Transactions of the 71st Annual Meeting of the Central Association of Obstetricians and GynecologistsExtended-release formulations of oxybutynin and tolterodine exhibit similar central nervous system tolerability profiles: A subanalysis of data from the OPERA trial
Section snippets
Design and methods
The original study was a double-blind, randomized comparison of the efficacy and safety of extended-release oxybutynin (10 mg/d) with extended-release tolterodine (4 mg/d) in 790 women with OAB. The study design and methods have been described elsewhere.17
Participants were asked during scheduled visits after 2, 4, 8, and 12 weeks of treatment if they had experienced adverse events. The protocol stipulated that adverse events occurring before a participant started taking the study drug or more
Incidence of CNS adverse events
More than 90% of the 790 participants in this trial did not report any CNS adverse event during the 12-week treatment period or 3-day period immediately after the final dose of study drug. The 5 CNS adverse events that occurred in more than 1% of either treatment group were dizziness, somnolence, insomnia, depression, and hypertonia (Table I). The overall incidence of CNS adverse events was 9% for the extended-release oxybutynin treatment group and 8% for the extended-release tolterodine
Comment
In this direct comparison of extended-release oxybutynin and extended-release tolterodine, neither agent elicited clinically problematic CNS adverse events. The incidence of CNS adverse events was reported at rates between 1.2% and 4.3% for extended-release oxybutynin and between 1.1% and 5.2% for extended-release tolterodine over the entire treatment period; none of the observed differences between the drugs was statistically significant. When CNS adverse events did occur, they were usually
Conclusions
In the current analysis of CNS adverse event data from the OPERA trial, extended-release oxybutynin and extended-release tolterodine had low and similar incidences of CNS adverse events. Neither drug elicited clinically problematic CNS adverse events. The percentage of participants who discontinued the trial because of CNS adverse events was low for both drugs. None of the observed differences between the drugs was statistically significant. Significant differences in the CNS tolerability
References (25)
- et al.
Tolterodine versus oxybutynin in the treatment of urge urinary incontinence: a meta-analysis
Am J Obstet Gynecol
(2001) - et al.
Tolterodine: superior tolerability than and comparable efficacy to oxybutynin in individuals 50 years old or older with overactive bladder: a randomized controlled trial
J Urol
(2001) An extended-release formulation of oxybutynin chloride for the treatment of overactive urinary bladder
Clin Ther
(1999)- et al.
Dry mouth with conventional and controlled-release oxybutynin in urinary incontinence. The Ditropan XL Study Group
Obstet Gynecol
(2000) - et al.
A comparison of the effects on saliva output of oxybutynin chloride and tolterodine tartrate
Clin Ther
(2001) - et al.
Prospective randomized controlled trial of extended-release oxybutynin chloride and tolterodine tartrate in the treatment of overactive bladder: results of the OBJECT Study
Mayo Clin Proc
(2001) - et al.
Therapeutic efficacy of extended release oxybutynin chloride, and immediate release and long acting tolterodine tartrate in children with diurnal urinary incontinence
J Urol
(2003) - et al.
Prospective, randomized, double-blind study of the efficacy and tolerability of the extended-release formulations of oxybutynin and tolterodine for overactive bladder: results of the OPERA trial
Mayo Clin Proc
(2003) - et al.
Muscarinic receptor agonists and antagonists
The mechanism of action of tolterodine
Rev Contemp Pharmacother
(2000)
Clinical efficacy and safety of tolterodine compared to oxybutynin in patients with overactive bladder
Neurourol Urodyn
Tolterodine, a new antimuscarinic agent: as effective but better tolerated than oxybutynin in patients with an overactive bladder
Br J Urol
Cited by (33)
Vibegron (RVT-901/MK-4618/KRP-114V) Administered Once Daily as Monotherapy or Concomitantly with Tolterodine in Patients with an Overactive Bladder: A Multicenter, Phase IIb, Randomized, Double-blind, Controlled Trial [Figure presented]
2019, European UrologyCitation Excerpt :Antimuscarinics (eg, oxybutynin, tolterodine, solifenacin, imidafenacin, and fesoterodine), which block postjunctional muscarinic receptors in the detrusor muscle to inhibit muscle contractures, have been the only available OAB pharmacotherapy for decades. Antimuscarinics lack bladder selectivity, resulting in unwanted side effects such as dry mouth, constipation, and central nervous system (CNS) side effects [6–8]. This influences patient satisfaction with treatment, leading to discontinuation, switching, or both [6,9,10].
Risk of serious falls associated with oxybutynin and tolterodine: A population based study
2011, Journal of UrologySacral Nerve Stimulation for Refractory Overactive Bladder in the Elderly Population
2009, Journal of UrologyCitation Excerpt :Adding an antimuscarinic is reasonable and generally safe when behavioral therapy fails.10 However, concern persists regarding real or perceived cognitive side effects when anticholinergics are used in elderly patients.3 Moreover, a large proportion of elderly individuals are intolerant of this class of drugs due to systemic side effects in the context of preexisting maladies, such as constipation, glaucoma etc, as well as drug-drug interactions.11
13 Drugs that affect autonomic functions or the extrapyramidal system
2008, Side Effects of Drugs AnnualCitation Excerpt :Antimuscarinic drugs that are used in management of bladder hyperactivity and incontinence are designed to have a very limited effect on the nervous system. However, there is no absolute guarantee of this, as has been shown by a subanalysis of data from the OPERA (Overactive Bladder: Performance of Extended Release Agents) study, in which modified-release tolterodine 4 mg/day and modified-release oxybutynin 10 mg/day over 12 weeks were compared in 790 women with overactive bladders (33C). The incidence of nervous system adverse effects was similar in the two groups (8 and 9%).
The Application of Evidence-Based Principles of Care in Older Persons (Issue 6): Urinary Incontinence
2007, Journal of the American Medical Directors Association
This study was supported by ALZA Corporation, Mountain View, Calif, and Ortho-McNeil Pharmaceutical, Raritan, NJ.
Presented at the 71st Annual Meeting of the Central Association of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, October 13-16, 2004, Washington, DC.