. Surf. Sci. Catal.

    (2004)
  • Y. Choi et al.

    Appl. Catal. A: Gen.

    (2001)
  • C.L. Carnes et al.

    J. Mol. Catal. A: Chem.

    (2003)
  • L.C. Wang et al.

    J. Catal.

    (2007)
  • G. Avgouropoulos et al.

    Appl. Catal. A: Gen.

    (2003)
  • K.C. Patil et al.

    Curr. Opin. Solid State Mater. Sci.

    (2002)
  • Q.G. Wang et al.

    Ceram. Int.

    (2008)
  • Z.L. Zhang et al.

    Appl. Catal. B: Environ.

    (2007)
  • N.F.P. Ribeiro et al.

    J. Power Sources

    (2008)
  • M.C. Greca et al.

    Appl. Catal. A: Gen.

    (2001)
  • G. Avgouropoulos et al.

    Appl. Catal. B: Environ.

    (2005)
  • J.C. Toniolo et al.

    Mater. Res. Bull.

    (2005)
  • R.D. Purohit et al.

    Mater. Res. Bull.

    (2001)
  • D.A. Fumo et al.

    Mater. Res. Bull.

    (1996)
  • G.C. Chinchen et al.

    J. Catal.

    (1987)
  • M.J. de Andrade et al.

    Mater. Res. Bull.

    (2006)
  • S.R. Jain et al.

    Combust. Flame

    (1981)
  • Z.Q. Tian et al.

    Mater. Chem. Phys.

    (2007)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text