3
Endoscopic and surgical management of bile duct injury after laparoscopic cholecystectomy

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bpg.2004.05.003Get rights and content

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy has become the first choice of management for symptomatic cholecystolithiasis. While it is associated with decreased postoperative morbidity and mortality, bile duct injuries are reported to be more severe and more common (0–2.7%), when compared to open cholecystectomy (0.2–0.5%) [New Engl. J. Med. 234 (1991) 1073; Am. J. Surg. 165 (1993) 9; Surg. Clin. N Am. 80 (2000) 1127]. These bile duct injuries include leaks, strictures, transection and removal of (part of) the duct, with or without vascular damage. Bile duct injury might be due to misidentification of the biliary tract anatomy due to acute cholecystitis, large impacted stones, short cystic duct, anatomical variations, but also due to technical errors leading to bleeding with subsequent clipping and coagulation trauma [Ann. Surg. 237 (2003) 460]. Early recognition and adequate multidisciplinary approach is the cornerstone for the optimal final outcome. Suboptimal management of injuries often leads to more extensive damage to the biliary tree and its vasculature with as consequences biliary peritonitis, sepsis, abscesses, multiple organ failure, a more difficult (proximal) reconstruction and in the long run, secondary biliary cirrhosis, and liver failure. Despite increasing experience in performing laparoscopic cholecystectomy, the frequency of bile duct injuries has not decreased [Ann. Surg. 234 (2001) 549].

Therapy encompasses endoscopic stenting, percutaneous transhepatic dilatation (PTCD) and surgical reconstruction.

Section snippets

Clinical presentation and diagnosis

Bile duct injuries are recognized in only 11–23% during the index operation.4., 6., 7., 8. Of the remaining 77–89%, in which the injury was not recognized at surgery, the injury was often even not diagnosed during the initial admission.9., 10., 11. The majority of patients with bile duct injuries present initially with only mild or moderate atypical symptoms such as abdominal tenderness, pain or abdominal distension, nausea, vomiting and ileus.12., 13., 14., 15. Early diagnosis is important

Classification of bile duct injuries

A few proposals have been made to classify postoperative strictures19 and bile duct injuries.4., 6., 8., 20., 21.

The Corlette-Bismuth classification19, originated from the time of open surgery and is based on the length of the proximal biliary stump (Table 1), but not to the nature and length of the lesion. This classification has a good correlation with the final outcome after surgical repair. A limitation is that patients with limited strictures, isolated occlusion of the right hepatic duct

Types of bile duct injury

Injuries to the bile ducts may range from small postoperative fluid collections containing bile with little or no clinical consequence to total excision of the bifurcation including damage to its vasculature.

In Amsterdam, we developed a modified classification, with direct implications for the further management of the patient.8

Management of bile duct injuries

Injuries to the biliary tree during after laparoscopic cholecystectomy, are mostly diagnosed after significant delay.4 During laparoscopic cholecystectomy 25–36% of the iatrogenic injuries are recognized.13 Also abnormal peroperative cholangiograms are in almost 50% incorrectly interpreted as normal.4

Suboptimal evaluation and management of bile duct injuries leads to delayed diagnosis, increased morbidity, and increased severity of the injury, treatment failure and even death.4., 23., 27.

A

Surgical management

The surgical treatment of bile duct injuries should be separated into treatment of injuries detected during the (laparoscopic) procedure, the early postoperative recognized injury (within a few days after surgery), and finally the delayed detected injuries.51., 52., 53., 54., 55., 56., 57., 58., 59.

Conclusion

Bile duct injuries are a severe complication of laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Early recognition and multi-disciplinary approach will lead to the optimal outcome for the individual patient. For all patients who do not recover immediately after cholecystectomy, and by definition should be suspected of having bile duct injury, we advise to follow the proposed flow diagram as depicted in Figure 7.

Box 1

Box 2

References (65)

  • The Southern Surgeons Club

    A prospective analysis of 1518 laparoscopic cholecystectomies

    New England Journal of Medicine

    (1991)
  • D.J. Deziel et al.

    Complications of laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a national survey of 4292 hospitals and an analysis of 77.604 cases

    American Journal of Surgery

    (1993)
  • T.R. Gadacz

    Update on laparoscopic cholecystectomy, including a clinical pathway

    Surgical Clinics of North America

    (2000)
  • L.W. Way et al.

    Causes and prevention of laparoscopic bile duct injuries: analysis of 252 cases from a human factors a cognitive psychology perspective

    Annals of Surgery

    (2003)
  • S.B. Archer et al.

    Bile duct injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy; results of a national survey

    Annals of Surgery

    (2001)
  • S.M. Strasberg et al.

    An analysis of the problem of biliary injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy

    Journal of the American College of Surgeons

    (1995)
  • J.C. Russel et al.

    Bile duct injuries, 1989–1993: a state-wide experience

    Archives of Surgery

    (1996)
  • J.J.G.H.M. Bergman et al.

    Treatment of bile duct lesions after laparoscopic cholecystectomy

    Gut

    (1996)
  • P.G. Foutch et al.

    Endoscopic therapy for patients with a post-operative biliary leak

    Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

    (1993)
  • D.J. Bjorkman et al.

    Postsurgical bile leaks: endoscopic obliteration of the transpapillary pressure gradient is enough

    American Journal of Gastroenterology

    (1995)
  • F. Prat et al.

    What role can endoscopy play in the management of biliary complications after laparoscopic cholecystectomy?

    Endoscopy

    (1997)
  • E. Birks et al.

    Occult biliary injury after laparoscopic cholecystectomy

    British Journal of Surgery

    (1994)
  • A.N. Barkun et al.

    Postcholecystectomy biliary leaks in the laparoscopic era: risk factors, presentation, and management

    Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

    (1997)
  • Y.C. Keulemans et al.

    Improvement in the management of bile duct injuries?

    Journal of the American College of Surgeons

    (1998)
  • A. Ferriman

    Laparoscopic surgery: two thirds of injuries initially missed

    British Medical Journal

    (2000)
  • L.H. Blumgart

    Hilar and intrahepatic biliary enteric anastomosis

    Surgical Clinics of North America

    (1994)
  • R. Brugge et al.

    Diagnosis of postoperative bile leaks

    American Journal of Gastroenterology

    (1994)
  • I.B. Schipper et al.

    Diagnosis of right hepatic duct injury after cholecystectomy: the use of cholangiography through percutaneous drainage catheters

    Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

    (1996)
  • H. Bismuth

    Postoperative strictures of the bile ducts

  • M.S. Woods et al.

    Characteristics of biliary tract complications during laparoscopic cholecystectomy

    American Journal of Surgery

    (1994)
  • A.J. McMahon et al.

    Bile duct injury and bile leakage in laparoscopic cholecystectomy

    British Journal of Surgery

    (1995)
  • E.H. Kang et al.

    Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: evaluation with sonography

    Radiology

    (1991)
  • D.B. Adams et al.

    Bile duct complications after laparoscopic cholecystectomy

    Surgical Endoscopy

    (1993)
  • T. McQuillan et al.

    Surgical significance of the bile duct of Luschka

    British Journal of Surgery

    (1989)
  • C.M. Ferguson et al.

    Bile duct injury in laparoscopic cholecystectomy

    Surgical Laparoscopìc Endoscopy

    (1992)
  • L.J. Wudel et al.

    Bile duct injury following laparoscopic cholecystectomy

    American Surgeon

    (2001)
  • D.R. Flum et al.

    Bile duct injury during cholecystectomy and survival in medicare beneficiaries

    Journal of American Medical Association

    (2003)
  • A.R. Moossa et al.

    Laparoscopic injuries to the bile duct

    Annals of Surgery

    (1992)
  • K.D. Lillemoe et al.

    Bile duct injuries during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Follow up after combined surgical and radiologic management

    Annals of Surgery

    (1997)
  • J. Barthel et al.

    Advantages and nasobiliary tube drainage in the treatment of cystic duct stump leak complicating laparoscopic cholecystectomy

    American Journal of Gastroenterology

    (1995)
  • K. Mergener et al.

    The role of ERCP in diagnosis and management of accessory bile duct leaks after cholecystectomy

    Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

    (1999)
  • P.H.P. Davids et al.

    Postoperative bile leakage: endoscopic management

    Gut

    (1992)
  • Cited by (57)

    • Analysis of surgical errors associated with anatomical variations clinically relevant in general surgery. Review of the literature

      2021, Translational Research in Anatomy
      Citation Excerpt :

      A crucial step in laparoscopic cholecystectomy is adequate assessment of Calot's triangle and familiarity with its associated variations in conjunction with biliary tracts and blood vessels [18–23]. Among the most serious complications of this procedure is damage to the biliary tracts and accompanying vessels [24–27]. The cystic artery (CA) may course anterior to the common hepatic duct or common bile duct, posing a risk of injury to these structures; mistakenly dissecting an accessory CA or deep CA may lead to intraoperative bleeding [22].

    • Treatment of late identified iatrogenic injuries of the right and left hepatic duct after laparoscopic cholecystectomy without transhepatic stent and Witzel drainage: Case report

      2018, International Journal of Surgery Case Reports
      Citation Excerpt :

      Complications of the biliary leak such as cholangitis, bleeding, anastomotic strictures and biliary cirrhosis remain a major concern affecting a patient’s outcome after the surgical operation is done [5]. Bile duct lesions were more common in laparoscopic cholecystectomy, the incidence is about 0.6% than in laparotomy method where the incidence is about 0.1% [6–9]. In most cases, treatment of iatrogenic BDI is based on primary repair of the duct, ductal repair with a stent, or creating duct-enteric anastomosis, often used and drainage by Witzel (Witzel enterostomy).

    • Chapter 42 - Biliary fistulae and strictures

      2016, Blumgart's Surgery of the Liver, Biliary Tract and Pancreas: Sixth Edition
    • A simultaneous endoscopic and laparoscopic approach for management of early iatrogenic bile duct obstruction

      2014, Gastrointestinal Endoscopy
      Citation Excerpt :

      In the latter setting, the patient usually requires multiple sessions of endoscopic therapy aimed at slow, incremental dilation of the stricture.2,6 Sometimes percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography is required to delineate complete biliary anatomy when the endoscopist is unable to pass a guidewire across the stricture.4,7 Laparoscopy, at present, has no established role in the management algorithm of patients with iatrogenic bile duct injuries.8

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text