ReviewDense gas processing of polymeric controlled release formulations
Introduction
A pure substance generally exists as either a solid, liquid or gas phase, which are clearly defined by phase boundaries, as shown in Fig. 1. Based on this pressure–temperature diagram for a pure substance, various phases can exist up to the critical point for all molecules. As pressure and temperature increase above the critical point, the liquid and gas phases become indistinguishable. Beyond the critical point, the substance exists as a supercritical fluid (SCF), which is a homogeneous medium. Therefore, it is possible to construct a path from point A to point B to induce a phase change from liquid to gas without passing through a distinct phase transition. A substance close to, but not necessarily above, its critical point is referred to as a dense gas (DG). The properties of DGs can vary widely and are generally intermediate to those of gases and liquids. The density of a DG is generally closer to that of conventional liquids and several orders of magnitude higher than that of conventional gases and accounts for the solvating capabilities of the DGs.
The interest in DGs and their potential use for process improvements has significantly increased in the past decade. Due to the properties of these fluids, which can be tuned by small changes in pressure or temperature, DGs have potential as alternative media for classical separation processes and as reaction environments. Several conventional techniques, such as spray drying (Broadhead et al., 1992, Masters, 1979), emulsion–solvent extraction (Puisieux et al., 1994, Chasin and Langer, 1990, Bakan, 1994) and processes based on cavitation, attrition, high shear and impaction (i.e. high-pressure homogenization, microfluidization, media milling, air-jet milling and ball milling) (Byers and Peck, 1990, Rubinstein and Gould, 1987, Parrott, 1990, Aiache and Beyssac, 1994, Illig et al., 1996), have been utilized for particle processing. However, these processes may often incur undesired effects such as thermal and chemical degradation, inner-batch particle size variability and broad size distribution. Other disadvantages of some conventional particle processing techniques include the need for additional stages for the extraction of residual solvent and the extensive use of organic solvents, which may result in health and environmental concerns. Therefore, the limitation of conventional particle processing techniques has driven the focus of studies towards the potential replacement of traditional organic solvents with more environmentally friendly materials, such as DGs.
One of the applications of DG techniques in particle processing is the preparation of microencapsulated drug formulations. Microencapsulation can be defined as a process of coating or entrapping micron-sized material with another material without chemical interaction. Microencapsulation is often used to provide a protection for a drug from the reactive surroundings and to prevent drug degradation from light or exposure to oxygen. Furthermore, microencapsulation can be used to improve the formulation characteristics such as taste, stability and wettability. Microencapsulated formulations can also be used to extend the dosage time from a repeated to single administration and to provide controlled release of drugs in a desired part of the body. Therefore, microencapsulated drug formulations can be pharmaceutically beneficial since a drug is generally more effective for long-term treatment and exhibits fewer side effects when the drug concentration in the body is kept constant at some optimum level over the duration of therapy.
In this review, the concepts and parameters involved in the microencapsulation of pharmaceutical controlled release formulations and the utilization of different DG techniques for the preparation of microencapsulated drug formulations are discussed.
Section snippets
Microencapsulation in controlled release formulations
There have been significant developments in controlled release administration in the last three decades from primitive delayed-release dosage forms in the 1960s to highly sophisticated self-regulated delivery systems in the 1990s (Park, 1997). These advances have produced many clinically useful controlled release dosage forms and provided better shelf-life for many existing drugs. The market of pharmaceutical controlled release formulations is expected to rise exponentially from US$ 19 billion
Polymers in controlled release formulations
Particle encapsulation has been demonstrated to be of particular interest in the control of drug release and it offers some advantages such as protection of bioactive agents from enzymatic degradation. The concept of incorporating polymers for controlled release was developed in the early 1970s when it was discovered that the then available forms of delivery using silicone rubber and polyethylene left foreign material in the body even after surgical removal of the device (Dunn and Ottenbrite,
Preparation of controlled release formulations
In recent years, many studies have been conducted to develop controlled release systems with optimum characteristics and performance. Manufacturing processes for the preparation of polymeric controlled release systems, which include conventional and novel processing techniques, have been evaluated over the years. In fact, conventional processes for the preparation of controlled release systems are still widely used by several pharmaceutical companies nowadays. However, due to the limitations of
Summary
Controlled release formulations are invariably more expensive than conventional formulations thus they can only be justified when they offer one or more therapeutic advantages. Apart from the improvement of pharmacological responses, the other advantages of controlled release systems include the maintenance of therapeutic drug levels and minimization of drug level fluctuation, total amount of drug used, patient compliance and reduction of side effects. On the other hand, there are some
References (78)
- et al.
Polydimethylsiloxanes in supercritical solvent impregnation (SSI) of polymers
J. Supercrit. Fluids
(2003) - et al.
Polymer versus monomer as displacer in immobilized metal affinity chromatography
J. Chromatgr.
(2001) - et al.
Influence of gas density and pressure on microparticles produced with the ASES process
Int. J. Pharm.
(1994) - et al.
The effect of the addition of low molecular weight poly(dl-lactide) on drug release from biodegradable poly(dl-lactide) drug delivery systems
Int. J. Pharm.
(1989) - et al.
Preparation of poly(methacrylic acid-g-poly(ethylene glycol)) nanospheres from methacrylic monomers for pharmaceutical applications
Int. J. Pharm.
(2002) - et al.
Preparation of controlled release microspheres using supercritical fluid technology for delivery of anti-inflammatory drugs
Int. J. Pharm.
(2006) - et al.
Production of insulin-loaded poly(ethylene glycol)/poly(l-lactide) (PEG/PLA) nanoparticles by gas antisolvent techniques
J. Pharm. Sci.
(2001) - et al.
Critical properties of lactide–co-glycolide polymers for the use in microparticle preparation by the Aerosol Solvent Extraction System
Int. J. Pharm.
(1999) - et al.
“Smart” polymers and what they could do in biotechnology and medicine
Trends Biotechnol.
(1999) - et al.
Gas anti-solvent recrystallisation of RDX: formation of ultra-fine particles of a difficult to comminute explosive
J. Supercrit. Fluids
(1992)
Particle design using supercritical fluids: literature and patent survey
J. Supercrit. Fluids
Supercritical impregnation of polymers
Curr. Opin. Solid State Mater. Sci.
Pulsatile drug release control using hydrogels
Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev.
Biodegradable nanoparticles from sustained-release formulations to improved site specific drug delivery
J. Control. Rel.
Sustained drug delivery systems. II: factors affecting release rates from poly(ɛ-caprolactone) and related biodegradable polyesters
J. Pharm. Sci.
Microencapsulation of protein particles within lipids using a novel supercritical fluid process
Int. J. Pharm.
Poly(N-isopropylacrylamide): experiment, theory and application
Prog. Polym. Sci.
Pharmaceutical processing with supercritical carbon dioxide
J. Pharm. Sci.
Controlled release system formed by supercritical anti-solvent coprecipitation of a herbicide and a biodegradable polymer
J. Supercrit. Fluids
A novel fluidized-bed coating of fine particles by rapid expansion of supercritical fluid solutions
Powder Technol.
The production of protein-loaded microparticles by supercritical fluid enhanced mixing and spraying
J. Control. Rel.
Precipitation of proteins in supercritical carbon dioxide
J. Pharm. Sci.
Formation of polymer particles with supercritical fluids: a review
J. Supercrit. Fluids
Strategies for particle design using supercritical fluid technologies
Pharm. Sci. Technol. Today
Encapsulation of lysozyme in a biodegradable polymer by precipitation with a vapor-over-liquid antisolvent
J. Pharm. Sci.
Powders as dosage forms
Microencapsulation
Control of flow direction in microfluidic devices with polyelectrolyte multilayers
Anal. Chem.
The spray drying of pharmaceuticals
Drug Dev. Ind. Pharm.
Polymers, biomaterials and supercritical fluids
The effect of mill variables on a granulation milling process
Drug. Dev. Ind. Pharm.
Biodegradable Polymers as Drug Delivery Systems
Protein nanoparticles formation by supercritical antisolvent with enhanced mass transfer
AIChE J.
Drug encapsulation using supercritical fluid extraction of emulsions
J. Pharm. Sci.
Sustained delivery and expression of DNA encapsulated in polymeric nanoparticles
Gene Therapy
A supercritical fluid-based coating technology. 3. Preparation and characterization of bovine serum albumin particles coated with lipids
J. Microencaps.
Polymeric drugs and drug delivery systems
Production of protein-loaded polymeric microcapsules by compressed CO2 in a mixed solvent
Ind. Eng. Chem. Res
Process variable implications for residual solvent removal and polymer morphology in the formation of gentamicin-loaded poly(l-lactide) microparticles
Pharm. Res.
Cited by (47)
Production of pharmaceutical micro and nano particles by subcritical water based technologies: A review
2023, Journal of Drug Delivery Science and TechnologyDense CO<inf>2</inf> technology: Overview of recent applications for drug processing/formulation/delivery
2019, Chemical Engineering and Processing - Process IntensificationSupercritical carbon dioxide-based technologies for the production of drug nanoparticles/nanocrystals – A comprehensive review
2018, Advanced Drug Delivery ReviewsCitation Excerpt :Other combination methods have also been tested, such as the PLH method, which involves three sequential steps (a precipitation method, followed by freeze-drying, followed by a HPH method [46, 150], and the combination of antisolvent precipitation, ultra-sonication and HPH [128, 148]. Due to several advantageous technical features that are typical of supercritical fluids (SCF), in general, and of supercritical carbon dioxide (scCO2), in particular, as well as to other really important and more recent subjects for the pharmaceutical industry, namely their “green”, sustainable, safe and “environmentally-friendly” intrinsic characteristics, SCF-based bottom-up processes and specifically those employing scCO2 and scCO2-based fluids, have attracted in recent years a great attention from the pharmaceutical and biomedical industries, namely at the development of new or improved “greener” and “safer” processes and/or products, including the formation of micro- and nano- particles/nanocrystals [42, 110, 151–182]. In this work, it is presented a comprehensive state-of-the-art review on scCO2-based processes for the formation and control of the morphologies and of the physicochemical properties of amorphous/crystalline pure drug nanoparticles.
Enhancing the solubility and bioavailability of poorly water-soluble drugs using supercritical antisolvent (SAS) process
2018, International Journal of PharmaceuticsGeneration of microparticles of ellagic acid by supercritical antisolvent process
2016, Journal of Supercritical FluidsCitation Excerpt :Formulations containing EA using Eudragit L100 (EUD) as the polymer were also prepared. EUD is a non-biodegradable, nonabsorbable, and nontoxic acrylic polymer that is used in intestinal drug delivery formulations because it is able to protect the active component from gastric fluid because it dissolves above pH 6.00 [21,22]. Drug delivery and dissolution profiles were obtained in simulated fluids.
Ibuprofen-polymer precipitation using supercritical CO<inf>2</inf> at low temperature
2014, Journal of Supercritical Fluids