Elsevier

Desalination

Volume 250, Issue 1, 1 January 2010, Pages 236-248
Desalination

Inorganic fouling of pressure-driven membrane processes — A critical review

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2009.02.056Get rights and content

Abstract

One of the major limitations of the application of membrane processes in water and wastewater treatment is inorganic fouling. Despite the extensive studies on concentration polarization and inorganic scaling in membrane filtration, the fundamental mechanisms and processes involved in inorganic fouling are not fully understood. This paper critically reviews the mechanisms and models of concentration polarization and inorganic fouling in pressure-driven membrane processes. Effects of operating parameters and membrane properties on the formation of inorganic scale at the membrane surface are also evaluated. Future research areas that need to be pursued to alleviate inorganic fouling problems in membrane installations are discussed.

Introduction

Membrane is a selective barrier between two phases that restricts the transport of particulate, colloidal, and dissolved chemical species other than solvent or water. The selective transport is achieved based on the differences in the physical and/or chemical properties of permeating components across the membrane. In recent years, membrane processes are extensively employed in the textile, pharmaceutical, pulp and paper, semi-conductor, tanning and leather, mining, electroplating, dairy, food and beverage processing, and biotechnology industries as well as for water and wastewater treatment. In water and wastewater industries, four types of membranes (microfilter, ultrafilter, nanofilter and reverse osmosis membrane) are widely used for the removal of hardness, color, biogenics, and disinfection by-products and their precursors to produce required quality of processed water.

Membranes used in water and wastewater industry can be broadly classified into two major groups: porous membranes and non-porous membranes. Porous membranes separate particles based on sieving, straining, or size exclusion. Microfiltration, ultrafiltration and loose end nanofiltration membranes are examples of porous membranes [1]. Non-porous membranes separate molecules based on the differences in solubility or diffusivity between the solvent and the solute in the membranes [2], [3]. Tight end nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membranes are typical non-porous membranes. These membranes differ in their pore sizes, operating pressures, and applications, which are summarized in Table 1.

Traditional methods to remove pollutants from water and wastewater are coagulation, flocculation, sedimentation, sand filtration, ion exchange, electrodeposition, extraction, precipitation and biological degradation, etc. Most of which have disadvantages of operating in a successive steps of heterogeneous reactions, or distribution of substances between different phases that usually require a lengthy operating period and a large area [4], [5]. Membrane processes are of great interest because they reduce the number of unit operations, recycle process water, and recover valuable products for other applications [5]. Additional inherent advantages, such as selective separation, continuous and automatic operation, relatively low capital/operating cost, easy scale-up and low space requirement, made membrane filtration an attractive alternative compared to conventional treatment [6], [7], [8], [9].

Because of the potential of the membrane applications, many membranes have been and are being developed by different manufacturers (e.g., Nitto Denko Corp., Koch, Toray Industries, Dow/FILMTEC, GE Osmonics, etc). Most of the membranes are composed of organic polymers, such as aromatic polyamide, polysulphonates, polyvinyl alcohol, piperazineamide, polyimide, and polyacetylene [10], [11]. Table 2 shows some of the commercially available membranes. Inorganic membranes are also used for the rejection of organic molecules and ion separation in aqueous solutions. The major strength of inorganic membranes is their higher chemical, thermal, and mechanical stability compared to organic membranes [12]. Applicability of inorganic membranes is of great importance in non-aqueous filtration due to their stability in organic solvents [13]. High temperature-resistant inorganic membranes have been prepared from titania, silica–zirconia, and alumina [13].

Despite its potential in water treatment, certain limitations prohibit membrane process from large-scale and continuous operation ([14]. One of the major limitations arises from membrane fouling caused by different inorganic salts [15], which reduces permeate flux, increases feed pressure, decreases product quality and ultimately shortens membrane life [16], [17]. Consequently, membrane fouling increases the costs by increasing (1) energy consumption, (2) system down time, (3) necessary membrane area, and (4) construction, labor, time, and material costs for backwashing and cleaning processes. Successful application of membrane technology, thus, requires efficient control of membrane fouling ([18]). However, lack of clear understanding of the fouling mechanisms is a challenge in water treatment using membrane technology. In the past decade, numerous studies had been performed to investigate concentration polarization (CP), cake or gel layer formation, membrane pore blocking, and other fouling mechanisms on different membranes ([20], [21] and the reference cited therein). These studies suggested that membrane fouling due to inorganic salts is dependent on several factors, including but not limited to, membrane characteristics, module geometry, feed solution characteristics and operating conditions [22], [23], [24]. Moreover, several hypotheses have been introduced to explain the observed fouling behaviors. The objective of this paper is to provide a state-of-science review of membrane fouling caused by inorganic salts in water and wastewater treatment. This critical review addresses the strengths and deficiencies of the models and theories proposed to date, summarizes the experimental investigations, and projects future research needs on inorganic fouling.

Section snippets

Concentration polarization (CP)

By definition, CP is a phenomenon that the solute or particle concentration in the vicinity of the membrane surface is higher than that in the bulk [25]. The phenomena of CP are inherent to all membrane filtration processes [1]. It causes elevated concentration of solutes and/or particles at the membrane surface and increases their break through into the permeate stream. This not only increases the risk of fouling and deteriorates the quality of the permeate, but also decreases the permeation

Inorganic fouling

Membrane fouling is the accumulation of materials at the surface, or in the pores of a membrane, which decreases the permeate flux of the membrane [40]. The proceeding of fouling is perceived as a multistage process, of which adhesion of the fouling agents to the membrane surface is an essential step [41]. According to the definition of membrane fouling, CP is not considered as fouling, although it is also responsible for the flux decline. Because once the filtration process is stopped, the

Conclusions and future research needs

This paper summarizes the concentration polarization, reversible and irreversible fouling phenomena of membranes. Different models of CP and inorganic fouling, as well as the factors that affect CP and inorganic fouling are also discussed. Most of the studies on inorganic fouling mechanisms were performed to investigate the effect of operating parameters (such as shear rate, and operating pressure) and membrane properties (e.g. porosity, roughness, etc.) on the crystallization of inorganic

Acknowledgements

The study is sponsored in parts by the Texas Hazardous Waste Research Center (Project No.: 068LUB0966 and 069LUB2966) and the Sustainable Agricultural Water Conservation (SAWC) program of the United States Department of Agriculture through a subcontract from Sul Ross State University. The funding support is greatly appreciated.

References (88)

  • H.R. Rabie et al.

    A method for assessing membrane fouling in pilot and full scale systems

    Desalination

    (2001)
  • J.G. Wijmans et al.

    The solution-diffusion model — a review

    Journal of Membrane Science

    (1995)
  • K.S. Spiegler et al.

    Thermodynamics of hyperfiltration (reverse osmosis): criteria for efficient membranes

    Desalination

    (1966)
  • H. Al-Zoubi et al.

    Rejection and modelling of sulphate and potassium salts by nanofiltration membranes: neural network and Spiegler–Kedem model

    Desalination

    (2007)
  • J. Schaep et al.

    Influence of ion size and charge in nanofiltration

    Separation and Purification Technology

    (1998)
  • K.L. Chen et al.

    The development of membrane fouling in full-scale RO processes

    Journal of Membrane Science

    (2004)
  • E. Matthiasson et al.

    Concentration polarization and fouling

    Desalination

    (1980)
  • I. Sutzkover et al.

    Simple technique for measuring the concentration polarization level in a reverse osmosis system

    Desalination

    (2000)
  • R.M. McDonogh et al.

    Experimental in situ measurement of concentration polarization during ultra- and micro-filtration of bovine serum albumin and dextran blue solutions

    Journal of Membrane Science

    (1995)
  • C.A.C. Van de Lisdonk et al.

    Monitoring scaling in nanofiltration and reverse osmosis membrane systems

    Desalination

    (2000)
  • B. Van der Bruggen et al.

    Modelling of the retention of uncharged molecules with nanofiltration

    Water Research

    (2002)
  • L.F. Song

    Flux decline in cross-flow microfiltration and ultrafiltration- mechanisms and modeling of membrane fouling

    Journal of Membrane Science

    (1998)
  • G.B. van den Berg et al.

    Flux decline in ultrafiltration processes

    Desalination

    (1990)
  • J.G. Wijmans et al.

    Flux limitation in ultrafiltration-osmotic pressure model and gel layer model

    Journal of Membrane Science

    (1984)
  • N.P. Cheremisinoff

    Liquid Filtration Elsevier

  • D. Hasson et al.

    Inspection of CaSO4 scaling on RO membranes at various water recovery levels

    Desalination

    (2001)
  • P. Dydo et al.

    Scaling analysis of nanofiltration systems fed with saturated calcium sulfate solutions in the presence of calcium carbonate ions

    Desalination

    (2003)
  • A.G. Pervov

    Scale formation prognosis and cleaning procedure schedules in reverse osmosis systems operation

    Desalination

    (1991)
  • J. Gilron et al.

    Analysis of laminar precipitation fouling on RO membranes

    Desalination

    (1986)
  • J. Gilron et al.

    Calcium sulphate fouling of reverse osmosis membranes: Flux decline mechanism

    Chemical Engineering Science

    (1987)
  • M. Elimelech et al.

    Role of membrane surface morphology in colloidal fouling of cellulose acetate and composite aromtic polyamide reverse osmosis membranes

    Journal of Membrane Science

    (1997)
  • M. Brusilovsky et al.

    Flux decline due to gypsum precipitation on RO membranes

    Desalination

    (1992)
  • O.D. Linnikov

    Investigation of the initial period of sulphate scale formation Part 3. Variations of calcium sulphate crystal growth rates at its crystallization on a heat-exchange surface

    Desalination

    (2000)
  • R.W. Field et al.

    Critical flux concept for microfiltration fouling

    Journal of Membrane Science

    (1995)
  • A.E. Childress et al.

    Effect of solution chemistry on surface charge of polymeric RO and NF membranes

    Journal of Membrane Science

    (1996)
  • D. Chen et al.

    Ultrasonic control of ceramic membrane fouling by natural organic matter and silica particles

    Journal of Membrane Science

    (2006)
  • P. Aimar et al.

    Membrane-solute interactions: influence on pure solvent transfer during ultrafiltration

    Journal of Membrane Science

    (1986)
  • D.Y. Kwon et al.

    Influence of particle size and surface charge on critical flux of cross-flow microfiltration

    Water Science and Technology

    (1998)
  • H. Li et al.

    Direct observation of particle deposition on the membrane surface during cross-flow microfiltration

    Journal of Membrane Science

    (1998)
  • S.S. Madaeni

    The effect of operating conditions on critical flux in membrane filtration latexes

    Process Safety and Environmental Protection

    (1997)
  • D. Chen et al.

    Ultrasonic control of ceramic membrane fouling: effect of particle characteristics

    Water Research

    (2006)
  • M. Hamachi et al.

    Experimental investigation of cake characteristics in cross-flow microfiltration

    Chemical Engineering Science

    (1999)
  • A.P. Mairal et al.

    Realtime measurement of inorganic fouling of RO desalination membranes using ultrasonic time-domain reflectometry

    Journal of Membrane Science

    (1999)
  • J. Li et al.

    In situ measurement of particle deposition and its removal in micro-filtration by ultrasonic timedomain reflectometry

    Desalination

    (2002)
  • Cited by (383)

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    1

    Current address: Department of Engineering, Indiana University - Purdue University Fort Wayne, Fort Wayne, IN 46805, USA.

    View full text