Elsevier

Desalination

Volume 326, 1 October 2013, Pages 77-95
Desalination

A review on membrane fabrication: Structure, properties and performance relationship

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2013.06.016Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Membrane fabrication techniques

  • Structure–property relationship of membranes

  • Structure parameters affect the membrane performance.

Abstract

In this review, polymeric membrane fabrication techniques for pressure driven membrane processes and membrane distillation are discussed. The fabrication technique, properties of the fabricated membranes and performance in water desalination are related. Important parameters which affect the membrane performance such as crystallinity of the membrane based polymer, porous structure, hydrophobicity/hydrophilicity, membrane charge and surface roughness are analyzed. Despite the fact that extensive knowledge exist on how to ‘tailor’ membrane pore structure including its surface properties and cross-section morphology by selection of appropriate fabrication methods, there is still a challenge to produce reliable membranes with anti-fouling properties, chemical resistance, high mechanical strength with high flux and selectivity. To ensure progress in membrane performance, further improvements are needed of common membrane fabrication techniques such as phase inversion and interfacial polymerization. At the same time, the potential of novel fabrication techniques such as electrospinning and track-etching needs to be assessed. A comprehensive understanding between structure-surface properties and performance is a key for further development and progress in membrane technology for water desalination.

Introduction

According to the world population clock, the population exceeds 7 billion and will reach 10 billion by 2050. Pure drinking water would be a major problem for the developing countries in the world. The improvement in the efficiency and cost of water treatment is a major challenge to overcome the scarcity of portable water. Different membrane methods have been used for water treatment, including microfiltration (MF), ultrafiltration (UF), nanofiltration (NF), reverse osmosis (RO) and membrane distillation (MD) [1]. UF and MF are well-developed techniques used for water treatment, whereas RO is widely used for water desalination and purification. MD is a new developing technique and it has potential for desalinating highly saline water [2], [3]. The membranes play a key role in membrane-based water treatment processes and determine the technological and economical efficiency of the aforementioned technologies; membrane improvement can greatly affect the performance of current technology. The material selection and pore size of the membranes depend on the application for which it would be used. Fig. 1 represents the average pore size requirement for membranes for different water treatment processes.

Different fabrication techniques and polymers used for the preparation of polymeric membranes are summarized in Table 1. Details of the fabrication techniques process and the material structural characteristics will be discussed in the subsequent sections.

In this article, the recent development of polymeric membrane materials and membrane preparation methods with focus on structure–property relationships for pressure-driven membrane processes and MD will be discussed. This review article will provide a reference to the researchers and manufacturers working on fabrication of membranes and materials for water treatment.

Section snippets

Membrane fabrication methods

The selection of a technique for polymer membrane fabrication depends on a choice of polymer and desired structure of the membrane. The most commonly used techniques for preparation of polymeric membranes include phase inversion, interfacial polymerization, stretching, track-etching and electrospinning.

Structure–property–performance relationship

Usually, the membrane performance (flux, rejection and fouling) is strongly influenced by membrane polymer properties, porous structure and specific membrane surface features [112], [113], [114]. The most important parameters, which affect the membrane performance, such as crystallinity of the membrane based polymer, porous structure, hydrophobicity/hydrophilicity, membrane charge and surface roughness are discussed in details below.

Conclusions

In this review, relationships between the synthesis of polymer membranes, their structure, surface properties and performance were discussed. It was shown that to date remarkable progress has been made in the fabrications of membranes for water treatment. However, there is still a challenge to produce reliable membranes with anti-fouling properties, high mechanical strength, high tolerance on chlorine attack and minimal thickness of the membrane barrier layer to provide a high flux. To ensure

List of abbreviations

    AFM

    atomic force microscopy

    BSA

    bovine serum albumin

    CA

    cellulose acetate

    DMF

    dimethyl formamide

    HFP

    hexafluoropropylene

    IP

    interfacial polymerisation

    Kow

    octanol–water distribution coefficient

    MD

    membrane distillation

    MF

    microfiltration

    MPD

    m-phenylenediamine

    NF

    nanofiltration

    NMP

    n-methyl-2-pyrrolidone

    NOM

    natural organic matter

    PA

    polyamide

    PAA

    poly(amic acid)

    PAN

    polyacrylonitrile

    PC

    polycarbonate

    PE

    polyethylene

    PEEK

    polyetheretherketone

    PEG

    poly(ethylene glycol)

    PES

    polyethersulfone

    PET

    polyethylene terephthalate

    Pluronic

References (202)

  • D.V. Mehta et al.

    Influence of some processing variables on the properties of cellulose acetate membranes III. Temperature dependence of the desalination performance of membranes plasticized by various plasticizers

    Desalination

    (1972)
  • M. Matsuda et al.

    On the conditions of fabrication of tubular cellulose acetate membranes

    Desalination

    (1978)
  • H.H. Schwarz et al.

    Annealing effect in porous cellulose acetate membranes

    J. Membr. Sci.

    (1987)
  • M.J. Han et al.

    Characterization of reverse osmosis cellulose acetate membranes by gas adsorption method: effect of casting variables and chlorine damage

    J. Membr. Sci.

    (1991)
  • T. Mohammadi et al.

    Effect of production conditions on morphology and permeability of asymmetric cellulose acetate membranes

    Desalination

    (2009)
  • A.S. More et al.

    Synthesis and characterization of polyamides containing pendant pentadecyl chains

    Eur. Polym. J.

    (2010)
  • P.R. Buch et al.

    Preparation, characterization and chlorine stability of aromatic–cycloaliphatic polyamide thin film composite membranes

    J. Membr. Sci.

    (2008)
  • W.Y. Chuang et al.

    The effect of polymeric additives on the structure and permeability of poly(vinyl alcohol) asymmetric membranes

    Polymer

    (2000)
  • A. Bottino et al.

    High-performance ultrafiltration membranes cast from LiCl doped solutions

    Desalination

    (1988)
  • E. Fontananova et al.

    Effect of additives in the casting solution on the formation of PVDF membranes

    Desalination

    (2006)
  • H.J. Lee et al.

    Solution properties of poly(amic acid)-NMP containing LiCl and their effects on membrane morphologies

    J. Membr. Sci.

    (2002)
  • L. Shi et al.

    Effect of additives on the fabrication of poly (vinylidene fluoride-co-hexafluropropylene) (PVDF-HFP) asymmetric microporous hollow fiber membranes

    J. Membr. Sci.

    (2008)
  • D.L. Wang et al.

    Porous PVDF asymmetric hollow fiber membranes prepared with the use of small molecular additives

    J. Membr. Sci.

    (2000)
  • N.A. Ochoa et al.

    Pore size distributions based on AFM imaging and retention of multidisperse polymer solutes — characterisation of polyethersulfone UF membranes with dopes containing different PVP

    J. Membr. Sci.

    (2001)
  • J. Marchese et al.

    Fouling behaviour of polyethersulfone UF membranes made with different PVP

    J. Membr. Sci.

    (2003)
  • D.M. Wang et al.

    Formation mechanism of the macrovoids induced by surfactant additives

    J. Membr. Sci.

    (1998)
  • S.A. McKelvey et al.

    Phase separation, vitrification, and the manifestation of macrovoids in polymeric asymmetric membranes

    J. Membr. Sci.

    (1996)
  • G. Arthanareeswaran et al.

    Metal ion separation and protein removal from aqueous solutions using modified cellulose acetate membranes: role of polymeric additives

    Sep. Purif. Technol.

    (2007)
  • E. Saljoughi et al.

    Effect of PEG additive and coagulation bath temperature on the morphology, permeability and thermal/chemical stability of asymmetric CA membranes

    Desalination

    (2010)
  • H. Susanto et al.

    Characteristics, performance and stability of polyethersulfone ultrafiltration membranes prepared by phase separation method using different macromolecular additives

    J. Membr. Sci.

    (2009)
  • M.Z. Rong et al.

    Structure–property relationships of irradiation grafted nano-inorganic particle filled polypropylene composites

    Polymer

    (2001)
  • L.Y. Ng et al.

    Polymeric membranes incorporated with metal/metal oxide nanoparticles: a comprehensive review

    Desalination

    (2013)
  • K. Zodrow et al.

    Polysulfone ultrafiltration membranes impregnated with silver nanoparticles show improved biofouling resistance and virus removal

    Water Res.

    (2009)
  • L. Yan et al.

    Effect of nano-sized Al2O3-particle addition on PVDF ultratiltration membrane performance

    J. Membr. Sci.

    (2006)
  • Y.N. Yang et al.

    The influence of nano-sized TiO2 fillers on the morphologies and properties of PSFUF membrane

    J. Membr. Sci.

    (2007)
  • R.F. Silva et al.

    Solution-cast Nafion® ionomer membranes: preparation and characterization

    Electrochim. Acta

    (2004)
  • Q.T. Nguyen et al.

    Dry-cast process for synthetic microporous membranes: physico-chemical analyses through morphological studies

    J. Membr. Sci.

    (2010)
  • J.E. Cadotte et al.

    New thin-film composite seawater reverse-osmosis membrane

    Desalination

    (1980)
  • J. Cadotte et al.

    Nanofiltration membranes broaden the use of membrane separation technology

    Desalination

    (1988)
  • W.J. Lau et al.

    A recent progress in thin film composite membrane: a review

    Desalination

    (2012)
  • R.J. Petersen

    Composite reverse-osmosis and nanofiltration membranes

    J. Membr. Sci.

    (1993)
  • I.J. Roh et al.

    Synthesis and characterization of interfacially polymerized polyamide thin films

    Desalination

    (2006)
  • A.K. Ghosh et al.

    Impacts of reaction and curing conditions on polyamide composite reverse osmosis membrane properties

    J. Membr. Sci.

    (2008)
  • S. Verissimo et al.

    Influence of the diamine structure on the nanofiltration performance, surface morphology and surface charge of the composite polyamide membranes

    J. Membr. Sci.

    (2006)
  • S.H. Huang et al.

    Polyamide thin-film composite membranes prepared by interfacial polymerization for pervaporation separation

    Desalination

    (2006)
  • A.R. Korikov et al.

    Interfacially polymerized hydrophilic microporous thin film composite membranes on porous polypropylene hollow fibers and flat films

    J. Membr. Sci.

    (2006)
  • L. Li et al.

    Polyamide thin film composite membranes prepared from 3,4′,5-biphenyl triacyl chloride, 3,3′,5,5′-biphenyl tetraacyl chloride and m-phenylenediamine

    J. Membr. Sci.

    (2007)
  • L.F. Liu et al.

    Study on a novel antifouling polyamide-urea reverse osmosis composite membrane (ICIC-MPD) — III. Analysis of membrane electrical properties

    J. Membr. Sci.

    (2008)
  • Q.F. An et al.

    Influence of polyvinyl alcohol on the surface morphology, separation and anti-fouling performance of the composite polyamide nanofiltration membranes

    J. Membr. Sci.

    (2011)
  • M.H. Liu et al.

    Preparation, structure characteristics and separation properties of thin-film composite polyamide-urethane seawater reverse osmosis membrane

    J. Membr. Sci.

    (2008)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text