Polymerization control and fast characterization of the stereo-defect distribution of heterogeneous Ziegler–Natta isotactic polypropylene
Graphical abstract
Highlights
► We produce five iPP samples with slightly varied Al/Si ratios. ► We investigate the stereo-defect distribution of the samples in detail. ► We improved the use of SSA on the stereo-defect distribution of iPP. ► Slight increase of Al/Si ratio makes the distribution of stereo-defects more uniform.
Introduction
Since the heterogeneous Ziegler–Natta catalysts contain multiple active centers (usually including highly isospecific centers, centers of moderate isospecificity, and nearly completely aspecific centers), the prepared isotactic polypropylene (iPP) resins usually have varying distribution of stereo-defects, which not only reflects the information of catalyst and polymerization mechanism, but also determines for most part of the processability and mechanical properties. Therefore, it is important to intentionally control the distribution of stereo-defects.
One direct method for this achievement is to modify the polymerization conditions. In the past decades, great efforts have been made to understand the basic principles and action mechanisms of polymerization conditions (such as the constitution of the catalyst system, monomer concentration, the concentration of hydrogen, pressure, temperature and polymerization equipment, etc.) on the molecular structure of the product, great achievement were obtained. A large number of novel catalyst systems and polymerization technologies with high performance and high stereospecificity were developed by the researchers and companies involved in iPP [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8]. However, due to proprietary reasons, and the complex influences on the molecular structure and the complexity of interactions of polymerization conditions, the basic principle of polymerization conditions on the stereo-defect distribution of iPP is still not clear enough, and is a subject open to debate.
In heterogeneous Ziegler–Natta polymerization, catalysts comprising MgCl2, TiCl4 and an electron donor are widely utilized. The cocatalyst most commonly used is a trialkylauminium such as AlEt3. For high stereospecificity the ester-containing catalysts, it normally require the presence of an additional Lewis base in polymerization, termed external donor, which is typically a second aromatic ester for catalysts containing ethyl benzoate, and an alkoxysilane for catalysts containing a phthalate ester. The performance of MgCl2-supported catalysts in propene polymerization is strongly dependent on the cocatalyst, donors and their mole ratio present in the catalyst system. According to literatures, type and concentration of the co-catalyst and external donor greatly influence the insertion and transition manner of the monomer, the region- and stereo-selectivity of the catalyst system, and therefore determine the isotacticity, molecular weight and its distribution, production yield, sensitivity to hydrogen, etc. [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8]. This gives the researchers a light to adjust the stereo-defect distribution by changing the mole ratio of the cocatalyst and external donor, which is of great value from both economic and academic point of view. However, the feasibility of which is still unknown and needs to be investigated.
On the other hand, currently the quantitative methods for determining the distribution of tacticity comprise high resolution 13C NMR, solvent fractionation [9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14] (usually an extremely time consuming and tedious work), temperature rising elution fractionation (TREF), crystallization analysis fractionation (CRYSTAF) [9], [15], [16], [17], [18], crystallization elution fractionation (CEF) and calorimetric methods [19].
TREF involves two consecutive steps, crystallization of the sample slowly on a column from a dilute solution and elution from it when raising temperature, while in CRYSTAF the elution step is skipped by measuring the change in concentration of the solution directly during the cooling phase. In both TREF and CRYSTAF, sample is fractionated on the basis of chain crystallizabilities in a dilute solution, and can give information about the inter-chain distribution of the longest crystallizable sequence (denoted as LCS) [20]. Moreover, by combination the analysis of the separate fractions, preparation (P-type) TREF and CRYSTAF can provide more molecular information of the polymer. However, both typical TREF and CRYSTAF are time-consuming, which demand solvents and specific installation. Recently, Monrabal et al. [21], [22] proposed a promising technique, CEF. They believed that using CEF, results of chemical composition distribution (CCD) of the polymer can be obtained in much shorter time. However, CEF still require expensive specific installation and is not widely applied. TREF, CRYSTAF and CEF can hardly provide quick analysis of tacticity distribution with common instrument, which is in demand greatly during the manufacturing process, especially for the large-scale production of polyolefin.
Because of this practical consideration, other less time consuming methods such as thermal fractionation technique have been developed [19]. The thermal fractionation technique mainly comprises stepwise isothermal crystallization (SIC) [23], [24], [25], segregation fractionation technique (SFT) [26], [27], [28], [29], successive self-nucleation and annealing (SSA) [19], [30], [31], etc. Among which, the SSA fractionation applies self-nucleation and annealing steps sequentially to a polymer sample to promote the potential molecular fractionation occurred during crystallization, and to encourage the unmolten crystals to anneal at each stage of the process, so that small differences in molecular structure can be magnified. The main advantages of SSA include enhanced resolution, effective molecular segregation, relatively short measurement times, free of solvent and additional molecular structural information [19]. Because of these advantages, SSA is widely used in the characterization of the microstructure of polymers, mainly for polyethylene and ethylene/α-olefin copolymers [30], [31], [32], [33], [34], [35], [36], [37], [38], [39], [40], [41], [42], [43], aging and degradation of polyethylene [44], [45], crystallization behavior of the nano-composites [46], [47], [48] and evaluation of the compatibility of polymer blends [49], [50]. In the case of iPP, however, only few literatures had investigated its tacticity distribution using DSC-based fractionation, because iPP possesses no branched structures and is not easy to be fractionated thermally. Virkkunen, Sundholm et al. [51], [52] investigated the tacticity distribution of iPP fractions with varying isotacticity using a combination of solvent fractionation and SSA, the results obtained were compared with 13C NMR and TREF. They classified the fractions into three main groups according to the lamellar structure generated in SSA, and found good correspondence between the SSA melting curves and the TREF fractograms.
The aim of this study is to intentionally modify the cocatalyst/external donor (triethylaluminium/dicyclopentyldimethoxysilane, Al/Si) mole ratio in the heterogeneous Ziegler–Natta polymerization process, and to investigate the variation in stereo-defect distribution and other molecular structure of the obtained resin using a relative time-saving manner, SSA. High resolution 13C NMR, TREF, solvent fractionation combined with DSC and GPC, and SSA fractionation were applied. Quantitative information about the distribution of tacticity was obtained, the results of each method were compared, and the action mechanism of Al/Si ratio on the stereo-defect distribution of the iPP resin was discussed.
Section snippets
Material Preparation
The iPP samples were produced in the Spheripol process (Basell) in the two loop reactors, which is one of the most widespread commercial methods to produce polypropylene [53]. A highly activity supported forth generation Ziegler–Natta (TiCl4 = MgCl2) catalyst was used. The cocatalyst was triethylaluminium (TEAL), and the external donor used was dicyclopentyldimethoxysilane (DCPDMS). The temperature for the prepolymerization reactor was controlled at 20 °C and 70 °C for the main polymerization
Preliminary characterization of isotactic polypropylene
The molecular structure information of the samples was investigated by XS, 13C NMR, GPC and DSC, and the obtained results were listed in Table 1. As can be seen from Table 1, the results of XS (wt%) and isotacticity of all the samples are nearly same, showing that slight modification of Al/Si ratio from 30 to 36 has little influence on the average degrees of tacticity. However, the significant decrease of the melting peak temperature Tm with the increase of Al/Si ratio from 30 to 36 indicates a
Conclusions
In this study, the cocatalyst/ external donor (triethylaluminium/ dicyclopentyldimethoxysilane, Al/Si) mole ratio was modified gradually from 30 to 36 in the Spheripol process (Basell), and five iPP samples with different Al/Si ratio were obtained. Their stereo-defect distribution and other molecular structure were characterized. The results of 13C NMR and determination of xylene soluble fractions (XS) showed that, the average isotacticity of the samples are nearly same, however, analysis of
Acknowledgements
We express our sincerely thanks to the Program for New Century Excellent Talents in Univeristy (NCET-10-0562).
References (65)
- et al.
Prog Polym Sci
(1991) - et al.
Prog Polym Sci
(2001) - et al.
Prog Polym Sci
(2008) - et al.
Polymer
(1994) - et al.
Polymer
(1993) - et al.
Eur Polym J
(2000) - et al.
Prog Polym Sci
(2005) - et al.
Polymer
(2002) Eur Polym J
(2003)- et al.
Eur Polym J
(2006)
Polymer
Polym Degra Stabi
Polym Degra Stabi
Polym Degra Stabi
Polymer
Polymer
Polymer
Polymer
Polymer
Chem Eng Sci
Thermochim Acta
Angew Chem
Macromol Chem Phys
Eur Polym J
J Appl Polym Sci
Macromolecules
Macromol Chem Phys
Adv Polym Sci
J Polym Sci Part B: Polym Phy
Cited by (76)
Comparison of the melt memory effects in matched fractions segregated from Ziegler-Natta and metallocene-made isotactic polypropylene with similar total defect content
2021, PolymerCitation Excerpt :Fig. 4 showed the SSA final melting curves which were fitted by using Origin 9.3 software with Gaussian function. In the SSA final melting curve, the higher Tm is corresponding to the thicker lamella formed by longer isotactic sequence in the chains [45]. It could be found that the Tms of the fractions in the Mf1.79 were located in a much narrower temperature range compared with the ZNf1.79, which indicated that the isotactic sequence length in the Mf1.79 were more uniform.
A tailor-made Successive Self-nucleation and Annealing protocol for the characterization of recycled polyolefin blends
2020, PolymerCitation Excerpt :Following the work of Virkkunen et al., Chang et al. [46] optimized the SSA protocol on different polypropylenes. Based on these results, they confirmed that the addition of an external electron donor during the polymerization process increased the crystallizable sequence length, in agreement with the fact that the addition of a co-catalyst and an electron donor transforms the sites of the catalyst with low isospecificity into sites with higher isospecificity, as confirmed also by Kang et al. [47]. However, blends of polyethylene and polypropylene were never characterized by means of a thermal fractionation technique.
Robust, transparent films of propylene−ethylene copolymer through isotropic-orientation transition at low temperature accelerated by adjustment of ethylene contents
2020, PolymerCitation Excerpt :The structural characteristics and evolution of stretched PP film are crucial to establish the relationship between structure and properties, which also can be prerequisites to optimize the parameters of stretching processing. It is known that PP exhibits polymorphism, i.e. monoclinic α-form [8], trigonal β-form [9,10], orthorhombic γ-form [11,12], and a mesophase [13]. In the crystallization process of coPP, ethylene segments can be partially included in the crystalline region of PP which has been proven by 13C NMR and X-ray diffraction [14,15], however, hardly affecting the crystal lattice of polypropylene as α-form [16], β-form [17], γ-form [6,18] and mesophase [16] can be obtained under certain conditions.
The effects of a new aminosilane external donor on propylene polymerization with MgCl<inf>2</inf>-supported Ziegler-Natta catalyst
2024, Journal of Polymer ResearchRoles of Chain Architecture and Polymorphic Form in Tailoring the Properties of Surface-Roughened Biaxially Oriented Polypropylene Films for Capacitors
2024, Macromolecular Materials and Engineering