Phytochemical delivery through nanocarriers: a review

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.colsurfb.2020.111389Get rights and content

Highlights

  • Phytochemicals are secondary metabolites of plants which find application in human disease therapy.

  • Stability and degradation of phytochemicals in the GI tract is a challenge which can be overcome by nano-conjugation.

  • Various types of organic and inorganic nanocarriers are employed for nanoformulations.

  • Biomedical applications of phytochemical nanoformulations include use as nanomedicine, antimicrobials and diagnostic agents.

Abstract

In recent times, phytochemicals encapsulated or conjugated with nanocarriers for delivery to the specific sites have gained considerable research interest. Phytochemicals are mostly plant secondary metabolites which reported to be beneficial for human health and in disease theraphy. However, these compound are large size and polar nature of these compounds, make it difficult to cross the blood-brain barrier (BBB), endothelial lining of blood vessels, gastrointestinal tract and mucosa. Moreover, they are enzymatically degraded in the gastrointestinal tract. Therefore, encapsulation or conjugation of these compounds with nanocrriers could be an alternate way to enhance their bioefficacy by influencing their gastrointestinal stability, rate of absorption and dispersion. This review presents an overview of nanocarriers alternatives which improves therapeutic value and avoid toxicity, by releasing bioactive compounds specifically at target tissues with enhanced stability and bioavailability. Future investigations may emphasize on deciphering the structural changes in nanocarriers during digestion and absorption, the difference between in-vitro and in-vivo digestion simulations, and impact of nanocarriers on the metabolism of phytochemicals.

Introduction

Phytochemicals or phytonutrients are mostly secondary metabolites of plants with a wide range of chemical structures, such as alkaloids, saponins, indoles, phytosterols, phenolic acids, isothiocyanates and phytoprostanes/furanes [[1], [2], [3]]. These metabolites are not essential for growth and development of the plant, but they are found to be beneficial for human health and disease control [[4], [5], [6]]. Phytochemicals either in their native form or their metabolites, exert beneficial effects to our health through mechanisms involving direct scavenging of free radicals, metal chelation, inhibition of the assembly of microtubules and microfilaments as well as protease inhibition [[7], [8], [9], [10]]. An important factor to assess from the metabolization point of view is the pathway after oral intake, where these phytochemicals are recognized and processed as xenobiotics by the body. The phytochemicals would go through digestion and degradation along the mouth, stomach, small and large intestines followed by absorption from the digestive tract into the blood or lymph circulation and further distribution via diffusion or transportation to body circulation, then metabolism in body tissues by biochemical conversion or degradation, and final excretion via renal, biliary, or pulmonary pathways [7,10,11]. Additionally, the maximum bioaccessibility and bioavailability of the phytochemicals result in the actual capacity to exert biological effects in vivo which is termed as bioefficacy. The bioactivity of the nutrients and non-nutrients is monitored by short-term changes in the expression of biomarkers in plasma lipid, plasma glucose, blood pressure, plasma antioxidant activity and liver function [[12], [13], [14], [15], [16]]. The dispersion and absorption of phytochemicals in the small intestine is dependent on the chemical nature and polarity of the phytochemicals. After absorption, small intestinal cells are responsible for the cellular uptake and efflux pumping while the transformation of these compounds occurs in the hepatic cells from inactive precursors to the active form which is important for the bioaccessibility of the phytochemicals [10,17]. The microbiota of the large intestine metabolize the remaining unabsorbed phytochemicals from the small intestine and thus affect the bioefficacy [10].

Thus, nanoencapsulation technology could be an alternative for the delivery of bioactive compounds in cells and tissues to prevent the harmful effect of metabolization of these compounds at operative concentrations. The nanoparticles used as carrier are designed to deliver the phytochemicals to the target site with enhanced bioefficacy. As nanoparticles comprise materials designed at the atomic or molecular level, they are usually small sized nanostructure. Hence, they can move more freely in the human body as compared to bigger materials [18,19]. Nanoparticles used as nanocarriers are basically of two types inorganic and organic. Some of the most commonly used inorganic nanocarriers include Super Paramagnetic Iron-Oxide Nanoparticles (SPIONs), Mesoporous Silica Nanoparticles and Gold/Silver nanoparticles [20]. The use of inorganic nanoparticles is very limited in drug delivery owing to their poor drug loading efficiency, high peripheral toxicity and health risks. The organic based nanocarriers are basically composed of lipids such as micelles, liposomes, niosomes, bilosomes, solid lipid nanoparticles (SLN) and archaeosomes. Lipid-based drug delivery systems are used to deliver hydrophobic drugs in the body. Encapsulation material protects the drug from degradation and avoids peripheral organ toxicity. It increases the therapeutic index of the drug, provides stability, ease of permeability and site-specific active targeting. However, inadequate knowledge about nanostructures toxicity is a major worry and need further research to improve the efficacy with higher safety to enable safer practical implementation. Therefore, cautiously designing these nanoparticles could be helpful in tackling the problems associated with their use.

Nanotechnology plays an important role in drug formation and its controlled delivery to the target site along with a controlled release [[21], [22], [23]]. Thus, this technology provides numerous plausible benefits in treating chronic human diseases by site-specific, and target-oriented delivery of medicines. Considering all the facts, this review aims to report different nanocarrier used for the conjugation of phytochemicals to enhance their stability and their significant applications as therapeutic agents.

Section snippets

Phytochemical uniqueness and their delivery challenges

Phytochemicals have been of great therapeutic importance since the beginning. They are mostly bioactive, secondary metabolites produced by plants. Although, they have no direct role in plant growth, they may sometimes have a protective role against adverse environmental conditions, microbial infestation or predators. Interestingly, phytochemicals have been used for curing patients for ages without actually knowing the science behind it. Studies conducted on phytochemicals revealed that they

Phytochemical Nanocarriers

These nanocarriers are designed to deliver the phytochemicals to the target site with enhanced bioefficacy. They encapsulate both hydrophilic and hydrophobic molecules depending upon the carrier material. For example, lipid-based nanocarriers carry both polar (in the aqueous core) and non-polar (in the membrane) compounds. There are different types of nanocarriers as described below and illustrated in Fig. 1.

Applications

Nanoparticles present myriad biological applications owing to their biocompatible size-range, shape and unique surface properties. However, since many of the nanoparticles are synthesized from toxic chemical agents and metals, their biological applications may accompany some challenges. Thus, coating or loading with phytochemicals provides an efficient way to decrease toxicity as well as conferring additional therapeutic properties due to their bioactive nature [89]. Table 1 summarizes the

Current Scenario and Future Perspective

In early times, humans mostly used phytochemicals and other natural compounds obtained from plants as medicinal products. They have remarkable chemical diversity, biological and chemical properties with molecular specificity, therapeutic potential, and reduced toxicity or side effects. But inspite of, so many advantages, pharmaceutical industry is hesitant to invest in natural product based drugs. The challenges faced in bringing natural plant compounds to therapeutic use is their in-vivo

Conclusion

This review presents an overview of the recent strategies for the delivery of different phytochemicals through nanocarriers for their stability and bioavailability. Based on several reports, it is evident that nanotechnology could be instrumental in improving the stability of encapsulated phytochemicals against environmental changes and provides controlled release of the phytotherapeutics. However, despite all the benefits of phytochemical based nanomedicine, it is still difficult to convert

Declaration of Competing Interest

The authors report no declarations of interest.

References (199)

  • K.J. Shelat et al.

    Diffusion and rheology characteristics of barley mixed linkage β-glucan and possible implications for digestion

    Carbohydrate polymers

    (2011)
  • C. Bengoechea et al.

    Formation and characterization of lactoferrin/pectin electrostatic complexes: Impact of composition, pH and thermal treatment

    Food Hydrocolloids

    (2011)
  • C.C. Berton-Carabin et al.

    Effect of the lipophilicity of model ingredients on their location and reactivity in emulsions and solid lipid nanoparticles

    Colloids and Surfaces A: Physicochemical and Engineering Aspects

    (2013)
  • A.O. Elzoghby et al.

    Hybrid protein-inorganic nanoparticles: from tumor-targeted drug delivery to cancer imaging

    Journal of Controlled Release

    (2016)
  • A. Marcu et al.

    Magnetic iron oxide nanoparticles as drug delivery system in breast cancer

    Applied Surface Science

    (2013)
  • K. Prusty et al.

    Nano silver decorated polyacrylamide/dextran nanohydrogels hybrid composites for drug delivery applications

    Materials Science and Engineering: C

    (2018)
  • K. Hayashi et al.

    Span 80 vesicles have a more fluid, flexible and "wet" surface than phospholipid liposomes

    Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces

    (2011)
  • V.B. Junyaprasert et al.

    Physicochemical properties and skin permeation of Span 60/Tween 60 niosomes of ellagic acid

    International journal of pharmaceutics

    (2012)
  • A. Shukla et al.

    Bilosomes in the context of oral immunization: development, challenges and opportunities

    Drug discovery today

    (2016)
  • A. Gordillo-Galeano et al.

    Solid lipid nanoparticles and nanostructured lipid carriers: a review emphasizing on particle structure and drug release

    European Journal of Pharmaceutics and Biopharmaceutics

    (2018)
  • M. Mir et al.

    A. ur Rehman, Recent applications of PLGA based nanostructures in drug delivery

    Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces

    (2017)
  • L. Xing et al.

    pH-sensitive and specific ligand-conjugated chitosan nanogels for efficient drug delivery

    International journal of biological macromolecules

    (2019)
  • R. Ahmad et al.

    Immobilization of Aspergillus niger cellulase on multiwall carbon nanotubes for cellulose hydrolysis

    Bioresource technology

    (2018)
  • A. Kumari et al.

    Adverse effect of CdTe quantum dots on the cell membrane of Bacillus subtilis: Insight from microscopy

    Nano-Structures & Nano-Objects

    (2017)
  • D. Huang et al.

    Biodegradable dendrimers for drug delivery

    Materials Science and Engineering: C

    (2018)
  • M. Yousefi et al.

    Dendrimers as efficient nanocarriers for the protection and delivery of bioactive phytochemicals

    Advances in Colloid and Interface Science

    (2020)
  • S. Narayanan et al.

    Sequential release of epigallocatechin gallate and paclitaxel from PLGA-casein core/shell nanoparticles sensitizes drug-resistant breast cancer cells

    Nanomedicine: Nanotechnology, Biology and Medicine

    (2015)
  • S. Guo et al.

    Nanoparticles containing insoluble drug for cancer therapy

    Biotechnology advances

    (2014)
  • K. Jamuna-Thevi et al.

    Triple-layered PLGA/nanoapatite/lauric acid graded composite membrane for periodontal guided bone regeneration

    Materials Science and Engineering: C

    (2014)
  • J.L. Arias et al.

    Nanobody conjugated PLGA nanoparticles for active targeting of African Trypanosomiasis

    Journal of Controlled Release

    (2015)
  • I. Takeuchi et al.

    Estradiol-loaded PLGA nanoparticles for improving low bone mineral density of cancellous bone caused by osteoporosis: Application of enhanced charged nanoparticles with iontophoresis

    Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces

    (2017)
  • M.K. Khan et al.

    Phytochemical composition and bioactivities of lupin: a review

    International journal of food science & technology

    (2015)
  • M. Pinciroli et al.

    Comparative Study of the Phytoprostane and Phytofuran Content of indica and japonica Rice (Oryza sativa L.) Flours

    Journal of agricultural and food chemistry

    (2017)
  • M.K. Swamy et al.

    A comprehensive review on the phytochemical constituents and pharmacological activities of Pogostemon cablin Benth.: an aromatic medicinal plant of industrial importance

    Molecules

    (2015)
  • B. Lu et al.

    Phytochemical content, health benefits, and toxicology of common edible flowers: a review (2000-2015)

    Critical reviews in food science and nutrition

    (2017)
  • C.A.K. Ta et al.

    Mini review of phytochemicals and plant taxa with activity as microbial biofilm and quorum sensing inhibitors

    Molecules

    (2016)
  • Y.-R. Son et al.

    Bioefficacy of Graviola leaf extracts in scavenging free radicals and upregulating antioxidant genes

    Food & function

    (2016)
  • J. Xiao et al.

    Edible nanoencapsulation vehicles for oral delivery of phytochemicals: A perspective paper

    Journal of agricultural and food chemistry

    (2017)
  • S. Medina et al.

    Metabolomics and the diagnosis of human diseases-A guide to the markers and pathophysiological pathways affected

    Current medicinal chemistry

    (2014)
  • K. Oehlke et al.

    Potential bioavailability enhancement of bioactive compounds using food-grade engineered nanomaterials: a review of the existing evidence

    Food & function

    (2014)
  • M.J. Rein et al.

    Bioavailability of bioactive food compounds: a challenging journey to bioefficacy

    British journal of clinical pharmacology

    (2013)
  • C. Camilo Melo-Filho et al.

    Advances in methods for predicting phase I metabolism of polyphenols

    Current drug metabolism

    (2014)
  • A.Z. Mirza et al.

    Nanomedicine and drug delivery: a mini review

    International Nano Letters

    (2014)
  • G.R. Rudramurthy et al.

    Nanoparticles: alternatives against drug-resistant pathogenic microbes

    Molecules

    (2016)
  • D. Lombardo et al.

    Smart nanoparticles for drug delivery application: development of versatile nanocarrier platforms in biotechnology and nanomedicine

    Journal of Nanomaterials

    (2019)
  • H. Jahangirian et al.

    A review of drug delivery systems based on nanotechnology and green chemistry: green nanomedicine

    International journal of nanomedicine

    (2017)
  • P.-L. Lam et al.

    Recent advances in green nanoparticulate systems for drug delivery: efficient delivery and safety concern

    Nanomedicine

    (2017)
  • M. Martinez-Ballesta et al.

    Nanoparticles and controlled delivery for bioactive compounds: Outlining challenges for new "Smart-foods"□for health

    Foods

    (2018)
  • J. Xiao

    Phytochemicals in food and nutrition

    Critical reviews in food science and nutrition

    (2016)
  • S. Laboukhi-Khorsi et al.

    Efficient solvent selection approach for high solubility of active phytochemicals: application for the extraction of an antimalarial compound from medicinal plants

    ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering

    (2017)
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text