Micromechanical modeling of isotropic elastic behavior of semicrystalline polymers
Introduction
Semicrystalline polymers are increasingly being used as structural materials. Much work has focused on the prediction of the crystallinity and microstructure morphology of these materials [1], [2], [3], [4], and several methods have been developed to characterize this microstructure by optical microscopy or scanning electron microscopy (SEM) after an etching processing [5] or by X-ray scattering [6]. Less work has been done in terms of relating the microstructure to the mechanical behavior. Semicrystalline polymers may be considered as heterogeneous materials, and micromechanical models can be used to estimate or predict their mechanical properties. Recent work [7], [8], [9], [10] has explored this area, focusing on large-strain-scale elastoplastic or elastoviscoplastic behaviors. Very little work has been done at the small-strain level [11]. Even less is known about the elasticity of these materials.
Previous work [12] has made it possible to understand a paradox involving polypropylene (PP) and polyethylene (PE) using micromechanical modeling. It has been shown that using a micromechanics approach may help explain why PP is more rigid than PE despite a lower crystallinity and less rigid amorphous and crystalline phases. Beyond this qualitative result, the applicability of micromechanical modeling for the quantitative prediction of the elastic properties of semicrystalline polymers remains an issue. In order to decide whether micromechanical modeling applies at the scale of the crystallites, three semicrystalline polymers are considered: an isotactic PP, a PE, and a polyethylene terephthalate (PET) crystallized by annealing. Firstly, the mechanical properties of the homogeneous materials were measured and the results considered in terms of crystallinity. Secondly, the microstructure was observed and the crystallite lamellae dimensions were estimated when possible. Finally, considering two schematic representations and several homogenization schemes, the estimates of the models were compared with experimental data.
Section snippets
Mechanical properties
Three commercial homopolymers were chosen for this study: a PP (ELTEX PP HV 252) and a high-density PE (HD6070 EA) supplied by Solvay, and a PET (ARNITE 00D301) supplied by DSM. We are interested in the elastic isotropic behavior of these materials, and thus we focus on measurements and estimates of Young’s modulus. A few Poisson’s ratio values were also estimated.
PP plates with a thickness of 1 and 3 mm were obtained by injection molding. Isotropic samples were taken from the core of the
General theory
Considering semicrystalline polymers are heterogeneous materials, micromechanical modeling is used to estimate the mechanical properties of equivalent homogeneous materials. Two material representations are commonly used for polymers. The first representation is the model arising from the Eshelby inclusion theory [35] for which the reinforcing phase of ellipsoidal shape is embedded in a matrix. In the present case, crystalline lamellae are the reinforcing phase while the amorphous phase is the
Results
For both PP and PE there is a strong contrast between the mechanical behaviors of the two constitutive phases. PP morphology is relatively well estimated in Section 2.1.2, and none of the inputs required by micromechanical modeling is unknown. Considering PE, the crystallite dimensions, which provide inclusion shape ratios, remain unknown. However, Young’s modulus of the homogeneous material has been measured for a large range of crystallinity, which provides a good database to estimate the
Conclusion
In this paper we have compared several micromechanical models in order to study the applicability of micromechanical modeling at the nanoscale of crystallites of semicrystalline polymers in the context of elasticity. For this purpose, three commonly used semicrystalline polymers have been considered: PP, PE, and PET. Comparisons between experiment and the models have shown that the micromechanical approach may be applicable for semicrystalline polymers. More precisely, a very good estimate of
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful for the helpful discussion on theoretical aspects of homogenization with M. Pierre Gilormini. We very much thank M. Carlos N. Tomé for sharing some of his numerical routines, which have significantly increased the accuracy of our results.
References (47)
- et al.
Polymer
(1998) - et al.
Polymer
(2004) - et al.
Polymer
(1982) - et al.
Polymer
(2003) - et al.
J Mech Phys Solids
(1993) - et al.
Polymer
(1993) - et al.
J Mech Phys Solids
(2003) - et al.
J Mech Phys Solids
(2002) - et al.
Polymer
(2004) - et al.
Polymer
(2002)
Polymer
Polymer
J Mech Phys Solids
Acta Metall
J Mech Phys Solids
Polymer
J Mech Phys Solids
J Rheol
Polymer
Polym Eng Sci
Polym Eng Sci
Cited by (92)
The study of mechanical properties in sheaf-structured spherulite semi-crystalline polymers using a data-driven micromechanical model
2024, Computational Materials ScienceMicro-mechanical modeling of semi-crystalline polymers: A review
2024, International Journal of Solids and StructuresNumerical and experimental analysis of inelastic and rate-dependent buckling of thin injection-moulded high-density polyethylene structure
2024, International Journal of Solids and StructuresModelling of rate-dependent inelasticity and damage in semi-crystalline polymers using an Eulerian framework
2023, International Journal of Engineering ScienceMicromechanical modelling of biodegradable semi-crystalline polymers: The evolution of anisotropic mechanical properties during degradation
2023, International Journal of Solids and Structures