Elsevier

Biomass and Bioenergy

Volume 34, Issue 4, April 2010, Pages 500-505
Biomass and Bioenergy

Cool-season grasses produce more total biomass across the growing season than do warm-season grasses when managed with an applied irrigation gradient

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2009.12.015Get rights and content

Abstract

Warm-season grasses have shown great potential for biomass production. However, their productivity under irrigated conditions has not been thoroughly documented. This study evaluated the biomass production potential and production stability of a number of warm- and cool-season grasses across an irrigation gradient. Under the multiple-harvest management strategy, the cool-season grasses were most productive across the entire growing season. Nevertheless, when considering only the summer harvests, the switchgrass and big bluestem entries were the most productive, although the lowland cultivar Alamo did not perform well under the conditions. Overall, cool-season grasses were clearly the most productive for total biomass production across the growing season. However, based on the high biomass production of switchgrass, this species may have potential as a high-producing option for animal feed during the summer months when the cool-season grasses are unproductive.

Introduction

Considerable interest has been generated around the world concerning the use of plant biomass to produce energy, including economic viability, environmental impacts, and sustainability [1]. Because of high biomass production, efficient use of resources, and other desirable traits much research effort is now focused on the use of warm-season grasses (C4 photosynthesis) for bioenergy production reviewed in Ref. [2]. Particular emphasis for herbaceous biomass production in the United States has been focused on switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) [3], [4], although several different warm-season grasses have also been considered [5], [6].

Switchgrass biomass production is a focus primarily in the Great Plains, Midwest, and Transition Zone regions of the U.S., i.e., those areas east of the humid belt and to which switchgrass is native and well-adapted [7]. Extensive studies of switchgrass agronomic traits have been conducted in these areas. The focus of these studies has been harvest management [8], [9], [10], nutrient usage [11], [12], and biomass potential [13] among others. Evaluations of the potential of switchgrass as a biofuel crop proved that switchgrass production is possible in areas outside its normal region of adaptation, including Canada [14], [15] and Europe [16].

While switchgrass production has been clearly documented in humid areas of the temperate world, its potential in semi-arid regions is less understood. Although preliminary reports on the potential production of switchgrass in the western U.S. have been made [17], the only refereed publication available for semi-arid areas concerns the establishment and winter survival of warm-season grasses [18]. Thus, despite increasing interest in switchgrass production among producers in semi-arid regions, no definitive evaluations are available concerning the potential biomass production of warm-season grasses generally, and switchgrass specifically, under irrigated conditions common to higher-elevation areas of the semi-arid western U.S.

The objective of this study was to test the hypothesis that production of warm-season grasses, and in particular switchgrass, under various irrigation levels provides higher biomass production than cool-season grasses under high-elevation semi-arid conditions of the western U.S.

Section snippets

Plant material

The study comprised 27 grass varieties, representing six cool- and seven warm-season grass species (Table 1). Each species was represented by one to four varieties. Warm-season species were big bluestem (Andropogon gerardii Vitman), blue grama (Bouteloua gracilis (Kunth) Lag. ex Griffiths), buffalograss (Buchloë dactyloides (Nutt.) Engelm.), indiangrass (Sorghastrum nutans (L.) Nash.), little bluestem (Schizachyrium scoparium (Michx.) Nash), sideoats grama (Bouteloua curtipendula (Michx.)

Overall biomass production

The overall mean value for total biomass production pooled across years and ILs was 9.9 Mg ha−1 (Table 1), with variety means that ranged from 5.0 Mg ha−1 (Bad River blue grama and Cimarron little bluestem) to 23.7 Mg ha−1 (Rush intermediate wheatgrass). The overall mean value for summer biomass production pooled across years and ILs was 5.4 Mg ha−1 (Table 1), with variety means that ranged from 3.4 Mg ha−1 (Cache meadow bromegrass) and 9.9 Mg ha−1 (Blackwell switchgrass). Thus, for total and summer

Conclusions

The cool-season grasses proved to be the most productive across the entire growing season. For total biomass accumulation there appeared to be little benefit for growing warm-season grasses in the conditions. However, the warm-season grasses, particularly switchgrass, showed promise for biomass production during the summer months and may work well in a forage production scheme to overcome the declining production of the cool-season grasses during that growth period.

References (36)

  • A.S. Hitchcock
    (1971)
  • M.A. Sanderson et al.

    Harvest management of switchgrass for biomass feedstock and forage production

    Agronomy Journal

    (1999)
  • K.P. Vogel et al.

    Switchgrass biomass production in the Midwest USA: harvest and nitrogen management

    Agronomy Journal

    (2002)
  • P.R. Adler et al.

    Biomass yield and biofuel quality of switchgrass harvested in fall or spring

    Agronomy Journal

    (2006)
  • J.P. Muir et al.

    Biomass production of ‘Alamo’ switchgrass in response to nitrogen, phosphorus, and row spacing

    Agronomy Journal

    (2001)
  • I.C. Madakadze et al.

    Leaf area development, light interception, and yield among switchgrass populations in a short-season area

    Crop Science

    (1998)
  • I.C. Madakadze et al.

    Cutting frequency and nitrogen fertilization effects on yield and nitrogen concentration of switchgrass in a short season area

    Crop Science

    (1999)
  • S.C. Fransen et al.

    Perennial warm-season grasses for biofuels

  • Cited by (31)

    • Evaluation of harvest time effects on the combustion quality of warm- and cool-season perennial grasses in two contrasting semi-arid environments

      2022, Industrial Crops and Products
      Citation Excerpt :

      Reed canary grass (Phalaris arundinacea L.) is the most studied cool-season grass as a biomass feedstock so far, which has been investigated for bioelectricity and paper production in northern Europe (Lewandowski et al., 2003; Don et al., 2012). Moreover, several summer dormant cool-season grasses, such tall wheatgrass (Agropyron elongatum L.), bulbous canary grass (Phalaris aquatica L.), tall fescue (Festuca arundinacea L.), perennial ryegrass (Lolium perenne L.), orchard grass (Dactylis glomerata L.), and smooth brome grass (Bromus inermis Leyss), have also been put forth as novel bioenergy crops due to their satisfactory biomass yields and superior drought tolerance for the dry marginal lands of semi-arid areas, which are generally not suited for warm-season grasses (Robins, 2010; Maletta et al., 2012; Alexopoulou et al., 2013; Porensky et al., 2014; Ciria et al., 2020). Additionally, some of these grasses have generated particular interest as alternative biogas substrates to silage maize in Europe, because they have high DM yields and organic matter digestibility, low input requirements, and are easily ensileable (Kandel et al., 2013; Butkutė et al., 2014; Tilvikiene et al., 2016; Dickeduisberg et al., 2017; Herrmann et al., 2017).

    • The quality and energy potential of introduced energy crops in northern part of temperate climate zone

      2020, Renewable Energy
      Citation Excerpt :

      In Lithuania, the productivity of this crop grown under Endocalcari-Endohypogleyic Cambisol (CMg-n-w-can), fertilized with N180 and harvested twice a year was 13.4 t ha−1 [10,35]. In a previous study, F. arundinacea grown under irrigation DM yielded up to 12.5 t ha−1 [58]. However, in the present study, the biomass DM yield of F. arundinacea was lower.

    • Biomass yield and nitrogen use of potential C<inf>4</inf> and C<inf>3</inf> dedicated energy crops in a Mediterranean climate

      2014, Field Crops Research
      Citation Excerpt :

      may require less irrigation in Mediterranean climates because of their ability to grow during the wet cooler months. In addition, agricultural production systems in Mediterranean climates are often irrigated, and C3 cool-season grasses have been reported to out-perform C4 warm-season grasses in irrigated cropping systems (Robins, 2010). Tall wheatgrass is native to Turkey, Asia Minor and Russia (USDA, 2008).

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text