Elsevier

Electrochimica Acta

Volume 78, 1 September 2012, Pages 171-176
Electrochimica Acta

Acceleration of the reduction of carbon dioxide in the presence of multivalent cations

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electacta.2012.05.118Get rights and content

Abstract

The accelerating effect of various multivalent cations, the halogen anions and the acidity of the solution on the rate of the electrochemical reduction of CO2 on a Cu (88)–Sn (6)–Pb (6) alloy cathode was studied. In 1.5 mol L−1 HCl containing various cations, at −0.65 V vs. Ag/AgCl the rate increases with the increase of the surface charge of the cation of the supporting electrolyte in the order Na+ < Mg2+ < Ca2+ < Ba2+ < Al3+ < Zr4+ < Nd3+ < La3+. In La3+ containing electrolyte the rate was two-times higher than that in the case of Na+ at the same potential. The acceleration effect was attributed to the participation of the radical anion (CO2radical dot) in the rate determining step. The effect of the cation was somewhat higher at pH > 4, but less pronounced at quite negative potentials (−1.7 V). This was attributed to the change of the rate-determining step of the reduction at high overpotentials. In strongly acidic solution at −0.65 V the halogen anion increases the rate in the order Cl < Br < I, while the increase of the [H3O+] from 0.1 to 2 mol L−1 resulted to an increase in the rate by 53%. The main products of the reduction were CH3OH, CH3CHO, HCOOH and CO. The % current efficiency (% CE) of CH3OH and HCOOH displayed maxima (∼35 and 28%) at −0.6 and −0.65 V respectively. The %CE of CH3CHO was continuously increased with increasing negative potential from −0.55 to −1.2 V, while that of CO followed the reverse trend. In the presence of Zr4+ a relatively high %CE of CH3CHO (17.6%) was obtained. The main conclusion of this work is that the rate of CO2 reduction can be increased at low overpotentials and the distribution of the products can be controlled simply by varying the composition of the electrolyte.

Introduction

The electrochemical reduction of CO2 was studied for the first time in 1870 by Royer [1]. Since then, it has been the subject of a large number of publications, especially during the recent twenty years. These works have been reviewed by Sammells and Cook [2], Jitaru et al. [3], Hori [4], Gattrell et al. [5] as well as by Chaplin and Wragg [6].

The conversion of CO2 to organic chemicals is of crucial importance for the storage of the energy produced by renewable energy sources such as wind, solar, geothermal as well as from nuclear stations. Among various chemicals that can be produced from the reduction of CO2, methanol has many advantages. The “methanol economy” in which methanol will replace fossil fuels is an alternative way to the so-called “hydrogen economy” due to the limitations and disadvantages of hydrogen [7]. Even though the electrochemical production of methanol from CO2 is thermodynamically more favorable than the production of hydrogen from water [8], which is the main competitive reaction, it is kinetically difficult and needs suitable electrocatalysts and reaction conditions. Formation of methanol has been observed on various metallic electrodes such as Ru [9], Mo [10], Cu (90.5)–Ni (9.5) [11], Cu in a C2H5OH–H2O–LiCl electrolyte [12] and on Ru–Cu [13] as well as on conductive oxides such as RuO2 [14] or mixtures of oxides [8]. The % CE usually is high at low cathodic overpotentials and depends strongly on the nature of the cathode and the other electrolysis conditions.

The influence of the electrolyte and its concentration on the electrochemical reduction of CO2 has been studied in several works [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20], [21], [22]. It has been found from steady state electrolytic experiments that the rate of the reduction depends on the Stokes radius of the alkali metal cation in the order Li+ < Na+ < K+ < Cs+. Cyclic voltammetry experiments have also proved that the rate of the reduction increases as the size of the anion of the electrolyte increases in the order Cl < Br < I [23].

The present work includes experimental results on the influence of multivalent cations on the rate of the reduction of CO2. The effect of the halogen anions and the acidity of the electrolyte was also studied.

Section snippets

Experimental

A Teflon cell having a total volume of 24 mL (Scheme 1) was used in all experiments. A Nafion 117 (H+ form) cation exchange membrane divided the cell into two equal volume compartments. The heat transfer from the cell was achieved by two aluminum plates (10 cm × 10 cm × 0.5 cm). The compartment of the catholyte had an extra volume of 2 mL on the top, in order to secure that the electrolyte covered the whole surface of the cathode, despite the volume removed due to the sampling. Moreover, the cell had an

Influence of the potential

Fig. 1 shows the cyclic voltammograms of the supporting electrolyte (1.5 mol L−1 HCl, 0.5 mol L−1 NaCl) as well as that of a CO2 saturated solution. The current density in the presence of CO2 was lower than that of the background electrolyte in all the potential range examined and this is in accordance with a previous work [21]. This was attributed to the inhibition of the hydrogen evolution reaction from the adsorbed CO2 or from intermediates of the reduction.

Fig. 2a shows that the current density

Conclusions

The rate of the reduction of carbon dioxide at low overpotentials, where the rate determining step is the reduction of the negatively charged anion (CO2radical dot) increases as the surface charge of the cation of the supporting electrolyte increases from Na+ to La3+ in strongly acidic solution and this increase is more intense at pH > 4. The influence of the cation is minimized at high overpotentials, because the rate determining step of the reduction changes. The halogen anion increases the rate in the

References (40)

  • M.E. Royer

    Comptes Rendus

    (1870)
  • A.F. Sammells et al.
  • M. Jitaru et al.

    Journal of Applied Electrochemistry

    (1997)
  • Y. Hori
  • M. Gattrell et al.

    Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry

    (2006)
  • R.P.S Chaplin et al.

    Journal of Applied Electrochemistry

    (2003)
  • G.A. Olah et al.

    Journal of Organic Chemistry

    (2009)
  • A. Bandi

    Journal of the Electrochemical Society

    (1990)
  • D.P. Summers et al.

    Langmuir

    (1988)
  • D.P. Summers et al.

    Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry

    (1986)
  • M. Watanabe et al.

    Journal of the Electrochemical Society

    (1991)
  • J.W. Li et al.

    Journal of the Electrochemical Society

    (1997)
  • J. Popic et al.

    Journal of Electroanalytical Chemistry

    (1997)
  • N. Spataru et al.

    Journal of Applied Electrochemistry

    (2003)
  • S. Kaneco et al.

    Journal of Solid State Electrochemistry

    (1999)
  • S. Kaneco et al.

    Electrochimica Acta

    (1999)
  • S. Kaneco et al.

    Electrochimica Acta

    (2006)
  • G. Kyriacou et al.

    Journal of Applied Electrochemistry

    (1993)
  • Y. Hori et al.

    Bulletin of the Chemical Society of Japan

    (1982)
  • M. Spichiger-Ulmann et al.

    Nouveau Journal De Chimie-New Journal of Chemistry

    (1986)
  • Cited by (0)

    1

    ISE Member.

    View full text