Elsevier

Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews

Volume 57, Issue 3, 10 January 2005, Pages 391-410
Advanced Drug Delivery Reviews

Biodegradable poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) microparticles for injectable delivery of vaccine antigens

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.addr.2004.09.003Get rights and content

Abstract

Injectable biodegradable polymeric particles (usually microspheres) represent an exciting approach to control the release of vaccine antigens to reduce the number of doses in the immunization schedule and optimize the desired immune response via selective targeting of antigen to antigen presenting cells. After the first couple of decades of their study, much progress has been made towards the clinical use of antigen-loaded microspheres. Poly(lactide-co-glycolic acids) (PLGAs) have been studied most commonly for this purpose because of their proven safety record and established use in marketed products for controlled delivery of several peptide drugs. PLGA microspheres have many desirable features relative to standard aluminum-based adjuvants, including the microspheres' ability to induce cell-mediated immunity, a necessary requirement for emergent vaccines against HIV and cancer. This review examines several impediments to PLGA microparticle development, such as PLGA-encapsulated antigen instability and deficiency of animal models in predicting human response, and describes new trends in overcoming these important issues. PLGA microparticles have displayed unprecedented versatility and safety to accomplish release of one or multiple antigens of varying physical–chemical characteristics and immunologic requirements, and have now met numerous critical benchmarks in development of long-lasting immunity after a single injected dose.

Introduction

In spite of great successes with vaccines against infectious diseases (e.g., small pox, polio, tetanus, diphtheria, and several others [1]), because of a logistical difficulty to attain immunization coverage with existing vaccines in certain parts of the world, especially in developing countries, these diseases are still leading killers. The World Health Organization estimates that over 14 million people die each year from infectious disease, about a quarter of all deaths worldwide [2]. Inadequate coverage for the six vaccines against diphtheria, pertussis (whooping cough), polio, measles, tetanus and tuberculosis still causes two million unnecessary deaths each year [3].

Several factors have been largely responsible for the inability of vaccines to protect against infectious diseases. One of the most significant factors includes the unavailability of vaccines against intracellular pathogens, or infected or altered cells, such as malaria and HIV, which rely on cell-mediated immunity [4], [5], [6]. Second, progress in the field of adjuvants for use with human vaccines has been inadequate, and the range of adjuvant activities represented by existing adjuvants, mainly aluminum compounds, is limited, often prohibiting optimization of the magnitude and direction of the immune response (i.e., the role of the adjuvant [7]). Aluminum compounds (often termed alum after potassium aluminum sulfate [8]), which are the only adjuvants used with human vaccines in the United States, are well known for their inability to induce cell-mediated immunity [9]. The EU has accepted vaccines containing a few additional adjuvants, such as calcium compounds and MF59 [7], but their potential for cell-mediated immunity is also limited [5]. Third, high dropout rates for receiving booster vaccine doses have left significant fractions of people in developing countries not fully immunized, often due to poor or limited access to medical care, and lack of education regarding the importance of booster vaccination [10]. Finally, incompletely immunized women (mostly in developing countries) cannot pass immunity to neonates, leaving newborns susceptible to infections, e.g., umbilical cord infections [11].

Whereas aluminum compounds have been used with a large number of antigens, these adjuvants are not suitable for all antigens and are insufficient in many respects, including variable or poor adsorption of some antigens, the difficulty to lyophilize, the general requirement for booster doses, the inability to elicit cytotoxic T-cell (CTL) responses, the inability to elicit muscosal IgA antibody responses and the rare occurrence of hypersensitivity reactions in some subjects [8], [9], [12], [13]. Because of these limitations of aluminum compounds, additional adjuvants are needed to overcome the aforementioned difficulties with existing vaccine preparations, and to lend support to the newer, and often less immunogenic, antigens under development. To this end, biodegradable polymer microparticles, most commonly microspheres, with microencapsulated peptide or protein antigens have been studied for more than 20 years after early reports of the possibility to control the release of protein antigens over extended time periods for the purpose to eliminate booster doses [14], [15], [16]. Primarily because of their safety, including everyday use in healthy people (including children) as resorbable sutures, and their use in several commercial controlled-release drug products, copolymers of lactic and glycolic acid (PLGA) have become the most widely studied polymer to help meet this goal. Moreover, PLGA microspheres have several additional advantages, such as the ability to elicit CTL responses, and the potential for mucosal immunization and DNA delivery (see reviews by O'Hagan et al. [6] and Gupta and Siber [12]; reviewed also by Alpar et al. and by Foster and Hirst in this issue).

Therefore, the primary objective of this review is to examine PLGA microparticles as a parenterally administered controlled-release antigen carrier or adjuvant with a focus on identifying primary developmental barriers and recent progress to overcome them. In light of the ambitious aim of future vaccines, e.g., to provide maximum efficacy with minimum number of doses, delivered safely and easily [7], these novel adjuvants have the potential to compliment or replace aluminum-based adjuvants, for existing and future protein/subunit vaccine antigens. Mucosal vaccines as well as the mechanisms of processing of polymer microparticles by cells of the immune system will be examined in detail elsewhere in this issue (see Alpar et al. and Johansen et al., respectively)

Section snippets

Poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) microparticles for antigen delivery

PLGA is a polyester composed of one or more of three different hydroxy acid monomers, d-lactic, l-lactic, and/or glycolic acids. In general, the polymer can be made to highly crystalline [e.g., poly(l-lactic acid)], or completely amorphous [e.g., poly(d,l-lactic-co-glycolic acid), can be processed into most any shape and size (down to <200 nm), and can encapsulate molecules of virtually any size. PLGA microspheres and other injectable implants have a long safety record and are used in at least

Issues impeding development of PLGA microparticles for antigen delivery

Considering all of the strongly desirable attributes of PLGA microparticles for antigen delivery, why then have not human clinical studies been conducted with vaccines incorporating these novel adjuvants? There is a large body of evidence that proteins are typically unstable when encapsulated in PLGA microspheres unless careful measures are taken to prevent instability pathways (see reviews by Putney and Burke [36] and Schwendeman [37] for exclusive lists of general protein instability in PLGAs

Significant progress toward development of injectable PLGA microparticles for antigen delivery

From the foregoing discussion, it is clear that significant developmental barriers to PLGA microparticles for antigen delivery exist. However, several exciting initiatives have been pursued over the last 10 years to overcome these impediments, and these trends are described below. Advances in immunological studies with PLGA-based vaccines are described in Section 5.

The immune response to PLGA-microencapsulated vaccine antigens

One of the critical preclinical evaluations for any new vaccine, adjuvant or delivery system is the study of the immune response in experimental animals using model and novel vaccine antigens. Many PLGA-microencapsulated vaccine antigens have been evaluated in a variety of animal models for protection against challenge, antibody responses or cell-mediated immune responses. Progress has been made in understanding the effects of in vitro release of antigen on immunogenicity in animals. Several

Conclusions

Over the last couple of decades, much of the ground rules have been formed regarding development of injectable PLGA controlled-release microparticles for delivery of protein antigens. Several important impediments to development of PLGA microparticles have been identified, such as antigen instability, difficulties with manufacture of microparticles and deficiencies in animal models. Considering the history of overcoming similar impediments faced by developers of vaccines and numerous

Acknowledgements

The authors are indebted to the technical assistance by Ms. Amy G. Ding and Ms. Li Zhang, and the reviewers of this manuscript for their helpful comments. This research was funded in part by NIH HL 68345.

References (138)

  • C.D. Partidos et al.

    CTL responses induced by a single immunization with peptide encapsulated in biodegradable microparticles

    J. Immunol. Methods

    (1997)
  • Y. Men et al.

    Induction of a cytotoxic T lymphocyte response by immunization with a malaria specific CTL peptide entrapped in biodegradable polymer microspheres

    Vaccine

    (1997)
  • R.K. Gupta et al.

    Chronic local tissue reactions, long term immunogenicity and immunologic priming of mice and guinea pigs to tetanus toxoid encapsulated in biodegradable polymer microspheres composed of poly lactide-co-glycolide polymers

    Vaccine

    (1997)
  • J. Hanes et al.

    New advances in microsphere-based single-dose vaccines

    Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev.

    (1997)
  • P. Johansen et al.

    Revisiting PLA/PLGA microspheres: an analysis of their potential in parenteral vaccination

    Eur. J. Pharm. Biopharm.

    (2000)
  • M.J. Alonso et al.

    Biodegradable microspheres as controlled-release tetanus toxoid delivery systems

    Vaccine

    (1994)
  • D.X.L. Xing et al.

    Physicochemical and immunological studies on the stability of free and microsphere-encapsulated tetanus toxoid in vitro

    Vaccine

    (1996)
  • A.C. Chang et al.

    Stabilization of tetanus toxoid in poly(dl-lactic-co-glycolic acid) microspheres for the controlled release of antigen

    J. Pharm. Sci.

    (1996)
  • P. Johansen et al.

    Ambiguities in the preclinical quality assessment of microparticulate vaccines

    Trends Biotechnol.

    (2000)
  • A.B. Sasiak et al.

    Comparison of in vitro and in vivo methods to study stability of PLGA microencapsulated tetanus toxoid vaccines

    Vaccine

    (2000)
  • R.K. Gupta et al.

    Determination of protein loading in biodegradable polymer microspheres containing tetanus toxoid

    Vaccine

    (1997)
  • G.F.A. Kersten et al.

    Single shot with tetanus toxoid in biodegradable microspheres protects mice despite acid-induced denaturation of the antigen

    Vaccine

    (1996)
  • H.R. Costantino et al.

    Solid-phase aggregation of proteins under pharmaceutically relevant conditions

    J. Pharm. Sci.

    (1994)
  • W. Jiang et al.

    Stabilization of a model formalinized protein antigen encapsulated in poly(lactide-co-glycolide)-based microspheres

    J. Pharm. Sci.

    (2001)
  • E. Shalaev et al.

    Protection of a protein against irradiation-induced degradation by additives in the solid state

    Radiat. Phys. Chem.

    (2003)
  • D.X.L. Xing et al.

    Estimation of antigenic tetanus toxoid extracted from biodegradable microspheres

    Biologicals

    (1996)
  • C.R. Alving

    Design and selection of vaccine adjuvants: animal models and human trials

    Vaccine

    (2002)
  • F.D. Dastur et al.

    Response to single dose of tetanus vaccine in subjects with naturally acquired tetanus antitoxin

    Lancet

    (1981)
  • E. Relyveld et al.

    Antibody-response of pregnant-women to 2 different adsorbed tetanus toxoids

    Vaccine

    (1991)
  • H. Aggerbeck et al.

    Booster vaccination against diphtheria and tetanus in man—comparison of calcium-phosphate and aluminum hydroxide as adjuvants 2

    Vaccine

    (1995)
  • J.M. Anderson et al.

    Biodegradation and biocompatibility of PLA and PLGA microspheres

    Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev.

    (1997)
  • J. Kang et al.

    Comparison of the effects of Mg(OH)2 and sucrose on the stability of bovine serum albumin encapsulated in injectable poly(d,l-lactide-co-glycolide) implants

    Biomaterials

    (2002)
  • A.G. Ding et al.

    Determination of water-soluble acid distribution in poly(lactide-co-glycolide)

    J. Pharm. Sci.

    (2004)
  • N. Venkataprasad et al.

    Induction of cellular immunity to a mycobacterial antigen adsorbed on lamellar particles of lactide polymers

    Vaccine

    (1999)
  • I. Jabbal-Gill et al.

    Potential of polymeric lamellar substrate particles (PLSP) as adjuvants for vaccines

    Vaccine

    (1999)
  • I. Jabbal-Gill et al.

    Polymeric lamellar substrate particles for intranasal vaccination

    Adv. Drug Deliv. Rev.

    (2001)
  • J. Kazzaz et al.

    Novel anionic microparticles are a potent adjuvant for the induction of cytotoxic T lymphocytes against recombinant p55 gag from HIV-1

    J. Control. Release

    (2000)
  • S.M. Butler et al.

    Adsorption of serum albumin to thin films of poly(lactide-co-glycolide)

    J. Control. Release

    (1999)
  • E.C. Lavelle et al.

    The stability and immunogenicity of a protein antigen encapsulated in biodegradable microparticles based on blends of lactide polymers and polyethylene glycol

    Vaccine

    (1999)
  • L. Shi et al.

    Pharmaceutical and immunological evaluation of a single-shot hepatitis B vaccine formulated with PLGA microspheres

    J. Pharm. Sci.

    (2002)
  • R.S. Raghuvanshi et al.

    Improved immune response from biodegradable polymer particles entrapping tetanus toxoid by use of different immunization protocol and adjuvants

    Int. J. Pharm.

    (2002)
  • I. Esparza et al.

    Parameters affecting the immunogenicity of microencapsulated tetanus toxoid

    Vaccine

    (1992)
  • Y. Men et al.

    A single administration of tetanus toxoid in biodegradable microspheres elicits T-cell and antibody-responses similar or superior to those obtained with aluminum hydroxide

    Vaccine

    (1995)
  • C.D. Partidos et al.

    Biodegradable microparticles as a delivery system for measles virus cytotoxic T cell epitopes

    Mol. Immunol.

    (1996)
  • D.B. Weiner et al.

    Genetic vaccines

    Sci. Am.

    (1999)
  • World Health Organisation, WHO, Geneva...
  • W.H.R. Langridge

    Edible vaccines

    Sci. Am.

    (2000)
  • M. Singh et al.

    Recent advances in vaccine adjuvants

    Pharm. Res.

    (2002)
  • D.T. O'Hagan et al.

    Recent advances in the discovery and delivery of vaccine adjuvants

    Nat. Rev., Drug Discov.

    (2003)
  • R.K. Gupta et al.

    Adjuvant properties of aluminium and calcium compounds

  • Cited by (0)

    View full text