Numerical simulation of the ballistic protection performance of a laminated armor system with pre-existing debonding/delamination

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.10.080Get rights and content

Abstract

The ballistic protection performance of laminated body armor may be significantly reduced through defects such as debonding/delamination. To understand the effect of a pre-existing defect on body armor performance, a two-dimensional finite element model was developed. The numerical study shows that the laminated armor system with a pre-existing debonding/delamination has poorer ballistic protection performance than that without any imperfection. Also, it was noted that the ballistic protection performance of the laminated armor system with a pre-existing debonding/delamination is sensitive to the changes in the parameters considered such as size, location and pattern of the pre-existing debonding/delamination.

Introduction

Over the past decades, there has been an increase in the development and application of laminated body armor systems, such as composite armor systems made of a ceramic strike face and a fiber-reinforced composite backing layer. The hardened ceramic facing material initially erodes or fragments the projectile, followed by the composite backing material reacting against the blunted projectile. This second stage normally involves considerable membrane stretching, bulge formation, and delamination, and thus the backing material play a role in absorbing part of the projectile kinetic energy and catching the fragments of both ceramic and projectile to prevent the wearer from the fragment assaults. This design exploits the fact that ceramic composites are more weight-efficient than traditional monolithic armor materials. [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], [9], [10].

Defence departments of many countries such as those of Australia, US, UK and Canada require that the ballistic protection performance of a body armor system must meet a certain design standard such as the National Institute of Justice (NIJ) standard [11]. According to the NIJ standard, the performance of a body armor system is judged by the ballistic limit Vbl and maximum back face deformation (MAXBFD) [11], [12].

In one of the initial attempts at simulating the ballistic protection performance of ceramic composite armor system, Woodward [13] developed a simple one-dimensional (1D) approach for analyzing and describing the penetration mechanism involved in the perforation of ceramic composite armor, which was made of a ceramic front layer and a metallic backing layer. For simulating the projectile impact on ceramic/composite armors, Chocron-Benloulo and Sánchez-Gálvez [2] proposed a very simple 1D analytical model, which was divided into three phases of penetration (intact ceramic, fractured ceramic and initial response of the composite substrate) and fabric response and failure. The predicted residual velocity and residual length of the projectile compared reasonably well with the numerical results evaluated using the commercial finite element (FE) software Autodyn.

Fawaz et al. [3] developed three-dimensional (3D) FE models using the non-linear FE code LS-DYNA3D for simulating the performance of ceramic composite armor systems subjected to normal and oblique projectile impacts. The numerical results correlated reasonably well with the experimental data available in the literature. Shokrieh and Javadpour [5] developed FE model using Ansys/Ls-dyna software for the penetration analysis of a two-layer armor system subjected to a projectile impact, where the armor system was composed of a boron carbide ceramic front layer and a Kevlar 49 fiber composite backing layer. There was good agreement of projectile residual velocity between their FE model and Chocron’s analytical model, especially at high velocities. Krishnan et al. [6] developed an FE model for designing a body armor system made of ceramic and high-performance polyethylene materials. Laboratory testing of the prototype package showed that the FE predictions of damage were excellent even though the back face deformations were under-predicted. Burger et al. [10] developed a numerical model using the ABAQUS/explicit FE code for simulating the response of hybrid ceramic/fiber reinforced composite armors. There was good agreement of the ballistic limit between the numerical and experimental results. Feli and Asgari [8] conducted a simulation using LS-Dyna code for the ballistic perforation of ceramic/composite armor, which consisted of an alumina 99.5% ceramic front layer and a Twaron fiber backing layer. In this simulation, the Johnson–Holmquist model was used for modeling the ceramic front layer and the composite-damage model was used for modeling the composite backing layer. Since distortions caused by larger deformation of elements may result in stopping computations or making them extremely slow, the material erosion model was used to delete the failed elements from the analysis. For the initial velocity ranging from 1000 m/s to 1600 m/s, the FE simulation results compared well with the numerical results from Chocron-Benloulo and Sánchez-Gálvez [2] and the analytical results from Feli et al. [7].

Owing to the fact that debonding or delamination defects can occur during the manufacturing process and in service, these pre-existing defects may significantly degrade the ballistic protection performance of laminated body armor systems. In order to improve the defect/damage-survivability and defect/damage-tolerance of a laminated body armor system, it is essential to understand the effect of a pre-existing debonding/delamination within a laminated body armor system on its ballistic protection performance. During a bullet or projectile impact event, the dynamic response of a laminated armor system is a combination of the local and global reactions. The relative contributions from these two reactions are generally determined by many parameters such as the impact velocity of the bullet or projectile, the geometries and material properties of the projectile and laminated armor system components, boundary conditions, damage location, size and pattern [14], [15]. As limited work has been done in this area, this paper focuses on modeling simulation for the ballistic protection performance of a laminated ceramic/Kevlar composite armor system with a pre-existing debonding/delamination. This investigation also formed part of the Defence Material Technology Centre (DMTC) Personnel Survivability Program on Life of Type of armor systems.

In this paper, an FE model was developed using the commercial FE software Autodyn [16] to study the effects of major parameters such as pre-existing debonding/delamination size, location and pattern on the predicted values of ballistic limit Vbl and MAXBFD for the laminated body armor system subjected to a flat-faced cylindrical projectile impact. This FE model can also be applied to investigate the ballistic protection performance of an armor system with multiple debondings/delaminations. It can be achieved by either simplifying the multiple debondings/delaminations as a single debonding/delamination or replacing the single debonding/delamination with multiple debondings/delaminations. The present FE modeling procedure was used previously for investigating the blast wave and fragment/projectile protection performance of laminated armor systems backed with or without an air spacer [17]. In order to investigate the effect of projectile geometry on the predicted values of Vbl and MAXBFD, three flat-faced cylindrical projectiles having the same mass but different geometries were considered.

Section snippets

Finite element modeling development

Four baseline cases for three-layer laminated armor systems with or without a pre-existing debonding/delamination were considered for studying the effects of the location and size of a pre-existing debonding/delamination on the predicted Vbl and MAXBFD. The schematics of the FE models are shown in Fig. 1, in which Lv is the distance between the debonding/delamination and the front surface of the Kevlar/epoxy component. The laminated ceramic/Kevlar composite panels shown in Fig. 1 were composed

Parametric studies

The FE model was used to investigate the effects of the following parameters on the predicted Vbl and MAXBFD of a laminated ceramic composite armor system: size and location of the pre-existing debonding/delamination, the geometric strain for erosion, the thickness of adhesive layer and material property of the armor system. These parameters were varied in individual simulation: size of the pre-existing debonding/delamination of 0, 5, 15, and 25 mm; location of the pre-existing

Conclusions

For investigating the degraded ballistic protection performance of a laminated armor system with a pre-existing debonding/delamination, a two-dimensional finite element model was developed using the commercial FE software Autodyn. It was noted from the corresponding parametric study that in general, the predicted Vbl increases with decreases in δv, Rv and Lv, whereas the predicted MAXBFD decreases with an increase in Lv and decreases in Rv and δv. For the cases considered, the influence of the

Acknowledgements

This research work was conducted under the Defence Materials Technology Centre Personnel Survivability program, Project 7.1.2 on Life of Type of Armor Materials. The author would like to thank Dr. M. Ling, Mr. T. Radtke, Dr. A. Bhoyro, and Dr. N. Beagley for assistance during the preparation of the manuscript.

References (39)

Cited by (32)

  • Effects of SiC particulate size on dynamic compressive properties in 7075-T6 Al-SiC<inf>p</inf> composites

    2018, Materials Science and Engineering: A
    Citation Excerpt :

    Intensive efforts on designing and modifying armored structures and materials have been made to achieve the excellent protective capability against ballistic impacts as well as crew members’ survival [1–5].

  • Development of microstructural and voxel based models of deformation and failure of the porous ceramics for assessment of ballistic performance

    2017, International Journal of Mechanical Sciences
    Citation Excerpt :

    Numerical simulations (FE or meshless methods) have been widely used to predict stress distribution in ceramics subjected to dynamic loads [23–42]. There are different failure models like JH-1 (Johnson–Holmquist) [25–30] and JH-2 [31–36], Johnson–Holmquist–Beissel (JHB) [37], Deshpande–Evans model (DE) [38,39], Denoual, Forquin and Hild model (DFH) [40,41] that reflect the solid phase and cracked/powder phases of ceramics life. However, the use of these models requires expensive and complicated experiments with thick samples, like Edge-On-Impact (EOI) or Depth-Of-Penetration (DOP) tests, to determine valuable material parameters for numerical analysis.

View all citing articles on Scopus
View full text