Review
Evanescent wave fluorescence biosensors

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bios.2004.10.026Get rights and content

Abstract

Since discovery and first use in the mid-1970s, evanescent wave fluorescence biosensors have developed into a diverse range of instruments, each designed to meet a particular detection need. In this review, we provide a brief synopsis of what evanescent wave fluorescence biosensors are, how they work, and how they are used. In addition, we have summarized the important patents that have impacted the evolution from laboratory curiosities to fully automated commercial products. Finally, we address the critical issues that evanescent wave fluorescence biosensors will face in the coming years.

Introduction

Biosensors can be defined as opto/electronic detection devices that use biological molecules for detection and quantification of targets of interest. Distinct from single-use devices such as standard pregnancy tests or microtiter plate assays, biosensors have the additional requirement that they can be reused or regenerated for subsequent analyses.

The heart of the biosensor is the biological recognition element, which is chosen for its specificity and affinity, and can be an enzyme, receptor, antibody, chelator, nucleic acid, or antibiotic. For use in any optical sensor, the end result must be a change in an optical property induced by interaction of the recognition element with the target; these changes may be due to the formation of a fluorescent or luminescent product, association of molecules to fluoresce or to quench fluorescence, or modification of refractive index or absorption spectrum. For purposes of this article, we will discuss only those systems utilizing fluorescence, fluorescence quenching, or fluorescence resonance energy transfer (FRET) for signal generation upon evanescent wave excitation.

Well known now, evanescent wave excitation was first described in 1965 (Hirschfeld, 1965). Kronick and Little (1975) were the first to make use of evanescent wave excitation for a fluorescence immunoassay. Based on the principle of total internal reflectance, light launched into a waveguide placed into a dielectric medium of lower refractive index (nwaveguide > nmedium) will reflect all the light within the waveguide when the angle of incidence of light entering the waveguide, θ, is greater than the critical angle, θc, as defined by:θc=sin1nmediumnwaveguide.Under conditions of total internal reflectance, the Fresnel transmission coefficients for the transverse electric wave and the transverse magnetic wave are non-zero. This means that, although the light energy is totally reflected, an electromagnetic field extends out from the interface into the lower index medium. This field, the evanescent wave, decays exponentially with distance from the surface, generally over the distance of 100 nm to approximately a wavelength. For multi-mode waveguides, the penetration depth dp, the distance from the surface at which the strength of this field is 1/e of its value at the surface, is a function of the two refractive indices, the angle of incidence of the light, and the wavelength:dp=14π[(nwaveguide)2sinθ(nmedium)2]1/2.The exponential decay of field strength essentially confines transducible optical signals to within a discrete distance from the waveguide's surface, minimizing optical interference or contribution from components in the lower index medium.

The surface-selectivity of the evanescent wave has been exploited by a number of biosensor types including: resonant mirrors, interferometers, surface plasmon resonance sensors, and fiber optic and planar array fluorescence sensors. All these sensors can measure surface-specific binding events in real time. Waveguides can be made of materials that both have suitable optical properties and are easily modified for attachment of recognition molecules. Sensor design is adaptable owing to the wide variety of visible and near IR light sources and detectors. Additionally, the systems described in detail here, fiber optic and planar array fluorescence sensors that utilize the evanescent wave for excitation of fluorescently tagged reporters, gain improved discrimination of specific binding from non-specific adsorption of sample components. Surface-selectivity of evanescent wave sensors, however, can prove a double-edged sword. Since the evanescent field interrogates only surface events, interactions occurring outside of the evanescent field are not significantly detectable. This can make analyzing large targets such as intact cells problematic. Furthermore, below a critical flow rate, mass transport may limit binding of target to immobilized recognition molecules.

The remainder of this article describes the means, methods, and materials by which this physical principle has been exploited for sensor development. Additionally, many of the critical inventions that have been made along this ongoing journey are recounted as well.

Section snippets

Materials

Materials for use in fiber optic and planar array evanescent wave sensors must satisfy several criteria: first, they must be transparent to the wavelengths used; second, they must be free from impurities that affect refractive indices or cause scattering; and, for fiber optic sensors, the physical characteristics must be such that they can be pulled into fibers. Glasses are the most widely used, due to their low cost and wide range of optical properties available through use of dopants. While

Instrumentation

The hardware for evanescent biosensors has three principal components: (1) the optics, including the waveguide, the light source for excitation of fluorescence and the detector for measuring the signal; (2) the fluidics for delivering sample and reagents to the waveguide; and (3) electronics and computer processor for recording and analyzing the signal and controlling the fluidics. The first two components are discussed in more detail below.

Immobilization methods

The biological component of any biosensor must be incorporated into the device in such a way that the molecule's activity is preserved and that its active or binding site is available to interact with the target. The general methods used to immobilize biological recognition species onto the surface of the optical fibers or planar waveguides include covalent immobilization, physical adsorption, entrapment within polymer matrices, and indirect attachment via intermediate biomolecular species.

Molecular recognition

As in all biosensors, the immobilized biological recognition element must meet several criteria for successful incorporation into the sensing unit: affinity for the target, sufficient selectivity to distinguish target from environment, and stability. The recognition event can be simple binding of the target molecule or may be enzymatic in nature. The detection for these sensors requires formation or quenching of fluorescence. Some of the numerous methods are detailed below.

Affinity-based assays

Key patents

While the great majority of research and development on evanescent sensors performing fluorescence assays has been published in scientific journals, books, and conference proceedings, patents clearly have a major role in commercialization of the technology and in bringing biosensors into the hands of the users. While there are relevant patents describing coatings and immobilization methods for biomolecules, the majority of patents critical to these biosensors describe optical components or

Critical issues and future directions

Even though evanescent wave excitation limits the optical effects of complex matrices on immunoassays, the ability of complex matrices to interfere physically with analyte recognition remains. However, as the number of evanescent wave fluoroimmunosensors capable of performing multiplexed assays has increased, their use to analyze complex samples has also burgeoned (Table 3); matrices long considered especially problematic for PCR-based detection, such as foods, fecal matter, and soil matter,

Conclusions

Evanescent wave fluorescent sensors have been under development for 30 years. Nonetheless, the technology continues to evolve with new breakthroughs in optics, biochemistry, and chemical engineering. Genomics and proteomics are driving the field in terms of methods for multi-analyte detection, while microfluidics can be incorporated for parallel sample processing, improved assay speed, and enhanced sensitivity. The fact that this particular type of biosensor places biorecognition molecules at

References (215)

  • J.P. Golden et al.

    A comparison of imaging methods for use in an array biosensor

    Biosens. Bioelectron.

    (2002)
  • C.R. Graham et al.

    Gene probe assays on a fiber-optic biosensor

    Biosens. Bioelectron.

    (1992)
  • Z.M. Hale et al.

    The single mode tapered optical fibre loop immunosensor

    Biosens. Bioelectron.

    (1996)
  • R.-P. Huang et al.

    Simultaneous detection of multiple cytokines form conditioned media and patient's sera by an antibody-based protein array system

    Anal. Biochem.

    (2001)
  • K.D. King et al.

    Detecting staphylococcal enterotoxin B using an automated fiber optic biosensor

    Biosens. Bioelectron.

    (1999)
  • M.F. Kramer et al.

    A rapid and automated fiber optic-based biosensor assay for the detection of Salmonella in spent irrigation water used in the sprouting of sprout seeds

    J. Food Prot.

    (2004)
  • M.N. Kronick et al.

    New immunoassay based on fluorescence excitation by internal-reflection spectroscopy

    J. Immunol. Meth.

    (1975)
  • H.J. Kwon et al.

    Sensing performance of protein C immuno-biosensor for biological samples and sensor minimization

    Comp. Biochem. Physiol. A

    (2002)
  • A.P. Abel et al.

    Fiber-optic evanescent wave biosensor for the detection of oligonucleotides

    Anal. Chem.

    (1996)
  • Anderson, G.P., Golden, J., 1995. Mode-matched, combination taper fiber optic probe....
  • G.P. Anderson et al.

    An evanescent wave biosensor: Part I. Fluorescent signal acquisition from step-etched fiber

    IEEE Trans. Biomed. Eng.

    (1994)
  • G.P. Anderson et al.

    Quantifying serum antiplague antibodies with a fiber-optic biosensor

    Clin. Diagn. Lab. Immunol.

    (1998)
  • G.P. Anderson et al.

    Biological agent detection using an airborne biosensor

    Field Anal. Chem. Technol.

    (1999)
  • G.P. Anderson et al.

    Multi-analyte interrogation using the fiber optic biosensor

    Biosens. Bioelectron.

    (2000)
  • G.P. Anderson et al.

    RAPTOR: a portable, automated biosensor

  • G.P. Anderson et al.

    Water quality monitoring using an automated portable fiber optic biosensor: RAPTOR

    Proc. SPIE

    (2001)
  • G.P. Anderson et al.

    Eight analyte detection using a four-channel optical biosensor

    Sens. Lett.

    (2004)
  • Andrade, J.D., Van Wagenen, R., 1983. Process for conducting fluorescence immunoassays without added labels and...
  • N.A. Anis et al.

    A fiber-optic immunosensor for detection parathion

    Anal. Lett.

    (1992)
  • Attridge, J.W., 1994a. Fluorescent assay and sensor therefore. US5344784, WO9006503,...
  • Attridge, J.W., 1994b. Method of optical analysis of a fluid including an optical waveguide. DK429512T, WO9015985,...
  • Attridge, J.W., 1996. Method for improving assay sensitivity. GR3019483T, WO9115751, EP0524224, US5369717,...
  • Attridge, J.W., Love, C.A., Robinson, G.A., Thomson, A.M., Daniels, P.B., Deacon, J.K., 1998. Method of assay having...
  • Attridge, J.W., Love, C.A., Robinson, G.A., Thomson, A.M., Daniels, P.B., Deacon, J.K., 2000. Capillary-fill biosensor...
  • S. Babin et al.

    Fabrication of a refractive microlens integrated onto the monomode fiber

    J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B

    (1996)
  • H.I. Balcer et al.

    Effects of blocking buffers and plasma proteins on the protein C biosensor performance

    Adv. Exp. Med. Biol.

    (2003)
  • A. Bernard et al.

    Micromosaic immunoassays

    Anal. Chem.

    (2001)
  • S.K. Bhatia et al.

    New approaches to producing patterned biomolecular assemblies

    J. Am. Chem. Soc.

    (1992)
  • Block, M.J., Hirschfeld, T.B., 1984a. Immunoassay apparatus and methods. WO8400817,...
  • Block, M.J., Hirschfeld, T.B., 1984b. Assay apparatus and methods. EP0128723, US4558014,...
  • Block, M.J., Hirschfeld, T.B., 1987. Fluorescent assays, including immunoassays, with feature of flowing samples....
  • Block, M.J., Lackie, S.J., 1992. Fluorescence assay apparatus. CA2073344, WO9208966,...
  • B.I. Bluestein et al.

    Evanescent wave immunosensors for clinical diagnostics

  • Bogdanov, V., Malak, H.K., 2004. Optochemical sensing with multi-band fluorescence enhanced by surface plasmon...
  • Bopp, M.A., Abel, A.P., Ehrat, M., Schaerer-Hernandez, N.G., Schuermann-Mader, E., Duveneck, G.L., Pawlak, M., Schick,...
  • Bopp, M.A., Ehrat, M., Pawlak, M., Duveneck, G.L., 2003a. Grid-waveguide structure for reinforcing an excitation field...
  • Bopp, M.A., Ehrat, M. Pawlak, M., Duveneck, G.L., 2003b. Grating optical waveguide structure for multi-analyte...
  • Bopp, M.A., Schurmann-Mader, E., Ehrat, M., Abel, A.P., Kersbach, G.M., Pawlack, M., Schick, E., Duveneck, G.L., 2003c....
  • Bruno-Raimondi, A.E., Helg, A., Oroszlan, P., Kraus, G., Pawlak, M., Duveneck, G.L., 2001. Measuring device and its use...
  • Bruno-Raimondi, A.E., Daendliker, R.E., Herzig, H.-P., Voelkel, R., Duveneck, G.L., Effenhouser, C.S., 2002. Sensing...
  • Cited by (0)

    View full text