Elsevier

Desalination

Volume 249, Issue 3, 25 December 2009, Pages 1079-1087
Desalination

The role of hydrodynamic conditions and solution chemistry on protein fouling during ultrafiltration

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2009.05.015Get rights and content

Abstract

This study investigates the effect of hydrodynamic conditions and solution chemistry on protein fouling during ultrafiltration. Drastic flux reduction was observed at high initial flux and/or low cross-flow velocity. A limiting flux existed during BSA filtration, beyond which membrane flux cannot be sustained. Further increase in pressure over the limiting value did not enhance the stable flux. The rate and extent of BSA fouling were also strongly dependent on the feedwater composition, such as BSA concentration, pH, and ionic strength. Foulant concentration had no effect on the stable flux, although the rate approaching to the stable flux increased proportionally with increasing foulant concentration. Fouling was most severe at the isoelectric point of BSA (pH 4.7), where the electrostatic repulsion between foulant molecules is negligible. Membrane fouling became less severe at pHs away from the isoelectric point. Increasing ionic strength at pH 3.0 promoted severe fouling likely due to electric double layer (EDL) compression. On the other hand, the flux behavior was insensitive to salt concentration at pH 4.7 due to the lack of electrostatic interaction. At a solution pH of 5.8, effect of ionic strength on long-term flux behavior was directly opposite to that on the transient behavior. While the long-term flux was lower at higher ionic strength due to EDL compression, the transient behavior was also affected by the BSA retention of the membrane.

Introduction

Ultrafiltration (UF) has received increasing popularity in the recent decades. UF membranes have been used in surface water treatment (such as natural organic matter and pathogen removal), in membrane bioreactors (MBRs), in pretreatment processes for reverse osmosis (RO) and nanofiltration (NF), and in many other industrial applications [1], [2], [3], [4]. Similar to other types of pressure-driven membranes, UF membranes are prone to fouling — the accumulation of inorganic colloids, organic macromolecules, and biological entities on membrane surfaces or inside membrane pores, which directly reduces the productivity and increases the operational costs.

Protein has been identified as one of the major membrane foulants in wastewater treatment and reclamation applications [5], [6], [7], [8]. Fouling of non-porous membranes (NF and RO membranes) is likely dominated by cake layer formation in addition to concentration polarization [8], [9], [10]. In contrast, the permeability loss of porous microfiltration (MF) and UF membranes might be attributed to a combination of pore blockage and cake layer formation [11], [12], [13]. Existing studies suggest that initial stages of fouling for porous membranes are likely dominated by pore plugging, while the flux behavior is probably determined by a foulant cake layer when severe fouling occurs at longer filtration duration [11], [12], [13], [14], [15]. Numerous studies have also demonstrated that membrane fouling by organic macromolecules are affected by hydrodynamic conditions such as membrane flux and cross-flow velocity [8], [16], [17], feedwater characteristics including foulant concentration, pH, and ionic compositions [8], [15], [16], [18], [19], [20], as well as membrane properties (membrane hydrophobicity, roughness, and porosity) [7], [18], [21]. In general, severe fouling is observed at the isoelectric point (IEP) of a protein where the electrostatic repulsive force between protein molecules is at the minimum [8], [15], [19], [20]. In addition, protein fouling is typically promoted by increased membrane flux and/or reduced cross-flow velocity [8], [17], [22]. Such phenomena are consistent with the critical flux concept [17], [22] which states that little flux decline occurs when the membrane flux is below a threshold value, i.e., the critical flux. On the other hand, severe fouling can occur above the critical flux [17], [22].

Despite the vast number of studies on protein fouling, the effects of ionic strength and foulant concentration have been controversial in the literature. Studies on non-porous membranes [8], [20] reported that protein fouling was more severe at elevated ionic strength due to electric double layer (EDL) compression. Consistent with the above studies, several research groups [15], [19], [23] also reported greater protein fouling tendency for MF and UF membranes at greater ionic strength. Similar effect of EDL compression has been suggested for natural organic matter, alginate, and inorganic colloids [24], [25], [26]. In contrast, Chan and Chen [16] observed lower fouling rate for MF membranes at greater background salt concentrations, which was attributed to the greater protein solubility at increased salt content. Similar observation has also been documented for UF membranes [27]. The literature on the effect of foulant concentration is equally confusing. While many researchers have suggested that more severe fouling occurred at higher protein concentrations [28], [29], [30], other studies revealed that the quasi-steady flux at long filtration time was independent of the foulant concentration [24], [31], [32]. Despite of the increased fouling rate (the rate approaching to the stable flux) at greater foulant concentrations, Tang and Leckie [24] demonstrated that the long-term stable flux was determined by interaction forces between foulant–membrane and foulant-deposited-foulant which were largely independent of foulant concentration.

The study aims to systematically investigate the influence of hydrodynamic conditions and solution environment on protein fouling during ultrafiltration. The effect of membrane flux, cross-flow velocity, protein concentration, pH, and ionic strength were thoroughly investigated through constant pressure fouling tests. The results from the current study may help us to better understand the coupled effects of solution chemistry and hydrodynamic conditions.

Section snippets

Chemicals and materials

Ultrapure water, supplied from an ELGA water purification system (UK) with a resistivity of 18.2 MΩ cm, was used for preparing all reagents and working solutions. The ionic composition and solution pH were adjusted by drop-wise addition of analytical grade sodium chloride, sodium hydroxide, and hydrochloric acid (Sigma-Aldrich, St. Louis, MO).

Bovine serum albumin (BSA, 98% purity, A7906, Sigma-Aldrich) was used as a model protein foulant. It is approximately ellipsoidal (14 × 4 × 4 nm), with a

Effect of hydrodynamic conditions

The effect of applied pressure and cross-flow velocity on the BSA fouling is systematically investigated. Fig. 2(a) shows the flux performance of the MW membrane at various applied pressures ranging from 20 to 500 kPa. The feed composition was fixed at pH 5.8, 10 mM NaCl, and 20 mg/L BSA. In a typical run, membrane experienced rapid initial flux decline in the first 15 min of the test. Subsequent flux decline was much milder, and stable flux was achieved within 2 h. Increasing applied pressure

Conclusions

The effect of hydrodynamic conditions and solution chemistry on protein fouling during ultrafiltration was systematically investigated. Severe fouling occurred at high initial flux and/or low cross-flow velocity. A limiting flux was observed at high applied pressure, beyond which increase in pressure did not enhance the stable flux. The rate and extent of BSA fouling were strongly dependent on the feedwater composition, such as BSA concentration, pH, and ionic strength. While the long-term flux

Acknowledgement

This research was funded by AcRF Project No. SUG4/07, Nanyang Technological University (NTU), Singapore. We thank GE Osmonics© for providing membrane samples used in this study.

References (44)

  • S.P. Palecek et al.

    Hydraulic permeability of protein deposits formed during microfiltration: effect of solution pH and ionic strength

    Journal of Membrane Science

    (1994)
  • R. Chan et al.

    The effects of electrolyte concentration and pH on protein aggregation and deposition: critical flux and constant flux membrane filtration

    Journal of Membrane Science

    (2001)
  • D.X. Wu et al.

    Critical flux measurement for model colloids

    Journal of Membrane Science

    (1999)
  • A.G. Fane et al.

    The effect of ph and ionic environment on the ultrafiltration of protein solutions with retentive membranes

    Journal of Membrane Science

    (1983)
  • H. Mo et al.

    Fouling of reverse osmosis membrane by protein (BSA): effects of pH, calcium, magnesium, ionic strength and temperature

    Journal of Membrane Science

    (2008)
  • S. Kang et al.

    Protein antifouling mechanisms of PAN UF membranes incorporating PAN-g-PEO additive

    Journal of Membrane Science

    (2007)
  • P. Heinemann et al.

    Microfiltration of protein solutions: effect of fouling on rejection

    Desalination

    (1988)
  • J.E. Kilduff et al.

    Flux decline during nanofiltration of naturally-occurring dissolved organic matter: effects of osmotic pressure, membrane permeability, and cake formation

    Journal of Membrane Science

    (2004)
  • P. Bacchin et al.

    Critical and sustainable fluxes: theory, experiments and applications

    Journal of Membrane Science

    (2006)
  • S. Lee et al.

    Fouling of reverse osmosis membranes by hydrophilic organic matter: implications for water reuse

    Desalination

    (2006)
  • R.D. Cohen et al.

    Colloidal fouling of reverse osmosis membranes

    Journal of Colloid and Interface Science

    (1986)
  • S.T. Kelly et al.

    Mechanisms for BSA fouling during microfiltration

    Journal of Membrane Science

    (1995)
  • Cited by (113)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    1

    Tel.: +65 6790 5267; fax: +65 6791 0676.

    2

    Tel.: +86 21 54745640.

    View full text