Triggers entrepreneurship among creative consumers
Introduction
“I'm Gary Fisher. I've been called the founding father of mountain biking. I don't know about that, but I do know this: I love bikes. Riding them, building them, making them better. Cross bikes, mountain bikes, town bikes. Bikes for fun, for transport, for everything. I love them all.”2 In the early 1970s, Fisher wanted a bike he could ride off-road, “away from cops, cars, and concrete.”3 He went on to develop a new genre of biking. Later, he decided to go into business and created a bicycle company called Mountain Bikes. Similarly, during his spare time, Marc Grégoire invented a new non-stick material for fishing: Teflon®. His wife suggested he might coat her set of cooking pans to make washing-up easier.4 After registering a patent, Grégoire decided “to sell the idea to the manufacturers. But they took no notice of him” (Le Masson, Weil, & Hatchuel, 2010). At this point, he subsequently decided to produce non-stick cookware and to create his own firm, “Tefal,” which became a part of the global Group SEB. Both Fisher's and Grégoire's anecdotal cases are striking illustrations of the phenomenon of user entrepreneurship (Shah & Tripsas, 2007). User entrepreneurship describes the new venture creation and commercialization of a new product or service by an individual or group of individuals who are also users of the product or service and who experience a need for improvement (Shah & Tripsas, 2007). This need can be related to a job (professional user entrepreneurs) or personal use (end user entrepreneurs).
Empirical studies have shown that 10.7% of all startups and 46.6% of innovative startups (that survived to their fifth year) created in the United States in 2004 were founded by users (Shah, Winston Smith, & Reedy, 2011). Other studies find that 29% of US-based medical device startups and 84% of large and small firms in the juvenile products industries (263 firms created between 1980 and 2007) were founded by users (physicians in the first case and parents, babysitters and caregivers in the second) (Chatterji, 2009; Shah et al., 2011; Shah and Tripsas, 2007, Shah and Tripsas, 2016). Over the past 10 years, these empirical patterns highlighted the magnitude and importance of user entrepreneurship for the industrial system (Winston Smith & Shah, 2014). However, as firm founders, end users (in contrast with professional users) remain relatively unexplored by scholars, even though the Kauffman Firm Survey, conducted among a sample of 5000 startups launched in 2004, showed that 40% of user entrepreneur firms were created by end user entrepreneurs (Shah et al., 2011).5
This exploratory study focuses exclusively on consumer entrepreneurs and aims to extend our knowledge of this unconventional but growing form of production. More precisely, we aim to shed light on why, in some cases, innovative consumers decide to diffuse and commercialize a solution they have developed for their own use, by creating their own business and starting a for-profit company. To address this aim, we interviewed 20 innovative consumers who developed a product or service related to their daily consumption experience and, subsequently, decided to found firms. Based on our results, we develop a set of research propositions about the factors that lead consumers to switch to an entrepreneurial role.
Section snippets
The user innovation phenomenon
Von Hippel's pioneering work opened a tremendous research stream that challenges the traditional dominant perspective that “the firm produces goods and services for the user.” Von Hippel's view considers that consumers can be a source of innovation since they are able to find truly novel solutions that better fit their personal needs. This “paradigm shift” (Baldwin & von Hippel, 2011) has been supported by many empirical studies across different domains and countries.6
Methodology
This research aims to explore empirically why innovative end users decide to bring their solutions to market and start their own firms. Since this research is exploratory and expands an existing theory, we used a phenomenon-based approach to “capture, describe, document, as well as conceptualize a phenomenon [end user entrepreneurship]” (von Krogh, Rossi Lamastra, & Haefliger, 2012). To address this research goal, we conducted in-depth interviews with end users who developed a product for
Triggering mechanisms and motives (RQ1)
Five main factors that motivated our informants to switch from an innovator to an entrepreneur role emerged from our research: (1) dissatisfaction with a product/service category; (2) a sense of pleasure or enjoyment and the desire to take up a challenge; (3) personal belief in the success of the project; (4) social relations; and (5) financial benefits. These motives are strongly interrelated.
Discussion and contributions to the literature
Based on 20 interviews conducted with end users who decided to commercialize their solutions, our research contributes new theoretical and empirical knowledge to an extensive phenomenon that is still underestimated (Franke, Schirg, & Reinsberger, 2016) and understudied (Shah & Tripsas, 2007). While most work published to date has focused on the user entrepreneurship phenomenon in general (without making any distinction between end users and professional users), our study addresses this gap with
References (49)
- et al.
Knowledge sources of entrepreneurship: Firm formation by academic, user & employee innovators
Research Policy
(2014) - et al.
How user innovations become commercial products: A theoretical investigation and case study
Research Policy
(2006) - et al.
When customers get clever: Managerial approaches to dealing with creative consumers
Business Horizons
(2007) - et al.
The frequency of end-user innovation: A re-estimation of extant
Research Policy
(2016) - et al.
Conviviality behavior in entrepreneurial communities and business networks
Journal of Business Research
(2016) - et al.
Under the radar: Industry entry by user entrepreneurs
Research Policy
(2010) - et al.
Market failure in the diffusion of consumer-developed innovations: Patterns in Finland
Research Policy
(2015) - et al.
Phenomenon-based research in management and organization science: When is it rigorous and does it matter?
Long Range Planning
(2012) - et al.
Networks and innovation in a modular system: Lessons from the microcomputer and stereo component industries
Research Policy
(1992) - et al.
User-innovators and “local” information: The case of mountain biking
Research Policy
(2005)
Accessing hidden and hard-to-reach populations: Snowball research strategies
Social Research Update
Modeling a paradigm shift: From producer innovation to user and open collaborative innovation
Organization Science
L'analyse de contenu
Users as innovators: A review, critique, and future research directions
Journal of Management
The nature and experience of entrepreneurial passion
Academy of Management Review
Les Pages bleues des inventeurs. Dictionnaire de la recherche et de la connaissance
Spawned with a silver spoon? Entrepreneurial performance and innovation in the medical device industry
Strategic Management Journal
Marketing research: Mythological foundations
Consumer made: Quand le consommateur devient producteur
Décisions Marketing
Thinking inside the box: Why consumers enjoy constrained creative experiences
Journal of Marketing Research
Building theories from case study research
Academy of Management Review
Tinkering: Customers reinvent the early automobile
Développement de produits et services en coopération avec des communautés en ligne
Décisions Marketing
The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies in qualitative research
Cited by (24)
An identity perspective on the diffusion of user innovations in the household sector
2024, Research PolicyWhy do user innovators want to pursue user entrepreneurship? On the influence of the communitarian identity
2023, Journal of Business Venturing InsightsPassion as process: Three perspectives on entrepreneurial passion and an integrated path forward
2023, Journal of Business ResearchThe cultural intertwining of consumption and entrepreneurship: A selective review of qualitative studies
2021, Journal of Business ResearchCitation Excerpt :Perhaps because of this focus, those papers limit themselves to describing one direction of the phenomenon: the one that goes from consumer to entrepreneurial desire. The study written by Hamdi-Kidar (2018) is an excellent example of unidirectionality in the description of fluxes of desire. It investigates why specific creators decide to market a product they initially invented for their use and presents the conclusion that this type of entrepreneurship is more likely to occur when a shared passion occupies a higher position on the priority scale than does the desire or need to reap a profit.
A service ecosystem perspective on the diffusion of sustainability-oriented user innovations
2020, Journal of Business ResearchCitation Excerpt :Collectively these studies show that user entrepreneurs rely heavily on a community of fellow users as a knowledge pool for skills development, feedback and (financial) support, experimentation with different commercialization paths, and first adoption. However, it also needs to be noted that diffusion via users becoming entrepreneurs only applies to a fraction of innovations because users often lack the necessary time and resources or interest in becoming entrepreneurs (de Jong et al., 2015; Hamdi-Kidar & Vellera, 2018). Six national user innovation surveys confirm this by finding that less than 10% of user innovators are interested in becoming entrepreneurs or selling their innovations to producers (von Hippel, 2016).
Predicting individuals' digital autopreneurship: Does educational intervention matter?
2020, Journal of Business ResearchCitation Excerpt :These four types of motivation also contribute to entrepreneurship success. Similarly, in a qualitative study, Hamdi-Kidar and Vellera (2018) concluded that intrinsic and extrinsic motivation, a lack of other alternatives, and time/stage of life are the three major factors that trigger entrepreneurship. A review of these studies shows that researchers recognize intrinsic and extrinsic motivation as typical motivational types.
- 1
The authors are listed alphabetically and contributed equally to the research.