Elsevier

Cement and Concrete Research

Volume 80, February 2016, Pages 1-9
Cement and Concrete Research

Organic admixtures and cement particles: Competitive adsorption and its macroscopic rheological consequences

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cemconres.2015.10.010Get rights and content

Highlights

  • We develop a new protocol using dynamic light scattering allowing for the study of competitive adsorption

  • We study competitive adsorption between a superplasticizer and a viscosity agent

  • We study competitive adsorption between the same superplasticizer and a retarder

  • We identify three main competitive adsorption regimes

  • We show that macroscopic variations in rheological properties find their origin in competitive adsorption.

Abstract

In this work, we study the competitive adsorption in cement paste between a superplasticizer and a so-called viscosity agent along with the competitive adsorption between the same superplasticizer and a retarder. We develop a new protocol using dynamic light scattering, which allows for distinguishing the relative adsorption of different fractions of admixtures when introduced simultaneously in cement paste. Our results show that the result of competitive adsorption is not only a matter of admixture chemical structures or physical properties but is also very dependent on surface coverage. We identify from our results, similarly to other authors in polymer literature, three main competitive adsorption regimes. We finally show that the outcome of competitive adsorption measured at the microscopic scale can explain the measured macroscopic variations in rheology in terms of yield stress and viscosity.

Introduction

Admixtures are fundamental components of cementitious materials in the fresh state. In the construction materials industry, these admixtures can be chosen among an impressive variety of molecules with very different chemical structures and physical properties. Some of them, called plasticizers or superplasticizers, allow, for instance, for a decrease in the yield stress [1] and viscosity [2] of the material, in which they are introduced. Some others, called viscosity agents or stabilizers, allow for a decrease in bleeding and segregation [3] or an enhancement of water retention capability [4], [5], [6]. Retarders can also be used to postpone cement hydration [7], [8] and therefore increase flowability retention and what is often called the “open time” of the product [9], [10]. When targeting specific rheology requirements, mix design of cementitious materials is generally achieved through the blending of these different admixtures.

A major source of difficulty in the simultaneous integration of various admixtures in a cement paste lies in the competitive adsorption between these molecules at the surface of cement particles [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], [18], [19], [20]. From a more general point of view, this issue relates to the adsorption competitions between all adsorbing species (i.e. including ions) in the system. As the outcome of this competition dictates the rheological behavior of the cement paste by dictating the nature and intensity of cement particles interactions, the understanding and prediction of this competition has become of utter importance for the mix design engineer [21]. An example that has been extensively studied in the literature of cementitious materials is the competition between sulfate ions and superplasticizers [22], [23]. By adsorbing on the surface of cement particles, these ions restrict the adsorption of polycarboxylate-type superplasticizer and therefore affect their dispersion efficiency from a macroscopic point of view.

In this work, we focus on the competitive adsorption between a superplasticizer molecule and a so-called viscosity agent along with the competitive adsorption between the same superplasticizer and a retarder. We develop a new protocol using dynamic light scattering, which allows for distinguishing the relative adsorption of different admixtures added to a cement paste. We identify from our results, similarly to other authors, three main competitive adsorption regimes. We finally measure the macroscopic changes in rheology in terms of yield stress and residual viscosity and correlate them to the outcome of the competitive adsorption observed at the microscopic scale.

Section snippets

Cement

The cement used in this study is an ordinary Portland cement equivalent to ASTM Type I cement. Its chemical composition obtained through ICP-AES and ATD–ATG is given in Table 1. Its Bogue composition is also given in Table 1. The free lime content was determined by extraction with hot ethylene glycol [24]. The cement powder maximum packing fraction was estimated to be around 60% in [25] and its Blaine specific surface is 3650 ± 100 cm2/g.

Polymers and molecules

We study here a comb co-polymer (PCE) in the flexible

Mixing protocol

All cement pastes were prepared with the same mass ratio W/C = 0.4. Only dosage and nature of organic admixtures varied from one sample to another. All sample preparations were carried out at 20 °C. We used, in this work, a mixing protocol, which was shown to limit the consequences of any early chemical interactions such as polymer intercalation or co-precipitation [30]. This is crucial, for instance, in the case of polymers such as PCE, for which the measured polymer depletion in the solution can

Experimental results

We first study the competition between PCE and NG in cement paste. The PCE dosage is kept constant and equal to 0.4% of the cement mass whereas the dosage of NG is gradually increased from 0.1% to 5% of the cement mass. We remind here that PCE is first introduced in the system while NG is added 15 min later. We plot in Fig. 7 the respective amounts of adsorbed PCE as a function of NG dosage. For comparison, we also plot the adsorption isotherms of NG and the expected adsorbed amount of PCE when

Competitive adsorption between NG and PCE

We plot in Fig. 9 the relative yield stress (i.e. the ratio between the yield stress of the cement paste with PCE and the yield stress of the reference cement paste) and residual viscosity (i.e. the ratio between the residual viscosity at the plateau of the cement paste with PCE and the residual viscosity of the reference cement paste) respectively as a function of NG dosage. We first focus here on the effect of NG and PCE when introduced alone in the cement paste. At a given dosage of polymer

Conclusion

In this work, we studied the competitive adsorption of organic admixtures in a cement paste. We focused successively on the competition between a superplasticizer and a retarder and between the same superplasticizer and a so-called viscosity agent.

We developed a new protocol using dynamic light scattering, which allows for distinguishing the relative adsorption of different admixtures present in a given cement paste. Our results suggest that the result of competitive adsorption is not only a

Acknowledgment

The authors wish to thank Dow Chemical Company for providing the polymers as well as for the financial support of this project.

References (47)

  • M.P. Javellana et al.

    Extraction of free lime in Portland cement and clinker by ethylene glycol

    Cem. Concr. Res.

    (1982)
  • A. Perrot et al.

    Yield stress and bleeding of fresh cement pastes

    Cem. Concr. Res.

    (2012)
  • C. Gay et al.

    Comb-like polymers inside nanoscale pores

    Adv. Colloid Interf. Sci.

    (2001)
  • R.J. Flatt et al.

    A simplified view on chemical effects perturbing the action of superplasticizers

    Cem. Concr. Res.

    (2001)
  • J. Plank et al.

    Fundamental mechanisms for polycarboxylate intercalation into C3A hydrate phases and the role of sulfate present in cement

    Cem. Concr. Res.

    (2010)
  • H. Bessaies-Bey et al.

    Effect of poly-acrylamide on rheology of fresh cement pastes

    Cem. Concr. Res.

    (2015)
  • N. Roussel et al.

    Steady state flow of cement suspensions: a micromechanical state of the art

    Cem. Concr. Res.

    (2010)
  • J.A. Kling et al.

    Desorption of adsorbed poly (ethylene oxide) from colloidal polystyrene particles

    J. Colloid Interface Sci.

    (1998)
  • R. Ramachandran et al.

    Competitive adsorption of polyelectrolytes: a size exclusion chromatographic study

    J. Colloid Interface Sci.

    (1987)
  • C. Geffroy et al.

    Molar mass selectivity in adsorption of polyacrylates on calcite

    Colloids Surf., A

    (2000)
  • J. Pourchez et al.

    Alkaline stability of cellulose ethers and impact of their degradation products on cement hydration

    Cem. Concr. Res.

    (2006)
  • K.H. Khayat

    Viscosity-enhancing admixtures for cement-based materials

    Cem. Concr. Res.

    (1998)
  • Thomas M. Vickers et al.

    Influence of dispersant structure and mixing speed on concrete slump retention

    Cem. Concr. Res.

    (2005)
  • Cited by (88)

    • From physics to chemistry of fresh blended cements

      2023, Cement and Concrete Research
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text