Elsevier

European Polymer Journal

Volume 48, Issue 2, February 2012, Pages 425-434
European Polymer Journal

Polymerization control and fast characterization of the stereo-defect distribution of heterogeneous Ziegler–Natta isotactic polypropylene

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2011.11.023Get rights and content

Abstract

Adjustment of the stereo-defects distribution of isotactic polypropylene (iPP) is important for obtaining better properties of the resins in Ziegler–Natta polymerization. In this study, in order to adjust the stereo-defect distribution of iPP prepared by the Spheripol process (Basell), the cocatalyst/external donor (triethylaluminium/dicyclopentyldimethoxysilane, Al/Si) mole ratio was gradually changed from 30 to 36, accompanied with hydrogen adjustment. And we obtained a series of iPP samples (A–E). The characterization of 13C NMR, xylene soluble fraction (XS) showed the average isotacticity of the obtained samples are nearly same, but the results of high resolution 13C NMR, temperature rising elution fractionation (TREF) and xylene solvent fractionation indicated that, as the Al/Si ratio increases, the amount of high isotacticity in iPP gradually decreases, the amount of medium and low isotacticity gradually increased, the distribution of stereo-defects becomes more uniform.

A relative time-saving method, successive self-nucleation and annealing (SSA) fractionation was applied to evaluate the stereo-defect distribution of iPP. A calibration which can be used to convert SSA final melting curves to the average meso sequence length curves was constructed. A good agreement between 13C NMR, XS, TREF results and SSA fractionation results indicated that it is feasible by using SSA to provide quick characterize of the stereo-defect distribution of iPP.

Highlights

► We produce five iPP samples with slightly varied Al/Si ratios. ► We investigate the stereo-defect distribution of the samples in detail. ► We improved the use of SSA on the stereo-defect distribution of iPP. ► Slight increase of Al/Si ratio makes the distribution of stereo-defects more uniform.

Introduction

Since the heterogeneous Ziegler–Natta catalysts contain multiple active centers (usually including highly isospecific centers, centers of moderate isospecificity, and nearly completely aspecific centers), the prepared isotactic polypropylene (iPP) resins usually have varying distribution of stereo-defects, which not only reflects the information of catalyst and polymerization mechanism, but also determines for most part of the processability and mechanical properties. Therefore, it is important to intentionally control the distribution of stereo-defects.

One direct method for this achievement is to modify the polymerization conditions. In the past decades, great efforts have been made to understand the basic principles and action mechanisms of polymerization conditions (such as the constitution of the catalyst system, monomer concentration, the concentration of hydrogen, pressure, temperature and polymerization equipment, etc.) on the molecular structure of the product, great achievement were obtained. A large number of novel catalyst systems and polymerization technologies with high performance and high stereospecificity were developed by the researchers and companies involved in iPP [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8]. However, due to proprietary reasons, and the complex influences on the molecular structure and the complexity of interactions of polymerization conditions, the basic principle of polymerization conditions on the stereo-defect distribution of iPP is still not clear enough, and is a subject open to debate.

In heterogeneous Ziegler–Natta polymerization, catalysts comprising MgCl2, TiCl4 and an electron donor are widely utilized. The cocatalyst most commonly used is a trialkylauminium such as AlEt3. For high stereospecificity the ester-containing catalysts, it normally require the presence of an additional Lewis base in polymerization, termed external donor, which is typically a second aromatic ester for catalysts containing ethyl benzoate, and an alkoxysilane for catalysts containing a phthalate ester. The performance of MgCl2-supported catalysts in propene polymerization is strongly dependent on the cocatalyst, donors and their mole ratio present in the catalyst system. According to literatures, type and concentration of the co-catalyst and external donor greatly influence the insertion and transition manner of the monomer, the region- and stereo-selectivity of the catalyst system, and therefore determine the isotacticity, molecular weight and its distribution, production yield, sensitivity to hydrogen, etc. [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8]. This gives the researchers a light to adjust the stereo-defect distribution by changing the mole ratio of the cocatalyst and external donor, which is of great value from both economic and academic point of view. However, the feasibility of which is still unknown and needs to be investigated.

On the other hand, currently the quantitative methods for determining the distribution of tacticity comprise high resolution 13C NMR, solvent fractionation [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14] (usually an extremely time consuming and tedious work), temperature rising elution fractionation (TREF), crystallization analysis fractionation (CRYSTAF) [9], [15], [16], [17], [18], crystallization elution fractionation (CEF) and calorimetric methods [19].

TREF involves two consecutive steps, crystallization of the sample slowly on a column from a dilute solution and elution from it when raising temperature, while in CRYSTAF the elution step is skipped by measuring the change in concentration of the solution directly during the cooling phase. In both TREF and CRYSTAF, sample is fractionated on the basis of chain crystallizabilities in a dilute solution, and can give information about the inter-chain distribution of the longest crystallizable sequence (denoted as LCS) [20]. Moreover, by combination the analysis of the separate fractions, preparation (P-type) TREF and CRYSTAF can provide more molecular information of the polymer. However, both typical TREF and CRYSTAF are time-consuming, which demand solvents and specific installation. Recently, Monrabal et al. [21], [22] proposed a promising technique, CEF. They believed that using CEF, results of chemical composition distribution (CCD) of the polymer can be obtained in much shorter time. However, CEF still require expensive specific installation and is not widely applied. TREF, CRYSTAF and CEF can hardly provide quick analysis of tacticity distribution with common instrument, which is in demand greatly during the manufacturing process, especially for the large-scale production of polyolefin.

Because of this practical consideration, other less time consuming methods such as thermal fractionation technique have been developed [19]. The thermal fractionation technique mainly comprises stepwise isothermal crystallization (SIC) [23], [24], [25], segregation fractionation technique (SFT) [26], [27], [28], [29], successive self-nucleation and annealing (SSA) [19], [30], [31], etc. Among which, the SSA fractionation applies self-nucleation and annealing steps sequentially to a polymer sample to promote the potential molecular fractionation occurred during crystallization, and to encourage the unmolten crystals to anneal at each stage of the process, so that small differences in molecular structure can be magnified. The main advantages of SSA include enhanced resolution, effective molecular segregation, relatively short measurement times, free of solvent and additional molecular structural information [19]. Because of these advantages, SSA is widely used in the characterization of the microstructure of polymers, mainly for polyethylene and ethylene/α-olefin copolymers [30], [31], [32], [33], [34], [35], [36], [37], [38], [39], [40], [41], [42], [43], aging and degradation of polyethylene [44], [45], crystallization behavior of the nano-composites [46], [47], [48] and evaluation of the compatibility of polymer blends [49], [50]. In the case of iPP, however, only few literatures had investigated its tacticity distribution using DSC-based fractionation, because iPP possesses no branched structures and is not easy to be fractionated thermally. Virkkunen, Sundholm et al. [51], [52] investigated the tacticity distribution of iPP fractions with varying isotacticity using a combination of solvent fractionation and SSA, the results obtained were compared with 13C NMR and TREF. They classified the fractions into three main groups according to the lamellar structure generated in SSA, and found good correspondence between the SSA melting curves and the TREF fractograms.

The aim of this study is to intentionally modify the cocatalyst/external donor (triethylaluminium/dicyclopentyldimethoxysilane, Al/Si) mole ratio in the heterogeneous Ziegler–Natta polymerization process, and to investigate the variation in stereo-defect distribution and other molecular structure of the obtained resin using a relative time-saving manner, SSA. High resolution 13C NMR, TREF, solvent fractionation combined with DSC and GPC, and SSA fractionation were applied. Quantitative information about the distribution of tacticity was obtained, the results of each method were compared, and the action mechanism of Al/Si ratio on the stereo-defect distribution of the iPP resin was discussed.

Section snippets

Material Preparation

The iPP samples were produced in the Spheripol process (Basell) in the two loop reactors, which is one of the most widespread commercial methods to produce polypropylene [53]. A highly activity supported forth generation Ziegler–Natta (TiCl4 = MgCl2) catalyst was used. The cocatalyst was triethylaluminium (TEAL), and the external donor used was dicyclopentyldimethoxysilane (DCPDMS). The temperature for the prepolymerization reactor was controlled at 20 °C and 70 °C for the main polymerization

Preliminary characterization of isotactic polypropylene

The molecular structure information of the samples was investigated by XS, 13C NMR, GPC and DSC, and the obtained results were listed in Table 1. As can be seen from Table 1, the results of XS (wt%) and isotacticity of all the samples are nearly same, showing that slight modification of Al/Si ratio from 30 to 36 has little influence on the average degrees of tacticity. However, the significant decrease of the melting peak temperature Tm with the increase of Al/Si ratio from 30 to 36 indicates a

Conclusions

In this study, the cocatalyst/ external donor (triethylaluminium/ dicyclopentyldimethoxysilane, Al/Si) mole ratio was modified gradually from 30 to 36 in the Spheripol process (Basell), and five iPP samples with different Al/Si ratio were obtained. Their stereo-defect distribution and other molecular structure were characterized. The results of 13C NMR and determination of xylene soluble fractions (XS) showed that, the average isotacticity of the samples are nearly same, however, analysis of

Acknowledgements

We express our sincerely thanks to the Program for New Century Excellent Talents in Univeristy (NCET-10-0562).

References (65)

  • T. Simonazzi et al.

    Prog Polym Sci

    (1991)
  • V. Busico et al.

    Prog Polym Sci

    (2001)
  • P.S. Chum et al.

    Prog Polym Sci

    (2008)
  • R. Paukkeri et al.

    Polymer

    (1994)
  • R. Paukkeri et al.

    Polymer

    (1993)
  • J.T. Xu et al.

    Eur Polym J

    (2000)
  • A.J. Muller et al.

    Prog Polym Sci

    (2005)
  • F.J. Zhang et al.

    Polymer

    (2002)
  • F.J. Zhang

    Eur Polym J

    (2003)
  • A.T. Lorenzo et al.

    Eur Polym J

    (2006)
  • S. Song et al.

    Polymer

    (2009)
  • C.J. Perez et al.

    Polym Degra Stabi

    (2009)
  • C.J. Perez et al.

    Polym Degra Stabi

    (2007)
  • J. Tochacek et al.

    Polym Degra Stabi

    (2008)
  • S. Song et al.

    Polymer

    (2008)
  • M.L. Arnal et al.

    Polymer

    (2001)
  • B.S. Tanem et al.

    Polymer

    (2001)
  • V. Virkkunen et al.

    Polymer

    (2004)
  • V. Virkkunen et al.

    Polymer

    (2004)
  • J.B.P. Soares

    Chem Eng Sci

    (2001)
  • M.Y. Keating et al.

    Thermochim Acta

    (1996)
  • K. Ziegler et al.

    Angew Chem

    (1955)
  • Arjunan P. et al. In Olefin Polymerization. ACS Symposium Series, American Chemical Society: Washington, DC,...
  • Chadwick JC, Gerard M, Sudmeijer O. Macromol Chem Phys 1995;...
  • Y.V. Kissin et al.

    Macromol Chem Phys

    (2006)
  • Shamshoum ES, Rauscher DJ, Malbari SA. US6667380,...
  • J. Xu et al.

    Eur Polym J

    (1998)
  • T. Ogawa et al.

    J Appl Polym Sci

    (1973)
  • H. Kawamura et al.

    Macromolecules

    (1989)
  • A. Lehtinen et al.

    Macromol Chem Phys

    (1994)
  • S. Anantawaraskul et al.

    Adv Polym Sci

    (2005)
  • J.B.P. Soares et al.

    J Polym Sci Part B: Polym Phy

    (2005)
  • Cited by (76)

    • Comparison of the melt memory effects in matched fractions segregated from Ziegler-Natta and metallocene-made isotactic polypropylene with similar total defect content

      2021, Polymer
      Citation Excerpt :

      Fig. 4 showed the SSA final melting curves which were fitted by using Origin 9.3 software with Gaussian function. In the SSA final melting curve, the higher Tm is corresponding to the thicker lamella formed by longer isotactic sequence in the chains [45]. It could be found that the Tms of the fractions in the Mf1.79 were located in a much narrower temperature range compared with the ZNf1.79, which indicated that the isotactic sequence length in the Mf1.79 were more uniform.

    • A tailor-made Successive Self-nucleation and Annealing protocol for the characterization of recycled polyolefin blends

      2020, Polymer
      Citation Excerpt :

      Following the work of Virkkunen et al., Chang et al. [46] optimized the SSA protocol on different polypropylenes. Based on these results, they confirmed that the addition of an external electron donor during the polymerization process increased the crystallizable sequence length, in agreement with the fact that the addition of a co-catalyst and an electron donor transforms the sites of the catalyst with low isospecificity into sites with higher isospecificity, as confirmed also by Kang et al. [47]. However, blends of polyethylene and polypropylene were never characterized by means of a thermal fractionation technique.

    • Robust, transparent films of propylene−ethylene copolymer through isotropic-orientation transition at low temperature accelerated by adjustment of ethylene contents

      2020, Polymer
      Citation Excerpt :

      The structural characteristics and evolution of stretched PP film are crucial to establish the relationship between structure and properties, which also can be prerequisites to optimize the parameters of stretching processing. It is known that PP exhibits polymorphism, i.e. monoclinic α-form [8], trigonal β-form [9,10], orthorhombic γ-form [11,12], and a mesophase [13]. In the crystallization process of coPP, ethylene segments can be partially included in the crystalline region of PP which has been proven by 13C NMR and X-ray diffraction [14,15], however, hardly affecting the crystal lattice of polypropylene as α-form [16], β-form [17], γ-form [6,18] and mesophase [16] can be obtained under certain conditions.

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text