Injectable matrices and scaffolds for drug delivery in tissue engineering☆
Introduction
Injectable biomaterials are widely researched and hold great promise in both the fields of drug delivery and tissue engineering, largely due to the minimally invasive nature with which they can be delivered. Injectable systems in drug delivery can be used both for parenteral drug delivery or localized injection to an affected site. Drug release kinetics can be varied via altering the character and processing of the injectable biomaterial matrix or depot, and the properties (size, hydrophobicity, etc.) of the drug to be released often have a large effect on release kinetics. For a patient, injectable delivery systems offer the advantage of avoiding surgical procedures and the host of potential complications thereof to implant the drug depot or, in the case of long term drug delivery, an elimination of the need for repeated doctors visits or potentially dangerous indwelling percutaneous lines. Thus a long term drug delivery system deliverable via a simple injection holds multiple benefits for patient safety and quality of life.
Tissue engineering is a relatively new field that seeks to regenerate human tissues through the use of some combination of cells, bioactive molecules such as drugs or growth factors, and a biomaterial support system or scaffold. The need for such technology is readily apparent — with the continued aging of the population, the current shortage in donor organ availability will likely only grow, and strategies to address the shortage through increased donation are fraught with medical [1], [2] and ethical concerns [3], [4], [5], [6], [7]. The ability to regenerate damaged tissues and organs to a healthy and functional state using the body's own healing capabilities and without the need for long term immune suppression represents a near ideal solution to this growing problem. Injectable materials for use in tissue engineering share the same advantages as those used in drug delivery. Additionally, in tissue engineering applications, injectable biomaterials that form scaffolds in situ have the advantage of being able to take the shape of a tissue defect, avoiding the need for patient specific scaffold prefabrication. There are, however, additional considerations necessary when developing injectable systems for tissue engineering; for many applications the system must also able to support a suspended cell population prior to injection and throughout the solidification process.
With these considerations in mind, an examination of injectable systems for both drug delivery and tissue engineering is warranted, including an overview of necessary characteristics for tissue engineering scaffolds and how current injectable systems for drug delivery applications could be modified to facilitate their use as injectable tissue engineering scaffolds.
Section snippets
Injectable scaffolds: requirements for tissue engineering
The classical tissue engineering paradigm relies on a scaffold that can be used as a space filling material and for cell and therapeutic agent delivery. Injectable materials hold promise for tissue engineering applications as they offer some advantages over prefabricated scaffolds for certain indications. Injectable scaffolds eliminate the need for surgical interventions for delivery, and the minimally invasive procedure of injection reduces discomfort and complications for the patient.
In situ chemical polymerization and crosslinking
Solidification for a series of polymers is achieved in situ with a thermally activated polymerization or crosslinking. An initiator creates free radicals which react with functional groups, often unsaturated bonds, of the monomers or macromers and the reaction or crosslinking is propagated. This initiation system provides the advantage of being activated with temperature change and can be used in areas of limited light penetration as opposed to the photoinitiated systems which will be analyzed
Current injectable materials for drug delivery
Although not specifically designed for tissue engineering or cell based applications, many injectable materials used in drug delivery bear resemblance to injectable scaffolds. As such, a brief examination of the processing parameters and techniques used in the design and fabrication of injectable drug delivery formulations is warranted. Focus will be directed to composite materials, including those utilizing degradable particles for controlled release of bioactive molecules, and materials that
How to modify existing materials
Having these prerequisites in mind, how can one adapt an injectable material that has been successfully used for drug delivery to a tissue engineering scaffold?
Concluding remarks
Significant research towards injectable materials and systems exists in both the field of drug delivery and tissue engineering. The rationale for developing injectable materials and systems is the same across both fields, and, as drug delivery comprises one of the three tenets of the tissue engineering paradigm, many currently researched drug delivery matrices hold promise as tissue engineering scaffolds. Because the requirements for successful application are different in these fields, a
Acknowledgements
Work in tissue engineering with drug delivery has been funded by the National Institutes of Health (R01 AR48756 and R01 DE15164). JDK also acknowledges support by the National Institutes of Health under Ruth L. Kirschstein National Research Service Award 2T32-GM008362 from the National Institute of General Medical Sciences. JDK is a student in the Medical Scientist Training Program and was supported by the National Institute of General Medical Sciences (T32 GM07330).
References (134)
The price is wrong: the moral cost of living donor inducements
Am. J. Transplant.
(2006)- et al.
Limiting financial disincentives in live organ donation: a rational solution to the kidney shortage
Am. J. Transplant.
(2006) - et al.
Disparities in solid organ transplantation for ethnic minorities: facts and solutions
Am. J. Transplant.
(2006) - et al.
In vitro degradation of polymeric networks of poly(propylene fumarate) and the crosslinking macromer poly(propylene fumarate)-diacrylate
Biomaterials
(2003) - et al.
Development of an injectable, in situ crosslinkable, degradable polymeric carrier for osteogenic cell populations. Part 2. Viability of encapsulated marrow stromal osteoblasts cultured on crosslinking poly(propylene fumarate)
Biomaterials
(2002) - et al.
Development of an injectable, in situ crosslinkable, degradable polymeric carrier for osteogenic cell populations. Part 3. Proliferation and differentiation of encapsulated marrow stromal osteoblasts cultured on crosslinking poly(propylene fumarate)
Biomaterials
(2002) - et al.
In vitro release of transforming growth factor-beta 1 from gelatin microparticles encapsulated in biodegradable, injectable oligo(poly(ethylene glycol) fumarate) hydrogels
J. Control. Release
(2003) - et al.
Transforming growth factor-beta 1 release from oligo(poly(ethylene glycol) fumarate) hydrogels in conditions that model the cartilage wound healing environment
J. Control. Release
(2004) - et al.
Degradable hydrogel scaffolds for in vivo delivery of single and dual growth factors in cartilage repair
Osteoarthr. Cartil.
(2007) - et al.
Delivery of TGF-beta 1 and chondrocytes via injectable, biodegradable hydrogels for cartilage tissue engineering applications
Biomaterials
(2005)
Photoinitiated crosslinked degradable copolymer networks for tissue engineering applications
Biomaterials
Variable cytocompatibility of six cell lines with photoinitiators used for polymerizing hydrogels and cell encapsulation
Biomaterials
Photopolymerizable hydrogels for tissue engineering applications
Biomaterials
Synthesis and characterization of hyperbranched polyglycerol hydrogels
Biomaterials
Synthesis and characterization of a novel degradable phosphate-containing hydrogel
Biomaterials
Biodegradable and photocrosslinkable polyphosphoester hydrogel
Biomaterials
Chondrogenic differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells using a thermosensitive poly(N-isopropylacrylamide) and water-soluble chitosan copolymer
Biomaterials
Temperature-responsive hydroxybutyl chitosan for the culture of mesenchymal stem cells and intervertebral disk cells
Biomaterials
Polylysine-functionalised thermoresponsive chitosan hydrogel for neural tissue engineering
Biomaterials
Delivery of dexamethasone, ascorbate, and growth factor (TGF-beta 3) in thermo-reversible hydrogel constructs embedded with rabbit chondrocytes
Biomaterials
Towards a fully-synthetic substitute of alginate: development of a new process using thermal gelation and chemical cross-linking
Biomaterials
Morphology of spheroidal hepatocytes within injectable, biodegradable, and thermosensitive poly(organophosphazene) hydrogel as cell delivery vehicle
J. Biosci. Bioeng.
Alginate hydrogels as synthetic extracellular matrix materials
Biomaterials
Ionically crosslinked alginate hydrogels as scaffolds for tissue engineering: part 1. Structure, gelation rate and mechanical properties
Biomaterials
A rapid-curing alginate gel system: utility in periosteum-derived cartilage tissue engineering
Biomaterials
Triggered release of calcium from lipid vesicles: a bioinspired strategy for rapid gelation of polysaccharide and protein hydrogels
Biomaterials
Biodegradable injectable in situ forming drug delivery systems
J. Control. Release
Design of an injectable system based on bioerodible polyanhydride microspheres for sustained drug delivery
Biomaterials
In vivo release of plasmid DNA from composites of oligo(poly(ethylene glycol)fumarate) and cationized gelatin microspheres
J. Control. Release
Manufacturing techniques of various drug loaded biodegradable poly(lactide-co-glycolide) (PLGA) devices
Biomaterials
Biodegradable poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) microparticles for injectable delivery of vaccine antigens
Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev.
Gelatin as a delivery vehicle for the controlled release of bioactive molecules
J. Control. Release
In vivo targeting of dendritic cells in lymph nodes with poly(propylene sulfide) nanoparticles
J. Control. Release
Formulation of functionalized PLGA–PEG nanoparticles for in vivo targeted drug delivery
Biomaterials
Controlled release of an osteogenic peptide from injectable biodegradable polymeric composites
J. Control. Release
Thermal analysis of bone cement polymerisation at the cement–bone interface
J. Biomech.
In vitro release of plasmid DNA from oligo(poly(ethylene glycol) fumarate) hydrogels
J. Control. Release
In situ crosslinking of a biomimetic peptide–PEG hydrogel via thermally triggered activation of factor XIII
Biomaterials
Targeted drug delivery by thermally responsive polymers
Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev.
Design of thermally responsive, recombinant polypeptide carriers for targeted drug delivery
Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev.
Thermosensitive sol–gel reversible hydrogels
Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev.
Fabrication and characterization of microgel-impregnated, thermosensitive PNIPAAm hydrogels
Polymer
Ethoxysilane-capped PEO–PPO–PEO triblocks: a new family of reverse thermo-responsive polymers
Biomaterials
Reverse thermo-responsive poly(ethylene oxide) and poly(propylene oxide) multiblock copolymers
Biomaterials
Improved reverse thermo-responsive polymeric systems
Biomaterials
PEO–PPO–PEO-based poly(ether ester urethane)s as degradable reverse thermo-responsive multiblock copolymers
Biomaterials
Preparation, characterization, swelling and in vitro drug release behaviour of poly[N-acryloylglycine-chitosan] interpolymeric pH and thermally-responsive hydrogels
Eur. Polym. J.
Fast-gelling injectable blend of hyaluronan and methylcellulose for intrathecal, localized delivery to the injured spinal cord
Biomaterials
A thermally responsive biopolymer for intra-articular drug delivery
J. Control. Release
Structural optimization of a “smart” doxorubicin–polypeptide conjugate for thermally targeted delivery to solid tumors
J. Control. Release
Cited by (0)
- ☆
This review is part of the Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews theme issue on "Matrices and Scaffolds for Drug Delivery in Tissue Engineering".
- 1
These two authors contributed equally to this work.