Elsevier

English for Specific Purposes

Volume 53, January 2019, Pages 47-59
English for Specific Purposes

Sources of college EFL learners' self-efficacy in the English public speaking domain

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.esp.2018.09.004Get rights and content

Highlights

  • This study extends self-efficacy research to English public speaking (EPS) domain.

  • Bandura's sources of self-efficacy theory are largely supported in EPS.

  • Mastery experience, vicarious experience, and persuasion predict EPS self-efficacy.

  • Gender, major, and prior experience impact the magnitude of such relationships.

  • Pedagogies are offered to support EFL learners' EPS self-efficacy and performance.

Abstract

The English language is playing an ever-increasing role in global cultural, political, and economic domains. This underscores a rapidly growing need for good English public speaking (EPS) skills among college students and a need to better understand instructionally manipulable factors, such as self-efficacy, that may contribute to EPS skills development. Grounded in Bandura's self-efficacy theory, this study investigated the degree to which four sources of self-efficacy— enactive mastery experience (EME), vicarious experience (VE), verbal persuasion (VP), and physiological and affective states (PAS)—predicted EPS self-efficacy among 263 adult Chinese English as a foreign language learners. The overall results in the combined sample largely support Bandura's hypothesized sources of self-efficacy, with EME, VE, and VP—but not PAS—significantly making unique contributions to predicting EPS self-efficacy. The results by subsample highlight prior EPS course experience, gender, and academic major as factors that may impact the existence and the magnitude of the relationship between self-efficacy and its theoretical sources. This is particularly important for educators who wish to foster their students' EPS self-efficacy beliefs as the findings suggest that different groups of students may respond differently to their instructors' efforts. Pedagogical recommendations for EPS self-efficacy building are discussed.

Introduction

Following the political reforms of the late 1970s, English as a Foreign Language (EFL) education in China has witnessed a sharp increase in popularity (Fang, 2018). However, Chinese EFL learners have been reported to generally attain lower proficiency in speaking—in contrast with reading—in English (Wei & Su, 2015). This, Wei and Su argued, may be due to, among other things, an uneven instructional emphasis across language skills in traditional education in China (the instructional support for speaking skills is limited even for the native languages). In the context of globalization and China's policy of enhancing communication and trading channels with the outside world (Fang, 2018), the new college English curriculum reform in China highlights the role of the English language in international exchange and modernization, emphasizes the promotion of students' speaking abilities, and promotes English instruction in colleges to support the country's international aspirations (The Higher Education Department of the Ministry of Education, 2007). These political reforms and educational needs laid the foundation for the emergence of English Public Speaking (EPS) curricula in China, further fueled by such events as China's entry into the World Trade Organization, the hosting of the Olympic Games, and three popular national EPS competitions: the 21st Century Cup, the China Central Television Cup, and the Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press Cup. These events and the rise of information technology have showcased to the public the power of public speaking on the (inter)national stage, gradually leading to the establishment and flourishing of college-level EPS courses in China.

Lucas (2013) defined EPS as English speeches delivered with the purpose of strategic communication, in a clear, consistent, and convincing way. EPS can be viewed as a specialized discourse, particularly in English for Specific Purposes (ESP) settings (Shih, 2010). According to Paltridge and Starfield (2013), the fundamental goal of ESP teaching is to help learners acquire and use English to achieve academic, professional, or occupational goals, thus requiring that ESP courses target the specific needs of the learners, focusing on “the language, skills, and genres appropriate to the specific activities the learners need to carry out in English” (p. 2). ESP speaking, in particular, aims at “providing appropriate, tailor-made instruction,” addressing pragmatics, specific contexts, and matters of cross-cultural awareness (Feak, 2013, p. 49). Consistent with ESP tenets, EPS incorporates a variety of speeches for specific purposes ranging from academic presentations at conferences and seminars to professional presentations in business, cultural, and political settings. The primary goal of the EPS course is to assist students in demonstrating content and speech genre expertise, with a consideration for intercultural communication (Han & Yin, 2016). Thus, the EPS course draws on genre analysis approaches (analyzing texts for structural and linguistic features that aid in realizing the speaker's intent) and instructionally focuses on a range of speech types (e.g., introductory, informative, persuasive). Students are taught to deliver information to the audience in a communicative, comprehensive, and engaging way (Morton, 2009). In other words, reflecting the demands of the 21st century, the EPS course differs from the traditional EFL speaking curricula by integrating multiple disciplines, including second language acquisition (SLA), linguistics, rhetoric, communication, and psychology.

To date, however, EPS-focused research remains limited. A number of studies explored EPS from a teaching perspective, examining ways to instructionally support EPS skills development, using such pedagogical approaches and tools as blended learning (Ibrahim and Yusoff, 2012, Shih, 2010), Toastmaster clubs (Sun, 2008), and TED (Technology, Entertainment, Design) talks (Li, Gao, & Zhang, 2016). Other studies indicated that the development of EPS skills can facilitate critical thinking and intercultural communicative competence (e.g., Jing and Li, 2009, Lucas, 2013), which are considered major 21st century skills for success in education, life, and work. None of these studies, however, examined EPS from the learner perspective to consider potentially powerful contributions of learners' individual differences in EPS performance. One such variable—the development of which is at the heart of the present study—is self-efficacy.

An indispensable component of social cognitive theory (Bandura, 1986), self-efficacy has been defined as people's beliefs in their personal abilities to accomplish a certain task with desired outcomes (Bandura, 1997). Research has linked higher self-efficacy beliefs with positive learning behaviors (Schunk, 1989, Schunk, 2003), higher motivation (e.g., Prat-Sala & Redford, 2010), and, ultimately, higher academic achievement (e.g., Pajares, 1996; see Honicke & Broadbent, 2016). This is demonstrated by studies documenting how self-regulated learning—with regard to the use of learning strategies, goal setting, responses to challenges, and effort investment—functions in learner agency (e.g., Schunk and Ertmer, 2000, Zimmerman et al., 1992; see also Rose, Briggs, Boggs, Sergio, & Ivanova-Slavianskaia, 2018). Within the field of SLA, in particular, a growing body of research has indicated that self-efficacy predicts language performance (e.g., Anyadubalu, 2010, Mills et al., 2006, Mills et al., 2007), is associated with a number of important learning behaviors (e.g., Magogwe and Oliver, 2007, Mills et al., 2006, Mills et al., 2007), and can be instructionally impacted (e.g., Ching, 2002, Graham and Macaro, 2008; see Mills, 2014).

Given the significant role that self-efficacy plays in learning processes, as well as in learning outcomes, understanding how self-efficacy is developed is of the essence. Furthermore, research in other academic domains (see Usher & Pajares, 2008) has documented substantial variations in how self-efficacy is developed in relation to other student characteristics (e.g., gender, prior learning experiences). These variations may inform different teaching and learning practices fostering learners' positive self-efficacy beliefs. Thus, considering a possibility of interactions with student background characteristics noted in the literature, the present study seeks to investigate the contribution of theoretically defined sources of self-efficacy (discussed next) to EFL learners' EPS self-efficacy development, an area that is still understudied in our field (Zheng, Liang, & Tsai, 2017).

Section snippets

A typical EPS course

An EPS course is most typically offered as a semester-long (16–18 week) elective course to college-level EFL learners; the class meets once a week for about 90 min. Given the popularity of EPS courses and the comparatively limited teacher resources, some (not all) universities set English proficiency requirements (i.e., a minimum required proficiency score on the standardized College English Test Band 4 is set at 425 [out of 710 points]; this indicates an above-average English proficiency).

Methods

The purpose of this study is to investigate the degree to which four sources of self-efficacy predict EPS self-efficacy among Chinese college EFL learners and the degree to which the effect of these sources is influenced by learners' background characteristics, such as prior EPS course experience, gender, and academic major. Four research questions guided this study:

  • 1)

    What are, overall, the relative contributions of sources of self-efficacy to EPS self-efficacy among Chinese college EFL learners?

  • 2)

Results

Prior to the main analyses, assumptions associated with missing data and normality were tested. The expectation-maximum method was used to impute missing (5%) data (i.e., using observed values to predict missing values, Newman, 2014). Given the skewness and kurtosis values, the data met the requirement of normal distribution. The descriptive statistics and bivariate correlations among variables were reported in Appendix C.

Discussion and pedagogical implications

EPS courses have increasingly gained in popularity in the EFL curriculum due to globalization and an ever-increasing need for advanced EPS skills, especially among college students. “Instructionally capitalizing on self-efficacy offers a potentially powerful tool for improving EPS instruction” (Zhang et al., 2018), which first necessitates a better understanding of factors that contribute to self-efficacy development. This study examined the extent to which each of the theoretically

Acknowledgement

The authors would like to thank Dr. Nigel Harwood and the anonymous English for Specific Purposes reviewers for their insightful comments and edits. Any shortcomings of the study are our sole responsibility.

Xue Zhang is a doctoral candidate in the Language, Literacy, and Technology PhD program at Washington State University. Her research interests focus on examining English public speaking skills' development among adult EFL learners from a cross-disciplinary perceptive, integrating the domains of second language acquisition, psychology, and communication.

References (73)

  • J. Morton

    Genre and disciplinary competence: A case study of contextualization in an academic speech genre

    English for Specific Purposes

    (2009)
  • H. Rose et al.

    A systematic review of language learner strategy research in the face of self-regulation

    System

    (2018)
  • D.H. Schunk et al.

    Self-regulation and academic learning: Self-efficacy enhancing interventions

  • T.T. Ali et al.

    Foreign language classroom anxiety among Iraqi students and its relation with gender and achievement

    International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature

    (2016)
  • R. Anwan et al.

    An investigation of foreign language classroom anxiety and its relationship with students' achievement

    Journal of College Teaching & Learning

    (2010)
  • C. Anyadubalu

    Self-efficacy, anxiety, and performance in the English language among middle-school students in English language program in Satri Si Suriyothai, Bangkok

    International Journal of Social Science

    (2010)
  • Y. Ardasheva et al.

    Exploring effectiveness and moderators of language learning strategy instruction on second language and self-regulated learning outcomes

    Review of Educational Research

    (2017)
  • A. Bandura

    Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory

    (1986)
  • A. Bandura

    Self- efficacy: The exercise of control

    (1997)
  • A. Bandura

    Guide for constructing self-efficacy scales

  • R.A. Bartsch et al.

    Increasing academic self-efficacy in statistics with a live vicarious experience presentation

    Teaching of Psychology

    (2012)
  • S.L. Britner

    Motivation in high school science students: A comparison of gender differences in life, physical, and earth science classes

    Journal of Research in Science Teaching

    (2008)
  • S.L. Britner et al.

    Sources of science self-efficacy beliefs of middle school students

    Journal of Research in Science Teaching

    (2006)
  • L.C. Ching

    Strategy and self-regulation instruction as contributors to improving students' cognitive model in an ESL program

    English for Specific Purposes

    (2002)
  • M.H. Chou

    Predicting self-efficacy in test preparation: Gender, value, anxiety, test performance, and strategies

    The Journal of Educational Research

    (2018)
  • B.H. Cohen

    Explaining psychological statistics

    (2014)
  • N. Fallah

    Mindfulness, coping self-efficacy and foreign language anxiety: A mediation analysis

    Educational Psychology

    (2017)
  • F. Fang

    Ideology and identity debate of English in China: Past, present and future

    Asian Englishes

    (2018)
  • C.B. Feak

    ESP and speaking

  • S. Graham

    Learner strategies and self-efficacy: Making the connection

    The Language Learning Journal

    (2007)
  • S. Graham et al.

    Strategy instruction in listening for lower-intermediate learners of French

    Language Learning

    (2008)
  • J.M. Green et al.

    A closer look at learning strategies, L2 proficiency, and gender

    TESOL Quarterly

    (1995)
  • Y. Gu

    Gender, academic major, and vocabulary learning strategies of Chinese EFL learners

    RELC Journal

    (2002)
  • A.H. Ibrahim et al.

    Teaching public speaking in a blended learning environment

    International Journal of Social Science and Humanity

    (2012)
  • W. Jing et al.

    A study of the relationship between English public speaking curriculum and the integrated ability of foreign language talents

    Foreign Languages and Their Teaching

    (2009)
  • G. Joët et al.

    Sources of self-efficacy: An investigation of elementary school students in France

    Journal of Educational Psychology

    (2011)
  • Cited by (54)

    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Xue Zhang is a doctoral candidate in the Language, Literacy, and Technology PhD program at Washington State University. Her research interests focus on examining English public speaking skills' development among adult EFL learners from a cross-disciplinary perceptive, integrating the domains of second language acquisition, psychology, and communication.

    Yuliya Ardasheva is an assistant professor in ELL/bilingual education at Washington State University. Her research focuses on the contributions of individual differences to second language development and the interplay between second language and academic development. She has published her work in TESOL Quarterly, Language Learning, and Review of Educational Research.

    View full text